Ta Geoff,
I'll try to fill in the answers below...
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2001, James Bromberger wrote:
chomp
I built 0.9.6a-engine under Solaris 8 and have the hardware device configured.
Sun ships a library called libswift.so (a link to
Hi everybody,
Configuration:
Windows NT 4.0, SP6a
Opensa 0.20
Apache 1.3.12
OpenSSL 0.9.5
I have create 2 Virtual Host on my Apache Server, these 2 Host are working
with SSL.
On host is on port 443 and the other on port 444.
All work perfectly when i try to load each site on different browser,
Hi everyone,
I have just installed an Apache server with SSL.
It works, but I can only read my html pages, I can't access to my cgi
scripts in /usr/local/apache/cgi-bin.
My browser says : You don't have the permission to access /cgi-bin.
May be this problem comes from the SSL configuration in
Are you using mod_ssl as static or dynamic module?
--enable-shared=ssl
I don't believe you want this, if...
--enable-module=ssl \
You are doing this. I notice you have this line
in both your mod_ssl and your apache ./configure
Try it without this line.
-Original Message-
From:
I had to add suexec to get around this. I created another
user and group (like www and www) and run Apache as this user.
(edit your httpd.conf, change from nobody) also compile in
a suexec user. If you've done if successfully, when you do a
httpd -l, you'll see a line that says suexec wrapper
Hi!
Does anybody have any idea what causes this error and what to do to fix it?
Syntax error on line 206 of /etc/httpd/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/lib/apache/libssl.so into server:
/usr/lib/apache/libssl.so: undefined symbol: ERR_load_RSAREF_strings
IfDefine SSL
LoadModule ssl_module
Thanks you very much Ray. It seems to be that.
Jeremy
-Message d'origine-
De : McCaffity, Ray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoye : jeudi 31 mai 2001 15:13
A : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Objet : RE: https - port problem
I had to add suexec to get around this. I created another
user and group
Hi there,
On Thu, 31 May 2001, James Bromberger wrote:
I built 0.9.6a-engine under Solaris 8 and have the hardware device configured.
Sun ships a library called libswift.so (a link to libswift.so.5.2.2),
along with libraries for Netscape Server (swiftns351.so, swiftns351.so.1) and
I'm having trouble with load-balancing on a cisco content switch.
The details are that I've got two servers running Apache 1.3.19 /
mod_ssl/2.8.1 OpenSSL/0.9.6 and a cisco 11155 content switch (formerly
known as an Arrowpoint) set up to load balance between them, and I'm
browsing with MS
Hi!
RedHat Linux7.1
Apache1.3.19
Perl 5.005
mod_perl
embperl
mod_ssl and openssl (precompiled from RedHat)
I've tried to set up a secure server for my web site and I thought I had succeeded.
The entire site is secure. I've made the server listen only on port 443. Other than
that I've
My company is looking at going to Stronghold 3, partly because of the commercial
aspect. Is it possible to run mod_ssl for commercial purposes now? Does anybody know
if their are major differences in the way Stronghold 3 is set up that would prevent us
from using mod_ssl instead? Thanks in
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 08:54:59AM -0500, Marcel Erkens wrote:
It's apache 1.3.20/modssl 2.8.4/openssl 0.9.6a/rsaref-2.0.
You shouldn't be using RSAREF - exclude that and you'll be fine.
The patent issues have not been a problem since September
last year.
vh
Mads Toftum
--
`Darn it, who
Emma Wermström (EMW) wrote:
I've tried to set up a secure server for my web site and I thought I had succeeded.
The entire site is secure. I've made the server listen only on port 443.
I wouldn't worry too much - it sounds like you *did* succeed.
Remember you have to separate SSL and
Just thought I'd share the fix I found on a devshed forum :)
Apparently the mod_ssl Makefile was missing something that causes this error
to occur.
I added -lRSAglue -L/pathto/rsaref-2.0/local/ -lrsaref (no quotes) to the
SSL_LIBS= line in apache_1.3.20/src/modules/ssl, ran make, make
hrrmmm... but I got it working now :) to rebuild or not to rebuild? that's
the question. I may just wait until apache 1.3.21 comes around.. REALLY
want to get done with this project, you know :)
-
(SYSERR0599) Press any key to
Hi!
I have two servers: Server A and Server B. This is how they are configured:
Server A: Apache 1.3.12 mod_ssl 2.6.6 OpenSSL 0.9.5a
Server B: Apache 1.3.19 mod_ssl 2.8.3 OpenSSL 0.9.6a
Server A has a valid server.crt file, along with a server.key file that it
has been using for months. I want
Believe me, it is not a very time consuming job to configure and get
Apache/OpenSSL/mod_ssl up and running. If an applications guy like me can do it ...
and there are benefits, similar to those accruing from learning to drive a car with a
standard transmission versus an automatic. As a bonus
Current update on this problem;
I've been sniffing the TCP stream while logging in with Netscape/PC and
Netscape/Mac. Interestingly the Mac version appears to load three objects
(images) and then wait for 18 seconds. Then load another three objects and
again wait 18 seconds. Etc etc etc.
Hi,
i have successfully installed Apache_1.3.19 + mod_ssl-2.8.2 + openssl-0.9.6a
on Solaris with a testing certificate signed by Snake Oil CA.
After reading the FAQ of how to install a real SSL server Certificate, there
are few steps confused me :
1. Since i can see both
We several Mac's all running OS 9.1 using MSIE 5,
Web server is Apache1.3.20+mod_ssl+openSSL0.9.6a
We don't have any problems. Maybe it's a Netscape thing?
-Original Message-
From: DAve Goodrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 12:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe.. but the Netscape I'm testing works perfectly with Amazon, ebay,
BN, etc etc etc. I've tried with Win2k servers, Solaris, Stronghold, all
work fine.
Anyone have a mod_ssl server I can try against? mod_ssl version number
different and same as mine for comparison would be excellent.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of DAve Goodrich
Maybe.. but the Netscape I'm testing works perfectly with Amazon, ebay,
BN, etc etc etc. I've tried with Win2k servers, Solaris, Stronghold, all
work fine.
Anyone have a mod_ssl
on 5/31/01 2:08 PM, David Rees at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of DAve Goodrich
Maybe.. but the Netscape I'm testing works perfectly with Amazon, ebay,
BN, etc etc etc. I've tried with Win2k servers,
Stronghold is now owned by Red Hat and is most definitely NOT free, as I mentioned in
the original posting. But Stronghold does use mod_ssl and it really is Apache anyway.
Unless the whole process terrifies you, why would you not prefer the support of this
community, which from personal
On Thu, 31 May 2001, David Rees wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of DAve Goodrich
Maybe.. but the Netscape I'm testing works perfectly with Amazon, ebay,
BN, etc etc etc. I've tried with Win2k servers, Solaris,
On Thu, 31 May 2001, DAve Goodrich wrote:
on 5/31/01 2:08 PM, David Rees at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of DAve Goodrich
Maybe.. but the Netscape I'm testing works perfectly with Amazon, ebay,
Of course ;^) Our web app is built around PHP+CPDF+GD+Openlink, to get
everything to compile without errors I can't use bleeding edge
releases. I'm
running Apache 1.2.13 and PHP 4.0.0 because they are rock solid
for me. CPDF
and GD compile best against PHP 4.0.0, and Openlink compiles best
Hi
I have
redhat linux 7.0
apache 1.3.14
openssl 0.9.5a
mod_ssl 2.6.6
mod_perl 1.24
all from rpm's
http is working but if I turn on the mod_ssl, I turn this on and off by
renameing the file /usr/lib/apache/libssl.so is there a better way?,
then I get back the document contained no data
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:43:41AM -0500, Woodraska, Robert J. wrote:
My company is looking at going to Stronghold 3, partly because of the commercial
aspect.
Is it possible to run mod_ssl for commercial purposes now?
Yes. The issue with the RSA patent ended in September last year.
Does
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:56:04AM -0700, DAve Goodrich wrote:
Current update on this problem;
I've been sniffing the TCP stream while logging in with Netscape/PC and
Netscape/Mac. Interestingly the Mac version appears to load three objects
(images) and then wait for 18 seconds. Then load
7.0 may be old but it's better then 7.1
Just install 7.0, update some programs and build the latest kernel and
things are good :)
At 06:56 PM 5/31/01 -0400, you wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2001, David Rees wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
31 matches
Mail list logo
