Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Cute little bug!
*extremely* sneaky workaround follows:
\setbox2=\hbox{\XETEX}
\def\XETEX{\copy2 }
Greetings, Taco
Thank you, this will do perfectly for today ;)
Mojca
___
ntg-context mailing list
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Try this code out with:
\startitemize
\item \XETEX
\item \PDFETEX
\stopitemize
I have a feeling that \mirror and itemize interfere in a strage
manner, but I don't understand the underlying code to fix it.
Thank you,
Mojca
PS: well, as I have to do a short
Rob Ermers wrote:
Hi,
If I make sure there is enough space, i.e. more than one space, between
the \begin... and the text, it works! However in the pdf the item drops
a line down, like this:
See \def\dodefineblock in core-buf.tex.
Does
\setupblock[Nederlandsblok][before=,after=]
Hi everybody,
The solution below works. Thanks a lot!
Using Mojca's solution plus a newline after the command apparently does
the trick.
After that, I didn't try the other solution, which resembles Olivier's.
Kind regards,
Robert
\defineblock[Nederlandsblok]
\defineblock[Engelsblok]
Rob Ermers wrote:
Dear Contexers,
I am setting up a complex bilingual document, which has to print one
language at the time.
Does anyone know how to use the wonderful blocks application in an
itemize environment? I think the second block causes problems.
Don't putn them in, but around
to find another solution.
Kind regards,
Robert
Dear Contexers,
I am setting up a complex bilingual document, which has to print one
language at the time.
Does anyone know how to use the wonderful blocks application in an
itemize environment? I think the second block causes problems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Taco,
I have of course thought of that, and I know it must work,
but in the way I intend to set up the document, especially
in regard to the connections between the blocks (item A'
= translation of item A), it would be handy if it could be
done around
.
The advantage of this setup is that in a bilingual document, printed
separatedly, I have both languages underneath and thus more control than when I
use separate itemize environments, such as proposed by Taco, and what I had
thought of earlier:
\beginblockA
\startitemize
\stopitemize
\endblockA
At 04:58 AM 8/22/2005, you wrote:
Thanks for your reaction. My original proposal was:
\startitemize
\beginblockA
\item Apple
\endblockA
\beginblockB
\item Pomme
\endBlockB
\beginblockA
\item Pear
\endblockA
\beginblockB
\item Poire
\endBlockB
\stopitemize
This
Thanks Brooks and Olivier,
I'm afraid the problem has not entirely been solved.
Brooks' solution works in the sense that I can hide BlockA or B
(\hideblocks[BlockA]), but the \items remain, and empty items are generated.
Olivier's suggestion is processed, the result is only one language. Now
Hi,
If I make sure there is enough space, i.e. more than one space, between
the \begin... and the text, it works! However in the pdf the item drops
a line down, like this:
*
Ik vraag me af ...
Does anyone have a workaround?
Kind regards,
Robert
\defineblock[Nederlandsblok,
Dear Contexers,
I am setting up a complex bilingual document, which has to print one
language at the time.
Does anyone know how to use the wonderful blocks application in an
itemize environment? I think the second block causes problems.
Kind regards,
Robert
\setupoutput[pdftex
Dear gang,
This seems like a very easy one, but I can't figure it out: on my
slides, I want numbered itemizations to appear item by item, and I
want the previous items to be greyed out. I think this can only be
done by combining two itemize environments. This is what I tried
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Dear gang,
This seems like a very easy one, but I can't figure it out: on my
slides, I want numbered itemizations to appear item by item, and I want
the previous items to be greyed out. I think this can only be done by
combining two itemize environments
I've added a custom font and defined symbols from it:
%
\loadmapfile[texnansi-glambats.map]
\definefontsynonym
[GlamoconRetrobats][texnansi-glambats][encoding=texnansi]
\def\GlamoconRetrobatsSym#1{\getglyph{GlamoconRetrobats}{\char#1}}
\startsymbolset[Glamocon Retrobats]
Stuart Jansen wrote:
I've added a custom font and defined symbols from it:
%
\loadmapfile[texnansi-glambats.map]
\definefontsynonym
[GlamoconRetrobats][texnansi-glambats][encoding=texnansi]
\def\GlamoconRetrobatsSym#1{\getglyph{GlamoconRetrobats}{\char#1}}
Stuart Jansen wrote:
For the benefit of anyone reading the archives, the solution requires a
\bgroup \egroup pair.
Alternatively, if you choose an as-of-yet unknown name for the symbol,
then you need to explicitly use it, but no harm is done to the 'normal'
environment:
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 22:47 +0200, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
\definesymbol[mysymbol][{$\diamond$}]
\startitemize[mysymbol,packed]
\item foo
\item bar
\item baz
\stopitemize
/me slaps forehead
Of course. I was trying \startitemize[symbol=mysymbol] and getting
nowhere.
--
Stuart Jansen wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 21:52 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
I've added a custom font and defined symbols from it:
*snip*
This produces the right symbol. But I can't figure out how to use that
bullet in an itemized list. I don't think I can use \usesymbols because
Stuart Jansen wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 22:47 +0200, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
\definesymbol[mysymbol][{$\diamond$}]
\startitemize[mysymbol,packed]
\item foo
\item bar
\item baz
\stopitemize
/me slaps forehead
as penalty add taco's solution to te wiki -)
Hans
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 23:39 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
I'm working on a rather complex document containing frequent use of
positional graphics. Unfortunately, I've discovered what I expect will
be a pretty nasty problem to fix. When I combine horoffset,
startitemize, positiongraphics the
Stuart Jansen wrote:
I'm working on a rather complex document containing frequent use of
positional graphics. Unfortunately, I've discovered what I expect will
be a pretty nasty problem to fix. When I combine horoffset,
startitemize, positiongraphics the graphics are placed in the wrong
spot.
I'm working on a rather complex document containing frequent use of
positional graphics. Unfortunately, I've discovered what I expect will
be a pretty nasty problem to fix. When I combine horoffset,
startitemize, positiongraphics the graphics are placed in the wrong
spot. I've managed to cook up
Thank you reply
but i can't solve that error with itemize seperater symbol with dot
\startitemize[1, packed] body font 22 or higher size
and attached my test file. How can i correct?
here-
\definebodyfontenvironment[22pt]
\setupbodyfont[22pt]
\starttext
\title{\midaligned
Hi
This error massage in \startitemize[1, packed] with \setbodyfont[22pt].
How can I do
systems : begin file paint at line 11
title : - \midaligned {자전거 폐기안내}
! Math formula deleted: Insufficient symbol fonts.
\mathematics #1-\relax \ifmmode #1\else
Id like to have the bullet appear closer to the text being itemized
inside a \startitemize. I changed the symbol being used to a \cdot and
now the text appears to far away from the bullet itself. Is there a way
to fix this? I figured that altering distance, width, and/or factor
would have some
On Jun 12, 2005, at 10:21 AM, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
Id like to have the bullet appear closer to the text being itemized
inside a \startitemize. I changed the symbol being used to a \cdot
and
now the text appears to far away from the bullet itself. Is there
a way
to fix this?
Try
Steve Peter wrote:
On Jun 12, 2005, at 10:21 AM, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
Id like to have the bullet appear closer to the text being itemized
inside a \startitemize. I changed the symbol being used to a \cdot
and now the text appears to far away from the bullet itself. Is
there a way
Just wanted to mention that I'm back to my box with the latest
ConTeXt. Uncommenting the line
\resetmapfiles \usetypescript [map] [base] [all]
and commenting everything else in the \resetmapfiles-department
appears to have fixed all my troubles in OS X. Let's see if htings
continue to
Willi Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on 2005-02-16, 20:14 (+0100 GMT):
may be not a very nice solution but ...
\startitemize[none,packed]
\item LONG-UGLY-STRING-LIKE-THIS
\startnarrower[left]
A few sentences, indented somewhat from the left margin, that
relate to the long
This should be simple, but my brain is currently clogged from reading too many
ConTeXt manuals, so please help!
Im trying to make a simple format that Ive used elsewhere. The first part
of each item (a kind of \head) is not indented, but the remaining paragraph(s)
of that item are. For
Hi,
may be not a very nice solution but ...
\startitemize[none,packed]
\item LONG-UGLY-STRING-LIKE-THIS
\startnarrower[left]
A few sentences, indented somewhat from the left margin, that
relate to the long ugly string above. The indentation allows the
reader to scan the ugly
. And many thanks
to Patrick and to you for pointing out the left= option. ConTeXt and
the number of options it gives never cease to amaze me!
since we're back on the topic of itemize, I'll repost a question that
I've posted here before
I am trying to run the following example from the beginner's guide:
\starttext
Hasselt lies in.
\startitemize
\head kraamschudden \hfill (child welcoming)
When a child is born
\head nabuurschap (naberschop) \hfill (neighbourship)
Smaller communities.
\stopitemize
\stoptext
I get
Me stupid! Willi, this message made my day. I've been using ConTeXt for
more than a year now, but I was never able to figure out what
setupitemize [.1.] .1. number each meant. So it's the level of
itemization. Thanks, that should make things easier. And many thanks to
Patrick and to you for
to Patrick and to you for pointing out the left= option. ConTeXt and
the number of options it gives never cease to amaze me!
since we're back on the topic of itemize, I'll repost a question that
I've posted here before:
-
It seems to me
Hello Willi,
Of course Patrick's answer works. Another aproach is to use the
\setupitemize command. This gives you more control over the spacing
between the symbol and the text.
I keep forgetting about right, left.
\setupitemize
[1] %level of itemization
[broad,atnmargin]
The atnmargin
Hello Patrick,
Patrick Gundlach wrote:
Hello Willi,
Of course Patrick's answer works. Another aproach is to use the
\setupitemize command. This gives you more control over the spacing
between the symbol and the text.
I keep forgetting about right, left.
\setupitemize
[1] %level of itemization
be grateful for pointing to
specific sections. So here comes:
1) Is it possible to have something in front of the number in numbered
itemize-groups? Like LatTeX-style [1] etc. All I could find was the
stopper= setup, but nothing for starters.
\starttext
\defineconversion[map][(\numbers
These are two very basic questions, but I couldn't find basic answers.
Am quite willing to RTFM, but would be grateful for pointing to
specific sections. So here comes:
1) Is it possible to have something in front of the number in numbered
itemize-groups? Like LatTeX-style [1] etc. All I could
itemize-groups? Like LatTeX-style [1] etc. All I could find was the
stopper= setup, but nothing for starters.
\starttext
\defineconversion[map][(\numbers]
\startitemize[map][stopper=)]
\item Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text
Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text
HiContex'ers,
As we are considering itemize, does anyone by any
chance know how to tackle this problem?
Kind regards,
Robert Ermers
As you know, the itemize blok can be stopped and
resumed by means of [continue]:
\startitemize[n]
\item abc
\item def
\stopitemize
bla bla
\startitemize
I'll take this chance to point out a long-standing problem/misunderstanding
that's causing me some grief:
It seems to me that the 'before' and 'after' keywords used in the third
argument of \setupitemize are operative only if 'columns' are also
specified. In the example below, the hairlines
Hans Hagen wrote:
At 10:18 20/02/2004, you wrote:
Hi all!
Is there a possiblity to have itemize calculate the optimal label
width itself? I have an itemize that has rather different labels, e.g.:
\startitemize
\sym{1.} An item
\sym{2.} Another item
\sym{103 a.} An item with a very broad label
Hi all!
Is there a possiblity to have itemize calculate the optimal label width
itself? I have an itemize that has rather different labels, e.g.:
\startitemize
\sym{1.} An item
\sym{2.} Another item
\sym{103 a.} An item with a very broad label
\stopitemize
In this example the label 103 a. flows
Hi Gary,
Now back to our regularly scheduled thread...
I'm reaching the conclusion that the behaviour I reported at the top of the
thread is a bug.
Is it?
If so, is a workaround or fix possible?
We had almost the same thread in May(?) this year. I came to the
conclusion that I don't know
it is listed as \setupitemgroup
are they synonyms? why two names?
For those, who still wonder: \setupitemize is a command generated by
\defineitemgroup.
\defineitemgroup [\v!itemize] [\c!niveaus=6]
in core-itm.tex
Good idea to clear that up.
Now back to our regularly scheduled
Hello Willi,
Willi Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TeXshow, but unfortunately the \setupitemize command is not listed
there. - In the english manual I could find the use of this command,
it is listed as \setupitemgroup
Patrick
--
You are your own rainbow!
Patrick Gundlach wrote:
see
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context/12640
Patrick
Ooops. I could find it myself, couldn't I? I'm sorry to bother you all.
And many thanks for your answer. I wonder how the \testpage works.
Many thanks,
M.K.
Hi,
Ooops. I could find it myself, couldn't I? I'm sorry to bother you
all.
no problem. Since I remember this being on the list a while ago, I
did a quick search.
And many thanks for your answer. I wonder how the \testpage works.
If you know a bit of TeX, you might want to look at
Hi,
Good morning.
?? it is almost afternoon... ;-)
How can I suppress the page break between section and itemize, i.e. in
a following case:
see
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context/12640
Patrick
--
You are your own rainbow!
___
ntg
It seems to me that the 'before' and 'after' keywords used in the third
argument of \setupitemize are operative only if 'columns' are also
specified. In the example below, the hairlines disappear if the 'columns'
keyword is eliminated.
Feature or bug?
BTW: can the lengths of the two hairlines
801 - 852 of 852 matches
Mail list logo