[NTG-context] Limit of the size of the email message is 100KB.

Hi all, the ml has (as always as far as I can remember) the limit of 100KB for the maximum size of the message. I have noticed that lately several messages are over the limit, and all I can do is write to the sender and discard the message, and this could happen a couple of days later the

[NTG-context] Re: Looking for itemize help

On 15 Jan 2024, at 16:15, Jim wrote: > > I would like > something which automagically "does the right thing". Not pretty, but... :-) \setupwhitespace [big] \setuppapersize [letter] \define[1]\mystopitemize{\stopitemize\doifsamestringelse{#1}{\par}{\blank}{#1}} \starttext This is a short

[NTG-context] Re: issue with fonts in current latest (2024.01.08 11:23)

Am 15.01.24 um 21:43 schrieb Mikael Sundqvist: Try this: \definebodyfontenvironment[16pt] Yes, works. Hraban ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist :

[NTG-context] Re: issue with fonts in current latest (2024.01.08 11:23)

Hi, Try this: On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 6:17 PM Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context wrote: > > Dear list, > > I have the following sample: > > \definefontfamily[mainface][rm][TeX Gyre Pagella] > \definefontfamily[coverface][rm][TeX Gyre Termes] \definebodyfontenvironment[16pt] >

[NTG-context] Re: Looking for itemize help

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 20:33 (+0100), Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > Am 15.01.24 um 17:15 schrieb Jim: >> "after" does the trick, but not in an automatic way. I would like >> something which automagically "does the right thing". > With “automagically”, do you mean for all instances? I hate to

[NTG-context] Re: Looking for itemize help

Am 15.01.24 um 17:15 schrieb Jim: "after" does the trick, but not in an automatic way. I would like something which automagically "does the right thing". With “automagically”, do you mean for all instances? \setupitemgroup[itemize][nowhite,after] Sorry, then you need "nowhite". Usually

[NTG-context] Re: issue with fonts in current latest (2024.01.08 11:23)

Am 15.01.24 um 18:16 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context: I guess there might be an issue here. Could anyone confirm this? Yes, same beta from last week (2024.01.08). No error in the console output. mkiv lua stats > loaded fonts: 4 files: latinmodernmath-companion.otf,

[NTG-context] Named characters

Hi all, not a complaint, just a question (for Hans and Wolfgang, I guess): in recent versions of lmtx, Greek named characters (constructs such as \greekdasiatonos) don't work any more. Which means I have to adapt some of my older macros. Is this an oversight or did they get axed? All best

[NTG-context] Re: Looking for itemize help

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 17:39 (+0100), Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > Jim schrieb am 15.01.2024 um 01:42: >> I have >> \setupwhitespace [big] >> so that I get "a blank line" between paragraphs. >> I would like to *not* have "blank lines" before and after my items. For >> example, if there is more

[NTG-context] issue with fonts in current latest (2024.01.08 11:23)

Dear list, I have the following sample: \definefontfamily[mainface][rm][TeX Gyre Pagella] \definefontfamily[coverface][rm][TeX Gyre Termes] \setupbodyfont[mainface, 16pt] \starttext \startmakeup[standard][style=\bf] \switchtobodyfont[coverface] This is a cover. \stopmakeup

[NTG-context] too large dimension in current latest

Hi Hans, after updating to current latest (2024.01.08 11:23), I get the following error. This is triggered when compiling XML sources (with extra environment files), so it is not easy to get a minimal sample file. I wonder whehter the message itself could reveal what may be wrong here. Many

[NTG-context] Re: Looking for itemize help

Jim schrieb am 15.01.2024 um 01:42: I have \setupwhitespace [big] so that I get "a blank line" between paragraphs. I would like to *not* have "blank lines" before and after my items. For example, if there is more "paragraph text" after the last item I would like to see this structure:

[NTG-context] Re: [External] Re: Looking for itemize help

Hi Michael, thanks for getting back. But the problem is not the text in front of the items, but rather vertical whitespace that I don't want. (Or, with 'nowhite', vertical space that I might want not being there.) Cheers. Jim On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 15:51

[NTG-context] Re: Looking for itemize help

Two replies in one... On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 15:47 (+0100), Aditya Mahajan wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jan 2024, Jim wrote: >> Thoughts? > \startitemize[nowhite, after] > . . . > \stopitemize > See: https://adityam.github.io/context-blog/post/spacing-in-itemize/ Aditya, thanks for the

[NTG-context] Re: [External] Re: Looking for itemize help

Hi Jim, I think you want alternative “a”, if the dot instead of a letter is the problem and not the whitespace: %% \starttext This is a short paragraph. This is a line before a {\bf packed, joinedup} itemization. \startitemize[a,packed,joinedup] \item First item. \item Second item.

[NTG-context] Re: Linebreak in formual

Thanks a lot, Aditya. On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 8:41 PM Aditya Mahajan wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jan 2024, Mikael Sundqvist wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > you can try something like > > > > \sum_{\mstack{k=0, k\equiv p + 1 (\mtext{mod }2)}}^{p -1} > > > > but it will not be too pretty with such a large

[NTG-context] OT: special ToC

I came across a table of contents style that’s hardly possible with TeX: https://historians.social/@dbellingradt/111760591144801241 (image is too big for the ML) (Yes of course you can do it with manual references and MetaPost lines…) ;D

[NTG-context] Re: Looking for itemize help

Am 15.01.24 um 15:36 schrieb Jim: \startitemize[packed,joinedup] should be the right combination. I won't argue about "should", but I will point out it isn't, at least on my computer with a recently updated context. Here is a non-minimal but short non-working example. Sorry, then you need

[NTG-context] Re: Linebreak in formual

On Mon, 15 Jan 2024, Mikael Sundqvist wrote: > Hi, > > you can try something like > > \sum_{\mstack{k=0, k\equiv p + 1 (\mtext{mod }2)}}^{p -1} > > but it will not be too pretty with such a large sub-index to the sum. There is also \sum_{\startsubstack \NC a \NR \NC b \NR \stopsubstack}

[NTG-context] Re: Looking for itemize help

On Mon, 15 Jan 2024, Jim wrote: > Thoughts? \startitemize[nowhite, after] . . . \stopitemize See: https://adityam.github.io/context-blog/post/spacing-in-itemize/ Aditya ___ If your question is of interest to

[NTG-context] Re: Looking for itemize help

Hi Hraban, thanks for your response. But... On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 08:17 (+0100), Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > Am 15.01.24 um 01:42 schrieb Jim: >> Some text preceding the list of items: >> a. Item one. >> b. Second item. >> This sentence is part of the same paragraph. >> The next paragraph

[NTG-context] Re: Linebreak in formual

It works nicely. You are a lifesaver. Thanks a lot. On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 7:30 PM Mikael Sundqvist wrote: > Hi, > > you can try something like > > \sum_{\mstack{k=0, k\equiv p + 1 (\mtext{mod }2)}}^{p -1} > > but it will not be too pretty with such a large sub-index to the sum. > > /Mikael >

[NTG-context] Re: Linebreak in formual

Hi, you can try something like \sum_{\mstack{k=0, k\equiv p + 1 (\mtext{mod }2)}}^{p -1} but it will not be too pretty with such a large sub-index to the sum. /Mikael On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 2:41 PM Shiv Shankar Dayal wrote: > > I have following formula > \sum_{k=0\\ k\equiv p +

[NTG-context] Re: Spacing problem in formula

Am 15.01.24 um 13:21 schrieb Hans Hagen: On 1/15/2024 8:00 AM, Shiv Shankar Dayal wrote: Thanks a lot Mikael. in addition: in context lmtx {} are grouping symbols not (ordinary) empty atoms Only in math, or generally? \startquotation {}[…] Here I need the empty group, otherwise the

[NTG-context] Linebreak in formual

I have following formula \sum_{k=0\\ k\equiv p + 1(\mathrm{mod}\;2)}^{p -1} but the \\ does not break the line below Sigma. How can I achieve this because AFAIK it will work in LaTeX? -- Respect, Shiv Shankar Dayal

[NTG-context] Re: Spacing problem in formula

On 1/15/2024 8:00 AM, Shiv Shankar Dayal wrote: Thanks a lot Mikael. in addition: in context lmtx {} are grouping symbols not (ordinary) empty atoms On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 12:24 PM Mikael Sundqvist > wrote: Hi, ConTeXt supports prescripts: