etscript[nihongo]
\begingroup \showmakeup[glyph,fontkern]
% \startfont[file:notosanscjkjpregular*default]「うわアぬすと狐め」と、どなりたてました。\stopfont
%
% \startfont[file:notosanscjkjpregular*default]「「うわアぬすと狐め」と、「どなりたてました」。\stopfont
%
%
\startfont[file:notosanscjkjpregular*default,halt]「うわアぬすと狐め」と、どなりたて
end with any font other than latin modern
>
> Here
>
> \setupbodyfont[stixtwo]
>
>
> \setuplayout[width=16cm]
> \showmakeup
>
> \starttext
>
> Thus, I came to the conclusion that the designer of a new
> system must not only be the implementer and
th any font other than latin modern
Here
\setupbodyfont[stixtwo]
\setuplayout[width=16cm]
\showmakeup
\starttext
Thus, I came to the conclusion that the designer of a new
system must not only be the implementer and first
large||scale user; the designer should also write the first
user manual.
\
I sent prior to your message?
> 2. The example below results in a correct output for \TEX.
>
Not in my end with any font other than latin modern
> \setuplayout[width=16cm]
> \showmakeup
>
> \starttext
>
> Thus, I came to the conclusion that the designer of a new
>
n
>>> of any of these four components would have hurt \TeX\ significantly. }
>>
>> Likewise what?
>>
>>>
>>> The next sentence: «If I had not participated…» does not get any
>>> \nofrenchspacing which is equally and doubly problematic. It shows lack of
>>
Hi,
1. Learn to two provide a working minimal example which shows the problem.
2. The example below results in a correct output for \TEX.
\setuplayout[width=16cm]
\showmakeup
\starttext
Thus, I came to the conclusion that the designer of a new
system must not only be the implementer
consistency. And this ought not to be an ‹either› ‹or› scenario. But
> > rather, an and conjunctional construct. It fails both ways.
>
> Consistency of what? Spacing? Where? Can you make a complete example?
> (You can show space amount with \showmakup[space])
yes. and showmakeup d
e hyphens at the edge of lines.
> >>
> >> Any help would be appreciated.
> > I suppose you would be disappointed it there was no tracker ...
> >
> > \enabletrackers[hyphenation.applied.console]
> > \enabletrackers[hyphenation.applied.visualize]
>
letrackers[hyphenation.applied.console]
\enabletrackers[hyphenation.applied.visualize]
you even get a file with the hyphenated words
You can see all of them with
\disabledirectives[backend.cleanup.flatten]
\bitwiseflip \normalizelinemode -\flattendiscretionariesnormalizecode
\showmakeup[discretionary]
weren't it
up.flatten]
\bitwiseflip \normalizelinemode -\flattendiscretionariesnormalizecode
\showmakeup[discretionary]
weren't it that i had to provide the directive for this to work well
(disbale flattening) so for that you have to wait till we upd
]
\setcounter[userpage][1]
%\showmakeup[vbox]
%\showlayout
\dostepwiserecurse{0}{30}{1}{
\xmlprocessfile{mysetups}{/path to xhtml
files/4439720318703948998_84-h-\recurselevel.htm.xhtml}{}
}
\stoptext
Below are the result showing the number of overfull boxes for these
novels using the setups
]
%\setupalignpass[test1]
\setupalignpass[test2]
%\setupalignpass[test3]
%\setupalignpass[test4]
%\setupalignpass[test5]
%\setupalignpass[optional1]
%\setupalignpass[test2b]
\starttext
\setuppagenumbering[location={footer,middle},alternative=doublesided,state=start]
\setcounter[userpage][1]
%\showmakeup
On 7/7/2023 1:09 PM, Carlos wrote:
\showmakeup displays it astonishingly correctly indeed
probably a side effect of the fact that injected stuff resynchronizes
the character progression in the pdf file (every char start with
explicit coordinates) while without showing it depends on the width
2:32PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > > > > On 7/5/2023 5:53 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > > > > > > On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > > > > > > > \showmakeup
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > > > > > On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > > > > > > \showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 07:37:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> On 7/5/2023 7:05 PM, Carlos wrote:
>
> > And I don't want to stir up anything here either, but if the convention of
> > using non-official vs official fonts is the new de facto under lmtx,
> > I guess my opening
te:
> > > > > On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > > > > > \showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
> > > > > >
> > > > > > tSP:3.282
> > > > > > THK:-1.721
> > > > > > H__E
> > > >
On 7/5/2023 7:05 PM, Carlos wrote:
And I don't want to stir up anything here either, but if the convention of
using non-official vs official fonts is the new de facto under lmtx,
I guess my opening question is invalid by all acounts
Well, the policy wrt font is quite simple:
(1) one can
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 06:15:41PM +0200, Alan Braslau via ntg-context wrote:
> On 05/07/23 05/07/23, 17:53, Carlos wrote:
> > (sorry for duplicate messages. sending out to mailing list works
> > sporadically Sometimes works, other times doesn't).
>
> As reported, the contextgarden server was
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 06:12:32PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 7/5/2023 5:53 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > > On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > > > \showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
> > > >
> &g
On 7/5/2023 6:38 PM, Carlos wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 06:12:32PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 7/5/2023 5:53 PM, Carlos wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
\showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
tSP:3.282
THK:-1.721
H__E
X
HK:-1.291
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 06:12:32PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 7/5/2023 5:53 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > > On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > > > \showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
> > > >
> &g
On 05/07/23 05/07/23, 17:53, Carlos wrote:
(sorry for duplicate messages. sending out to mailing list works
sporadically Sometimes works, other times doesn't).
As reported, the contextgarden server was down following a disk
controller failure and had taken some time to be reconfigured with
On 7/5/2023 5:53 PM, Carlos wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
\showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
tSP:3.282
THK:-1.721
H__E
X
HK:-1.291
SP:3.282
no MWE includes so clueless
\starttypescript[mylucidaserif]
\definefontsynonym
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 11:53:47AM -0400, Carlos wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > > \showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
> > >
> > > tSP:3.282
> > > THK:-1.721
> > > H__E
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 04:43:56PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > \showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
> >
> > tSP:3.282
> > THK:-1.721
> > H__E
> > X
> > HK:-1.291
> > SP:3.282
>
> no MWE includes so cluel
On 7/5/2023 3:18 PM, Carlos wrote:
\showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
tSP:3.282
THK:-1.721
H__E
X
HK:-1.291
SP:3.282
no MWE includes so clueless
> I assume that SP stands for space. Correct me if I'm wrong
After reading some of the manuals that mention \showmakeup with and
without [spa
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 09:32:51AM -0400, Carlos wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 09:18:35AM -0400, Carlos wrote:
> > \showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
> >
> > tSP:3.282
> > THK:-1.721
> > H__E
> > X
> > HK:-1.291
> > SP:3.282
> >
>
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 09:18:35AM -0400, Carlos wrote:
> \showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
>
> tSP:3.282
> THK:-1.721
> H__E
> X
> HK:-1.291
> SP:3.282
>
> I assume that SP stands for space. Correct me if I'm wrong
>
> After reading some of the manuals that me
\showmakeup on \TeX\ shows a
tSP:3.282
THK:-1.721
H__E
X
HK:-1.291
SP:3.282
I assume that SP stands for space. Correct me if I'm wrong
After reading some of the manuals that mention \showmakeup with and
without [spaces] and so forth, I couldn't find any more info related
to this.
If anyone
fset=1ts]
> \startcombination[1*3]
> {\startoverlay
> {\vtop{\showmakeup[space]\hsize #1mm\ttest
> \samplefile{tufte}}}
> {\vtop{\showmakeup[space]\hsize #1mm\rtest
> \setupalign[granular]\samplefile{tufte}}}
> \stopoverla
]
\definecolor[rtest][a=1,t=.5,r=1]
\dostepwiserecurse{80}{120}{1}{
\startTEXpage[offset=1ts]
\startcombination[1*3]
{\startoverlay
{\vtop{\showmakeup[space]\hsize #1mm\ttest
\samplefile{tufte}}}
{\vtop{\showmakeup[space]\hsize #1mm\rtest
} = 0.935
>>>> \stopformula
>>>> \stoptext
>>>> This produces the result attached below. The 1.32 looks fine, but
>>>> the next two
>>>> numbers have excess space around the decimal point. Adding the line
>>>> \showmakeup[mathglue] %\m
This produces the result attached below. The 1.32 looks fine, but
>>> the next two
>>> numbers have excess space around the decimal point. Adding the line
>>>\showmakeup[mathglue] %\mathspacingmode=1
>>> to the preamble reveals that the second and th
the decimal point. Adding the
line
\showmakeup[mathglue] %\mathspacingmode=1
to the preamble reveals that the second and third decimal
points are being
treated as binary operators. It’s very strang. Are others
getting this?
can you pick up a binary from:
https://dl.contextgarden.net/build
fine, but the next two
numbers have excess space around the decimal point. Adding the line
\showmakeup[mathglue] %\mathspacingmode=1
to the preamble reveals that the second and third decimal points are being
treated as binary operators. It’s very strang. Are others getting this?
can you pick up
fine, but the next two
numbers have excess space around the decimal point. Adding the line
\showmakeup[mathglue] %\mathspacingmode=1
to the preamble reveals that the second and third decimal points are being
treated as binary operators. It’s very strang. Are others getting this?
weird indeed
the decimal point. Adding the line
\showmakeup[mathglue] %\mathspacingmode=1
to the preamble reveals that the second and third decimal points are being
treated as binary operators. It’s very strang. Are others getting this?
Gavin
PastedGraphic-1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
cell three \NC \darkblue cell three \NC \NR
\TM[a] \NC \darkred cell four \NC \darkgray cell four \NC \NR
\TM[b] \NC \darkgreen cell four \NC \darkblue cell four \NC \NR
\stoptabulate
\stopbuffer
\start \showmakeup[line] \showstruts \ruledvbox{\getbuffer[b]} \stop
\start
three \NC \darkblue cell three \NC \NR
\TM[a] \NC \darkred cell four \NC \darkgray cell four \NC \NR
\TM[b] \NC \darkgreen cell four \NC \darkblue cell four \NC \NR
\stoptabulate
\stopbuffer
\start \showmakeup[line] \showstruts \ruledvbox{\getbuffer[b]} \stop
\start
for noticing, i uploaded a new lmtx
as a reward i'll reveal a new mechanism:
\useMPlibrary[dum]
\definetextdisplay[steppedbystep][before={\blank[halfline]}]
\starttext \showmakeup[line]
\dostepwiserecurse{10}{25}{1}{
\par
\starttextdisplay
\externalfigure
Hi Hans,
There's an uncommented linebreak in the definition of
\pack_framed_text_start that's introducing an unwanted space just before
\startframedtext.
Minimal example:
\showmakeup[space]
\starttext
\hbox{.\startframedtext.\stopframedtext}
\stoptext
Patch:
--- texmf
Hi List,
I am trying to improve the spacing produced by the \unit command. I have solved
three of my four issues by modifying phys-dim.mkxl, but the fourth issue has me
stumped. Consider this example:
\showmakeup[mathglue] \mathspacingmode=1
\starttext
\startformula
\unit{1.23e5 kg m^2/s^2
Hi list,
I made a small example with all of the issues I am trying to fix for the \units
command. The first formula below uses the \unit command, but produces strange
spacing. The second formula produces the desired spacing, without using the
\unit command.
\showmakeup[mathglue
the “x" in scientific notation, which might be accomplished the same way.
Thanks for all the work on spacing in math!
Gavin
\setuppapersize[A4]
\showmakeup[mathglue] %\mathspacingmode=1
\starttext
Digits in math mode have problems with comma separators.
\startbuffer
10 \setdigitmo
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
% \setupbodyfont[cambria]
\setupbodyfont[pagella]
% \setupbodyfont[bonum]
\starttext
% \showmakeup[mathglue] \mathspacingmode1 \showglyphs
\enablemathautospacing % more global
\enablemathautofencing % more global
ers[math.dictionaries]
\starttext
\definemathgroupset[demoa][binary arithmic,nary relation]
\definemathgroupset[demob][binary relation,nary relation]
% \tracingmath2 \tracingonline2 \showmakeup[mathglue]
\startbuffer[a]
$ a \leq b \geq c < d > e = \naturalnumbers = ℕ$
\stopbuffer
\getbuffer[a] \blank
, and everything looks really nice!
Thanks.
Btw, you can run with
\showmakeup[mathglue] % \mathspacingmode=1
to see what math atoms are 'seen' (the spacingmode also injects zero
spaces) (there are other tracers too but this is the one we use most)
Hans
ealignments. We can use them for example to
> collect some equations with a brace (and give the collection one
> number).
>
> /Mikael
>
> \setupbodyfont[lucidadk]
>
> \definemathsimplealign[collecteqequations][
> left={\startmathfenced[sesac]},
> right=\stopmath
ecteqequations][
left={\startmathfenced[sesac]},
right=\stopmathfenced,
align={1:right,2:left},
]
\starttext
%\showmakeup[mathglue]
${\mathcal ABC}$ and ${\mathscr ABC}$
\placeformula
\startformula
\startcollecteqequations
\NC x \NC = r\sin\theta\cos\phi\NR
\NC y \NC = r\sin\theta\sin\phi \NR
\NC z \NC
ons-amb-fraccions-2]{multiplicació i divisió}
> Opereu:
> \startitemize[a, columns]
>
>
> the 'c' jumps.
>
> Isn't ConTeXt capable of handle that?
Please see the attached PDF which is your sample with the command
\showmakeup[vbox] added after \starttext
The green l
}%
> \ignorespaces
> \input tufte
> \stoptext
>
> Indeed it looks bad (ugly) but it illustrates the idea. What makes
> vadjust sort of useless for content is that it messes up spacing (but if
> there is real demand and usage i can sort that out at some point, maybe
demand and usage i can sort that out at some point, maybe
some new options or so). Thsi example also brings us to local boxes:
\showframe
\starttext
\showmakeup[hbox]
\startnarrower[2*left] \raggedleft
{\localleftbox par {L1}\input tufte \par}
\stopnarrower
\blank
\startnarrower[2*middle
tarttext
>
> \dostepwiserecurse{40}{110}{2}{
> \startTEXpage[offset=4mm,width=#1mm,align={stretch,normal,tolerant}]
> \showmakeup[penalty]%
> \orphanpenalties 4 4000 3000 2000 1000\relax
> \updateparagraphpenalties
> \samplefile{tufte}
>
=darkred]
\stopTEXpage
(there always were command line options for it)
More interesting is asome new experimental code:
\starttext
\dostepwiserecurse{40}{110}{2}{
\startTEXpage[offset=4mm,width=#1mm,align={stretch,normal,tolerant}]
\showmakeup[penalty]%
\orphanpenalties 4 4000
th)
\starttext
\showframe
% this is the current default behaviour; we have a topskip with
% quite some stretch and that stretch is taken into account
% when tex calculates the badness; watch the next page
\dorecurse{4}{
\bgroup
\shapingpenaltiesmode\zerocount
\sho
\showmakeup[math] f = 10
$
$
\mathcontrolmode\plusone
\bitwiseflip\mathfontcontrol\orditalickernmathcontrolcode
\bitwiseflip\mathfontcontrol\charitalicnoreboxmathcontrolcode
\bitwiseflip\mathfontcontrol\orditalickernmathcontrolcode
\bitwiseflip\mathfontcontrol
]
\enabletrackers [typesetters.directions]
%\showmakeup [glue,dir]
\definepapersize [Testing]
[width=6.69in]
\setuppapersize [Testing]
\setuplayout [width=fit,
backspace=1.4in,
cutspace=1in
enupheight5mm^1_2^^3__4
\mathinner{\vrule height 30mm depth 30mm width 5mm}
\rab\Umathadapttoleft \Umathnoaxis\Umathvoid\Umathopenupdepth
5mm^5_6^^7__8
$
\stopTEXpage
\startTEXpage[offset=5mm]
$ \showmakeup[math]
\rab\Umathadapttoright\Umathnoaxis\Umathopenupheight 5mm^1_2^^3__4
\
axis\Umathvoid\Umathopenupheight5mm^1_2^^3__4
\mathinner{\vrule height 30mm depth 30mm width 5mm}
\rab\Umathadapttoleft \Umathnoaxis\Umathvoid\Umathopenupdepth
5mm^5_6^^7__8
$
\stopTEXpage
\startTEXpage[offset=5mm]
$ \showmakeup[math]
\rab\Umathadapttoright\Umathnoaxis\Umathopenuphe
}
]
2nd, note the before={\vskip 0.5\lineheight}. A bit of a hack one has to
admit, but it solves the problem of reducing the gap between each entry.
Instead of using \vskip try to use blank because that also handles
whitespace and unwanted breaks.
\starttext
\showmakeup[line,glue]
\strut test
correction prevention, as
shown in:
\starttext
\startTEXpage[offset=10pt] \showglyphs
\startcombination[nx=3,ny=1]
\startcontent \framed[strut=no,align=normal,offset=1ex]\bgroup
\showmakeup[math,kern]%
$a = b + c$\par
$b = c + d$\par
$c = e
\displaywidowpenalties{2}{0}
\stopsetups
\setuplayout[setups=mypenalties]
%\showframe
\showmakeup
\showsetups
\starttext
\dorecurse{5}{\input knuth\par}
\stoptext
===
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Maier, Denis Christian (UB)
> Gesendet: Donne
=mypenalties]
%\showframe
\showmakeup
%\showsetups
\starttext
\dorecurse{5}{\input knuth\par}
\stoptext
=
How do you do this usually? Any best-practices? Hints? Trial and error seems to
work ok, but maybe there is a more efficient method...
Best
Denis
Just try this (notice the spacing):
\startTEXpage[offset=10pt]
\showmakeup[mathglue]%
\enableexperiments[simplegroups]%
$ a = b \color[red]{=} c \startcolor[blue]=\stopcolor d $\par
$ \sin \color[green]{(x)} = \sin {(x)} $\par
\disableexperiments[simplegroups]%
$ a = b \col
Hello,
with \setupalign[flushleft] non-breakable space has different width than
regular space. With pure \rightskip0pt plus 1fill all spaces are equal. Is
this wanted behaviour or do I miss additional settings?
\showmakeup[glue]
\startTEXpage[width=80mm,offset=5mm]
\rightskip0pt plus 1fill
woo
will look okay:
>
> \definemathfraction
>[gefrac]
>[d:frac]
>
> \setupmathfraction
>[gefrac]
>[mathstyle=display,
> alternative=inner,
> rule=hidden]
>
> \unexpanded\def\cofrac#1#2{%
> \rlap{\cfrac{1}{\phantom{#1}}}%
> \gefrac{}{\gef
\startformula \showmakeup[kern]
\alpha
+
\cofrac {\alpha'}
{\cofrac {\alpha''}
{\cofrac {\alpha'''}
{\endfrac {\ddots
+
\frac{1}{\alpha'''}
\stopformula
\stopTEXpage
\stoptext
Hello Hans,
\registerhyphenationexception as described in latest languages-mkiv.pdf and
i-context.pdf does nothing, contrary to \startexceptions, which behaves as
expected. Here is the minimal example:
\mainlanguage[cs]
\showmakeup[discretionary]
\registerhyphenationexception[cs][cíl-em
; hm, not here, so question for wolfgang:
>
> can you run the test with
>
> \showmakeup[whatsit]
>
> and see if there are lateluas shown
The visualizer for section 16 appears one the first page but the section
itself is moved to the second page.
Wolfgang
_
for wolfgang:
can you run the test with
\showmakeup[whatsit]
and see if there are lateluas shown
The visualizer for section 16 appears one the first page but the section
itself is moved to the second page.
Wolfgang
resolvers > trees > analyzing 'home:texmf'
open source > level
with
\showmakeup[whatsit]
and see if there are lateluas shown
(beta on ftp)
Joseph
*De : *Hans Hagen <mailto:j.ha...@xs4all.nl>
*Envoyé le :*samedi 18 août 2018 13:48
*À : *mailing list for ConTeXt users <mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>;
Wolfgang Schuster <mailto:wolfgang.schuster.li...@gma
Am 24.08.2017 um 15:46 schrieb Hans Hagen:
you can enable some tracers:
\starttext
\bgroup
\showglyphs
\showfontkerns
\showmakeup[hbox]
»Tee for Two« shows negative kerning.
\input sapolsky \par
\egroup
\stoptext
thanks, works fine!
Herbert
(I will add
:
\starttext
\bgroup
\showglyphs
\showfontkerns
\showmakeup[hbox]
»Tee for Two« shows negative kerning.
\input sapolsky \par
\egroup
\stoptext
(I will add a \showmakeup[line] that will mark lines
mn
>> until the column doesn't generate orphan/widow
>>
>> Is this possible with ConTeXt/LuaTeX?
>
> maybe be more explicit with very large penalties helps
>
> \startdocument
>
> \showmakeup[penalty]
>
> [...]
>
> \stopdocument
Thanks, Hans, that's a ver
repeat
adjust parameters (column width, looseness, ...)
typeset column
until the column doesn't generate orphan/widow
Is this possible with ConTeXt/LuaTeX?
maybe be more explicit with very large penalties helps
\startdocument
\showmakeup[penalty]
\startbuffer
\dorecurse{30}{
\widowp
(you can use \showmakeup to see what is in a \framed box)
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com
refers to some logging
or visualization of spacing.
AFAIR ConTeXt can do that very nicely (while I never used it and don’t know how
to enable it).
\starttext
\start
\showfontkerns \showmakeup[glue]
\input tufte \par
\stop
\st
)
emememememememememememememememememememem
emememememem
(longest)
emememememememememememememememememememem
emememememememememememememememememem
I slightly modified your example and even with verystrict settings all seems to
be fine (except too narrow blocks, which is not my use case).
\showmakeup[glue]
\setupindenting[yes,2em
emememememememememememememememememem
I slightly modified your example and even with verystrict settings all seems to
be fine (except too narrow blocks, which is not my use case).
\showmakeup[glue]
\setupindenting[yes,2em]
\edef\ward{\cldloadfile{ward}}
\setupalign[verystrict,hz]
\starttext
\dorecurse{100}{
\hsize
--
So there are two last line lengths extrems:
(shortest)
emememememememememememememememememememem
emememememem
(longest)
emememememememememememememememememememem
emememememememememememememememememem
I slightly modified your example and even with verystrict settings all seems to
be fine (except too
TeX interpretation of the above pseudo code
may be inappropriate...
you can see what glue eventually is used with:
\showmakeup[glue]
\start
\parfillskip 123pt \relax \input tufte \par
\parfillskip 123pt plus 1fil \relax \input tufte \par
\parfillskip 123pt \relax \input
at the end of the line ... so like any skip
> and if you give it a fill that will be taken into account in
> linebreaks (just like other fill)
>
> \starttext
>
> \dorecurse{100}{testtesttesttesttest #1 \hskip0ptplus1fill\relax}
>
> \stoptext
>
To be honest, I can'
from
2015.05.15 11:42 includes a wrong page break. The setups for widow and
orphan lines move the two last lines to the next page.
Could anyone confirm this bug?
i wonder if it's a bug or just tex's decision ... you can use
\showmakeup[penalty]
and see what penalties get injected
includes a wrong page break. The setups for widow and
orphan lines move the two last lines to the next page.
Could anyone confirm this bug?
i wonder if it's a bug or just tex's decision ... you can use
\showmakeup[penalty]
and see what penalties get injected
are the linebreaks identical, i.e. same
for widow and
orphan lines move the two last lines to the next page.
Could anyone confirm this bug?
i wonder if it's a bug or just tex's decision ... you can use
\showmakeup[penalty]
and see what penalties get injected
are the linebreaks identical, i.e. same hyphenation?
Many thanks for your
2015.05.24 12:42 (or even with beta from
2015.05.15 11:42 includes a wrong page break. The setups for widow and
orphan lines move the two last lines to the next page.
Could anyone confirm this bug?
i wonder if it's a bug or just tex's decision ... you can use
\showmakeup[penalty]
and see what penalties
in the beta
\showmakeup
\starttext
\strut \hfill first line
\blank[overlay]
second line \hfill \strut
\ruledvbox {
\strut \hfill line 1
\blank[overlay]
line 2\hfill \strut
\blank[overlay]
\strut \hfill line 3\hfill \strut
}
\startitemize[n]
\item bla
\item
Hi,
this works ok in the beta
\showmakeup
\starttext
\strut \hfill first line
\blank[overlay]
second line \hfill \strut
\ruledvbox {
\strut \hfill line 1
\blank[overlay]
line 2\hfill \strut
\blank[overlay]
\strut \hfill line 3\hfill \strut
}
\startitemize[n]
\item
Hello,
** Hans Hagen [2014-03-27 20:09:55 +0100]:
Hi,
this works ok in the beta
\showmakeup
\starttext
\strut \hfill first line
\blank[overlay]
second line \hfill \strut
\ruledvbox {
\strut \hfill line 1
\blank[overlay]
line 2\hfill \strut
\blank[overlay
.
if the grid is on that can indeed be the case but only if there are
lines with lineheight so that's why you can use less strict
options
(older mails)
Yes, it is true, but in my example the grid is not activated, just
shown to
compare differences...
maybe
\showmakeup
shows what
this process more efficient (not requiring to generate both
variants).
I've noticed something like this is already implemented for the body area
(visualizer vbox layer).
Or is there any option for this already?
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\showgrid \showframe \showmakeup \showlayoutcomponents
On 2013-11-30 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/30/2013 12:04 AM, Jan Tosovsky wrote:
it would be nice to have a possibility to interactively
disable/enable a grid rendered via \showgrid command.
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\showgrid \showframe \showmakeup \showlayoutcomponents
if there are
lines with lineheight so that's why you can use less strict options
(older mails)
Yes, it is true, but in my example the grid is not activated, just shown to
compare differences...
maybe
\showmakeup
shows what makes that happen (for instance it can be that you inject
invisible stuff
into it).
As they are often used for testing, \ruledhbox, \ruledvbox and
\ruledvtop remained and all the others have been replaced by
placeholders (and might go away). The \show* commands are mostly dummies
(and will disappear) but these remain:
\showmakeup
\showallmakeup
\showstruts
\showglyphs
Hopefully this doesn't
, \ruledvbox and \ruledvtop
remained and all the others have been replaced by placeholders (and might go
away). The \show* commands are mostly dummies (and will disappear) but these
remain:
\showmakeup
\showallmakeup
\showstruts
\showglyphs
Hopefully this doesn't spoil your playing
Hi all,
I'm having a but of a problem using writetolist. In principle, I want to
insert something into the table of contents, but I don't want to disturb
the flow of the text. Unfortunately, the following code seems to
generate a blank at the top of the page:
\showframe
\showmakeup
of the page:
mkii or mkiv or both?
\showframe
\showmakeup
\starttext
\writetolist[section]{}{}%
\framed{This box has been pushed down}
\stoptext
I've also tried using a section command where the output has been set to
empty:
\showframe
\showmakeup
\setuphead[section][
before=,
after=,
command
is in
higher position).
What's wrong?
\bfc does not correct interline spacing. If you notice, the Title is
aligned at the top to the rest of the text.
\showmakeup
% \defineenumeration[test][location=left,text={\bfc Title}]
\defineenuemration[test][location=left,text={Title},headstyle={\bfc
|margin|edge]
\showgrid
# \showgridboxes
# \showgridsnapping
\showlayout
# \showlayoutcomponents
\showmakeup
\showpalet[name][horizontal|vertical|name|value]
\showprint[typesetting papersize][printing papersize][settings]
\showsetups
\showstruts
# \showstruts
\showsymbolset[name]
# \snaptogrid
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
