Re: [NTG-context] Let's Polish the math!

2009-03-17 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 08:52, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Also, we put periods after section numbers, so no 1.2 Section, but rather 1.2. Section. \setuplabeltext [pl] [section={{},{.}}] Hello Aditya, Interesting trick, thanks. But the problem is that references then ignore the dot. So \in[ref]

Re: [NTG-context] Let's Polish the math!

2009-03-17 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 17.03.2009 um 20:12 schrieb Mojca Miklavec: On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 08:52, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Also, we put periods after section numbers, so no 1.2 Section, but rather 1.2. Section. \setuplabeltext [pl] [section={{},{.}}] Hello Aditya, Interesting trick, thanks. But the problem

Re: [NTG-context] Let's Polish the math!

2009-03-17 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 20:56, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 17.03.2009 um 20:12 schrieb Mojca Miklavec: On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 08:52, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Also, we put periods after section numbers, so no 1.2 Section, but rather 1.2. Section. \setuplabeltext [pl] [section={{},{.}}]

Re: [NTG-context] Let's Polish the math!

2009-03-17 Thread Hans Hagen
Mojca Miklavec wrote: On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 20:56, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 17.03.2009 um 20:12 schrieb Mojca Miklavec: On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 08:52, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Also, we put periods after section numbers, so no 1.2 Section, but rather 1.2. Section. \setuplabeltext [pl]

Re: [NTG-context] Let's Polish the math!

2009-03-14 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 01:26, Marcin Borkowski wrote: Hi, how to do this: here in Poland we have some conventions as for typesetting math; for example, we don't use  \leq, but \leqslant; we don't write tan for tangent, but tg; That one is trivial. In math-tex there are dozens of definitions

Re: [NTG-context] Let's Polish the math!

2009-03-14 Thread Aditya Mahajan
Hi Marcin, On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Marcin Borkowski wrote: Hi, how to do this: here in Poland we have some conventions as for typesetting math; for example, we don't use \leq, but \leqslant; The easy way is to type ⩽ (0x2A7D) instead of ≤ (0x2264) :). You can do something like

Re: [NTG-context] Let's Polish the math!

2009-03-14 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 14.03.2009 um 01:26 schrieb Marcin Borkowski: Would it be possible to have such typographic conventions (I could provide a more comprehensive list, of course) enabled by \mainlanguage[pl]? \startlanguagespecifics[pl] ... % what Mojca and Aditya told you \stoplanguagespecifics Wolfgang

Re: [NTG-context] Let's Polish the math!

2009-03-14 Thread Xan
En/na Aditya Mahajan ha escrit: Hi Marcin, On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Marcin Borkowski wrote: Hi, how to do this: here in Poland we have some conventions as for typesetting math; for example, we don't use \leq, but \leqslant; In catalan and spanish languages we have too some conventions: $\max$

Re: [NTG-context] Let's Polish the math!

2009-03-14 Thread Hans Hagen
Xan wrote: En/na Aditya Mahajan ha escrit: Hi Marcin, On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Marcin Borkowski wrote: Hi, how to do this: here in Poland we have some conventions as for typesetting math; for example, we don't use \leq, but \leqslant; In catalan and spanish languages we have too some

Re: [NTG-context] Let's Polish the math!

2009-03-14 Thread Xan
En/na Hans Hagen ha escrit: Xan wrote: En/na Aditya Mahajan ha escrit: Hi Marcin, On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Marcin Borkowski wrote: Hi, how to do this: here in Poland we have some conventions as for typesetting math; for example, we don't use \leq, but \leqslant; In catalan and spanish

Re: [NTG-context] Let's Polish the math!

2009-03-14 Thread Hans Hagen
Aditya Mahajan wrote: It is relatively easy to do this. I am in favour of implementing the trignometric functions, etc; but I do not think that changing the meanings of mathematical symbols is a good thing. It is really hard to remember the names of symbols as is, changing meaning according

[NTG-context] Let's Polish the math!

2009-03-13 Thread Marcin Borkowski
Hi, how to do this: here in Poland we have some conventions as for typesetting math; for example, we don't use \leq, but \leqslant; we don't write tan for tangent, but tg; we don't write arcsin, but arc\,sin; etc. Would it be possible to have such typographic conventions (I could provide a more