Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

On Tue, 15 May 2018 16:51:13 +0200 luigi scarso wrote: > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Christoph Reller < > christoph.rel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, 15 May 2018 08:23:04 +0200 luigi scarso > > wrote: > > > >> > >> On Tue, May 15, 2018

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

On 5/17/2018 5:47 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Mohammad Hossein, Thanks for your work regarding the RawSteps! However I tried just now the examples you have on github, but it seems that it does not work out of the box: ConTeXt reports an error at line 114 of p-rsteps.tex, complaining about an

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

Hi Mohammad Hossein, Thanks for your work regarding the RawSteps! However I tried just now the examples you have on github, but it seems that it does not work out of the box: ConTeXt reports an error at line 114 of p-rsteps.tex, complaining about an « Undefined control sequence » which points

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

Fabrice, Accepting the caveats Hans pointed out for problematic spacing and some issues with references, you might find [ https://github.com/bateni/rawsteps-mkiv] useful. I ported RawSteps to MkIV and have used it in a few presentations. The version on github might be buggy, but a good start if

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

On 5/16/2018 9:14 PM, Fabrice L wrote: Dear all, > - Check what additional features users want (miss) and decide to what extent and with what priority we will put effort in this. As asked, I add a wish to the list... One feature which I depend a lot on is to be able to do animations: I

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

Dear all, > - Check what additional features users want (miss) and decide to what extent and with what priority we will put effort in this. As asked, I add a wish to the list... One feature which I depend a lot on is to be able to do animations: I actually use the Raw Steps module, by David

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

On 05/15/2018 11:26 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 5/15/2018 9:17 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> [...] >> Hans, >> >> I wonder whether it would be possible to implement a feature that you >> mentioned in the past. >> >> In order to avoid widow and orphan lines, you mentioned that it would be >>

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

On 5/16/2018 7:38 AM, Henri Menke wrote: I just thought of another thing. Could you expose _all_ the subtypes of _all_ the different node types similar to node.id? (currently this is only enabled for whatsits)  As of now I always have to go to texnodes.w, find the array and count to find out

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

If I am not mistaken, you can write : node.new(‘noad’, nodes.noadcodes.bin) De : Henri Menke Envoyé le :mercredi 16 mai 2018 07:39 À : ntg-context@ntg.nl >> mailing list for ConTeXt users Objet :Re: [NTG-context] roadmap I just thought of another thing. Could you expose _all_ the su

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

I just thought of another thing. Could you expose _all_ the subtypes of _all_ the different node types similar to node.id? (currently this is only enabled for whatsits) As of now I always have to go to texnodes.w, find the array and count to find out which number a subtype has. It would be

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

On 5/15/2018 9:17 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: On 05/14/2018 05:17 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, The ConTeXt meeting is - as usual - the right place and moment to discuss the roadmap. We never had real binding roadmaps, more informal ones. Anyway, here are some thoughts on the two main components:

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

On 05/14/2018 05:17 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > Hi, > > The ConTeXt meeting is - as usual - the right place and moment to > discuss the roadmap. We never had real binding roadmaps, more informal > ones. Anyway, here are some thoughts on the two main components: MkIV > and LuaTeX. > > ConTeXt

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Christoph Reller < christoph.rel...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 15 May 2018 08:23:04 +0200 luigi scarso > wrote: > >> >> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 8:15 AM, Christoph Reller < >> christoph.rel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > Our company is

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

On Tue, 15 May 2018 08:23:04 +0200 luigi scarso wrote: > > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 8:15 AM, Christoph Reller < > christoph.rel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Our company is producing (and weekly updating) 67 manuals and > > technical documents from more than 900 ConTeXt

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

> > * References: see Massimiliano’s question, apparently there are > > options missing for code before/after the list of pages > > These hooks were added; adding a few more hooks is normally no big > deal > ... the main problem with such additions is that they seldom get > documented (in fact

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

users <ntg-context@ntg.nl> Subject: Re: [NTG-context] roadmap Message-ID: <c504ea08-a021--4eba-c2894d72d...@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed On 5/14/2018 9:36 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: Hi Hans, thank you so much! Keep up the good work!

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 8:15 AM, Christoph Reller < christoph.rel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Our company is producing (and weekly updating) 67 manuals and > technical documents from more than 900 ConTeXt source files for our > software products. The output PDFs are converted to PDF/A-2a, which is >

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

lt;ntg-context@ntg.nl> > Subject: Re: [NTG-context] roadmap > Message-ID: <c504ea08-a021--4eba-c2894d72d...@xs4all.nl> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > On 5/14/2018 9:36 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > > Hi Hans, thank you so much!

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:52 AM, Henri Menke wrote: > > Math typesetting is really crappy in ConTeXt > hm -- luigi ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

On 5/15/2018 12:52 AM, Henri Menke wrote: Math typesetting is really crappy in ConTeXt, but I get that this is beyond your priorities.  I plan to develop a module which resembles the features and syntax of the amsmath LaTeX package for my PhD thesis.  I'm not sure how well this will integrate

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

On 15/05/18 03:17, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, The ConTeXt meeting is - as usual - the right place and moment to discuss the roadmap. We never had real binding roadmaps, more informal ones. Anyway, here are some thoughts on the two main components: MkIV and LuaTeX. ConTeXt MkIV: - Check if some

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

On 5/14/2018 9:36 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: Hi Hans, thank you so much! Am 2018-05-14 um 17:17 schrieb Hans Hagen : - Get rid of inconsistencies in the user interface e.g. by introducing new commands with settings. +1 - Check what additional features users want

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

Hi Hans, thank you so much! Am 2018-05-14 um 17:17 schrieb Hans Hagen : > - Get rid of inconsistencies in the user interface e.g. by introducing new > commands with settings. +1 > - Check what additional features users want (miss) and decide to what extent > and with what

[NTG-context] roadmap

Hi, The ConTeXt meeting is - as usual - the right place and moment to discuss the roadmap. We never had real binding roadmaps, more informal ones. Anyway, here are some thoughts on the two main components: MkIV and LuaTeX. ConTeXt MkIV: - Check if some mechanism can (by now) be simplified