}
\startformula
c^2 = a^2 + b^2.
\stopformula
\framed{ok}
\subject{math - subformula}
Expected formular numbers: (2a) and (2b):
\startsubformulas[eq:1]
\placeformula[eq:first]
\startformula
PM \xrightarrow R_{PM} \xrightarrow PM
\stopformula
\placeformula[eq:second]
\startformula
R_{PM} = \{ K, F, Z
\startsubformulas[eq:ax=b]
\placeformula
\startformula
\startalign[n=3]
\NC A x\NC = b,\NR[eq:example-one][a]
\NC A x\NC = b,\NR[eq:example-two][a]
\stopalign
\stopformula
\stopsubformulas
\stoptext
%%% MINIMAL EXAMPLE %%%
Am Dec 16, 2012 um 8:16 PM schrieb Zenlima p...@zenlima.eu:
Hi,
I am
leaded me to confusion in the past, I
worked out a suggestion for a more intuitive syntax for formula
numbering.
In sum it ends with:
All three commands:
\NR
\placeformula
\formualanumber
will share the same attributes:
* sublevel (maybe better: formulalevel
E
? You want to edit file Terms_and_Concepts/Terms_and_Concepts.tex at
line 69
Here is the suspect file:
https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~avaneya/avaneya/trunk/view/head:/Documentation/Contributors/Handbook/Terms_and_Concepts/Terms_and_Concepts.tex
\placeformula[formula:Limit
the behaviour.
Any ideas for a quick fix?!
Thanks,
Andreas
ConTeXt ver: 2012.11.23 17:35 MKIV
minimal example
\setuphead[subsection][number=no]
\starttext
\chapter{First Chapter}
\section{First Section}
\placeformula
\startformula
Ax=b % as expected: (1.1)
\stopformula
commands.
minimal example
\setuphead[subsection][number=no]
\starttext
\chapter{First Chapter}
\section{First Section}
\placeformula
\startformula
Ax=b % as expected: (1.1)
\stopformula
\subsection{First Subsection}
\subsubject{First Subsection} %% = like so
]
...
In addition, the following formula does not typeset correctly. There is
no arrow linking 't' to infinity symbol:
\placeformula[formula:Limit of Verhulst equation]
\startformula
\math{\lim_{t\to\infty} P(t) = K.\,}
\stopformula
Works for me (Version 2012.11.23).
It's probably
symbol:
\placeformula[formula:Limit of Verhulst equation]
\startformula
\math{\lim_{t\to\infty} P(t) = K.\,}
\stopformula
Works for me (Version 2012.11.23).
It's probably the font I am using.
BTW: Why do you use \math inside of \startformula because it’s the command
for inline math
Am 25.11.2012 um 02:13 schrieb Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com:
Hey list,
I am trying to typeset the Verhulst equation which contains a Euler
constant which I cannot get to display correctly:
\placeformula[formula:Verhulst equation]
\startformula
\math{P(t) = \frac{K P_0 \Eulerconst^{rt
?
In addition, the following formula does not typeset correctly. There is
no arrow linking 't' to infinity symbol:
\placeformula[formula:Limit of Verhulst equation]
\startformula
\math{\lim_{t\to\infty} P(t) = K.\,}
\stopformula
Works for me (Version 2012.11.23).
It's probably
:
\placeformula[formula:Limit of Verhulst equation]
\startformula
\math{\lim_{t\to\infty} P(t) = K.\,}
\stopformula
Works for me (Version 2012.11.23).
It's probably the font I am using.
BTW: Why do you use \math inside of \startformula because it’s the command
for inline math in normal
:
\placeformula[formula:Limit of Verhulst equation]
\startformula
\math{\lim_{t\to\infty} P(t) = K.\,}
\stopformula
Works for me (Version 2012.11.23).
It's probably the font I am using.
BTW: Why do you use \math inside of \startformula because it’s the command
for inline math in normal
Hey list,
I am trying to typeset the Verhulst equation which contains a Euler
constant which I cannot get to display correctly:
\placeformula[formula:Verhulst equation]
\startformula
\math{P(t) = \frac{K P_0 \Eulerconst^{rt}}
{K + P_0(\Eulerconst^{r t} - 1)}}
\stopformula
)` in a document with three
\placefigures and one \placeformula. Note the reference in
T.cached.1.references.reference, and the caption in
T.cached.1.titledata.title (T stands for the table yone passed to
showtables); and note how the tables of figures 2 and 3 are not
printed, because they follow the same
).
The excerpt is from the output of
`userdata.showtable(structures.lists)` in a document with three
\placefigures and one \placeformula. Note the reference in
T.cached.1.references.reference, and the caption in
T.cached.1.titledata.title (T stands for the table yone passed to
showtables); and note how
of the problem:
\usemodule[annotation]
\setupformulae[way=bychapter,prefixsegments=chapter,prefixstopper=.]
\starttext
\chapter{A chapter}
\section{A section}
\placeformula[OK]
\startformula
a+b=c
\stopformula
In \in[OK] we noticed blabla ...
\stoptext
Another problem is that \smash seems
, there is no chapter
number at all in the \in[...] reference!
A minimal example of the problem:
\usemodule[annotation]
\setupformulae[way=bychapter,prefixsegments=chapter,prefixstopper=.]
\starttext
\chapter{A chapter}
\section{A section}
\placeformula[OK]
\startformula
a+b=c
On 18-8-2012 21:04, Andreas Mang wrote:
\startsubformulas[eq:ax=b]
\placeformula
\startformula \startalign
\NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[+][a]
\NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[+][b]
\stopalign \stopformula
\stoptext
You can put this in cont-new.mkiv (after \unprotect):
\def
the
following alternative, which used to work but now gives me an error with the
latest beta (ConTeXt ver: 2012.08.16 22:20 MKIV fmt: 2012.8.18):
% start example
% the following used to work in an earlier version
\startsubformulas[eq:ax=b]
\placeformula
\startformula
:20 MKIV fmt: 2012.8.18):
% start example
% the following used to work in an earlier version
\startsubformulas[eq:ax=b]
\placeformula
\startformula \startalign
\NC a_1 x + b_1 y \NC = c_1 \NR[+][a]
\NC a_2 x + b_2 y \NC = c_2 \NR[+][b]
\stopalign \stopformula
Hi,
please have a look at this minimal example below:
you'll find three formulas (1), (4), (5)
What happen to (2) and (3)?
Steffen
...
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula a+b=c \stopformula
\bTABLE[frame=on,align=right,width=fit,style={\switchtobodyfont[9pt]}]
\bTR
\bTD[width=35mm
Am 12.08.2012 um 21:48 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de:
Hi,
please have a look at this minimal example below:
you'll find three formulas (1), (4), (5)
What happen to (2) and (3)?
Steffen
...
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula a+b=c \stopformula
\placeformula \startformula a+b=c \stopformula
\bTABLE[frame=on,align=right,width=fit,style={\switchtobodyfont[9pt]}]
\bTR
\bTD[width=35mm]
\placeformula
\startformula c-a=b
\stopformula
\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\placeformula \startformula c-b=a \stopformula
\stoptext
It’s a bug
), (5)
What happen to (2) and (3)?
Steffen
...
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula a+b=c \stopformula
\bTABLE[frame=on,align=right,width=fit,style={\switchtobodyfont[9pt]}]
\bTR
\bTD[width=35mm]
\placeformula
\startformula c-a=b
\stopformula
\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
at this minimal example below:
you'll find three formulas (1), (4), (5)
What happen to (2) and (3)?
Steffen
...
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula a+b=c \stopformula
\bTABLE[frame=on,align=right,width=fit,style={\switchtobodyfont[9pt]}]
\bTR
\bTD[width=35mm]
\placeformula
On 12-8-2012 22:10, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 12.08.2012 um 21:48 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de:
Hi,
please have a look at this minimal example below:
you'll find three formulas (1), (4), (5)
What happen to (2) and (3)?
Steffen
...
\starttext
\placeformula
---
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula[9pt]
I=\big\{\lambda u(x_0-\pi^H K)+(1-\lambda)[\pi^L u(x_0-K+(1-\pi^L)Z_{L'})
+(1-\pi^L)u(x_0-\pi^L Z_{L'})]\big\}-\big\{\pi^U u(x_0-K+(1-\pi^U)Z_{U'})
+(1-\pi^U)u(x_0-\pi^U Z_{U'})\big\}.
\stopformula
\defineframedtext
[defbackground]
[width=10cm,
frame
that don't work)
Thanks,
Steffen
---
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula[9pt]
I=\big\{\lambda u(x_0-\pi^H K)+(1-\lambda)[\pi^L u(x_0-K+(1-\pi^L)Z_{L'})
+(1-\pi^L)u(x_0-\pi^L Z_{L'})]\big\}-\big\{\pi^U u(x_0-K+(1-\pi^U)Z_{U'})
+(1-\pi^U)u(x_0-\pi^U Z_{U'})\big\}.
\stopformula
\defineframedtext
... is there a handy solution?
(Below are examples that don't work)
Thanks,
Steffen
---
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula[9pt]
I=\big\{\lambda u(x_0-\pi^H K)+(1-\lambda)[\pi^L u(x_0-K+(1-\pi^L)Z_{L'})
+(1-\pi^L)u(x_0-\pi^L Z_{L'})]\big\}-\big\{\pi^U u(x_0-K+(1-\pi^U)Z_{U'})
+(1
Now \eqaligno crashes. Please, can this be repaired. It is so common a macro
that I cannot complete my work without.
Minimal example:
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
\eqalignno{
x = j\cr
x = j\cr
}
\stopformula
\stoptext
! Undefined control sequence.
\eqalignno
On 2012-07-22, at 1:27 PM, Meer, H. van der h.vanderm...@uva.nl wrote:
Now \eqaligno crashes. Please, can this be repaired. It is so common a macro
that I cannot complete my work without.
Minimal example:
\starttext
\placeformula\startformula
\eqalignno{
x = j\cr
x = j\cr
The space around formula with \placeformula is a bit too large to my taste,
even in the case of \setupformulae[spaceafter=small]. Because setting this to
0pt didn't make much difference, I had to resort to spaceafter=-1ex. Why is
there seemingly always such a large space around the formula? Why
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Meer, H. van der h.vanderm...@uva.nlwrote:
The space around formula with \placeformula is a bit too large to my
taste, even in the case of \setupformulae[spaceafter=small]. Because
setting this to 0pt didn't make much difference, I had to resort
. (It has been commented out below in case you want to test
that too.
Best regards,
Prash
%\setupformulas[align=right]
\starttext
\placeformula[eq:ate-intr]
\startformula
\text{Jane slept.}
\stopformula
\startfloatcombination [2*1]
\placetable[force][tab:eq1]{Sentence 1}{
\bTABLE
On 2-6-2012 22:39, Kip Warner wrote:
\starttext
\placeformula[reaction:Sabatier Reaction]
\startformula
\inlinechemical{CO_2,+,4H_2,-,CH_4,+,2H_2O,+,heat}
\stopformula
\stoptext
fixed in next upload.
If you're in a hurry you can change this in chem-str.mkiv:
\unexpanded\def\chemicalsymbol[#1
Hey list,
The following minimal does not appear to typeset the reaction properly
in 2012.05.30.
\starttext
\placeformula[reaction:Sabatier Reaction]
\startformula
\inlinechemical{CO_2,+,4H_2,-,CH_4,+,2H_2O,+,heat}
\stopformula
\stoptext
But maybe I am not doing something right.
--
Kip Warner
,Romannumerals,numbers,character][numbers]
\setupheads[sectionconversionset=CCS]
\starttext
\chapter{Lorem}
\section{Ipsum}
\placeformula[f1] % The formula is numbered (1.1) instead of (A.1)
\startformula
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
\stopformula
\section{Dolor}
The famous formula \in[f1] % The reference
example
\definestructureconversionset[CCS][numbers,Character,Romannumerals,numbers,character][numbers]
\setupheads[sectionconversionset=CCS]
\starttext
\chapter{Lorem}
\section{Ipsum}
\placeformula[f1] % The formula is numbered (1.1) instead of (A.1)
\startformula
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
Hi Hans,
I updated to the beta (2012.01.24) and doing my usual test suites, I
encountered two bugs: one is with \placeformula, another with \int.
My minimal test with mkiv is:
\starttext
Here is a well-known identity due to Leonhard Euler in which the five most
important numbers appear
On 24-1-2012 14:15, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
I updated to the beta (2012.01.24) and doing my usual test suites, I
encountered two bugs: one is with \placeformula, another with \int.
My minimal test with mkiv is:
fixed
? E
You want to edit file Source/Terms_and_Concepts/Terms_and_Concepts.tex
at line 120
The line it is referring to is the last line of the following code
snippet:
...
\placeformula[formula:Verhulst equation]
\startformula
\math{P(t) = \frac{K P_0 {\it e}^{rt}}
{K + P_0({\it e
tufte\par
\placeformula\startformula
q = \delta \frac{\partial p}{\partial x} =
\delta(\phi) p_{vsat}(\theta) \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x} =
\left[ \frac{\delta_a}{\mu(\theta)} p_{vsat}(\theta) \right]
\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}
\stopformula
\input tufte\par
Thanks,
--
Peter Park Nelson
, what is the use/necessity of \endgraf ?
\starttext
\subsubject{List of Formulas}\placelist[formula][criterium=text,alternative=c]
\subsubject{Formulas}\placenamedformula[one]{First listed Formula}\startformula
a = 1 \stopformula \endgraf
\placeformula\startformula a = 2 \stopformula \endgraf
Hi Paul,
It seems that the left parenthesis causes trouble when giving a label to a
reference:
\definereferenceformat[eqref][left=(,right=)]
\starttext
\placeformula[N)]
\startformula
\Pr\{N = n\} = \Pr\left\{ \min_{1 ≤ k ≤ n} S_k 0 \right\} = p_n^{(1
On 8-12-2011 09:36, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Paul,
It seems that the left parenthesis causes trouble when giving a label to a
reference:
\definereferenceformat[eqref][left=(,right=)]
\starttext
\placeformula[N)]
\startformula
\Pr\{N = n\} = \Pr
}]$
\type{$\left( \sqrt{x} \right)$}: $\left( \sqrt{x} \right)$
With \type{\,}: \type{$\left[ \sqrt{x}\, \right]$}: $\left[ \sqrt{x}\,
\right]$
\placeformula
\startformula
\left[ \sqrt{x} \right]
\stopformula
\CONTEXT
message is in the log file.
references unknown reference [][(N)]
\definereferenceformat[eqref][left=(,right=)]
\starttext
\placeformula[(N)]
\startformula
\Pr\{N = n\} = \Pr\left\{ \min_{1 ≤ k ≤ n} S_k 0 \right\} =
p_n^{(1
:29 MKIV fmt: 2011.11.25 int:
english/english
and the following message is in the log file.
references unknown reference [][(N)]
\definereferenceformat[eqref][left=(,right=)]
\starttext
\placeformula[(N)]
\startformula
$ then
\placeformula[eq:1]
\startformula
(a+b)^2 = a^2 + b^2.
\stopformula
Using the identity (\in[eq:1]) prove that $(a=b)^{2n} = a^{2n} + b^{2n}$.
\stopExo
\page
\startExo[exo:Moivre]{Moivre's formula} Prove that for any integer $n$
\placeformula[eq:2] % I would like the reference to be [eq:1
=0$ then
\placeformula[eq:1]
\startformula
(a+b)^2 = a^2 + b^2.
\stopformula
Using the identity (\in[eq:1]) prove that $(a=b)^{2n} = a^{2n} + b^{2n}$.
\stopExo
\page
\startExo[prefix=Moivre]{Moivre's formula} Prove that for any integer $n$
\placeformula[eq:1]
\startformula
(\cos(x) + {\rm i}\sin(x
\starttext
Exercice 1. Prove that if $ab=ba$ and $2ab=0$ then
\placeformula[eq:1]
\startformula
(a+b)^2 = a^2 + b^2.
\stopformula
Using the identity (\in[eq:1]) prove that $(a=b)^{2n} = a^{2n} + b^{2n}$.
\blank[big]
\hrule
\blank[big]
Exercice 2. Prove that for any integer $n$
\resetnumber[formula
the following minimal example
% begin
\starttext
Exercice 1. Prove that if $ab=ba$ and $2ab=0$ then
\placeformula[eq:1]
\startformula
(a+b)^2 = a^2 + b^2.
\stopformula
Using the identity (\in[eq:1]) prove that $(a=b)^{2n} = a^{2n} + b^{2n}$.
\blank[big]
\hrule
\blank[big
: 2011.10.14 22:47 MKIV fmt: 2011.10.15 int: english/english.
Using the minimal example
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
\startmathalignment[n=4, align={left, right, middle, left}]
\NC A \NC B \NC C \NC D \NR
\NC AA \NC BB \NC CC \NC DD \NR
\stopmathalignment
\stopformula
\stoptext
the last
Hi,
with the latest beta the following do not work anymore (example from
math-ali.mkiv).
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula \startalign
\NC a \EQ b \NR[+]
\NC c \EQ d \NR
\NC\EQ f \NR[for:demo-a-1]
\NC\EQ g \NR[for:demo-a-2][a]
\NC\EQ h \NR[for:demo-a-3][b]
\NC
On 25-11-2011 18:38, Andreas Harder wrote:
Hi,
with the latest beta the following do not work anymore (example from
math-ali.mkiv).
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula \startalign
\NC a \EQ b \NR[+]
\NC c \EQ d \NR
\NC\EQ f \NR[for:demo-a-1]
\NC\EQ g \NR[for:demo
Dear ConTeXt folks,
having upgraded
ConTeXt ver: 2011.10.14 22:47 MKIV fmt: 2011.10.15 int:
english/english.
to
ConTeXt ver: 2011.11.23 18:58 MKIV fmt: 2011.11.24 int:
english/english
With
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
\placeformula
\startformula
A^\prime
\stopformula
\stoptext
I get the following error.
fontsfallback modern rm 12pt is loaded
! Missing { inserted.
system tex
\placeformula
\startformula
A^\prime
\stopformula
\stoptext
I get the following error.
fonts fallback modern rm 12pt is loaded
! Missing { inserted.
system tex error on line 4 in file exponent
:
english/english
With
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
A^\prime
\stopformula
\stoptext
I get the following error.
fonts fallback modern rm 12pt is loaded
! Missing { inserted
: 2011.11.24 int:
english/english
With
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
A^\prime
\stopformula
\stoptext
I get the following error.
fonts fallback modern rm 12pt is loaded
! Missing
the minimal example
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
\startmathalignment[n=4, align={left, right, middle, left}]
\NC A \NC B \NC C \NC D \NR
\NC AA \NC BB \NC CC \NC DD \NR
\stopmathalignment
\stopformula
\stoptext
int: english/english.
Using the minimal example
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
\startmathalignment[n=4, align={left, right, middle, left}]
\NC A \NC B \NC C \NC D \NR
\NC AA \NC BB \NC CC \NC DD \NR
\stopmathalignment
it is the equationnumbering.
Doing \placeformula\startformula..\stopformula gives the equation a certain
number, lets say (1.5).
Now I change the call to
\placeformula[equ:thisfml]\startformula..\stopformula and the number changes
to (1.6).
Why is this? What I have in mind is to number all
ConTeXt still has some mysteries for me ;-)
This time it is the equationnumbering.
Doing \placeformula\startformula..\stopformula gives the equation a certain
number, lets say (1.5).
Now I change the call to \placeformula[equ:thisfml]\startformula..\stopformula
and the number changes to (1.6
[spacebefore=0pt,spaceafter=0pt]
\starttext
\placeformula[eq:one]\startformula a = 1 \stopformula
\placeformula[-]\startformula a = 2 \stopformula
\placeformula[eq:three]\startformula a = 3 \stopformula
\pagereference[ref:p]
Refer equation-1: \in{equ=}[eq:one] in page \at[ref:p].\par
Refer equation
Dear ConTeXt folks,
is it expected that \right)² is not recognized as \right)^2?
\starttext
Using ^2:
\placeformula
\startformula
\left( a + b \right)^2 = a² + 2ab + b²
\stopformula
\placeformula
Dear ConTeXt folks,
there must be a regression between
ConTeXt ver: 2011.05.18 18:04 MKIV fmt: 2011.7.24 int: english/english
and
ConTeXt ver: 2011.10.14 22:47 MKIV fmt: 2011.10.15 int: english/english.
Using the minimal example
\starttext
\placeformula
not put at the correct
height when used like `\right)²`.
Thanks,
Paul
square.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
\usemodule[mathcrap]
\starttext
Using ^2:
\placeformula
\startformula
\left( a + b \right)^2 = a² + 2ab + b²
\stopformula
\placeformula
\startformula
\left( a + \frac72 \right)^2
Hi,
Is it possible to reset the numbers which appear after invoking \placeformula?
To be more precise, I mean the following situation:
\starttext
Euler says
\placeformula
\startformula
{\rm e}^{{\rm i} \pi} + 1 = 0.
\stopformula
The above formula
I replied to the original thread, but no reply of that so far.
Am I the only one that has the problem not getting
%%% Start example
\definereferenceformat[eqref][left={(},right={)}]
\starttext
\placeformula[eq:gamma]
\startformula
\Gamma(n+1)=n!
\stopformula
The fundamental formula~\eqref
Many thanks, Christian: that's the way…
I added a note in the wiki:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Reference/en/placeformula
Best regards: OK
On 17 nov. 2011, at 14:48, Christian wrote:
Is it possible to reset the numbers which appear after invoking
\placeformula?
To be more precise
, but no reply of that so far.
Am I the only one that has the problem not getting
%%% Start example
\definereferenceformat[eqref][left={(},right={)}]
\starttext
\placeformula[eq:gamma]
\startformula
\Gamma(n+1)=n!
\stopformula
The fundamental formula~\eqref[eq:gamma]\ldots.
\stoptext
Dear ConTeXt folks,
in the example for `\in` in the reference [1] there is a space after the
»(«.
\placeformula[eq:pythagoras]
\startformula
a^2+b^2=c^2
\stopformula
This is explained in \in{Equation (}{)}[eq:pythagoras].
Normally this space
Am 16.11.2011 um 10:44 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Dear ConTeXt folks,
in the example for `\in` in the reference [1] there is a space after the
»(«.
\placeformula[eq:pythagoras]
\startformula
a^2+b^2=c^2
\stopformula
This is explained in \in{Equation
Dear Paul,
this used to work:
%%% Start example
\definereferenceformat[eqref][left={(},right={)}]
\starttext
\placeformula[eq:gamma]
\startformula
\Gamma(n+1)=n!
\stopformula
The fundamental formula~\eqref[eq:gamma]\ldots.
\stoptext
%%% Stop example
But with the latest minimals it does
Dear ConTeXt folks,
Am Mittwoch, den 16.11.2011, 11:20 +0100 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 16.11.2011 um 10:44 schrieb Paul Menzel:
in the example for `\in` in the reference [1] there is a space after the
»(«.
\placeformula[eq:pythagoras]
\startformula
a^2+b
with and without equation number.
\starttext
\input tufte
\placeformula\startformula a^2 + b^2 = c^2 \stopformula % no extra white
\input tufte
\placeformula[-]\startformula a^2 + b^2 = c^2 \stopformula % extra white
\input tufte
\stoptext
equationwhite.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
\placeformula and \placeformula[-].
Hans van der Meer
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
\starttext
\placenamedformula[one]{first} \startformula a = 1 \stopformula \endgraf
\placeformula[-] \startformula a = 2 \stopformula \endgraf
\placenamedformula {second} \startformula a = 3 \stopformula \endgraf
\stoptext
It appears that in the case of an absent equationnumber
int:
english/english
That's also true for yesterdays beta.
I’m aware of this but I hadn’t time so far to write a fix for this.
Hi Wolfgang,
still no fix?
\starttext
\placeformula[eq:1]
\startformula a+b \stopformula
\in{Equation:}[eq:1]
\stoptext
Regards
Andreas
\placeformula[eq:1]
\startformula a+b \stopformula
\in{Equation:}[eq:1]
\stoptext
When you don’t need subformulas change this in strc-mat.mkiv:
I don’t, thanks.
Andreas
___
If your question is of interest to others as well
I find I get a fairly large whitespace after the formulas placed with:
\placeformula\startformula \stopformula
How can I reduce this? The wiki does not give a parameter description for
\setupformulas. In the code I can only find some [distance=] parameter. But
using it with for example
Am 05.11.2011 um 16:12 schrieb Meer, H. van der:
I find I get a fairly large whitespace after the formulas placed with:
\placeformula\startformula \stopformula
How can I reduce this? The wiki does not give a parameter description for
\setupformulas. In the code I can only find some
On 29.10.2011, at 23:47, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear ConTeXt folks,
I am sorry for another reference related question. Using
ConTeXt ver: 2011.10.14 22:47 MKIV fmt: 2011.10.15 int:
english/english
That's also true for yesterdays beta.
\starttext
\placeformula[eq:1
Hi,
I just tried an example from math-ali.mkiv:
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula \startalign
\NC a \NC \eq b \NR[+]
\NC c \NC \neq d \NR
\NC \NC \neq f \NR[+]
\NC \NC \geq g \NR[+][a]
\NC \NC \leq
by
\placeformula[formulalabel]
\startformula
c^2 = a^2 + b^2.
\stopformula
And now we can refer to formula \ref[formulalabel] (ref).
And now we can refer to formula \in[formulalabel] (in).
\stoptext
--- 8 --- minimal example --- 8 ---
`\ref` does not seem to find the label for the equation. `\in` does
work
--- 8 ---
\starttext
The famous result (and again) is given by
\placeformula[formulalabel]
\startformula
c^2 = a^2 + b^2.
\stopformula
And now we can refer to formula \ref[formulalabel] (ref).
And now we can refer to formula \in[formulalabel] (in).
\stoptext
--- 8 --- minimal example --- 8
---
\starttext
The famous result (and again) is given by
\placeformula[formulalabel]
\startformula
c^2 = a^2 + b^2.
\stopformula
And now we can refer to formula \ref[formulalabel] (ref).
And now we can refer to formula \in[formulalabel] (in).
\stoptext
--- 8 --- minimal example --- 8 ---
`\ref
+0207B:⁻ (n=4)
[…]
The following minimal example demonstrates the problem which is visible
when ⁺ or ⁻ is used between `\{start,stop}align`.
--- minimal example ---
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
a⁺ \quad b⁻
\stopformula
\placeformula
\startformula\startalign
fix that somehow?
Thanks,
Paul
mathbold.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
\define[1]\P{{\mathbf P}\left( #1 \right)}
\starttext
The following equation contains probabilities.
\placeformula
\startformula
\P{A ∪ B} = \P{A} + \P{B} - \P{A ∩ B}
\stopformula
\stoptext
signature.asc
Description
something like
\definereferenceformat [ineqn] [right={)},text={equation (}]
to get what I want, or is there something better?
Example:
\definereferenceformat [ineqn] [left=(,right=),text=equation]
\starttext
Here in \ineqn[eq1].
\placeformula[eq1]
\startformula
a^2+b^2=c^2
\stopformula
\stoptext
]
\setuppagenumbering[state=stop]
\input t-rsteps-ok.tex
\setupinteraction[state=start]
% uncomment the following when not needing teps
% \UseStepsfalse
% when using \UseStepstrue, we redefine \placeformula...
\ifx\UseStepstrue{\def\placeformula[#1]{\PlaceFormula[#1]}}\fi
\StartSteps[Formula with steps
an idea how to accomplish this?
Don't use subsections with number=no. Rather use subsubject.
\setupformulas[way=bychapter]
\starttext
\chapter{Wake up}
\placeformula
\startformula a^2+b^2=c^2
\stopformula
\section{Make Coffee}
\placeformula
\startformula c^2+d^2=e^2
\stopformula
to accomplish this?
Thanks,
Julian
-
\setuphead[subsection][number=no]
\setupnumber[formula][key=chapter]
\starttext
\chapter{Wake up}
\placeformula
\startformula a^2+b^2=c^2
\stopformula
\section{Make Coffee}
\placeformula
\startformula c^2+d^2=e^2
\stopformula
\subsection{Now
The spacing for numbered and unnumbered equations is different:
\input tufte
\placeformula[-]
\startformula
a=b
\stopformula
\input tufte
\placeformula
\startformula
a=b
\stopformula
\input tufte
\placeformula[-] seems to insert extra space after the displayed
equation. Removable feature?
Thank
Hello,
I am trying to get something like the x_n equation here (second one):
http://latex.knobs-dials.com/images/47c5c3f63c4c9dcbdf4b4b4e362b01d00b8cb62b.100.png
but I am failing... this is my pathetic trial... any help would be
appreciated. Thanks!
\placeformula
\startformula
\phi^{N(n)}_m
trying to get something like the x_n equation here (second one):
http://latex.knobs-dials.com/images/47c5c3f63c4c9dcbdf4b4b4e362b01d00b8cb62b.100.png
but I am failing... this is my pathetic trial... any help would be
appreciated. Thanks!
\placeformula
\startformula
\phi^{N(n)}_m = \left
Hi,
I cannot understand why, but multiline formulas are not numbered.
\starttext
% has number
\placeformula \startformula
f(x_0, u_0)=0.
\stopformula
% has no number
\placeformula \startformula \startalign
\NC \dot{x}(t) \NC=f(x(t), u(t)) \NR
\NC y(t) \NC=h(x(t), u(t)), \NR
\stopalign
Hi Vyatcheslav,
In fact you should say \NR[+] at the end of each line in \startalign in order
to get numbers.
This works for me:
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
\startalign
\NC \dot{x}(t) \NC=f(x(t), u(t)) \NR[+]
\NC y(t) \NC=h(x(t), u(t)), \NR[+]
\stopalign
\stopformula
\stoptext
In fact you should say \NR[+] at the end of each line in \startalign in
order to get numbers.
This works for me:
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
\startalign
\NC \dot{x}(t) \NC=f(x(t), u(t)) \NR[+]
\NC y(t) \NC=h(x(t), u(t)), \NR[+]
\stopalign
\stopformula
\stoptext
Wow, that's pure
201 - 300 of 652 matches
Mail list logo
