Ticket 10457 Code Review Request

LyX Developers: I've implemented the change (selfishly) requested in https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10457. What is the best way to get the change reviewed / committed / merged? Thanks, Joel

Re: LyXRC - %%s/scripts

On 24/10/2016 03:32, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 09:47:10PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: For me, this [1] fixes the issue: commit d5495caa in tommaso/master Thanks for coming up with a fix shall I commit to regular master, or would you like to give it a try first?

Re: [LyX/master] Fix Ticket #9741 misleading name for font-encoding setting "default".

On 2016-10-23, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --] > Am Sonntag, den 23.10.2016, 08:45 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: >> In the meantime, could you please revert your original change? I >> think >> it is clear that we will change the strings, but

Re: [LyX/master] unicodesymbols fixes.

Dear Guillaume, dear developers, On 2016-10-23, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 23/10/2016 à 13:18, Guillaume Munch a écrit : >> 1942c1942 ... resulted in a change in Math.lyx ... >> < \textrm{created with \textbf{\textbackslash frac}} & & >> \textrm{created with \textbf{\textbackslash cfrac}}\\ >>

Re: LyXRC - %%s/scripts

Le 24/10/2016 à 08:27, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit : On 24/10/2016 03:32, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 09:47:10PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: For me, this [1] fixes the issue: commit d5495caa in tommaso/master Thanks for coming up with a fix shall I commit to regular

Re: LinuxDay @ Pisa - Oct 22nd

Am Sonntag, 23. Oktober 2016 um 17:24:08, schrieb Tommaso Cucinotta > commit e85b0d01 > Author: Tommaso Cucinotta > Date: Wed Oct 16 22:55:40 2013 +0100 > > LyX XMPP Chat > > This patch enables XMPP-based chatting within LyX. > This is from

Re: Ticket 10457 Code Review Request

Am 24.10.2016 um 08:46 schrieb Joel Kulesza: I've implemented the change (selfishly) requested in https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10457. Hello Joel, many thanks! Everyone and every work welcome. What is the best way to get the change reviewed / committed / merged? You should attach your

Re: procmail (was: [PATCH] Re: Return + Return in nested environments)

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:42:16AM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 09:55:02PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > > Yes, of course, because procmail inserted a ">" just in front of the > > > > "From " line in the

Re: please revert: [LyX/2.2.x] Better title for ViewSource

Am 24.10.2016 um 00:38 schrieb Guillaume Munch: You are not being rude at all, in fact you are quite polite. OK. I felt I was rude. I thought about it and began to update the docs when I realized what an impact these renaming have. Then I searched the Wiki and googled around. The source

[PATCH] Add "Swap & Reverse" to math delimiter dialog

LyX Developers: Per Uwe's guidance, please find attached a proposed patch to address enhancement request Ticket #10457. Notes: - The attached patch was made on the master branch (per http://www.lyx.org/HowToUseGIT) and should lie neatly atop recent commit a9aaec5. While this was made

License to Publish Work

LyX Developers: I hereby grant the right to publish my work for LyX under the license GPL version 2 or later. Please contact me with any comments, questions, or concerns. Thank you, Joel

Re: Modules dialogue

Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 21:51 +0200 schrieb racoon: Ah, I have not made the settings dialog wide enough. Well anyway, the right part does not become wider up to a certain point (see attached screenshot). I would call that wasted space. So maybe the list of settings should be set to a

Re: Modules dialogue

Am Dienstag, den 25.10.2016, 08:55 +1300 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: > My concern was for the list of modules to be scannable "at a > glance".  > Particularly with the theorems modules there is a clump of them, > some  > with long names where the distinguishable part of the name is not  > initially

Re: Modules dialogue

On 23.10.2016 10:15, Andrew Parsloe wrote: In an earlier email I managed to overlook the Assumption environment, provided in the Theorems-AMS-Extended module, as Paul indicated. OK, more of this kind of thing is to be expected as I enter my dotage, but when I view the modules dialogue it looks

Re: Modules dialogue

On 24.10.2016 12:53, racoon wrote: On 23.10.2016 10:15, Andrew Parsloe wrote: Few documents have more than a module or five attached to them. Most of the Selected window is wasted space. I wonder if the two Defaults buttons in the penultimate row couldn't be shrunk to fit into the gap in the

Re: Modules dialogue

On 24.10.2016 13:15, racoon wrote: On 24.10.2016 12:53, racoon wrote: On 23.10.2016 10:15, Andrew Parsloe wrote: Few documents have more than a module or five attached to them. Most of the Selected window is wasted space. I wonder if the two Defaults buttons in the penultimate row couldn't be

Re: LyXRC - %%s/scripts

Le 24/10/2016 à 16:29, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit : On 24/10/2016 15:31, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Do not hesitate to commit to master once you have tested it. This is our playground, after all. Only stable is subject to authorization from Richard. +1. If it worked for you and the change makes

Re: LyXRC - %%s/scripts

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 09:42:10AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 24/10/2016 à 08:27, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit : > > shall I commit to regular master, or would you like to give it a try first? > > Do not hesitate to commit to master once you have tested it. This is our > playground,

Re: Possible Qt5 bugs (bug 10436)

Le 24/10/2016 à 02:25, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I have had unfortunately avoided making Qt bug reports for the same reason. Perhaps ask on Qt's dev mailing list? There was a time were André would magically pop up in moments like this and just report problems... Sigh. André, we miss you !

Re: LyXRC - %%s/scripts

On 24/10/2016 15:31, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Do not hesitate to commit to master once you have tested it. This is our playground, after all. Only stable is subject to authorization from Richard. +1. If it worked for you and the change makes logical sense, I would say go ahead for master.

Re: Supposed to be bolded page number not bolded in index

Le 23/10/2016 à 11:34, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : In the long term, I think the ideal solution would be that all of these special characters are escaped by default (so @, | and ! really output these glyphs), and that the functions they provide in indexes (sort key, indexical hierarchy, page

Re: Master is slow

Le 22/10/2016 à 19:39, Guillaume Munch a écrit : After improvements by Richard and Jean-Marc, GuiView::getStatus is down to 10% (mostly lyx::to_utf8) and there is no trace of tabs updating. Thanks for checking. New bottlenecks are Buffer::updateMacros (25%, of course depends on the document)

Re: Modules dialogue

Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 13:15 +0200 schrieb racoon: > Sorry, probably the attached is better. I would prefer a layout where we can maintain the horizontal order (which we use in all other similar dialogs). Maybe we can wrap the descriptions to multiple lines. Jürgen > > Daniel >

Re: Modules dialogue

On 24.10.2016 18:53, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 13:15 +0200 schrieb racoon: Sorry, probably the attached is better. I would prefer a layout where we can maintain the horizontal order (which we use in all other similar dialogs). Maybe we can wrap the descriptions to

Re: Modules dialogue

Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 20:21 +0200 schrieb racoon: > Another idea would be to make not the list of document settings > expand  > when one expands the settings dialog. All the settings names already > fit  > well into the list. So it would make more sense to expand the > individual  > settings

Re: procmail (was: [PATCH] Re: Return + Return in nested environments)

Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 09:55:02PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > Yes, of course, because procmail inserted a ">" just in front of the > > > "From " line in the attachment (which I do manually). > > > > > > Care to share the

Re: Modules dialogue

Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 19:36 +0200 schrieb racoon: > Can you give an example? Citation dialog. Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Modules dialogue

On 24.10.2016 20:08, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 19:36 +0200 schrieb racoon: Can you give an example? Citation dialog. Oh, I see. Haven't thought about non-settings/preferences dialogs. But since those are in quite different areas of LyX I would not mind to have

Re: Modules dialogue

On 24.10.2016 20:33, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 20:21 +0200 schrieb racoon: Another idea would be to make not the list of document settings expand when one expands the settings dialog. All the settings names already fit well into the list. So it would make more sense

Re: Modules dialogue

On 25/10/2016 5:53 a.m., Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Am Montag, den 24.10.2016, 13:15 +0200 schrieb racoon: Sorry, probably the attached is better. I would prefer a layout where we can maintain the horizontal order (which we use in all other similar dialogs). Maybe we can wrap the descriptions