On Apr 4, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
First, is there a possibility we can avoid the need for real-time meetings
altogether, and encourage asynchronous written communication on the
appropriate mailing lists? It's been a while since the TSG has been required
attendance on my
Once again we've got an unclear situation with the hotel reservations
and attendees requesting sponsorship.
So before a large number of people start registering, let's clarify:
If we're requesting sponsorship, what box should we check on the
registration form for the hotel reservation?
Are the
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Foster, Dawn M dawn.m.fos...@intel.com wrote:
For the current Maemo system,
1) what kind of details do people need to provide to justify
receiving a device and
2) what is the criteria that is used to decide who receives
them?
One big advantage of our system
- Original message -
[1] I hope I'm not presuming too much on behalf
of the Maemo community.
Speaking for my part of the council, no, I don't think you are, and I'd like to
thank you for championing the cause so doggedly. :)
--
Ryan Abel
Maemo Community Council member
and politically expedient bone to throw the
community. ;)
So, how about it, http://bugs.meego.com anybody?
--
Ryan Abel
Maemo Community Council member
___
Meego-community mailing list
Meego-community@meego.com
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:59 PM, ronan.maclave...@nokia.com wrote:
Since some projects/teams/working groups/whatever will use bugzilla to track
issues and not just bugs (SDK documentation for example), maybe a better
name would be issues.meego.com? Tying the name to bugs could be to narrow.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 2:01 PM, quim@nokia.com wrote:
The role of the Maemo Community Council doesn't translate here as such.
To an extent, that's true, yes. There's less of a requirement for a
community-to-Nokia and a Nokia-to-community conduit, but I don't
believe the requirement has
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Dave Neary dne...@maemo.org wrote:
So - there's the proposal, for discussion the consideration of the
next TSG meeting. Some people may prefer an independent elected body,
some people may prefer just to have the community workgroup elected
directly, and have
On Mar 19, 2010, at 11:41 AM, Randall Arnold wrote:
Only problem is Jeremiah, that results in complaints from people accessing
the forum with N900s.
This aint 1999, Randall. The days of tables and tables and HTML 3 are behind
us. It's perfectly feasible to implement a single fluid layout
On Mar 17, 2010, at 6:02 AM, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Chad Spears wrote:
I think that if anybody does, they need to speak up.
I think I have made myself perfectly clear, but I am more than willing to
state my position again: MeeGo infrastructure should reflect
On Mar 17, 2010, at 10:37 AM, quim@nokia.com wrote:
Rather than having questions sent by PM to Dawn, wouldn't it be better
to have them sent to a public channel (#meego-meeting-chat, for example)
preceded by QUESTION: or something equally parsable, where everyone
can see what's
On Feb 26, 2010, at 4:21 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
Dave Neary wrote:
I did a talk at FOSDEM 10 in the distributions room on the Maemo
Community Council as a case-study in how companies can empower community
members to feel ownership of corporate-sponsored projects. For those who
couldn't make
12 matches
Mail list logo
