Re: [NTG-context] Math Formula Alignment

Thank you Hans! Alignment works again as expected and documented in the Wiki. Greetings Lutz Am 23.02.2023 um 14:53 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context: On 2/18/2023 3:04 PM, Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context wrote: Hi, On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 3:01 PM Lutz Haseloff via ntg-context wrote:

Re: [NTG-context] Math Formula Alignment

On 2/18/2023 3:04 PM, Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context wrote: Hi, On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 3:01 PM Lutz Haseloff via ntg-context wrote: Hi Hans, hi all, the alignment of formulas seems broken: \setuppapersize[A5] \starttext \setuplayout[textwidth=8cm] \setupformulas[align=left]

Re: [NTG-context] Math Formula Alignment

Hi, On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 3:01 PM Lutz Haseloff via ntg-context wrote: > > Hi Hans, hi all, > > the alignment of formulas seems broken: > > \setuppapersize[A5] > \starttext > \setuplayout[textwidth=8cm] > \setupformulas[align=left] > \startformula c^2 = a^2 + b^2 \stopformula >

[NTG-context] Math Formula Alignment

Hi Hans, hi all,   the alignment of formulas seems broken:   \setuppapersize[A5] \starttext \setuplayout[textwidth=8cm] \setupformulas[align=left] \startformula c^2 = a^2 + b^2 \stopformula

Re: [NTG-context] Math issue

Hello Hans and Anditya, thank you both for your answers. — Reconstructing now the math… Kind regards Willi > On 16 Feb 2023, at 18:12, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context > wrote: > > On 2/16/2023 6:05 PM, Willi Egger via ntg-context wrote: >> Hi math gurus, >> I should typeset a couple of

Re: [NTG-context] Math issue

On Thu, 16 Feb 2023, Willi Egger via ntg-context wrote: > Hi math gurus, > > I should typeset a couple of simple math formulae. However I do not get the > desired result. I attach my output as pdf. > > 1. Why is the \times 12 in the denominator although the fraction is grouped? > — I tried

Re: [NTG-context] Math issue

On 2/16/2023 6:05 PM, Willi Egger via ntg-context wrote: Hi math gurus, I should typeset a couple of simple math formulae. However I do not get the desired result. I attach my output as pdf. 1. Why is the \times 12 in the denominator although the fraction is grouped? — I tried also the

[NTG-context] Math issue

Hi math gurus, I should typeset a couple of simple math formulae. However I do not get the desired result. I attach my output as pdf. 1. Why is the \times 12 in the denominator although the fraction is grouped? — I tried also the grouping with bracis, which gives the same result. 2. Why is the

Re: [NTG-context] Math bug (maybe) - prime

On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 08:26:24 +0100 Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context wrote: > Note that the 2 sits higher in > > \primed{a}^2 > > than it does in > > (a')^2. > > For readability, I really prefer the version with parentheses. Certain Mathematical writing styles seek to minimize the use of

Re: [NTG-context] Math bug (maybe) - prime

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 5:58 AM Alan Braslau via ntg-context wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 00:27:39 +0100 > Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote: > > > What you can do is: > > > > $\primed{a}^2$ > > > > which basically makes the prime an operation .. a small price to pay > > for more robust

Re: [NTG-context] Math bug (maybe) - prime

On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 00:27:39 +0100 Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote: > What you can do is: > > $\primed{a}^2$ > > which basically makes the prime an operation .. a small price to pay > for more robust handling of primes (also across fonts) I anticipated that (unicode) prime is a pain to

Re: [NTG-context] Math bug (maybe) - prime

On 12/27/2022 6:33 PM, Alan Braslau via ntg-context wrote: MWE: \starttext $a^2′$ $a′^2$ $\mathord{a′}^2$ $a^*^2$ \stoptext Should the \mathord{} be necessary to get the desired result? (I would expect the second line to work, just like $a^*^2$.) primes are kind of special and a pain in

[NTG-context] Math bug (maybe) - prime

MWE: \starttext $a^2′$ $a′^2$ $\mathord{a′}^2$ $a^*^2$ \stoptext Should the \mathord{} be necessary to get the desired result? (I would expect the second line to work, just like $a^*^2$.) Alan ___ If your

Re: [NTG-context] Math alignment question

Dear Hans, >> Thank you for your explanation. >> I just wonder \alinghere can be applicable to multiple formula. >> It is OK to use \NC \NR for multiple formulas. > What probably can be done, is to let the next formula start with the align of > the previous one .. Mikael can add it to our todo

Re: [NTG-context] Math alignment question

On 9/24/2022 4:51 PM, Jeong Dal via ntg-context wrote: Dear Aditya, Mikael, Thank you for your explanation. I just wonder \alinghere can be applicable to multiple formula. It is OK to use \NC \NR for multiple formulas. What probably can be done, is to let the next formula start with the align

Re: [NTG-context] Math alignment question

Dear Aditya, Mikael, Thank you for your explanation. I just wonder \alinghere can be applicable to multiple formula. It is OK to use \NC \NR for multiple formulas. Best regards, Dalyoung ___ If your question is of

Re: [NTG-context] Math alignment question

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 8:46 PM Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, Jeong Dal via ntg-context wrote: > > > Dear Mikael and Hans, > > > > Recently, you introdued the new command “\alignhere, \breakhere, \skiphere” > > which works fine. > > > > Since I usually use the

Re: [NTG-context] Math alignment question

On Thu, 22 Sep 2022, Jeong Dal via ntg-context wrote: > Dear Mikael and Hans, > > Recently, you introdued the new command “\alignhere, \breakhere, \skiphere” > which works fine. > > Since I usually use the following code that is adopted from My > Way(Mathalign.pdf), I’d like to know that

Re: [NTG-context] Math alignment problem

That was the solution, it worked! Thank you so much! /Jan-Erik > 22 sep. 2022 kl. 14:54 skrev Alexandre Christe via ntg-context > : > > Hi Jan-Erik, > > One way I came across searching the mailing list is the following: > > \starttext > > \startitemize [a,columns,joinedup] [n=3,grid=line]

[NTG-context] Math alignment question

Dear Mikael and Hans, Recently, you introdued the new command “\alignhere, \breakhere, \skiphere” which works fine. Since I usually use the following code that is adopted from My Way(Mathalign.pdf), I’d like to know that there is a way to use “\alignhere, \breakhere, \skiphere” for the case

Re: [NTG-context] Math alignment problem

Hi Jan-Erik, One way I came across searching the mailing list is the following: \starttext \startitemize [a,columns,joinedup] [n=3,grid=line] \item $ 56 + 2 \cdot 3 $ \item $ 5-(7) $ \item $ \frac{21}{7} $ \stopitemize \stoptext Could be that there is a *better* way. Le jeu. 22 sept. 2022 à

[NTG-context] Math alignment problem

Dear List!I do not know how to solve this issue.I want the formulas appear on same height, as you can se on the attachment the formula containing a fraction displaces on another vertical position compared to the other equations.How do I correct this?Code snippet pasted from

[NTG-context] math symbols

Hi, We're curious what math symbols users actually use. There are for instance all kind of variations on '<' and '>' and the quesiton is: how should we group them and are they used differently in different contexts. Traditionally tex sort of groups according to spacing related classes but

Re: [NTG-context] Math functions not typeset inside MetaPost

On 4/19/22 8:22 PM Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context wrote: > Thanks, this will be fixed in the next upload (that will take place > soon as far as I've heard). Thanks very much for the quick reply. Yes: it is fixed in the latest upload just now. Thanks, Sreeram

Re: [NTG-context] Math functions not typeset inside MetaPost

On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 3:59 PM śrīrāma via ntg-context wrote: > > Hi Hans, > > [I am sending this again since the previous mails regarding were sent during > the weekend]. > > I am on the most recent upload of LMTX [2022.04.15 20:20]. However, when I try > to use math functions inside MetaPost

[NTG-context] Math functions not typeset inside MetaPost

Hi Hans, [I am sending this again since the previous mails regarding were sent during the weekend]. I am on the most recent upload of LMTX [2022.04.15 20:20]. However, when I try to use math functions inside MetaPost strings, the function is not typeset correctly. Please consider the

Re: [NTG-context] Math prime issues for some fonts

On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 at 11:28, Hans Hagen wrote: > So to summarize: with primes we have to deal with (1) frozen tex math > expectations that won't change (although in context we're free to do > so), which (2) have found their way in unicode, and (3) also in fonts > due to the way traditional tex

Re: [NTG-context] Math prime issues for some fonts

On 11/26/2021 10:05 PM, Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context wrote: Hi Jack, I've been working with Hans on math in general and primes in particular in the last week. I do not understand all the details, but I think primes are handled differently now, and that one essentially need to have some

Re: [NTG-context] Math prime issues for some fonts

Jack Hill schrieb am 26.11.2021 um 19:53: On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 at 17:39, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Jack Hill via ntg-context schrieb am 26.11.2021 um 18:18: Hi list, When I run this test code [...] on my machine, the prime symbols are being placed too high (except for latin modern which is

Re: [NTG-context] Math prime issues for some fonts

Hi Jack, I've been working with Hans on math in general and primes in particular in the last week. I do not understand all the details, but I think primes are handled differently now, and that one essentially need to have some tuning in goodie files (the reason is that they are done differently

Re: [NTG-context] Math prime issues for some fonts

On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 at 17:39, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > > Jack Hill via ntg-context schrieb am 26.11.2021 um 18:18: > > Hi list, > > > > When I run this test code > > > > \definefontfamily[trm][math][tex gyre termes math] > > \definefontfamily[pag][math][tex gyre pagella math] > >

Re: [NTG-context] Math prime issues for some fonts

Jack Hill via ntg-context schrieb am 26.11.2021 um 18:18: Hi list, When I run this test code \definefontfamily[trm][math][tex gyre termes math] \definefontfamily[pag][math][tex gyre pagella math] \definefontfamily[bon][math][tex gyre bonum math] \definefontfamily[sch][math][tex gyre schola

[NTG-context] Math prime issues for some fonts

Hi list, When I run this test code \definefontfamily[trm][math][tex gyre termes math] \definefontfamily[pag][math][tex gyre pagella math] \definefontfamily[bon][math][tex gyre bonum math] \definefontfamily[sch][math][tex gyre schola math] \definefontfamily[stx][math][stix two math] \starttext

Re: [NTG-context] Math in LMTX and definemathcommand

On 11/17/2021 10:59 PM, Otared Kavian via ntg-context wrote: Hi Hans, Thank you for the new upload and the rewriting of the math fonts stuff, thanks also to Mikael S. I did several tests on real size math projects and did not notice important issues. you missed the multiple primes issue (a

[NTG-context] Math in LMTX and definemathcommand

Hi Hans, Thank you for the new upload and the rewriting of the math fonts stuff, thanks also to Mikael S. I did several tests on real size math projects and did not notice important issues. The two issues I noticed, show up mainly with LucidaOT, and are explained in the following example:

Re: [NTG-context] Math font tips and tricks

Sometime ago I needed some basic math in Minion and I concocted something like follows below: % latin \definefallbackfamily [mainface] [math] [Minion Pro] [preset=math:mathematicalalphanumericsymbols,force=yes] \definefallbackfamily [mainface] [math] [Minion Pro]

Re: [NTG-context] Math font tips and tricks

Hans Hagen via ntg-context schrieb am 07.11.2021 um 19:05: On 11/6/2021 11:23 AM, Alexandre Christe via ntg-context wrote: Dear all, I'd like to know how best to work with font features regarding adaptations of math fonts. For example, let's assume I'd like to use Minion Pro also for math

Re: [NTG-context] Math font tips and tricks

On 11/6/2021 11:23 AM, Alexandre Christe via ntg-context wrote: Dear all, I'd like to know how best to work with font features regarding adaptations of math fonts. For example, let's assume I'd like to use Minion Pro also for math typesetting. I've referred myself to this page of the Wiki

[NTG-context] Math font tips and tricks

Dear all, I'd like to know how best to work with font features regarding adaptations of math fonts. For example, let's assume I'd like to use Minion Pro also for math typesetting. I've referred myself to this page of the Wiki https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/definefontfallback. I have

Re: [NTG-context] Math cases

Thank you. I've updated the wiki to reflect those changes. The wiki's version of ConTeXt still seems to use the old \NC and \MC commands though. Jack ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please

Re: [NTG-context] Math cases

On Thu, 22 Jul 2021, Jack Hill wrote: > Dear list, > > I'm using ConTeXt version 2021.07.22 19:16 and the following code > typesets both columns in math mode > > \starttext > \startformula > \delta_{ij} = > \startcases > \NC 1 \NC if i = j \NR > \NC 0 \NC otherwise \NR > \stopcases >

[NTG-context] Math cases

Dear list, I'm using ConTeXt version 2021.07.22 19:16 and the following code typesets both columns in math mode \starttext \startformula \delta_{ij} = \startcases \NC 1 \NC if i = j \NR \NC 0 \NC otherwise \NR \stopcases \stopformula \stoptext The wiki states that the second column should be

[NTG-context] Math cases and text in math mode

Hi, I have two separate issues here. First, I'm struggling to get math cases to work. The wiki suggests that the following code \starttext \startformula f(x) = \startmathcases \NC x, \NC if $0 \le x \le \frac12$ \NR \NC 1-x ,\NC if $\frac12 \le x \le 1$ \NR \stopmathcases \stopformula

Re: [NTG-context] Math: Nested Cases?

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, Weber, Matthias wrote: > Hello, > > Is it possible to nest cases in math, like so: In principle, it should be. But we never tested this and I suspect that there is some macro which doesn't get initialized correctly in nested cases. > \starttext > \startformula > x= >

[NTG-context] Math: Nested Cases?

Hello, Is it possible to nest cases in math, like so: \starttext \startformula x= \startcases[align={right,left},distance=3pt] \NC a \NC = \startcases[align={right,left},distance=3pt] \NC 1 \NC \text{case a1} \NR

Re: [NTG-context] Math blackboard (bug?)

On 1/9/2021 1:31 PM, Johann Birnick wrote: To write blackboard math, the syntax was $\blackboard{N}$ , but now this also makes the rest of the text blackboard. So one has to use ${\blackboard N}$ . Is this indented? (the old way is a bit easier to use) Secondly, I want to address the

Re: [NTG-context] Math align not working

Hi Aditya, thank you very much, now I need to specify the alignment only for one "column" and it gets applied for all of them. However, there is still the problem with the standard setting of the alignment. For example, \starttext \startformula \startalign[m=2, align={right,left}] \NC ab \NC =

[NTG-context] Math blackboard (bug?)

To write blackboard math, the syntax was $\blackboard{N}$ , but now this also makes the rest of the text blackboard. So one has to use ${\blackboard N}$ . Is this indented? (the old way is a bit easier to use) Secondly, I want to address the blackboard font. Try out \starttext ${\blackboard

Re: [NTG-context] Math align not working

On Fri, 1 Jan 2021, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 1/1/2021 8:21 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > > \startformula \startalign[m=2,distance=8em,n=5, > > align={right,middle,middle,middle,left, right,middle,middle,middle,left}] > > \NC 0 \NC < \NC 2x + 5y \NC < \NC 10 > > \NC 4 \NC < \NC 3x + y \NC < \NC 9 \NR

Re: [NTG-context] Math align not working

On 1/1/2021 8:21 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: \startformula \startalign[m=2,distance=8em,n=5, align={right,middle,middle,middle,left, right,middle,middle,middle,left}] \NC 0 \NC < \NC 2x + 5y \NC < \NC 10 \NC 4 \NC < \NC 3x + y \NC < \NC 9 \NR \NC 3 \NC < \NC 2y + 3z \NC < \NC 15 \NC 10\NC < \NC 8y

Re: [NTG-context] Math align not working

On Wed, 30 Dec 2020, Johann Birnick wrote: > Okay, but I think it's a bug, because as you see in the linked pdf it worked > the > simple way some years ago... Yes, something has changed internally. Earlier, if you used: \startalign[align={right,left}, n=4] ... \stopalign then the alignment

Re: [NTG-context] Math align not working

The developers might tune in; perhaps it was changed. > On 30 Dec 2020, at 15:01, Johann Birnick wrote: > > Okay, but I think it's a bug, because as you see in the linked pdf it worked > the > simple way some years ago...

Re: [NTG-context] Math align not working

Okay, but I think it's a bug, because as you see in the linked pdf it worked the simple way some years ago... On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 14:38 +0100, Hans Åberg wrote: > One has to indicate the align pattern for all columns, otherwise it defaults > to left, it seems: > > \starttext > >

Re: [NTG-context] Math align not working

One has to indicate the align pattern for all columns, otherwise it defaults to left, it seems: \starttext \startformula \startalign[m=2,distance=8em,n=5, align={right,middle,middle,middle,left,right,middle,middle,middle,left}] \NC 0 \NC < \NC 2x + 5y \NC < \NC 10 \NC 4 \NC < \NC 3x + y \NC <

Re: [NTG-context] Math align not working

Hi Alain, I don't know what you mean by "you have two position in the second and one in the first" ? The 4 is not aligned correctly. Please see https://dl.contextgarden.net/myway/mathalign.pdf where the example comes from. The output looks different. Best regards, Johann On Wed, 2020-12-30 at

Re: [NTG-context] Math align not working

Hi Johann, The 4 is right aligned, but for this column you have two position in the second and one in the first. You could try ~4 and it will align with 10. Best regards, Alain Le 29/12/2020 à 22:27, Johann Birnick a écrit :

Re: [NTG-context] Math align not working

Hi Otared, I'm using the same version. The problem is the "right"-alignment. See the 4 on the right side. It should be right-aligned. I attached my pdf. Best regards, Johann On Tue, 2020-12-29 at 21:37 +0100, Otared Kavian wrote: > Hi Johann, > > The example you sent works fine here with LMTX

Re: [NTG-context] Math align not working

Hi Johann, The example you sent works fine here with LMTX version 2020.12.28 01:41. Which version of ConTeXt are you using ? Best regards: Otared > On 29 Dec 2020, at 14:36, Johann Birnick wrote: > > Hi there, > > I noticed that Math align is not working properly. In particular I mean the >

[NTG-context] Math align not working

Hi there, I noticed that Math align is not working properly. In particular I mean the alignment. For example, the following code \starttext \startformula \startalign[m=2,distance=8em,n=5,

Re: [NTG-context] math symbol for "is an element of"

If you happen to use ibus on a linux, there's a emoji/unicode picker , where you can type `elem` and pick one from the candidates “∈∉∊⋲⋳⋴⋵⋶⋷⋸⋹⟒⫙” . On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 21:25, wrote: > A quick question for

Re: [NTG-context] math symbol for "is an element of"

: Friday, November 6, 2020 12:10 AM To: mailing list for ConTeXt users ; t...@projectivespace.com Subject: Re: [NTG-context] math symbol for "is an element of" On 11/6/2020 12:24 AM, t...@projectivespace.com wrote: > In this particular case, as Wolfgang pointed out, \in actually does w

Re: [NTG-context] math symbol for "is an element of"

On 11/6/2020 12:24 AM, t...@projectivespace.com wrote: In this particular case, as Wolfgang pointed out, \in actually does work to get the desired symbol in math mode. But it is good to know how to use text substitutions too. WHen you are in doubt you can do this: \meaning\in it will show

Re: [NTG-context] math symbol for "is an element of"

too. Thanks, Sciurus -Original Message- From: ntg-context On Behalf Of Hans Åberg Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 12:44 PM To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Subject: Re: [NTG-context] math symbol for "is an element of" > On 5 Nov 2020, at 21:22, t...@projectivesp

Re: [NTG-context] math symbol for "is an element of"

al Message- From: Wolfgang Schuster Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 12:36 PM To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Cc: t...@projectivespace.com Subject: Re: [NTG-context] math symbol for "is an element of" t...@projectivespace.com schrieb am 05.11.2020 um 21:22: > A quick ques

Re: [NTG-context] math symbol for "is an element of"

> On 5 Nov 2020, at 21:22, t...@projectivespace.com wrote: > > Other than typing it directly (or cutting and pasting it), how does one get > the character ∈ (in case this gets garbled in emailing, this is supposed to > be the mathematical symbol that looks more or less like an epsilon, and >

Re: [NTG-context] math symbol for "is an element of"

t...@projectivespace.com schrieb am 05.11.2020 um 21:22: A quick question for the ConTeXt mailing list: Other than typing it directly (or cutting and pasting it), how does one get the character ∈ (in case this gets garbled in emailing, this is supposed to be the mathematical symbol that looks

[NTG-context] math symbol for "is an element of"

A quick question for the ConTeXt mailing list: Other than typing it directly (or cutting and pasting it), how does one get the character ∈ (in case this gets garbled in emailing, this is supposed to be the mathematical symbol that looks more or less like an epsilon, and which is the mathematical

Re: [NTG-context] Math fonts for Nimbus fonts

> On 21 Sep 2020, at 16:45, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: > > Otared Kavian schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 15:30: > […] > I don't understand your problem because you tell ConTeXt to use upright > letters (normal = upright) in math mode with the following setup. > >>

Re: [NTG-context] Math fonts for Nimbus fonts

Otared Kavian schrieb am 21.09.2020 um 15:30: Hi, I wish to use the Nimbus fonts, but since I didn't know which Math fonts is best adapted to this family, I tried several fonts such as Stix Math, TeX Gyre Math, and so on, but doing this the math-italic does not appear in these fonts: does

[NTG-context] Math fonts for Nimbus fonts

Hi, I wish to use the Nimbus fonts, but since I didn't know which Math fonts is best adapted to this family, I tried several fonts such as Stix Math, TeX Gyre Math, and so on, but doing this the math-italic does not appear in these fonts: does this mean that I have to set explicitely

[NTG-context] Math delimiters across math alignment environments

Hi dear list! I have a question about the use of delimiters. There are commands as \left ... \right which allow delimiters of variable size, but they are usually asymmetrical. AFAIK, ConTeXt has mechanisms of the form \definemathfence[something][something][command=yes]. My question is: is it

Re: [NTG-context] Math font not embedded

Hans Hagen schrieb am 18.03.2020 um 18:16: On 3/18/2020 2:35 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 3/18/20 10:51 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 3/18/2020 10:44 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: [...] fonts   > math: unset for global bodyfont mainface at 12pt that is weird .. question for Wolfgang: is

Re: [NTG-context] Math font not embedded

On 3/18/2020 2:35 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 3/18/20 10:51 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 3/18/2020 10:44 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: \definefontfamily [mainface] [rm] [DejaVu Serif] \definefontfamily [mainface] [mm] [TeX Gyre Pagella Math] \setupbodyfont[mainface] \starttext

Re: [NTG-context] Math font not embedded

On 3/18/20 10:51 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 3/18/2020 10:44 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> \definefontfamily [mainface] [rm] [DejaVu Serif] >>\definefontfamily [mainface] [mm] [TeX Gyre Pagella Math] >>\setupbodyfont[mainface] >>\starttext >>\m{\sin^2(t)^2 + \cos^2(t) = 1} >>

Re: [NTG-context] Math font not embedded

-context] Math font not embedded On 3/18/2020 11:20 AM, Jan Willem Flamma wrote:> Wiping the cache directory > (C:\data\context\tex\texmf-cache\luatex-cache\context\5fe67e0bfe781ce0dde776fb1556f32e\fonts)> > and mtxrun --script fonts --reload --force> > has not solved my issue.> >

Re: [NTG-context] Math font not embedded

On 3/18/2020 11:20 AM, Jan Willem Flamma wrote: Wiping the cache directory (C:\data\context\tex\texmf-cache\luatex-cache\context\5fe67e0bfe781ce0dde776fb1556f32e\fonts) and mtxrun --script fonts --reload --force has not solved my issue. Running Pablo’s example on a Mac and Windows machine

Re: [NTG-context] Math font not embedded

HagenSent: Wednesday, 18 March 2020 10:51To: mailing list for ConTeXt users; Pablo RodriguezSubject: Re: [NTG-context] Math font not embedded On 3/18/2020 10:44 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:> \definefontfamily [mainface] [rm] [DejaVu Serif]>    \definefontfamily [mainface] [mm] [TeX Gyre Pagell

Re: [NTG-context] Math font not embedded

On 3/18/2020 10:44 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: \definefontfamily [mainface] [rm] [DejaVu Serif] \definefontfamily [mainface] [mm] [TeX Gyre Pagella Math] \setupbodyfont[mainface] \starttext \m{\sin^2(t)^2 + \cos^2(t) = 1} \setupbodyfont[pagella] \m{\sin^2(t)^2 + \cos^2(t) = 1}

Re: [NTG-context] Math font not embedded

On 3/18/20 9:59 AM, Jan Willem Flamma wrote: > Dear list members, > > I have been running ConTeXt on a Mac for a number of years. > > I just installed ConTeXt LMTX on a new Windows machine following > instructions from the Pragma-ADE website. > > When I process the below MWE on the Windows machine

[NTG-context] Math font not embedded

Dear list members, I have been running ConTeXt on a Mac for a number of years.I just installed ConTeXt LMTX on a new Windows machine following instructions from the Pragma-ADE website. When I process the below MWE on the Windows machine the formulas are not displayed in the correct font. The log

Re: [NTG-context] math font

On 2/7/2020 3:34 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On 7. Feb 2020, at 15:14, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Does this also happen when you use \definetypeface to set the math font? \definetypeface [thomas] [mm] [math] [xits] [default] No, with this change, the warnings are gone. New syntax? Or

Re: [NTG-context] math font

> On 7. Feb 2020, at 15:14, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: > > Does this also happen when you use \definetypeface to set the math font? > > \definetypeface [thomas] [mm] [math] [xits] [default] No, with this change, the warnings are gone. New syntax? Or user error? Thomas

Re: [NTG-context] math font

On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 15:01:42 +0100 "Thomas A. Schmitz" wrote: > Hi all, > > in my environment file, I have defined a math font: > > \definefontfamily [thomas] [math] [XITS Math] > > and as far as I can see in the log file, this font is found: > > system >9:

[NTG-context] math font

Hi all, in my environment file, I have defined a math font: \definefontfamily [thomas] [math] [XITS Math] and as far as I can see in the log file, this font is found: system >9: filename=xits-math.lfg filetype=tex

Re: [NTG-context] math align broken

Dear Hans, I reinstall a new beta and test the previous file. (LuaMetaTeX: version 2.03.4, ConTeXt version: 2019.12.16 18:54, format: 2019.12.17) The problem is gone! The space in the aligned display math mode is normal. Thank you so much. Best regards, Dalyoung

Re: [NTG-context] math align broken

Dear Hans, Here is a small example which shows a strange spacing in the aligned display math mode. The same code is OK in both inline mode and just display mode, but it is not good in aligned mode. I hope that it helps your fix . Thank you. Best regards, Dalyoung % running luametatex

Re: [NTG-context] math align broken

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 3:08 PM Hans Hagen wrote: > On 12/16/2019 2:17 AM, Jeong Dal wrote: > > Dear Mikael, > > > > I also confirm your problem. > > I am using > > "ConTeXt ver: 2019.12.06 21:40 MKIV beta fmt: 2019.12.9 int: > english/english” > > > > However, if you change “\Bigl(“ to

Re: [NTG-context] math align broken

On 12/16/2019 2:17 AM, Jeong Dal wrote: Dear Mikael, I also confirm your problem. I am using "ConTeXt ver: 2019.12.06 21:40 MKIV beta fmt: 2019.12.9 int: english/english” However, if you change “\Bigl(“ to “\left(“, then the space between left parenthesis and text become narrower. I hope

Re: [NTG-context] math align broken

Dear Mikael, I also confirm your problem. I am using "ConTeXt ver: 2019.12.06 21:40 MKIV beta fmt: 2019.12.9 int: english/english” However, if you change “\Bigl(“ to “\left(“, then the space between left parenthesis and text become narrower. I hope that it will be fixed soon. Best

Re: [NTG-context] math align broken

Hi Mikael, II tested your example and can confirm the issue, using lmtx version: 2019.12.15 17:34 on MacOS. Best regards: OK > On 15 Dec 2019, at 16:54, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > > Hi, > > I hope this report is not a duplicate of another one. I updated lmtx today > (from

[NTG-context] math align broken

Hi, I hope this report is not a duplicate of another one. I updated lmtx today (from http://lmtx.pragma-ade.nl/install-lmtx/context-linux-64.zip, a fresh install in the folder), and found some strange things with math: The file %%% EXAMPLE \starttext \startformula \startalign \NC \int

Re: [NTG-context] Math symbol for inexact differential

Thanks, that is exactly what I wanted. On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:13 AM Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Like this? > > \def\dbar{\mathop{\text{\it đ}}} > > I do not know whether you want it to be \mathop or \mathord > > > On 13 Nov 2019, at 10:35, w n wrote: > > > > Can you give an example on how to

Re: [NTG-context] Math symbol for inexact differential

Like this? \def\dbar{\mathop{\text{\it đ}}} I do not know whether you want it to be \mathop or \mathord > On 13 Nov 2019, at 10:35, w n wrote: > > Can you give an example on how to use đ (U+00111) in \def\dbar{ ... } Taco Hoekwater Elvenkind BV

Re: [NTG-context] Math symbol for inexact differential

@Taco, Can you give an example on how to use đ (U+00111) in \def\dbar{ ... } Ideally I want to do \startformula d u = \dbar q + \dbar w \stopformula On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 9:40 AM Taco Hoekwater wrote: > > How about đ ? (U+00111) > > That is a character in Latin Extended-A, so most text

Re: [NTG-context] Math symbol for inexact differential

How about đ ? (U+00111) That is a character in Latin Extended-A, so most text fonts will have it (these days). > On 13 Nov 2019, at 01:59, w n wrote: > > True, I should not have used the term inexact differential. > How can I get a math symbol with a "d" and a bar across ? > > On Wed,

Re: [NTG-context] Math symbol for inexact differential

True, I should not have used the term inexact differential. How can I get a math symbol with a "d" and a bar across ? On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 1:11 AM Hans Åberg wrote: > > > On 13 Nov 2019, at 00:26, w n wrote: > > > > Working on some thermodynamics and I need a math symbol for > > an inexact

Re: [NTG-context] Math symbol for inexact differential

> On 13 Nov 2019, at 00:26, w n wrote: > > Working on some thermodynamics and I need a math symbol for > an inexact differential, it is the letter d with a bar across. Normally one is using a lowercase delta according to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inexact_differential

[NTG-context] Math symbol for inexact differential

Working on some thermodynamics and I need a math symbol for an inexact differential, it is the letter d with a bar across. Tried the following but failed \starttext \def\dbar{{\mathchar'26\mkern-12mu d}} \startformula d u = \dbar q + \dbar w \stopformula \stoptext

Re: [NTG-context] Math \not

Dear Aditya and all, > Is \nequiv defined as a binary operator when used in math Sorry not binary but binomial. 2019年9月12日(木) 22:20 Aditya Mahajan : > > char-def.lua Ah I should grep not "\nequiv" but "nequiv". Is there any document or wiki which explains math characters definition of

Re: [NTG-context] Math \not

On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, Atsuhito Kohda wrote: Dear all, \nequiv seems to work both in a math mode and in an ordinary text mode so I'd like to clarify the situation. Is \nequiv defined as a binary operator when used in math mode (that is \math{A\nequiv B})? When I grepped \nequiv in

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >