I forked the repository and made a few local changes to the LateNight
skin. They should be in the 1.12 release in my opinion.
Now I'm struggling with getting the changes pushed into my repository.
Please give me a few minutes..
Am 22.06.2015 um 22:39 schrieb Be:
On 06/14/2015 12:33 PM,
On 06/14/2015 12:33 PM, Sébastien Blaisot wrote: Remaining:
* skin polish (Jus has an active Deere branch) = bug lp:1454649
remaining. Is there other work needed ?
Yeah, the effects GUIs are confusingly inconsistent across the skins.
See
This isn't critical, but I would expect reviewers to write things like
The new key detection is a step forward, but it has some rough edges
unless this is fixed:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mixxx/+bug/1435628
I think users will expect meaningful key sorting and those who are used
to it in other
In about a month or so I'll be able to actively work on spanish and catalan
translations. I might also try to write something for the manual.
2015-06-14 20:07 GMT+02:00 Be b...@gmx.com:
I started working on revising chapter 3 of the manual and adding a
section describing how use a stereo
On Jun 14, 2015, at 7:33 PM, Sébastien Blaisot mi...@blaisot.org wrote:
We also need to open
more languages for website translation on transifex
The available source strings are for the current v1.11.
We need to update the website source for 1.12, then make the source strings
available
I started working on revising chapter 3 of the manual and adding a
section describing how use a stereo splitter adapter/cable now that
Mixxx can output to single channels. There are still a lot of parts of
the manual that need updating.
On 06/14/2015 01:04 PM, S.Brandt wrote:
On Jun 14,
OK, trying to gather what we said about 1.12 release blockers:
Done:
* skin polish (Jus has an active Deere branch) = PR579 PR608 merged.
* (win) installing 1.12 on top of a previous version installation =
PR621 waiting for merge
* (win) Uninstalling Mixxx leave files behind = PR603 merged
*
Hmm, interesting sketch. I like the idea of having the EQs and volume
fader adjacent to the waveforms. That is a more efficient use of space
than putting the mixer between the decks. However, in your mockup, I
think it would be easy to confuse which controls are for which deck. I
think moving
If I recall it correct, it should help.
This has also the benefit that you can see more tracks in the library.
Am 08.06.2015 um 23:10 schrieb re-cy...@hushmail.com:
Interesting re: CPU. What do you think about decreasing the height
but keeping the width re: CPU?
~RAWRR
On Mon, 08 Jun 2015
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Interesting re: CPU. What do you think about decreasing the height
but keeping the width re: CPU?
~RAWRR
On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 21:00:52 + Daniel Schürmann
dasch...@mixxx.org wrote:
Hi Markus,
Nice mock-up.
In the past we had issues with four
Oh, the three filter knobs next to each deck aren't meant to all be
filter knobs. They could be effect superknobs and/or effect parameters.
On 06/08/2015 05:13 PM, Be wrote:
Hmm, interesting sketch. I like the idea of having the EQs and volume
fader adjacent to the waveforms. That is a more
Any thoughts on the general outline I proposed?
[master gain][balance][head mix][head gain][4/2 deck toggle]
[Deck 1][Deck 1/2 mixer][Deck 2]
waveform 1
waveform 2
waveform 3
waveform 4
[Deck 3][Deck 3/4 mixer][Deck 4]
I'm using Mixxx without controller without scratching and so on, just
I tested it and it helps, but adding these options feels like putting
bandages on a bigger design issues that are not very easy to solve.
There are so many buttons for skin options at the top that it's kinda
overwhelming. However, I think trying to implement better solutions to
those design
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 00:29:14 + Owen Williams
owilli...@mixxx.org wrote:
I've posted a PR for some new LateNight display options. I'm
definitely
running up against the limits of the skinning engine so I can't do
a lot
more than this. But it makes
thanks as in, you tested it and it works well? I don't want to commit
without someone taking a look at it.
On Sat, 2015-06-06 at 09:30 +, re-cy...@hushmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 00:29:14 + Owen Williams
owilli...@mixxx.org wrote:
I've posted a PR for some new LateNight
I've posted a PR for some new LateNight display options. I'm definitely
running up against the limits of the skinning engine so I can't do a lot
more than this. But it makes it possible to specifically select the big
waveforms if you want them. It also makes it possible to turn off the
EQs to
On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 15:29 -0400, RJ Ryan wrote:
* skin polish (Jus has an active Deere branch)
The skins are in kind of bad shape at the moment. They really need
polish to bring them to design bar that we set pretty high with
1.11.0.
You mention skins are in a bad shape -- can you
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Sébastien Blaisot mi...@blaisot.org
wrote:
3) Install Mixxx in a versionned directory (either Mixxx $VERSION or
better Mixxx\$VERSION)
Pros
- Let you install and use different versions at the same time
- no need to worry about files left from earlier version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Owen,
I've been using the LateNight resizeable skin and I have a couple
of issues:
Can we get a thing where the effects bank can optionally get
minimized, possibly back to the simplistic dials existing
previously? I'm running out of real estate on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1
It will be pretty cool when those multiple versioned entries in the
uninstall panel truly *only* uninstall the version they reference
_ !!
And it's fine this doesn't solve for 1.12. As stated earlier, 1.13
won't be too far away.
On Thu, 04 Jun
I think we should come up with some sort of standard effect rack
template that all the skins can share (and theme as necessary) but I'm
not sure we can do that in time for release.
There is currently not enough room for big waveforms and the mixer and
also 4 decks. At low resolutions, it's
I also miss the wide waveforms. I think something like this would make a
good 4-deck layout with tall and wide waveforms:
[master gain][balance][head mix][head gain][4/2 deck toggle]
[Deck 1][Deck 1/2 mixer][Deck 2]
waveform 1
waveform 2
waveform 3
waveform 4
[Deck 3][Deck 3/4 mixer][Deck 4]
If
Sound Source refactoring release:
We are going on circles.
We have argued three month ago that we do not want to delay 1.12 by three
month because of
merging the soundsource branch.
Than Owen has proposed, that we can do an another beta after the API is
stable. RJ has added +1
This was also a
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Sébastien Blaisot mi...@blaisot.org wrote:
Le 02/06/2015 21:29, RJ Ryan a écrit :
I believe the blocking items are:
* critical Windows bugs
* skin polish (Jus has an active Deere branch)
* website updates (I'm working on this)
* manual updates
Hi RJ
Hi RJ,
Thank you for the answer. I think we are on the same track. Releasing the
Sound Source fixes and other fixes one or two month after the 1.12.0
release sound reasonable to me.
The only thing we have to care about, that we not fail this target because
of currently unfinished changes or
RJ summarized my position correctly. As we increase the velocity of our
releases it will get easier to allow a certain feature slip one release
cycle.
On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 16:11 +0200, Daniel Schürmann wrote:
Hi RJ,
Thank you for the answer. I think we are on the same track. Releasing
the
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Max Linke max_li...@gmx.de wrote:
On 05/20/2015 12:40 PM, Daniel Schürmann wrote:
Hi
# Mixxx 1.12 beta #
My Mixxx 1.12 beta experience on Linux is very good. I do not see any
issue that
justifies holding back the release any longer.
I believe
Hi RJ,
Someone recently gave me a Windows laptop so I'm going to setup a
Windows build environment to try and look at some of these.
Thank you for looking at this. Would you mind to provide windows symbol
files from the build server as well? This way we are able to get
more infos directly
On 06/02/2015 04:13 PM, Sébastien Blaisot wrote:
Secondly, we have some anoying bugs with windows installer that should
be resolved before releasing 1.12 or they will impact next version as well:\
I wonder if this is a good time to switch to using WiX to make MSI
installers. These handle
Le 02/06/2015 21:29, RJ Ryan a écrit :
I believe the blocking items are:
* critical Windows bugs
* skin polish (Jus has an active Deere branch)
* website updates (I'm working on this)
* manual updates
Hi RJ and all,
I agree with your blockers. In my opinion, there are also two more
On 05/20/2015 12:40 PM, Daniel Schürmann wrote:
Hi
# Mixxx 1.12 beta #
My Mixxx 1.12 beta experience on Linux is very good. I do not see any
issue that
justifies holding back the release any longer.
On the other hand Mixxx 1.12 beta still suffers 11 critical bugs. All of
them happen on
I think we should put out a call specifically for windows testers, and
maybe as people to fill out a short survey. It could be that the number
of affected users is a small percentage and it's good enough that we can
release.
Otherwise I agree, the number of bug reports has not been large and if
32 matches
Mail list logo
