sing LyX for a number of years. Because I was reusing a
> >>> lot of math macros, I started putting them in a separate file and
> >>> loading that file at the beginning of each document with an input
> >>> statement. Over time, the list has grown and I wanted t
On 1/24/24 03:09, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:35:25 -0500
schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
On 1/22/24 16:27, Michael Dean Pugh wrote:
I've been using LyX for a number of years. Because I was reusing a
lot of math macros, I started putting them in a separate file and
loading
Am Mon, 22 Jan 2024 17:35:25 -0500
schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
> On 1/22/24 16:27, Michael Dean Pugh wrote:
> > I've been using LyX for a number of years. Because I was reusing a
> > lot of math macros, I started putting them in a separate file and
> > loading that
On 1/22/24 16:27, Michael Dean Pugh wrote:
I've been using LyX for a number of years. Because I was reusing a
lot of math macros, I started putting them in a separate file and
loading that file at the beginning of each document with an input
statement. Over time, the list has grown and I
I've been using LyX for a number of years. Because I was reusing a lot of math
macros, I started putting them in a separate file and loading that file at the
beginning of each document with an input statement. Over time, the list has
grown and I wanted to search for a macro to see how I had
Am Freitag, den 06.08.2021, 11:15 -0400 schrieb Paul A. Rubin:
> On 8/6/21 5:52 AM, Tobias Hilbricht wrote:
> > Dear readers of this list,
> >
> > in my worksheets in chemistry I have to write chemical formulas and
> > physical quantities very often. But while that is very easy to do
> > in
> >
On 8/6/21 5:52 AM, Tobias Hilbricht wrote:
> Dear readers of this list,
>
> in my worksheets in chemistry I have to write chemical formulas and
> physical quantities very often. But while that is very easy to do in
> LyX out of the box with chemical formulas due to the integration of
> mhchem and
On 8/6/21 5:52 AM, Tobias Hilbricht wrote:
Dear readers of this list,
in my worksheets in chemistry I have to write chemical formulas and
physical quantities very often. But while that is very easy to do in
LyX out of the box with chemical formulas due to the integration of
mhchem and its macro
Dear readers of this list,
in my worksheets in chemistry I have to write chemical formulas and
physical quantities very often. But while that is very easy to do in
LyX out of the box with chemical formulas due to the integration of
mhchem and its macro \ce, I am still trying to achieve something
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 9:06 AM Richard Kimberly Heck
wrote:
> On 11/10/20 1:13 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote:
> > Colleagues,
> >
> > Is there a way to detokenize math macros in LyX such that characters
> > like an underscore are not passed? I'd like to highlight text a
On 11/10/20 1:13 PM, Joel Kulesza wrote:
Colleagues,
Is there a way to detokenize math macros in LyX such that characters
like an underscore are not passed? I'd like to highlight text and
then apply the macro (via toolbar button/shortcut), but it passes
through characters without escaping
Colleagues,
Is there a way to detokenize math macros in LyX such that characters like
an underscore are not passed? I'd like to highlight text and then apply
the macro (via toolbar button/shortcut), but it passes through characters
without escaping them automatically.
For example, please see
On 06/08/2018 01:39 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 06/08/2018 08:31 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
On 06/08/2018 01:14 AM, Reuven Segev wrote:
Hi,
When using LyX to produce slides with Beamer, I encountered the
following issue. Beamer produces an empty slide wherever I insert my
math macros
On 06/08/2018 08:31 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> On 06/08/2018 01:14 AM, Reuven Segev wrote:
>> Hi,
>> When using LyX to produce slides with Beamer, I encountered the
>> following issue. Beamer produces an empty slide wherever I insert my
>> math macros. I could not thi
On 06/08/2018 01:14 AM, Reuven Segev wrote:
Hi,
When using LyX to produce slides with Beamer, I encountered the
following issue. Beamer produces an empty slide wherever I insert my
math macros. I could not think of a way to "encapsulate" them.
Any help will be appreciated.
Be
Hi,
When using LyX to produce slides with Beamer, I encountered the following
issue. Beamer produces an empty slide wherever I insert my math macros. I
could not think of a way to "encapsulate" them.
Any help will be appreciated.
Best,
Reuven Segev
7). Further I would like to
> structure the different Includes by using Inputs for the associated
> sections. For each Input, I set the Include-file it is in as the main
> document. No problem so far.
>
> But I haven’t got to grips with my math macros file after several
> attempts
uts for the associated sections. For each
Input, I set the Include-file it is in as the main document. No problem so far.
But I haven’t got to grips with my math macros file after several attempts
(tried also with https://wiki.lyx.org/Tips/ChildMathMacros
<https://wiki.lyx.org/Tips/ChildMath
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org> wrote:
> Le 01/10/2015 12:03, David a écrit :
>>
>> Dear Lyx users,
>>
>> I work on a document that contains a long list of math macros
>> defining various mathematical symbols. I would like
Am 01.10.2015 um 23:49 schrieb Guillaume Munch:
>
> As of now, there is a list of math macros in the navigation menu and the
> outline pane. Especially the outline pane works well for that: math
> macros can now be accessed and ordered either by appearance or
> alphabet
On 2015-10-02, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org> wrote:
>> Le 01/10/2015 12:03, David a écrit :
...
>> As of now, there is a list of math macros in the navigation menu and the
>> outline pane. Especially
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Guenter Milde <mi...@users.sf.net> wrote:
> On 2015-10-02, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org> wrote:
>>> Le 01/10/2015 12:03, David a écrit :
>
> ...
>
>&g
As of now, there is a list of math macros in the navigation menu and the
outline pane. Especially the outline pane works well for that: math macros
can now be accessed and ordered either by appearance or alphabetically, and
can be searched for using the filter.
Is a list of math macros very different
Dear Lyx users,
I work on a document that contains a long list of math macros defining
various mathematical symbols. I would like to search in this list.
Please consider the example Lyx file attached. How could I find, for
example, \speedOfLight ? I have tried Edit > Find (Quick) and E
Le 01/10/2015 12:03, David a écrit :
Dear Lyx users,
I work on a document that contains a long list of math macros
defining various mathematical symbols. I would like to search in
this list.
Please consider the example Lyx file attached. How could I find, for
example, \speedOfLight ? I have
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Reuven Segev reuven.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
How can import a LaTeX file into LyX so that the LaTeX macros are imported
into LyX math macros?
Cross-posted at http://latex-community.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19t=26277
Scott
Hi,
How can import a LaTeX file into LyX so that the LaTeX macros are imported
into LyX math macros?
Thanks
Hi,
How can import a LaTeX file into LyX so that the LaTeX macros are imported
into LyX math macros?
Thanks
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Reuven Segev reuven.se...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
How can import a LaTeX file into LyX so that the LaTeX macros are imported
into LyX math macros?
Cross-posted at http://latex-community.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19t=26277
Scott
Hi,
How can import a LaTeX file into LyX so that the LaTeX macros are imported
into LyX math macros?
Thanks
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Reuven Segev <reuven.se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> How can import a LaTeX file into LyX so that the LaTeX macros are imported
> into LyX math macros?
>
Cross-posted at http://latex-community.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19=26277
Scott
On 2014-01-22, Liviu Andronic wrote:
So, is it a good or bad idea to use math macros to emulate text
macros? Is there a nicer approach?
IMO, it is a bad idea. Math macros are for mathematical typesetting (and
even then not the cleanest LaTeX code results).
The text alternative to math macros
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Guenter Milde mi...@users.sf.net wrote:
On 2014-01-22, Liviu Andronic wrote:
So, is it a good or bad idea to use math macros to emulate text
macros? Is there a nicer approach?
IMO, it is a bad idea. Math macros are for mathematical typesetting (and
even
On 2014-01-22, Liviu Andronic wrote:
So, is it a good or bad idea to use math macros to emulate text
macros? Is there a nicer approach?
IMO, it is a bad idea. Math macros are for mathematical typesetting (and
even then not the cleanest LaTeX code results).
The text alternative to math macros
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Guenter Milde mi...@users.sf.net wrote:
On 2014-01-22, Liviu Andronic wrote:
So, is it a good or bad idea to use math macros to emulate text
macros? Is there a nicer approach?
IMO, it is a bad idea. Math macros are for mathematical typesetting (and
even
On 2014-01-22, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> So, is it a good or bad idea to use math macros to emulate text
> macros? Is there a nicer approach?
IMO, it is a bad idea. "Math macros" are for mathematical typesetting (and
even then not the cleanest LaTeX code results).
The text alte
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Guenter Milde <mi...@users.sf.net> wrote:
> On 2014-01-22, Liviu Andronic wrote:
>
>> So, is it a good or bad idea to use math macros to emulate text
>> macros? Is there a nicer approach?
>
> IMO, it is a bad idea. "Math macro
(i.e. non-ERT) to do this in
LyX? I tried to use 'math macros' for this job (see attached):
- insert math macro
- Name= '\myname'
- TeX = ctrl+m to put the text into an mbox, then type 'M. Simpson'
But sofar I identified two issues:
- hyphenation/line breaks. Since the text is within a math
(i.e. non-ERT) to do this in
LyX? I tried to use 'math macros' for this job (see attached):
- insert math macro
- Name= '\myname'
- TeX = ctrl+m to put the text into an mbox, then type 'M. Simpson'
But sofar I identified two issues:
- hyphenation/line breaks. Since the text is within a math
rd, native way (i.e. non-ERT) to do this in
LyX? I tried to use 'math macros' for this job (see attached):
- insert > math > macro
- Name= '\myname'
- TeX = ctrl+m to put the text into an mbox, then type 'M. Simpson'
But sofar I identified two issues:
- hyphenation/line breaks. Since the text
On 07/21/2012 11:34 PM, Allen Barker wrote:
On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I
From: Richard Heck [rgh...@lyx.org]
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:20 AM
So the attached shows a way around this problem. The difference between \test
and \lest
doesn't show up inside LyX, but it does in the output.
Is there any way to put these inside a preview inset?
Scott
On 2012-07-22, Allen Barker wrote:
On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I
\input
On 07/21/2012 11:34 PM, Allen Barker wrote:
On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I
From: Richard Heck [rgh...@lyx.org]
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:20 AM
So the attached shows a way around this problem. The difference between \test
and \lest
doesn't show up inside LyX, but it does in the output.
Is there any way to put these inside a preview inset?
Scott
On 2012-07-22, Allen Barker wrote:
On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I
\input
On 07/21/2012 11:34 PM, Allen Barker wrote:
On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I
From: Richard Heck [rgh...@lyx.org]
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:20 AM
>So the attached shows a way around this problem. The difference between \test
>and \lest
>doesn't show up inside LyX, but it does in the output.
Is there any way to put these inside a preview inset?
Scott
On 2012-07-22, Allen Barker wrote:
> On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
>> document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
>> documents include a file of commonly used math
On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I
\input a file with commonly used preamble
On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I
\input a file with commonly used preamble
On 07/20/2012 03:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Also, math-macros are document specific - defining a math-macro in one
document does not make it available in other ones. This is why my
documents include a file of commonly used math macros -- just like I
\input a file with commonly used preamble
want to like LyX. What a great concept. And
yet... I find LyX math macros an absolutely horror. Why construct LyX
to ignore macros in an imported LaTex preamble? Why defeat the most
popular usage, and why not write something to properly automate the
import?
Because (La)TeX is a macro language
want to like LyX. What a great concept. And
yet... I find LyX math macros an absolutely horror. Why construct LyX
to ignore macros in an imported LaTex preamble? Why defeat the most
popular usage, and why not write something to properly automate the
import?
Because (La)TeX is a macro language
t; features. I really want to like LyX. What a great concept. And
> yet... I find LyX math macros an absolutely horror. Why construct LyX
> to ignore macros in an imported LaTex preamble? Why defeat the most
> popular usage, and why not write something to properly automate the
> import?
concept. And yet...
I find LyX math macros an absolutely horror. Why construct LyX to ignore macros
in an imported LaTex preamble? Why defeat the most
popular usage, and why not write something to properly automate the import?
It's a
fact that exchanging LaTex with collaborators and opening old files
concept. And yet...
I find LyX math macros an absolutely horror. Why construct LyX to ignore macros
in an imported LaTex preamble? Why defeat the most
popular usage, and why not write something to properly automate the import?
It's a
fact that exchanging LaTex with collaborators and opening old files
concept. And yet...
I find LyX math macros an absolutely horror. Why construct LyX to ignore macros
in an imported LaTex preamble? Why defeat the most
popular usage, and why not write something to properly automate the import?
It's a
fact that exchanging LaTex with collaborators and opening old files
) correct page numbers and references and LyX will use the
parent doc settings instead of the child-doc ones.
Actually, I regularly compile stand-alone child docs (to save time on
checking the appearance in the output). I have set up a stand-alone
branch for math-macros and bibliography and I can
But the only one for truly consistent behaviour. If you want to export
stand-alone, uncheck the master setting.
Even if the master setting is not set in the child, LyX still display all
macros perfectly if the master document is open.
My complaint is this: if LyX is able to interpret things
document is open.
This is a bug. (Around LyX 1.4, math-macros were resolved in any
open buffer - related or not.)
My complaint is this: if LyX is able to interpret things and display them in
the editor, it should be able to generate the output. That's all.
Specially if this problem
A show output anyway button would be great.
However, if LyX consistency were assured, there's no need for it (expect
when using ERT).
... or the LaTeX preamble (1) or an outdated TeX distribution (2) or a
package
combination with conflicts (3) or ... (?)
Günter
I repeat: if, and
) correct page numbers and references and LyX will use the
parent doc settings instead of the child-doc ones.
Actually, I regularly compile stand-alone child docs (to save time on
checking the appearance in the output). I have set up a stand-alone
branch for math-macros and bibliography and I can
But the only one for truly consistent behaviour. If you want to export
stand-alone, uncheck the master setting.
Even if the master setting is not set in the child, LyX still display all
macros perfectly if the master document is open.
My complaint is this: if LyX is able to interpret things
document is open.
This is a bug. (Around LyX 1.4, math-macros were resolved in any
open buffer - related or not.)
My complaint is this: if LyX is able to interpret things and display them in
the editor, it should be able to generate the output. That's all.
Specially if this problem
A show output anyway button would be great.
However, if LyX consistency were assured, there's no need for it (expect
when using ERT).
... or the LaTeX preamble (1) or an outdated TeX distribution (2) or a
package
combination with conflicts (3) or ... (?)
Günter
I repeat: if, and
e the includeonly feature
to compile a subset of sub-documents where LaTeX will ensure
(almost) correct page numbers and references and LyX will use the
parent doc settings instead of the child-doc ones.
>> > Actually, I regularly compile stand-alone child docs (to save time on
>> >
>
> But the only one for truly consistent behaviour. If you want to export
> stand-alone, uncheck the master setting.
>
Even if the master setting is not set in the child, LyX still display all
macros perfectly if the master document is open.
My complaint is this: if LyX is able to interpret
> macros perfectly if the master document is open.
This is a bug. (Around LyX 1.4, math-macros were resolved in any
open buffer - related or not.)
> My complaint is this: if LyX is able to interpret things and display them in
> the editor, it should be able to generate the output. That's all.
>
> > A "show output anyway" button would be great.
> > However, if LyX consistency were assured, there's no need for it (expect
> > when using ERT).
>
> ... or the LaTeX preamble (1) or an outdated TeX distribution (2) or a
> package
> combination with conflicts (3) or ... (?)
>
> Günter
>
I
mean, if I can see
everything right on the screen, what's the problem?
This is how I feel about the current behavior. LyX is handling everything on
the editor, since all math macros are interpreted correctly when I open any
document, but I can't generate the file because of its internal
Guenter Milde wrote:
For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone
compilation of documents setting a master (except for included (vs.
input) documents).
Why this? I have many documents with a master set that get compiled stand-
alone from time to time and should _not_
, equations,
tables and figures in other parts of the document.
Actually, I regularly compile stand-alone child docs (to save time on
checking the appearance in the output). I have set up a stand-alone
branch for math-macros and bibliography and I can live with the
question marks in the references
argument would hold for references to sections, equations,
tables and figures in other parts of the document.
Actually, I regularly compile stand-alone child docs (to save time on
checking the appearance in the output). I have set up a stand-alone
branch for math-macros and bibliography and I can
.
Actually, I regularly compile stand-alone child docs (to save time on
checking the appearance in the output). I have set up a stand-alone
branch for math-macros and bibliography and I can live with the
question marks in the references.
This is another subject, but let's understand
mean, if I can see
everything right on the screen, what's the problem?
This is how I feel about the current behavior. LyX is handling everything on
the editor, since all math macros are interpreted correctly when I open any
document, but I can't generate the file because of its internal
Guenter Milde wrote:
For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone
compilation of documents setting a master (except for included (vs.
input) documents).
Why this? I have many documents with a master set that get compiled stand-
alone from time to time and should _not_
, equations,
tables and figures in other parts of the document.
Actually, I regularly compile stand-alone child docs (to save time on
checking the appearance in the output). I have set up a stand-alone
branch for math-macros and bibliography and I can live with the
question marks in the references
argument would hold for references to sections, equations,
tables and figures in other parts of the document.
Actually, I regularly compile stand-alone child docs (to save time on
checking the appearance in the output). I have set up a stand-alone
branch for math-macros and bibliography and I can
.
Actually, I regularly compile stand-alone child docs (to save time on
checking the appearance in the output). I have set up a stand-alone
branch for math-macros and bibliography and I can live with the
question marks in the references.
This is another subject, but let's understand
g for a more "user oriented behavior". I mean, "if I can see
> everything right on the screen, what's the problem?"
> This is how I feel about the current behavior. LyX is handling everything on
> the editor, since all math macros are interpreted correctly when I open any
Guenter Milde wrote:
> For truly consistent behaviour, we would have to disable stand-alone
> compilation of documents setting a master (except for "included" (vs.
> "input") documents).
Why this? I have many documents with a master set that get compiled stand-
alone from time to time and should
tion.
The same argument would hold for references to sections, equations,
tables and figures in other parts of the document.
Actually, I regularly compile stand-alone child docs (to save time on
checking the appearance in the output). I have set up a "stand-alone"
branch for math-ma
acro
> expansions in the child doc but not make them available in stand-alone
> compilation.
>
> The same argument would hold for references to sections, equations,
> tables and figures in other parts of the document.
>
> Actually, I regularly compile stand-alone child docs (to save
cument with thousand of pages I will obligated to generate
all pages?
I do not agree.
> > Actually, I regularly compile stand-alone child docs (to save time on
> > checking the appearance in the output). I have set up a "stand-alone"
> > branch for math-macros and bib
I'm not sure if this is a bug report or a feature request. Probably the
second one.
In LyX it's ok to define a Math Macro in a Master document and use it in a
child one. It's also ok to use math macros that are defined in a child and
use it in other child document.
In both cases, I am able
On 05/09/2011 10:22 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a bug report or a feature request. Probably the
second one.
In LyX it's ok to define a Math Macro in a Master document and use it in a
child one. It's also ok to use math macros that are defined in a child and
use
If you ask to compile just the child, then you are asking to compile it
as a standalone document, so it is no surprise that this does not work.
Exactly. :-)
If you want to compile just one chapter as part of a larger document,
then you need to use the \includeonly support, accessible
On 05/09/2011 11:05 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
If you want to compile just one chapter as part of a larger document,
then you need to use the \includeonly support, accessible from
DocumentSettings.
I was not aware of this feature. Thanks for the hint.
It's new in 2.0.0.
But it is also
on the screen, what's the problem?
This is how I feel about the current behavior. LyX is handling everything on
the editor, since all math macros are interpreted correctly when I open any
document, but I can't generate the file because of its internal structure.
We should try to avoid consistency errors
On 09/05/2011 10:22 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a bug report or a feature request. Probably the
second one.
In LyX it's ok to define a Math Macro in a Master document and use it in a
child one. It's also ok to use math macros that are defined in a child and
use it in other
So, I do not experience your problem. However document settings and stuff
that gets defined in the preamble need to be set in both master and child
docs.
--
Julien
Actually, the answer is: yes, you do experience the very same problem.
Otherwise you won't need to go after a workaround,
won't need to go after a workaround, right? :-)
As I said before, I'm sure there are several ways to workaround this
limitation (I am not searching for one).
I just think we should focus on make LyX avoid these errors by itself.
Cheers,
---
Diego
Which workaround? You said math macros don't
On 09/05/2011 1:44 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
So, I do not experience your problem. However document settings and stuff
that gets defined in the preamble need to be set in both master and child
docs.
--
Julien
Actually, the answer is: yes, you do experience the very same problem.
Otherwise you
Which workaround? You said math macros don't work within child docs, I say
they work for me. No workaround necessary.
Maybe I misunderstood you.
I was citing your workaround to include bibtex in the childs.
I use a branch named child only, which is activated in child docs but
deactivated
On 09/05/2011 2:23 PM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
Which workaround? You said math macros don't work within child docs, I say
they work for me. No workaround necessary.
Maybe I misunderstood you.
I was citing your workaround to include bibtex in the childs.
I use a branch named child only, which
On 05/09/2011 02:38 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
Yes I am able to do what you describe in 1.6. In your example child
doc, you did not set the master setting, did you? But anyway, I
corrected it and still in 2.1.0svn the compilation of the child is
broken:
Undefined control sequence \anymacro
A
Yes I am able to do what you describe in 1.6. In your example child doc,
you did not set the master setting, did you?
Indeed.
I was in a hurry and I forgot it. ;/
---
Diego Queiroz
I'm not sure if this is a bug report or a feature request. Probably the
second one.
In LyX it's ok to define a Math Macro in a Master document and use it in a
child one. It's also ok to use math macros that are defined in a child and
use it in other child document.
In both cases, I am able
On 05/09/2011 10:22 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a bug report or a feature request. Probably the
second one.
In LyX it's ok to define a Math Macro in a Master document and use it in a
child one. It's also ok to use math macros that are defined in a child and
use
1 - 100 of 277 matches
Mail list logo
