On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 06:58:12PM +0200, Tim Michelsen wrote:
./configure --with-version-suffix=1.4
I get this error:
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C
compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
Do I need to install any
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 06:55:00PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Now that we have tex2lyx, a formally correct latex parser
This is exaggerated. It just happens to be able to parse most
of TeX we've needed so far...
Andre'
Hi,
trying to compile lyx-1.3.5 (and probably at the very final link
stage) I get the error msg. shown below.
Seems that something from the boost lib is missing - but I have
a fresh version installed.
Any help would be very much appreciated.
Thanks.
wolfram
CutAndPaste.o(.text+0x11): In
On 5/2/05, wolfram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trying to compile lyx-1.3.5 (and probably at the very final link
stage) I get the error msg. shown below.
Seems that something from the boost lib is missing - but I have
a fresh version installed.
Wolfram: have you checked whether there is an
Hello All.
I'm loading the hyperrref package to generate clickable bookmarks from
Lyx TOC in the final PDF file.
I noticed that a number of characters are NOT displayed correctly in
PDF bookmarks. For instance, the word LyX is shown like L.25emYX. The
qoute chars are also not displayed as they
Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wolfram: have you checked whether there is an already built rpm for
your distribution? In the affirmative case, you would not need to
compile lyx-1.3.5.
I googled to find only v 1.3.4 for my distro.
Thanks anyway.
Wolfram
Hello Uwe,
Monday, May 2, 2005, 3:29:33 PM, you wrote:
The problem is the different encoding in pdf-bookmarks. It cannot handle
sub- and superscripts and some special characters.
To avoid a bad output, hyperref provides the command
\texorpdfstring{text}{pdf-bookmark text}
See the attached
Angus Leeming wrote:
Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
Post the list of 20+ authors here and some wizard will spot the problem.
OK, here you go :)
LyX's BibTeX parser isn't really a parser at all. You can defeat it very
easily. One of the things it assumes is that each line is a complete
entry, so
On May 1, 2005, at 10:48, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 06:58:12PM +0200, Tim Michelsen wrote:
./configure --with-version-suffix=1.4
I get this error:
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error:
C
compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for
Matej Cepl wrote:
fuchst wrote:
Does any one know whether this can be done and could point me in the right
directions?
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/bytopic.html#bibmulti
Matìj
Matìj,
As I was also interested, in the multiple bib capability, I went to look at
the link
Matej Cepl wrote:
bibtopic or something like that. Try Catalogue on CTAN
(http://www.ctan.org)
Additionally, there's some info about LyX's support status on the wiki:
http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/BibTeX
HTH,
Jürgen
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:54:38PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
\documentstyle[12pt,rfc]{article}
means that you load the documentclass article with the option 12pt
and rfc. As the article class doesn't support the option rfc, you
get this error.
As the rfc style is defined as .sty-file, it is
Todd Denniston wrote:
As I was also interested, in the multiple bib capability, I went to look
at the link you sent. For some reason it returns no data at all (is CTAN
having a problem?). I also did not find a bibmulti listed in the
Alpha[1] Catalogue, nor through the CTAN search, even google
Matej Cepl wrote:
As I was also interested, in the multiple bib capability, I went to look
at the link you sent. For some reason it returns no data at all (is CTAN
having a problem?). I also did not find a bibmulti listed in the
Alpha[1] Catalogue, nor through the CTAN search, even google
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
As the rfc style is defined as .sty-file, it is an extension to any
document class and it can be loaded with the preamble line
\usepackage{rfc}
Right. I have that in the preamble, though. I get the feeling that
I somehow need to load rfc before I tell it to use the
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 07:16:53PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
No, you always have to load the documentclass at first. Why do you think
you need to load the package rfc before the class? What exactly is your
problem?
My problem is that, according to the rfc.sty documentation, rfc is to
be given
On 5/2/05, wolfram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wolfram: have you checked whether there is an already built rpm for
your distribution? In the affirmative case, you would not need to
compile lyx-1.3.5.
I googled to find only v 1.3.4 for my distro.
Wolfram, try:
Hello
I'm using Lyx1.3.3 in Windows.
A paper I'm writing has \chi_0 symbol that does not appear correctly in the
.ps output file. The zero sits much higher in the postscript output than in
all other subscripts.
Is there a way to fix that?
Thank you
Leo
Andrew Sullivan schrieb:
My problem is that, according to the rfc.sty documentation, rfc is to
be given as an argument to the documentclass command. But it seems
to be ignored if I do that.
The rfc.sty was published in 1991. It is therefore designed for the old
LaTeX-version 2.09. In 1994, the
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 09:09:38PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The rfc.sty was published in 1991. It is therefore designed for the old
LaTeX-version 2.09. In 1994, the actual LaTeX-version 2epsilon was
Doh. I knew I was doing something stupid. Thanks.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL
I have doing a bit of work with XML lately - mostly database to xml.
Using the xml utilities that come with SuSE out of the box (e.g.
xsltproc), it is fairly easy to translate for XML to other XML and even
to LyX.
Is there a schema (or DTD) available for the XML that will be the new
source
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 06:58:12PM +0200, Tim Michelsen wrote:
./configure --with-version-suffix=1.4
I get this error:
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C
compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details.
Do I need to install any
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 06:55:00PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
Now that we have tex2lyx, a formally correct latex parser
This is exaggerated. It just happens to be able to parse most
of TeX we've needed so far...
Andre'
Hi,
trying to compile lyx-1.3.5 (and probably at the very final link
stage) I get the error msg. shown below.
Seems that something from the boost lib is missing - but I have
a fresh version installed.
Any help would be very much appreciated.
Thanks.
wolfram
CutAndPaste.o(.text+0x11): In
On 5/2/05, wolfram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trying to compile lyx-1.3.5 (and probably at the very final link
stage) I get the error msg. shown below.
Seems that something from the boost lib is missing - but I have
a fresh version installed.
Wolfram: have you checked whether there is an
Hello All.
I'm loading the hyperrref package to generate clickable bookmarks from
Lyx TOC in the final PDF file.
I noticed that a number of characters are NOT displayed correctly in
PDF bookmarks. For instance, the word LyX is shown like L.25emYX. The
qoute chars are also not displayed as they
Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wolfram: have you checked whether there is an already built rpm for
your distribution? In the affirmative case, you would not need to
compile lyx-1.3.5.
I googled to find only v 1.3.4 for my distro.
Thanks anyway.
Wolfram
Hello Uwe,
Monday, May 2, 2005, 3:29:33 PM, you wrote:
The problem is the different encoding in pdf-bookmarks. It cannot handle
sub- and superscripts and some special characters.
To avoid a bad output, hyperref provides the command
\texorpdfstring{text}{pdf-bookmark text}
See the attached
Angus Leeming wrote:
Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
Post the list of 20+ authors here and some wizard will spot the problem.
OK, here you go :)
LyX's BibTeX parser isn't really a parser at all. You can defeat it very
easily. One of the things it assumes is that each line is a complete
entry, so
On May 1, 2005, at 10:48, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 06:58:12PM +0200, Tim Michelsen wrote:
./configure --with-version-suffix=1.4
I get this error:
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error:
C
compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for
Matej Cepl wrote:
fuchst wrote:
Does any one know whether this can be done and could point me in the right
directions?
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/bytopic.html#bibmulti
Matìj
Matìj,
As I was also interested, in the multiple bib capability, I went to look at
the link
Matej Cepl wrote:
bibtopic or something like that. Try Catalogue on CTAN
(http://www.ctan.org)
Additionally, there's some info about LyX's support status on the wiki:
http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/BibTeX
HTH,
Jürgen
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:54:38PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
\documentstyle[12pt,rfc]{article}
means that you load the documentclass article with the option 12pt
and rfc. As the article class doesn't support the option rfc, you
get this error.
As the rfc style is defined as .sty-file, it is
Todd Denniston wrote:
As I was also interested, in the multiple bib capability, I went to look
at the link you sent. For some reason it returns no data at all (is CTAN
having a problem?). I also did not find a bibmulti listed in the
Alpha[1] Catalogue, nor through the CTAN search, even google
Matej Cepl wrote:
As I was also interested, in the multiple bib capability, I went to look
at the link you sent. For some reason it returns no data at all (is CTAN
having a problem?). I also did not find a bibmulti listed in the
Alpha[1] Catalogue, nor through the CTAN search, even google
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
As the rfc style is defined as .sty-file, it is an extension to any
document class and it can be loaded with the preamble line
\usepackage{rfc}
Right. I have that in the preamble, though. I get the feeling that
I somehow need to load rfc before I tell it to use the
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 07:16:53PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
No, you always have to load the documentclass at first. Why do you think
you need to load the package rfc before the class? What exactly is your
problem?
My problem is that, according to the rfc.sty documentation, rfc is to
be given
On 5/2/05, wolfram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wolfram: have you checked whether there is an already built rpm for
your distribution? In the affirmative case, you would not need to
compile lyx-1.3.5.
I googled to find only v 1.3.4 for my distro.
Wolfram, try:
Hello
I'm using Lyx1.3.3 in Windows.
A paper I'm writing has \chi_0 symbol that does not appear correctly in the
.ps output file. The zero sits much higher in the postscript output than in
all other subscripts.
Is there a way to fix that?
Thank you
Leo
Andrew Sullivan schrieb:
My problem is that, according to the rfc.sty documentation, rfc is to
be given as an argument to the documentclass command. But it seems
to be ignored if I do that.
The rfc.sty was published in 1991. It is therefore designed for the old
LaTeX-version 2.09. In 1994, the
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 09:09:38PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The rfc.sty was published in 1991. It is therefore designed for the old
LaTeX-version 2.09. In 1994, the actual LaTeX-version 2epsilon was
Doh. I knew I was doing something stupid. Thanks.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL
I have doing a bit of work with XML lately - mostly database to xml.
Using the xml utilities that come with SuSE out of the box (e.g.
xsltproc), it is fairly easy to translate for XML to other XML and even
to LyX.
Is there a schema (or DTD) available for the XML that will be the new
source
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 06:58:12PM +0200, Tim Michelsen wrote:
> > ./configure --with-version-suffix=1.4
> I get this error:
>
> checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C
> compiler cannot create executables
> See `config.log' for more details.
>
> Do I need to
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 06:55:00PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Now that we have tex2lyx, a formally correct latex parser
This is exaggerated. It just happens to be able to parse most
of TeX we've needed so far...
Andre'
Hi,
trying to compile lyx-1.3.5 (and probably at the very final link
stage) I get the error msg. shown below.
Seems that something from the boost lib is missing - but I have
a fresh version installed.
Any help would be very much appreciated.
Thanks.
wolfram
CutAndPaste.o(.text+0x11): In
On 5/2/05, wolfram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> trying to compile lyx-1.3.5 (and probably at the very final link
> stage) I get the error msg. shown below.
> Seems that something from the boost lib is missing - but I have
> a fresh version installed.
Wolfram: have you checked whether there is an
Hello All.
I'm loading the hyperrref package to generate clickable bookmarks from
Lyx TOC in the final PDF file.
I noticed that a number of characters are NOT displayed correctly in
PDF bookmarks. For instance, the word LyX is shown like L.25emYX. The
qoute chars "" are also not displayed as
Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Wolfram: have you checked whether there is an already built rpm for
> your distribution? In the affirmative case, you would not need to
> compile lyx-1.3.5.
I googled to find only v 1.3.4 for my distro.
Thanks anyway.
Wolfram
Hello Uwe,
Monday, May 2, 2005, 3:29:33 PM, you wrote:
> The problem is the different encoding in pdf-bookmarks. It cannot handle
> sub- and superscripts and some special characters.
> To avoid a bad output, hyperref provides the command
> \texorpdfstring{text}{pdf-bookmark text}
> See the
Angus Leeming wrote:
Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:
Post the list of 20+ authors here and some wizard will spot the problem.
OK, here you go :)
LyX's BibTeX parser isn't really a parser at all. You can defeat it very
easily. One of the things it assumes is that each line is a complete
entry, so
On May 1, 2005, at 10:48, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 06:58:12PM +0200, Tim Michelsen wrote:
./configure --with-version-suffix=1.4
I get this error:
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error:
C
compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for
Matej Cepl wrote:
>
> fuchst wrote:
> > Does any one know whether this can be done and could point me in the right
> > directions?
>
> http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/bytopic.html#bibmulti
>
> Matìj
Matìj,
As I was also interested, in the multiple bib capability, I went to look
Matej Cepl wrote:
> bibtopic or something like that. Try Catalogue on CTAN
> (http://www.ctan.org)
Additionally, there's some info about LyX's support status on the wiki:
http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/BibTeX
HTH,
Jürgen
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:54:38PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> \documentstyle[12pt,rfc]{article}
> means that you load the documentclass "article" with the option "12pt"
> and "rfc". As the article class doesn't support the option "rfc", you
> get this error.
> As the rfc style is defined as
Todd Denniston wrote:
> As I was also interested, in the multiple bib capability, I went to look
> at the link you sent. For some reason it returns no data at all (is CTAN
> having a problem?). I also did not find a "bibmulti" listed in the
> Alpha[1] Catalogue, nor through the CTAN search, even
Matej Cepl wrote:
> > As I was also interested, in the multiple bib capability, I went to look
> > at the link you sent. For some reason it returns no data at all (is CTAN
> > having a problem?). I also did not find a "bibmulti" listed in the
> > Alpha[1] Catalogue, nor through the CTAN search,
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
As the rfc style is defined as .sty-file, it is an extension to any
document class and it can be loaded with the preamble line
\usepackage{rfc}
Right. I have that in the preamble, though. I get the feeling that
I somehow need to load rfc before I tell it to use the
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 07:16:53PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> No, you always have to load the documentclass at first. Why do you think
> you need to load the package rfc before the class? What exactly is your
> problem?
My problem is that, according to the rfc.sty documentation, rfc is to
be
On 5/2/05, wolfram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Wolfram: have you checked whether there is an already built rpm for
> > your distribution? In the affirmative case, you would not need to
> > compile lyx-1.3.5.
>
> I googled to find only v 1.3.4 for my distro.
Wolfram, try:
Hello
I'm using Lyx1.3.3 in Windows.
A paper I'm writing has \chi_0 symbol that does not appear correctly in the
.ps output file. The zero sits much higher in the postscript output than in
all other subscripts.
Is there a way to fix that?
Thank you
Leo
Andrew Sullivan schrieb:
My problem is that, according to the rfc.sty documentation, rfc is to
be given as an argument to the documentclass command. But it seems
to be ignored if I do that.
The rfc.sty was published in 1991. It is therefore designed for the old
LaTeX-version "2.09". In 1994, the
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 09:09:38PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
> The rfc.sty was published in 1991. It is therefore designed for the old
> LaTeX-version "2.09". In 1994, the actual LaTeX-version "2epsilon" was
Doh. I knew I was doing something stupid. Thanks.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL
I have doing a bit of work with XML lately - mostly database to xml.
Using the xml utilities that come with SuSE out of the box (e.g.
xsltproc), it is fairly easy to translate for XML to other XML and even
to LyX.
Is there a schema (or DTD) available for the XML that will be the new
source
63 matches
Mail list logo
