On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 01:15 (+), Bruce Horrocks wrote:
> On 15 Jan 2024, at 16:15, Jim wrote:
>> I would like
>> something which automagically "does the right thing".
> Not pretty, but... :-)
> \setupwhitespace [big]
> \setuppapersize [letter]
>
On 15 Jan 2024, at 16:15, Jim wrote:
>
> I would like
> something which automagically "does the right thing".
Not pretty, but... :-)
\setupwhitespace [big]
\setuppapersize [letter]
\define[1]\mystopitemize{\stopitemize\doifsamestringelse{#1}{\par}{\blank}{#1}}
\starttext
This is a short
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 20:33 (+0100), Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Am 15.01.24 um 17:15 schrieb Jim:
>> "after" does the trick, but not in an automatic way. I would like
>> something which automagically "does the right thing".
> With “automagically”, do you mean for all instances?
I hate to
Am 15.01.24 um 17:15 schrieb Jim:
"after" does the trick, but not in an automatic way. I would like
something which automagically "does the right thing".
With “automagically”, do you mean for all instances?
\setupitemgroup[itemize][nowhite,after]
Sorry, then you need "nowhite". Usually
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 17:39 (+0100), Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> Jim schrieb am 15.01.2024 um 01:42:
>> I have
>> \setupwhitespace [big]
>> so that I get "a blank line" between paragraphs.
>> I would like to *not* have "blank lines" before and after my items. For
>> example, if there is more
Jim schrieb am 15.01.2024 um 01:42:
I have
\setupwhitespace [big]
so that I get "a blank line" between paragraphs.
I would like to *not* have "blank lines" before and after my items. For
example, if there is more "paragraph text" after the last item I would like
to see this structure:
Two replies in one...
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 15:47 (+0100), Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024, Jim wrote:
>> Thoughts?
> \startitemize[nowhite, after]
> . . .
> \stopitemize
> See: https://adityam.github.io/context-blog/post/spacing-in-itemize/
Aditya,
thanks for the
Am 15.01.24 um 15:36 schrieb Jim:
\startitemize[packed,joinedup] should be the right combination.
I won't argue about "should", but I will point out it isn't, at least on my
computer with a recently updated context.
Here is a non-minimal but short non-working example.
Sorry, then you need
On Mon, 15 Jan 2024, Jim wrote:
> Thoughts?
\startitemize[nowhite, after]
. . .
\stopitemize
See: https://adityam.github.io/context-blog/post/spacing-in-itemize/
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to
Hi Hraban,
thanks for your response. But...
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 08:17 (+0100), Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Am 15.01.24 um 01:42 schrieb Jim:
>> Some text preceding the list of items:
>> a. Item one.
>> b. Second item.
>> This sentence is part of the same paragraph.
>> The next paragraph
Am 15.01.24 um 01:42 schrieb Jim:
Some text preceding the list of items:
a. Item one.
b. Second item.
This sentence is part of the same paragraph.
The next paragraph starts here...
\startitemize[packed,joinedup] should be the right combination.
Hraban
11 matches
Mail list logo
