On Jun 1, 2006, at 5:52 AM, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
Hmm, no: gentoo is distro where every package is optimally
*compiled* by
your machine, and tetex version right now is 3.0_p1-r3
cheers
--
Jean
That's not quite right: if you run the stable gentoo branch, you get
version
Le 01 juin à 09:56:46 Thomas A. Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
écrit notamment:
| On Jun 1, 2006, at 5:52 AM, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
| Hmm, no: gentoo is distro where every package is optimally
| *compiled* by
| your machine, and tetex version right now is 3.0_p1-r3
|
| cheers
| --
On Jun 1, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
Yes, there has been an interesting piece of information on this point:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/38615
Thanks, that was a very interesting read! Personally, if it weren't
for the really bad tex
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Jun 1, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
Yes, there has been an interesting piece of information on this point:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/38615
Thanks, that was a very interesting read! Personally, if it weren't
Le 01 juin à 13:44:33 Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit notamment:
[...]
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/38615
Thanks, that was a very interesting read! Personally, if it weren't
for the really bad tex installation, I would favor gentoo over most
other linux
Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
Le 01 juin � 13:44:33 Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] �crit notamment:
[...]
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/38615
Thanks, that was a very interesting read! Personally, if it weren't
for the really bad tex installation, I
On 6/1/06, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Thanks, that was a very interesting read! Personally, if it weren't
for the really bad tex installation, I would favor gentoo over most
other linux distros I have tried (the new SUSE 10.1 is a disaster,
hm, i could
On Jun 1, 2006, at 3:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/1/06, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Thanks, that was a very interesting read! Personally, if it weren't
for the really bad tex installation, I would favor gentoo over most
other linux distros I have
Hi Jean,
Your example works here...
I'm not a font guru but it is maybe more interesting for you to use
type1 fonts. Depending on which linux distro you use, you have to tell
tetex to use type1. On my debian testing box, I have uncommented Map
lm.map in /etc/texmf/updmap.d/10tetex-base.cfg and
Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
Hi all,
On a fresh installed done following (very exactly)
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/TeTeX_3.0_installation,
I get the following message with this :
.
\starttext
�
\oe \a
\stoptext
.
Sorry for my first post, I have misunderstood the problem...
I have checked your example with texexec --dvi + viewing it in xdvi: no
problem at all...
The complete log to see what happened:
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/ConTeXt/temp$ texexec
Le 31 mai à 13:33:18 Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit notamment:
| Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
| Hi all,
| On a fresh installed done following (very exactly)
|
| http://wiki.contextgarden.net/TeTeX_3.0_installation,
|
| I get the following message with this :
|
Can you upload the pdf on a website (instead of the ML)?
IMHO, problems with accentuated chars can come from the use of
heterogeneous encodings (emacs unicode + context ec for example as I
experienced). Check the encoding of your input file with file
test.tex, if you get something like ISO-8859
Le 31 mai à 14:30:33 Jean Magnan de Bornier [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit notamment:
| but with the pdf option I get something unexpected:
And here's what texexec says about that:
..
Warning: pdfetex (file /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf-local/fonts/map/dvipdfm/con
There is apparently a big problem in your installation but you already
known that... I have not used
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/TeTeX_3.0_installation since I use debian
(apt-get rules). Consequently, we are on the bounds of my knowledge on
this problem...
I assume you need LaTeX (like me :( ),
On Wed, 31 May 2006 15:21:15 +0200, Jean Magnan de Bornier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 31 mai à 14:30:33 Jean Magnan de Bornier [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit
notamment:
| but with the pdf option I get something unexpected:
And here's what texexec says about that:
..
Le 31 mai à 19:09:41 nico [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit notamment:
| On Wed, 31 May 2006 15:21:15 +0200, Jean Magnan de Bornier
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Le 31 mai à 14:30:33 Jean Magnan de Bornier [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit
| notamment:
|
| | but with the pdf option I get something
I don't know well gentoo but I believe that this distro is based on
debian stable = tetex 2
Jean Magnan de Bornier a écrit :
Renaud: I looked at the page about a debian install, it should be easy to
adapt this to other distros, like gentoo for instance which has up to date
tetex versions.
Le 31 mai à 23:51:44 Renaud AUBIN [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrit notamment:
| I don't know well gentoo but I believe that this distro is based on
| debian stable = tetex 2
Hmm, no: gentoo is distro where every package is optimally *compiled* by
your machine, and tetex version right now is 3.0_p1-r3
19 matches
Mail list logo
