Re: Support for python 2 and 3 in lyx2lyx for 2.3

Am Mittwoch, 29. März 2017 um 15:52:22, schrieb José Abílio Matos > On Wednesday, 29 March 2017 15.25.12 WEST Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > There is one task remaining. Creation of lyxrc.defaults uses string > > > > 'python' as executable even if lyx is configured for use with

Re: Support for python 2 and 3 in lyx2lyx for 2.3

On Wednesday, 29 March 2017 15.25.12 WEST Kornel Benko wrote: > > > There is one task remaining. Creation of lyxrc.defaults uses string > > > 'python' as executable even if lyx is configured for use with python3. > > > I agree that this could change. Actually here I meant to say not just that it

Re: Support for python 2 and 3 in lyx2lyx for 2.3

Am Mittwoch, 29. März 2017 um 14:50:46, schrieb José Abílio Matos > On Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13.19.23 WEST Kornel Benko wrote: > > So, should we make python3 be the default for lyx2.3? > > We want it to work as well as it works python 2. If it is the default or not > I >

Re: Support for python 2 and 3 in lyx2lyx for 2.3

On Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13.19.23 WEST Kornel Benko wrote: > So, should we make python3 be the default for lyx2.3? We want it to work as well as it works python 2. If it is the default or not I have no strong opinion. > There is one task remaining. Creation of lyxrc.defaults uses string

Re: Support for python 2 and 3 in lyx2lyx for 2.3

Am Mittwoch, 29. März 2017 um 12:41:37, schrieb José Abílio Matos > On Wednesday, 29 March 2017 12.14.29 WEST Kornel Benko wrote: > > Export tests to previous lyx-versions using python3 are failing. > > It should be working now. Yes, all 990 tests succeeded. (e.g. 'ctest -R

Re: Support for python 2 and 3 in lyx2lyx for 2.3

On Wednesday, 29 March 2017 12.14.29 WEST Kornel Benko wrote: > Export tests to previous lyx-versions using python3 are failing. It should be working now. Using iteritems() returns an iterator while items() returns a list in python 2. For python 3 items() returns and iterator and iteritems()

Re: Support for python 2 and 3 in lyx2lyx for 2.3

Am Mittwoch, 29. März 2017 um 01:32:05, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:43:10AM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > > At the same time and do not expect pressure from the users who want to > > convert > > lyx-0.10 documents so I do no expect that Scott

Re: Support for python 2 and 3 in lyx2lyx for 2.3

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:43:10AM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > At the same time and do not expect pressure from the users who want to > convert > lyx-0.10 documents so I do no expect that Scott makes this a release blocker > for 2.3. :-D Thanks for the investigation on this issue, José.

Re: Support for python 2 and 3 in lyx2lyx for 2.3

On Tuesday, 28 March 2017 23.57.39 WEST José Abílio Matos wrote: > FWIW the culprit seems to be normalize_font_whitespace in lyx_1_5.py, that > is used for formats 259 and 274. I found the reason. In that function the is a variable called changes that is a dictionary. We access to the list of

Re: Support for python 2 and 3 in lyx2lyx for 2.3

On Tuesday, 28 March 2017 15.07.17 WEST Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > It looks like something that can be handled by a bisect, either a real > one or a hand-made one where a dichotomy is done on the intermediate > commits. Nah... I prefer to follow Ken Thompson's advice: "When in doubt, use brute

Re: Support for python 2 and 3 in lyx2lyx for 2.3

Le 28/03/2017 à 12:43, José Abílio Matos a écrit : Using the 0.12.0 User Guide as the starting point the only differences between the two conversions is that python 2 way gets at some points: \bar default \family default while the python 3 gets \family default \bar default This happens in 12