Re: [NTG-context] next beta

Hi Hans, Thanks for the new feature for row backgrounds, which I tested: it works (though see below) and it is another great feature! I wanted to add the information on the wiki, but thought it would be better to explain the meanings of \ND and \NL: is the following correct: \NC = New Column

[NTG-context] next beta

Hi, The next beta will have: % row backgrounds: \setuptabulate[backgroundcolor=darkred] \starttext \starttabulate[|||] \NC foo \NC bar \NC \NR \ND foo \NC bar \NC \NR \NC foo \NC bar \NC \NR \NC foo \NC bar \NC \NR \ND foo \NC bar \NC \NR \stoptabulate

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Hans Hagen wrote: \setupformulas[split=yes,align=flushleft] % already there While you are tweaking formulas, would it make sense to add a key-value interface for \startformula, so that the following also works: \startformula[split=yes, align=flushleft] ...

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On 6/19/2017 12:56 AM, Henri Menke wrote: Let me quote the TeXbook (page 195): »Although formulas within a paragraph always break after binary operations and relations, displayed formulas always break before binary operations and relations.« given that one uses alignments On the other

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On Sun, 2017-06-18 at 13:00 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 6/17/2017 3:48 PM, Jeong Dal wrote: > > > > Dear Hans, > > > > I updated ConTeXt beta today and run your sample for long formula. > > It works nice and it is the feature what many math people want I think. > > Thank you for your concern.

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

Dear Hans, > 2017. 6. 18. 오후 8:00, Hans Hagen 작성: > > this is how tex works: just look at inline math > Yes, you are right. To start a new line with a sign may be a preference of me and some others. I found a document which illustrates the different displays of a long

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On 6/17/2017 3:48 PM, Jeong Dal wrote: Dear Hans, I updated ConTeXt beta today and run your sample for long formula. It works nice and it is the feature what many math people want I think. Thank you for your concern. One thing that I’d like say is that a new line in the splitted long formula

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

Dear Hans, I updated ConTeXt beta today and run your sample for long formula. It works nice and it is the feature what many math people want I think. Thank you for your concern. One thing that I’d like say is that a new line in the splitted long formula usually starts with operations in many

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On 6/14/2017 11:33 AM, Mathias Schickel wrote: Am 13.06.2017 um 16:46 schrieb Hans Hagen >: On 6/13/2017 1:18 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote: Am 12.06.2017 um 18:17 schrieb Hans Hagen >: On 6/12/2017 5:56 PM, Mathias

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

> Am 13.06.2017 um 16:46 schrieb Hans Hagen : > > On 6/13/2017 1:18 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote: >>> Am 12.06.2017 um 18:17 schrieb Hans Hagen : >>> >>> On 6/12/2017 5:56 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote: Hi Hans, if I get it right this means that you provide a

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, Hans Hagen wrote: attached what will be provided ... experimental for a while (not in the mood now for harder stuff) Thanks. I'll play around with it. Aditya ___ If your question is of

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

this looks really cool and useful! thanks a lot, Hans! On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 6/13/2017 1:18 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote: > >> >> Am 12.06.2017 um 18:17 schrieb Hans Hagen : >>> >>> On 6/12/2017 5:56 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote: >>>

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On 6/13/2017 1:18 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote: Am 12.06.2017 um 18:17 schrieb Hans Hagen : On 6/12/2017 5:56 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote: Hi Hans, if I get it right this means that you provide a mechanism that brakes formulas automatically across several lines? I appreciate

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

> On 12 Jun 2017, at 17:25, Hans Hagen wrote: > > Hi, > > experimental in next beta: There is a TeX Live updating utility, at least on the MacOS distribution, that allows for server synchronizations between the yearly updates. Is ConTeXt updated there?

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

> Am 12.06.2017 um 18:17 schrieb Hans Hagen : > > On 6/12/2017 5:56 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote: >> Hi Hans, >> if I get it right this means that you provide a mechanism that brakes >> formulas automatically across several lines? I appreciate this very much! >> Thank you for

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On 6/13/2017 8:06 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Hans Hagen wrote: i.e. (poor mans) multiline display math Interesting. An important reference for automatic breaking of multiline display are the notes of Michael J Downes included in the documentation of breqn: see section

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Hans Hagen wrote: i.e. (poor mans) multiline display math Interesting. An important reference for automatic breaking of multiline display are the notes of Michael J Downes included in the documentation of breqn: see section 14 (page 16) of

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On 6/12/2017 5:56 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote: Hi Hans, if I get it right this means that you provide a mechanism that brakes formulas automatically across several lines? I appreciate this very much! Thank you for including this into the next beta! Would it be possible to do something like

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

Hi Hans, if I get it right this means that you provide a mechanism that brakes formulas automatically across several lines? I appreciate this very much! Thank you for including this into the next beta! Would it be possible to do something like that for breaking long formulas across pages (or

[NTG-context] next beta

Hi, experimental in next beta: \starttext test \startbuffer \placeformula \startformula x\dorecurse{100}{+#1x^{#1x}}=10 \stopformula test \startformula x\dorecurse{100}{+#1x^{#1x}}=10 \stopformula test \stopbuffer \par \setupformula[split=no] \getbuffer \par \par

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On 1/17/2017 8:27 PM, Henri Menke wrote: On 01/17/2017 08:23 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 1/17/2017 8:13 PM, Henri Menke wrote: On 01/15/2017 05:19 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, the next beta has additional keywords for texdefinitions: \starttext % [spaces|nospaces] [global] [unexpanded]

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On 01/17/2017 08:23 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 1/17/2017 8:13 PM, Henri Menke wrote: >> On 01/15/2017 05:19 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> the next beta has additional keywords for texdefinitions: >>> >>> \starttext >>> >>> % [spaces|nospaces] [global] [unexpanded] [expanded] [..argument]

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On 1/17/2017 8:13 PM, Henri Menke wrote: On 01/15/2017 05:19 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, the next beta has additional keywords for texdefinitions: \starttext % [spaces|nospaces] [global] [unexpanded] [expanded] [..argument] csname \starttexdefinition unexpanded doubleempty whatever [#1][#2]#3

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On 01/15/2017 05:19 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > Hi, > > the next beta has additional keywords for texdefinitions: > > \starttext > > % [spaces|nospaces] [global] [unexpanded] [expanded] [..argument] csname > > \starttexdefinition unexpanded doubleempty whatever [#1][#2]#3 Is only the outer level

[NTG-context] next beta

Hi, the next beta has additional keywords for texdefinitions: \starttext % [spaces|nospaces] [global] [unexpanded] [expanded] [..argument] csname \starttexdefinition unexpanded doubleempty whatever [#1][#2]#3 this is (#1) (#2) it#3 \stoptexdefinition *\whatever[a]{!}* \stoptext (no

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

> On 27 Jun 2016, at 10:38, Hans Hagen wrote: > > The next beta will support this (for mp lovers) > > \definecolor[maincolor] [r=.5] > \startMPpage >fill fullcircle scaled 10cm withcolor "maincolor" ; >... > \stopMPpage > > So, in many cases you can use strings

[NTG-context] next beta

Hi, The next beta will support this (for mp lovers) \definecolor[maincolor] [r=.5] \definecolor[extracolor] [g=.5] \definecolor[anothercolor][b=.5] \definecolor[morecolor] [s=.8] \startMPpage fill fullcircle scaled 10cm withcolor "maincolor" ; fill fullcircle scaled 9cm withcolor

[NTG-context] next beta

Hi, The next beta will have a more efficient metafun filldraw option named 'fillup' (flaw and drill were rejected as operator names): \starttext \startMPpage fill fullsquare scaled 4cm withpen pencircle scaled 1cm; draw fullsquare scaled 4cm withpen pencircle scaled

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On 4/15/2015 7:08 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Hans Hagen wrote: \starttext \starttabulate[||CL{darkred}|CM{darkgreen}CT{white}|CR{darkblue}||] \NC first \NC left \NC middle \NC right \NC last \NC \NR \NC first \NC \color[white]{left} \NC

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Hans Hagen wrote: \starttext \starttabulate[||CL{darkred}|CM{darkgreen}CT{white}|CR{darkblue}||] \NC first \NC left \NC middle \NC right \NC last \NC \NR \NC first \NC \color[white]{left} \NC middle \NC \color[white]{right} \NC last \NC

[NTG-context] next beta

in next beta \starttext \pushpath[foo] \pushpath[foo/bar] \input test % . wins over /foo wins over foo/bar \poppath \poppath \stoptext -- - Hans Hagen |

[NTG-context] next beta

Hi, New key A in next beta: \setupbodyfont[tt] \starttext \starttabulate[|l|pA{nothyphenated,flushleft,stretch,verytolerant}|] \NC tufte \NC \input tufte \NC \NR \stoptabulate \stoptext -- -

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

Hi Hans, All, I find this nomenclature confusing and a little confusing from a design standpoint! 1) Color of the text background should be separate from the rest of the cell background 2) the names should reflect to what they apply That said we should have:

Re: [NTG-context] next beta (tabulate)

On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 23:46:35 +0100 Sietse Brouwer sbbrou...@gmail.com wrote: [1] http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Tabulate There is \starttabulate and \starttable. I understand that they use different mechanisms, even though their syntax are parallel. The wiki page [1] warns against the use of

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On 3/20/2013 8:14 AM, Keith J. Schultz wrote: Hi Hans, All, I find this nomenclature confusing and a little confusing from a design standpoint! 1) Color of the text background should be separate from the rest of the cell background 2) the names should reflect

Re: [NTG-context] next beta (tabulate)

On 3/20/2013 8:24 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 23:46:35 +0100 Sietse Brouwer sbbrou...@gmail.com wrote: [1] http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Tabulate There is \starttabulate and \starttable. I understand that they use different mechanisms, even though their syntax are parallel.

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 3/20/2013 8:14 AM, Keith J. Schultz wrote: Hi Hans, All, I find this nomenclature confusing and a little confusing from a design standpoint! 1) Color of the text background should be separate from the rest

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On 3/20/2013 5:36 PM, Jonathan Barchi wrote: Just to be clear: CT provides an alternate method to colorize the text, instead of using the standard \color[foo]{bar} - right? There is already a section on using the \color command to colorize the text, so I want to make sure I'm adding this

[NTG-context] next beta

Hi The next beta will have this (I needed it for a manual): \starttext \starttabulate[||CL{darkred}|CM{darkgreen}CT{white}|CR{darkblue}||] \NC first \NC left \NC middle \NC right \NC last \NC \NR \NC first \NC \color[white]{left} \NC middle \NC

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

i.e. we already had CL CM and CR, so CT is new .. should be wikified. The wiki [1] describes these \C* commands: \CR color is applied to the background of the text and the remaining space on the right; \CC color is applied to the background of the text only; \CM color is applied

Re: [NTG-context] next beta

On 3/19/2013 11:46 PM, Sietse Brouwer wrote: i.e. we already had CL CM and CR, so CT is new .. should be wikified. The wiki [1] describes these \C* commands: \CR color is applied to the background of the text and the remaining space on the right; \CC color is applied to the