Dear List,
I have used TikZ and pgfplots for a few years and I am considering switching to
metapost/metafun which appears more efficient with LMTX. I have already
designed several figures with metapost/metafun and some with the help of
metaobj and I am fully satisfied with the result.
I am
> Am 29.12.2020 um 22:56 schrieb Garulfo :
>
> Which process would you advice to add « drop shadows » to any kind of metafun
> / metapost figures like:
> picture p;
> p := textext("MetaPost is fun!") shifted (10cm,10cm);
>
>
> My current understanding of
On Fri, 1 Jan 2021, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2020, Garulfo wrote:
>
> > Which process would you advice to add « drop shadows » to any kind of
> > metafun / metapost figures like:
>
> > Actually, all this seems long and tedious, and contrasts with the
On Tue, 29 Dec 2020, Garulfo wrote:
> Which process would you advice to add « drop shadows » to any kind of metafun
> / metapost figures like:
> picture p;
> p := textext("MetaPost is fun!") shifted (10cm,10cm);
>
> My current understanding of the requir
Which process would you advice to add « drop shadows » to any kind of metafun /
metapost figures like:
picture p;
p := textext("MetaPost is fun!") shifted (10cm,10cm);
My current understanding of the required steps :
1- fill p with the shadow color
2- write it to an external met
quot;,.5,red) ;
mydotlabel(textext("\switchtobodyfont[8pt]" & "B"), point 1 of p)
withcolor transparent("exclusion",.5,red) ;
\stopMPcode
\stoptext
%% end squaredot-test.tex
I get an error message, which is obscure to me, saying:
%-- begin error message
On 12/26/2020 11:28 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
When I was testing your example with freelabel in another thread, I noticed
that freedotlabel does not work in LMTX.
Here is the code from the Metafun manual which works with ConTeXt version
2020.06.25 10:55 MKIV, but not with ConTeXt
Hi Hans,
When I was testing your example with freelabel in another thread, I noticed
that freedotlabel does not work in LMTX.
Here is the code from the Metafun manual which works with ConTeXt version
2020.06.25 10:55 MKIV, but not with ConTeXt version 2020.12.24 17:30 LMTX.
%% begin
On 12/25/20 10:09 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> [...]
> \startMPcode
> path p ; p := (
> ( 1, 1) --
> ( 1, 5) --
> (10, 10) --
> (14, 4) --
> cycle) xsized .75TextWidth;
>
> draw p ;
>
> freelabel("\strut α",point 0 of p,center p) ;
>
On 12/25/2020 6:36 PM, Fabrice L wrote:
Hi,
Le 25 déc. 2020 à 12:30, Pablo Rodriguez a écrit :
Dear list,
I have this minimal MetaFun sample (the only one in my real document):
\setupbodyfont[pagella]
\starttext
\startMPcode
pair a ; a := (1, 1) ;
pair b ; b := (1, 10) ;
pair c
On 12/25/20 6:36 PM, Fabrice L wrote:
>> I have this minimal MetaFun sample (the only one in my real document):
>> [...]
>> Is there a way to relate adapt the labels to the xsized positions used?
>
> I’m sure somebody could find a more elegant solution, but
Hi,
> Le 25 déc. 2020 à 12:30, Pablo Rodriguez a écrit :
>
> Dear list,
>
> I have this minimal MetaFun sample (the only one in my real document):
>
> \setupbodyfont[pagella]
> \starttext
> \startMPcode
> pair a ; a := (1, 1) ;
> pair b ; b := (
Dear list,
I have this minimal MetaFun sample (the only one in my real document):
\setupbodyfont[pagella]
\starttext
\startMPcode
pair a ; a := (1, 1) ;
pair b ; b := (1, 10) ;
pair c ; c := (10, 10) ;
pair d ; d := (10, 1) ;
draw (a--b--c--d--a) xsized .75TextWidth;
draw
Hi,
> Le 25 déc. 2020 à 08:48, Jairo A. del Rio a écrit :
>
> Hi, list. I've got a question about paths and intersections. The following:
>
> \starttext
> \startMPpage
> path p[];
>
> p[1] = fullcircle scaled 2cm;
> p[2] = unitsquare shifted (4cm,6cm);
>
> if (known (p[1] intersectionpoint
Hi, list. I've got a question about paths and intersections. The following:
\starttext
\startMPpage
path p[];
p[1] = fullcircle scaled 2cm;
p[2] = unitsquare shifted (4cm,6cm);
if (known (p[1] intersectionpoint p[2])):
draw textext("yes");
else:
draw textext("no");
fi;
Much more lean now thanks to your feedbacks.
I prefered to "remove the shapes of the letter"
rather than doubling the shading.
Wikified https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Cover_Pages#.22Empty.22_letters
\definecolor [ColorHighA] [h=c4a000]
\definecolor [ColorHighB] [h=602217]
\definecolor
> On 24 Dec 2020, at 00:14, Garulfo wrote:
>
> Thanks Taco,
>
> I made some progress :
> https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Talk:Cover_Pages
>
> I now have two additional questions ... ;-)
>
> - How can I deal with "space" characters (because current solution
> requires to explicitly add the ~
On 12/24/2020 12:46 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Garulfo,
Thank you for sharing your nice example: it typesets correctly with mkiv, but
it seems to me that with LMTX the text does not appear (at least on my
installation of the latest LMTX).
I admit that I had to trial and error this:
r)
- What would be the work to do in order to make this mechanism directly
usable in metapost / metafun, within \startMPpage \stopMPpage,
- to avoid switching between \start\stopMPdrawing and TeX
- to have something like "draw followtext" in mp-blob.mpiv ?
Maybe pic
be the work to do in order to make this mechanism directly
> usable in metapost / metafun, within \startMPpage \stopMPpage,
> - to avoid switching between \start\stopMPdrawing and TeX
>
er to make this mechanism directly
usable in metapost / metafun, within \startMPpage \stopMPpage,
- to avoid switching between \start\stopMPdrawing and TeX
- to have something like "draw followtext&q
> On 21 Dec 2020, at 16:09, Garulfo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> * I try to "remove the paths of text" from a metapost pictures to let
> the background visible.
>
> * Using
> https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2018/thread.html#92725
>
> * I was able to get the following with one glyph
Hi,
* I try to "remove the paths of text" from a metapost pictures to let
the background visible.
* Using
https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2018/thread.html#92725
* I was able to get the following with one glyph (MVE code below)
Nice. It works again. Thank you very much!
Cordially,
Jairo
El lun., 21 de dic. de 2020 2:45 a. m., Hans Hagen
escribió:
> On 12/21/2020 4:46 AM, Jairo A. del Rio wrote:
> > While shading works with MkIV, with LMTX the following breaks:
> >
> >
> > \startMPpage
> >
> > comment("two shades
On 12/21/2020 4:46 AM, Jairo A. del Rio wrote:
While shading works with MkIV, with LMTX the following breaks:
\startMPpage
comment("two shades with named colors");
fill fullcircle scaled 5cm
withshademethod "circular"
withshadecolors ((1,0,0),(0,0,1,0))
;
fill fullcircle scaled 5cm
quot;circular"
withcolor (1,0,0,0) shadedinto "blue"
;
\stopMPpage
The log says:
metafun > log >
metafun > log > error: Unknown relation will be considered false
metafun > log >
metapost > log >
metapost > log >
metapost > log > :
meta
Hi,
it's really fun to play with ConTeXt and MetaPost / Metafun to build
posters (color, fonts, alignment, scaling, randomized geometry).
Thanks to the ConTeXt team to make it easy.
PDF:
https://salsa.debian.org/zleap-guest/libreplanet2021/-/raw/master/ConTeXt_version
PDF-viewer-specific, I'm using Chromium as the PDF viewer).
I tried doing this in two different ways: using includesvgfile with
the offset option, and using startMPcode with setbounds in the MetaFun
code. In both cases I just get blank space instead of the cut-off
content
How can I fix this?
Relate
On 12/17/20 6:45 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
> On 12/17/20 5:08 PM, Neven Sajko wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 15:27, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Can you check with a desktop pdf viewer as well.
>>
>> It looks the same with MuPDF.
>
> Hi Neven,
>
> it seems to be an issue with the
On 12/17/20 5:08 PM, Neven Sajko wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 15:27, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> [...]
>> Can you check with a desktop pdf viewer as well.
>
> It looks the same with MuPDF.
Hi Neven,
it seems to be an issue with the conversion of the SVG file.
> This is a combined TeX file
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 15:27, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> OT but can Gadfly directly produce PDFs? [...]
Yes it can. Going to try that route if this doesn't work out.
> [..] Depending on how complicated plots you want to generate, you can also
> use metapost graph module or pdfplots package for
m using Chromium as the PDF viewer).
Can you check with a desktop pdf viewer as well.
> I tried doing this in two different ways: using includesvgfile with
> the offset option, and using startMPcode with setbounds in the MetaFun
> code. In both cases I just get blank space instead of th
iewer).
I tried doing this in two different ways: using includesvgfile with
the offset option, and using startMPcode with setbounds in the MetaFun
code. In both cases I just get blank space instead of the cut-off
content
How can I fix this?
Related question: is it possible to get the MetaPost co
On 12/15/2020 9:18 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 12/15/20 8:24 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
[...]
However after running install. sh on MacOS, I still get current
version: 2020.12.10 22:26, even after removing the .tma files.> So I guess I
have to wait a little bit for the new version to be
On 12/15/20 8:24 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
> [...]
> However after running install. sh on MacOS, I still get current
> version: 2020.12.10 22:26, even after removing the .tma files.> So I guess I
> have to wait a little bit for the new version to be
> upoaded.
Hans,
I’m afraid I’m having the same
Hi Hans,
Thanks for the new upload.
With your comments, I understand that, following the discussion with Aditya,
when using the new version I should not define in Metafun a new function named
dotlabel
in order to have a square dot… Actually I called it mydotlabel in order to be
able
HagenEnvoyé le :mardi 15 décembre 2020 10:35À : mailing list for ConTeXt usersObjet :[NTG-context] upload / metafun Hi, I uploaded a new lmtx. This time some work has been done at the metafun end. At the tex end we're working on some overload protection mechanism which involves tagging many macro so
Hi,
I uploaded a new lmtx. This time some work has been done at the metafun end.
At the tex end we're working on some overload protection mechanism which
involves tagging many macro so that will take a while (most tagging is
done but checking left over cases take time).
So, I wondered if we
back in the day, I would never try to use fonts
for "drawing". Especially, math fonts, where every designer has a different
idea of what the shape should look like.
ah pictex memories ... drawing lines with cmr5 periods ...
but actually, we can define a stable font with symbols in me
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > dotlabel uses a pen to draw the dot, and I am not sure why it uses that
> > rather
> > than a path. Here is a (to me) simpler definition, where you can change the
> > shape:
>
> just look in the pdf ... in your case the dot is a n point path while
>
it not conflict with the internal definitions of dotlabel in Metafun in some other place?
Maybe it is safer for me to call it something like « dotshapelabel » ?
In general, I agree. Redefining internal macros has the advantage that your
code doesn't have to change. See, for example:
it depends a bit
On 12/10/2020 6:44 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi all,
In Metafun when representing a point I woul dlike to have some dots represented
by a square (or even by another scalable symbol): for instance in the following
I would like the dot at the point B
with the internal definitions
> of dotlabel in Metafun in some other place?
> Maybe it is safer for me to call it something like « dotshapelabel » ?
In general, I agree. Redefining internal macros has the advantage that your
code doesn't have to change. See, for example:
https://github.com/adity
Hi Aditya,
Thank you very much !
That's great indeed, you gave me an elegant solution.
One more question, in order for me to understand a little more: when defining a
new dotlabel as you do, might it not conflict with the internal definitions of
dotlabel in Metafun in some other place?
Maybe
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020, Otared Kavian wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In Metafun when representing a point I woul dlike to have some dots
> represented by a square (or even by another scalable symbol): for instance in
> the following I would like the dot at the point B to be a square:
Hi all,
In Metafun when representing a point I woul dlike to have some dots represented
by a square (or even by another scalable symbol): for instance in the following
I would like the dot at the point B to be a square:
\starttext
\startMPcode
draw (2cm,3cm) -- (3cm,5cm) ;
dotlabel(textext
On 12/9/2020 9:38 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Or just redefine shortened to accept a pair!
\startMPdefinitions
primarydef p shortened d =
reverse ( ( reverse (p enlonged -xpart paired(d)) ) enlonged -ypart
paired(d) )
enddef ;
\stopMPdefinitions
patched but then also:
primarydef p
Thanks Aditya!
One can learn a lot with your answers !
In the Metafun manual I see enlonged but I did not know to use it.
Best regards: Otared
> On 9 Dec 2020, at 21:38, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, Otared Kavian wrote:
>
>> Hi Aditya,
>>
>> Tha
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, Otared Kavian wrote:
> Hi Aditya,
>
> Thanks for the alternative method, which comes handy if one wishes to extend
> the straight line by a different amount at either end:
>
> \starttext
> \startMPcode
>z1 = (1cm,3cm) ;
>z2 = (5cm, 9cm) ;
>z3 = 1cm * dir(angle
hows how wonderful Metafun
>> is !
>
> Or, if you want to use high school algebra:
>
> \starttext
> \startMPcode
>z1 = (1cm,3cm) ;
>z2 = (5cm, 9cm) ;
>z3 = 1cm * dir(angle (z2 - z1)) shifted z2;
>draw z1 -- z3 ;
>draw z1 -- z
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, Otared Kavian wrote:
> Thanks a lot ! Indeed that does the job, which shows how wonderful Metafun is
> !
Or, if you want to use high school algebra:
\starttext
\startMPcode
z1 = (1cm,3cm) ;
z2 = (5cm, 9cm) ;
z3 = 1cm * dir(angle (z2 - z1)) shifted z2;
Hi Fabrice,
Thanks a lot ! Indeed that does the job, which shows how wonderful Metafun is !
Best regards: Otared
> On 9 Dec 2020, at 17:19, Fabrice L wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> Le 9 déc. 2020 à 10:57, Otared Kavian a écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a sil
on of the line and then compute by
> hand the coordinates of the new end points, but I think there is a simpler
> way in Metafun to do this.
The shortened operation is the solution ! See MetaFun manual section 1.18
\starttext
\startMPpage
z1 = (1cm,3cm) ;
z2 = (5cm, 9cm) ;
draw (z1--z2) shortened -1
both the end points of this segment
(that is in this example, a point before z1 and a point after z2 on the
straight line) .
Indeed it is possible to write the equation of the line and then compute by
hand the coordinates of the new end points, but I think there is a simpler way
in Metafun to do
concurrent compiling and execution),
you only need to process those snippets when something has changed and
there are ways in context to deal with that (like \typesetbuffer and
such which only processes when something changed between runs)
- containing multiple MetaFun graphics,
those don't take
ss-referenced documents,
- with embedded literate-programmed code (which needs
concurrent compiling and execution),
- containing multiple MetaFun graphics,
all based upon ConTeXt-LMTX.
"In theory", it should be possible to typeset individual "sub-documents"
(any section which is
he "pages" (which were all blank, not
> > surprisingly).
> >
> > However, on my elderly desktop from 2008, both callbacks
> > essentially cut only 6-8 seconds out of 18 seconds, for the
> > `luametatex` document, and 190 seconds, for the `luametafun`
> >
luametatex we have no c++ ... all is
> just C.)
>
> > Finally, the computational complexity of my proof engine, will be
> > comparable to MetaFun/MetaPost... which I suspect you would not
> > consider implementing in pure Lua. Some things are faster in C.
>
> Hard
we have no c++ ... all is just C.)
Finally, the computational complexity of my proof engine, will be
comparable to MetaFun/MetaPost... which I suspect you would not
consider implementing in pure Lua. Some things are faster in C.
Hard to say ... I think that the parser / expansion machinery
ly desktop from 2008, both callbacks essentially cut
only 6-8 seconds out of 18 seconds, for the `luametatex` document, and
190 seconds, for the `luametafun` document.
hm, on my 2013 laptop the luametatex manual needs 10 sec (i have all the
fonts, so that includes a bunch) and a metafun manua
rogramming approach), *and* (since I can not even
hope to prove the compilers are *correct*), there must be many
*different* compiler implementations (to show that the results are not
artefacts of one particular implementation).
Finally, the computational complexity of my proof engine, will b
backs essentially cut
only 6-8 seconds out of 18 seconds, for the `luametatex` document, and
190 seconds, for the `luametafun` document.
In the case of the `luametafun` document, it is the MetaFun/MetaPost
processing which, of course, is taking a long time (as it should, the
graphics comput
Thanks Taco!
I understand much better now. I think it's best to leave the units out
until the drawing stage as you suggest.
Thanks again
Keith McKay
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020, 08:30 Taco Hoekwater, wrote:
>
>
> > On 26 Nov 2020, at 16:09, Keith McKay wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been using
> On 26 Nov 2020, at 16:09, Keith McKay wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been using xpart and ypart to extract these values from pairs of
> points in a path but I wasn't getting the correct result. I was expecting:
>
> pair (2cm, 11cm) to give xpart 2 and ypart 11
As explained by various people,
/First « //uniformdeviate(1) - 0.5// » could be modified to «
//uniformdeviate(0.5)//»./
/
/
/To add noise, you can use the randomized function of Metafun. For
exemple, you can write:/
/
/
/draw pp randomized 1cm ;/
/
/
That's true Fabrice but in this use case I wanted a random number
between
e xpart 2 and ypart 11
However I was getting:
pair (2cm, 11cm) -> xpart 56.6929 and ypart 311.8096
After much head scratching and reading the MetaPost and MetaFun
manuals, I realised that the units of xpart or ypart are in
Postcript points or Big Points (bp), and 1 bp is 1/72 of an inch,
and
hanks
> Keith McKay
First « uniformdeviate(1) - 0.5 » could be modified to « uniformdeviate(0.5)».
To add noise, you can use the randomized function of Metafun. For exemple, you
can write:
draw pp randomized 1cm ;
Fabrice.
>
> On 26/11/2020 15:19, Fabrice L wrote:
>> Hi keith,
>
of points in a path but I wasn't getting the correct result. I was
expecting:
pair (2cm, 11cm) to give xpart 2 and ypart 11
However I was getting:
pair (2cm, 11cm) -> xpart 56.6929 and ypart 311.8096
After much head scratching and reading the MetaPost and MetaFun
manuals, I realised that the un
result. I was
expecting:
pair (2cm, 11cm) to give xpart 2 and ypart 11
However I was getting:
pair (2cm, 11cm) -> xpart 56.6929 and ypart 311.8096
After much head scratching and reading the MetaPost and MetaFun
manuals, I realised that the units of xpart or ypart are in Postcript
points or Bi
art 56.6929 and ypart 311.8096
After much head scratching and reading the MetaPost and MetaFun manuals,
I realised that the units of xpart or ypart are in Postcript points or
Big Points (bp), and 1 bp is 1/72 of an inch, and thus to get the values
of xpart or ypart in cm I would have to
ypart 11
>
> However I was getting:
>
> pair (2cm, 11cm) -> xpart 56.6929 and ypart 311.8096
>
> After much head scratching and reading the MetaPost and MetaFun manuals, I
> realised that the units of xpart or ypart are in Postcript points or Big
> Points (bp), and 1 bp is 1
ead scratching and reading the MetaPost and MetaFun manuals,
I realised that the units of xpart or ypart are in Postcript points or
Big Points (bp), and 1 bp is 1/72 of an inch, and thus to get the values
of xpart or ypart in cm I would have to use a correction factor. I had
made the assumpt
On 11/25/2020 10:12 AM, Giulio Bertellini wrote:
Great. Made a clean install from scratch and now metafun manual compiles
great at first run:
mkiv lua stats > used engine:*luametatex version: 2.0803, functionality
level: 20201123*, format id: 547, compiler: gcc
mkiv lua stats &g
Great. Made a clean install from scratch and now metafun manual compiles
great at first run:
mkiv lua stats > used engine:* luametatex version: 2.0803, functionality
level: 20201123*, format id: 547, compiler: gcc
mkiv lua stats > tex properties: 740024 hash slots used of 2097152,
appro
Dear All
Unable to compile metafun manual with current release of LMTX for linux
X86_64 and RPI 4 (both Raspberry PI OS 32 bit and Manjaro Linux ARM 64).
engine: luametatex version: 2.0802, functionality level: 20201118
tex error > tex error on line 240 in file metafun-positioning.
> On 18 Nov 2020, at 13:28, Rik Kabel wrote:
>
>
> On 11/18/2020 08:11, Bruce Horrocks wrote:
>> Just working through the Metafun manual and have hit a problem. In the
>> following MWE the green circle appears but the blue one doesn't. Surely
>> reusable gra
On 11/18/2020 08:11, Bruce Horrocks wrote:
Just working through the Metafun manual and have hit a problem. In the
following MWE the green circle appears but the blue one doesn't. Surely
reusable graphics must be so commonly used that it has to be me that's doing
something wrong?
(Context
Just working through the Metafun manual and have hit a problem. In the
following MWE the green circle appears but the blue one doesn't. Surely
reusable graphics must be so commonly used that it has to be me that's doing
something wrong?
(Context version is: 2020.11.05 23:01)
\starttext
Jairo :)
El lun., 9 de nov. de 2020 a la(s) 16:59, Sylvain Hubert (
champign...@gmail.com) escribió:
> Dear List,
>
> I'm trying to embed a metapost image into the document. According the MetaFun
> manual <http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/metafun-p.pdf>
Dear List,
I'm trying to embed a metapost image into the document. According the MetaFun
manual <http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/metafun-p.pdf>,
"embedding such a graphic is done by:
\externalfigure[graphic.123][width=4cm]", but the following example
produc
Oh, cool. I've found some info in the Metafun manual too. I should read
more carefully next time.
Thank you very much!
Jairo :)
El mar., 3 de nov. de 2020 a la(s) 07:29, Hans Hagen (j.ha...@xs4all.nl)
escribió:
> On 11/3/2020 12:59 PM, Jairo A. del Rio wrote:
> > Hi everyone. I wan
On 11/3/2020 12:59 PM, Jairo A. del Rio wrote:
Hi everyone. I want to know if nowadays (2020) Metafun is able to do an
actual unfill, like above:
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/151068/how-can-i-fill-a-complex-path-with-metapost-metafun/218718#218718
Example of what I want to do
Hi everyone. I want to know if nowadays (2020) Metafun is able to do an
actual unfill, like above:
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/151068/how-can-i-fill-a-complex-path-with-metapost-metafun/218718#218718
Example of what I want to do:
\startMPpage
path A, B, C;
A := unitcircle shifted
On 18.10.20 22:59, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Hi juh,
>
>> Am 16.10.2020 um 15:34 schrieb Jan U. Hasecke :
>>
>> as I'll need to make some business charts in the near future I had a
>> look into metafun xl.
>
> you might like the new charts module by Tamar
Hi juh,
> Am 16.10.2020 um 15:34 schrieb Jan U. Hasecke :
>
> as I'll need to make some business charts in the near future I had a
> look into metafun xl.
you might like the new charts module by Tamara Kocurová & Adriana Kašparová.
Download: https://akela.mendelu.cz/~thala/st
On 10/16/2020 3:34 PM, Jan U. Hasecke wrote:
Hi,
as I'll need to make some business charts in the near future I had a
look into metafun xl.
Here is the first example:
\startMPcode
draw lmt_chart_circle [
samples
= { { 1, 4, 3, 2, 5, 7, 6 } },
percentage = true,
trace
= true,
] ;
\stopMPcode
Hi,
as I'll need to make some business charts in the near future I had a
look into metafun xl.
Here is the first example:
\startMPcode
draw lmt_chart_circle [
samples
= { { 1, 4, 3, 2, 5, 7, 6 } },
percentage = true,
trace
= true,
] ;
\stopMPcode
How can I change the colors used
Thank you Hans, this is exactly what I need. I will wikify the examples. Kind regards,Jan Willem Flamma From: Hans HagenSent: Friday, 4 September 2020 15:09To: mailing list for ConTeXt users; Jan Willem FlammaSubject: Re: [NTG-context] Combining modes and MetaFun On 9/4/2020 2:20 PM, Jan Willem
On 9/4/2020 2:20 PM, Jan Willem Flamma wrote:
Dear list members,
Is it possible to combine modes and MetaFun?
In the below MWE, the \doifmode construction does not work.
Kind regards,
Jan Willem Flamma
===
\enablemode[en]
%\enablemode[nl]
\starttext
\startbuffer[square]
u := 2cm
Dear list members, Is it possible to combine modes and MetaFun? In the below MWE, the \doifmode construction does not work. Kind regards,Jan Willem Flamma ===\enablemode[en]%\enablemode[nl] \starttext \startbuffer[square] u := 2cm ; draw unitsquare scaled u ; drawdblarrow (0,-0.2u)..(u
middle and right alignment.
\define[2]\MemoirChapter
{\midaligned{\startoverlay
{#1}
{#2}
\stopoverlay}}
Julian
On 17/8/20 4:54 pm, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020, jbf wrote:
Am completely new to using Metafun, which I presume I would need to use
to achieve
>
> On 17/8/20 4:54 pm, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2020, jbf wrote:
>>
>>> Am completely new to using Metafun, which I presume I would need to use
>>> to achieve a Hansen Memoir-style Chapter heading (chapter title
>>> overlayed on a large l
/8/20 4:54 pm, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020, jbf wrote:
Am completely new to using Metafun, which I presume I would need to use
to achieve a Hansen Memoir-style Chapter heading (chapter title
overlayed on a large lightgray number). Of course, I am assuming I would
need to use Metafun
wrote:
Am completely new to using Metafun, which I presume I would need to use
to achieve a Hansen Memoir-style Chapter heading (chapter title
overlayed on a large lightgray number). Of course, I am assuming I would
need to use Metafun to create this...
So my first question is to ask if I could
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020, jbf wrote:
> Am completely new to using Metafun, which I presume I would need to use
> to achieve a Hansen Memoir-style Chapter heading (chapter title
> overlayed on a large lightgray number). Of course, I am assuming I would
> need to use Metafun to create thi
Am completely new to using Metafun, which I presume I would need to use
to achieve a Hansen Memoir-style Chapter heading (chapter title
overlayed on a large lightgray number). Of course, I am assuming I would
need to use Metafun to create this...
So my first question is to ask if I could
y
> >
> > draw unitsquare scaled 1cm shifted (xcm, ycm);
> >
> > Page 11 of the manual metafun-p.pdf is your friend here. My recent
> conversation with Taco on this list will be usefull as well.
>
> Also:
>
> \starttext
> \startMPpage
> % puts the cente
> On 16 Aug 2020, at 21:09, Keith McKay wrote:
>
> Jairo
>
> Try
>
> draw unitsquare scaled 1cm shifted (xcm, ycm);
>
> Page 11 of the manual metafun-p.pdf is your friend here. My recent
> conversation with Taco on this list will be usefull as well.
Also:
Jairo
Try
draw unitsquare scaled 1cm shifted (xcm, ycm);
Page 11 of the manual metafun-p.pdf is your friend here. My recent
conversation with Taco on this list will be usefull as well.
Best Wishes
Keith
On 16/08/2020 18:06, Jairo A. del Rio wrote:
Hi list! A simple question
Hi list! A simple question: is there an equivalent of thetextext for a
normal picture (an "image(draw ... ;)")? I want to move the center of a
picture to an specific point, like this:
\startMPpage
draw thetextext("\tttf hello", origin) ;
draw unitsquare scaled 1cm;
\stopMPpage
The "hello" is
401 - 500 of 2634 matches
Mail list logo
