Re: Bad Citation Bug in 2.3dev

2017-06-03 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/01/2017 05:57 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2017-05-31 17:47 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck >: > > > PS It's probably too late for this, but is there really a good use > case > for mixing 'literal' and 'non-literal' citations in a single

Re: Bad Citation Bug in 2.3dev

2017-06-01 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2017-05-31 17:47 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck : > I see what's worrying you. > > The way I did the code, what we record are only *manual* changes to the > 'literal' value. Simply opening a dialog that has literal checked does > not change the recorded setting. If you *manually* set or

Re: Bad Citation Bug in 2.3dev

2017-05-31 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/31/2017 12:55 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 30.05.2017, 15:11 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck: >>> OK. Thanks. Since this is used as a session setting, we might have the >>> unwanted side-effect that it is now off by default for everybody starting >>> LyX 2.3 with an old

Re: Bad Citation Bug in 2.3dev

2017-05-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Dienstag, den 30.05.2017, 15:11 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck: > > OK. Thanks. Since this is used as a session setting, we might have > > the unwanted side-effect that it is now off by default for > > everybody starting LyX 2.3 with an old document. > > But it was off by default, anyway, I

Re: Bad Citation Bug in 2.3dev

2017-05-30 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/30/2017 07:04 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2017-05-30 4:54 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck >: > > >> Another question: Should the "literal" flag default to true or > false? > >> Having it default to true would be consistent with pre-2.3 >

Re: Bad Citation Bug in 2.3dev

2017-05-30 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2017-05-30 4:54 GMT+02:00 Richard Heck : > BibTeX bst files do not control the output of citations, only of > bibliography references. Right? > Right. You'd need to set it on package level (natbib's \setcitestyle or \bibpunct, for instance or cite.sty's \citemid). > >> Another

Re: Bad Citation Bug in 2.3dev

2017-05-29 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/28/2017 12:38 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 28.05.2017, 12:32 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck: >> Some do, not all. > But if a given style requests a pagination prefix, the bst (or biblatex > cbx) can and should be configured to output that. This is a > prerequisite for

Re: Bad Citation Bug in 2.3dev

2017-05-28 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Sonntag, den 28.05.2017, 12:32 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck: > Some do, not all. But if a given style requests a pagination prefix, the bst (or biblatex cbx) can and should be configured to output that. This is a prerequisite for portability between different styles (and languages). > And of

Re: Bad Citation Bug in 2.3dev

2017-05-28 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/27/2017 03:47 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Freitag, den 26.05.2017, 18:22 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck: >> So, question: Shouldn't there be some way to set "literal true" as default? >> Or shouldn't this setting be remembered? It's annoying to have to set it >> every time. > We could

Re: Bad Citation Bug in 2.3dev

2017-05-27 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, den 26.05.2017, 18:22 -0400 schrieb Richard Heck: > So, question: Shouldn't there be some way to set "literal true" as > default? Or shouldn't this setting be remembered? It's annoying to > have > to set it every time. We could remember the setting via session. OTOH, writing things

Re: Bad Citation Bug in 2.3dev

2017-05-26 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/26/2017 12:40 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > I am seeing the following bug: If I put, e.g., "pp.\ 22" into the text after > field in the citation dialog, I sometimes get as output: pp.\textbackslash{} > 22. This does not seem to happen with every > citation, and I cannot figure out what is