Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
Hi Taco,
Ok your hack works for small files but in my larger work this is causing TeX's
capacity to overload (indeed, I don't think I've run into this particular
overload message before; does the `255' signify some ceiling here?):
The definition is not recursive, but it
Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
I placed your definition in a \start-\stopenvironment file. The \inmargins are
in \product files each of which calls the environment file in its preamble. If
I compile just one product (say the second \product from the project), there
appears to be no problem. But if I
Hi Taco and all,
More on \inmargin and overfull boxes: If I define, e.g. a quote \start-stop
the overfull boxes come back, even with Taco's definition:
==
\setupoutput[pdftex]%
\setupindenting[medium]
\let\normalinmargin\inmargin
Hello !
I tried to install a new version of context, since somebody suggest to
do it (BTW I do not know how know what version of context I have
... running texexec --version gives me the version of texexec, I
presume, not the version of context ... but anyway ... that not my
sole problem, as for
Hi Taco and all,
I found a temporary solution: Given a \start-\stopnarrower environment like
===
\definestartstop
[quote]
[before={\startnarrower[1*middle]\blank[big]},
after={\stopnarrower\blank[big]}]
CORRECTION: should be
===
\let\normalinmargin\inmargin
\def\inmargin#1{{\parindent0pt \normalinmargin{#1}}}
\def\INMARGIN#1{{\advance\leftskip by -2\parindent
\inmargin{#1}
\advance\rightskip by -2\parindent}}
Hi Taco!
You suggestion would give a publication list, where the
first author is printed and everything else is substitued
by et~al., right?
I would like to be able to do the following. I have several
bib-entries, which only one author and and others as the
second one. I also have entries, where
Michael Fuchs wrote:
I want to create a publication list, where to all
(to a certain limit) authors a printed individually and the
the ones given by and others produce an et~al. entry in
the list. Is that possible?
Sorry, but that is not possible (and not likely to be added either).
Greetings,
On Saturday 07 May 2005 06:01 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello !
I tried to install a new version of context, since somebody suggest to
do it (BTW I do not know how know what version of context I have
... running texexec --version gives me the version of texexec, I
presume, not the version
