Here is the output of mtxrun. Note that there are two versions: T (title)
and ST (subtitle). I want the title version.
mtxrun --script fonts --list --all --pattern=DTL
identifier familyname fontname
filenamesubfont instances
Am 25.05.22 um 22:23 schrieb Stefan Nedeljkovic via ntg-context:
Dear list,
A quick question about a font that has a separate file for small caps. I
have the following:
\starttypescript [sans] [dtl-documenta-sans-t]
\definefontsynonym[Sans] [name:dtldocumentasanst][features=default]
Hello,
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:16:33 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 12/14/2017 8:37 AM, Procházka Lukáš Ing. wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to typeset some text in bold + smallcaps.
But even the sample on wiki:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Bold_small_caps
extended to:
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:24:17 +0200
Philipp Gesang philipp.ges...@alumni.uni-heidelberg.de wrote:
Hi John!
···date: 2013-08-10, Saturday···from: john Culleton···
I have asked everywhere else to no avail. In (plain) luatex how do I
specify the small cap version of an otf font? I use
Hi John!
···date: 2013-08-10, Saturday···from: john Culleton···
I have asked everywhere else to no avail. In (plain) luatex how do I
specify the small cap version of an otf font? I use context for
non-fiction but pdftex and now luatex for fiction.
Plain uses a feature syntax similar to
On 2012-07-25 Shriramana Sharma samj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Shriramana,
Hi thanks for your help. Sorry to keep returning with errors (but as I
said I'm a noob):
loading : ConTeXt User Module / Simplefonts
! Undefined control sequence.
l.144 \ctxloadluafile
On 25-7-2012 04:33, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Basically I'm trying to move away from wordprocessors, and while I'm
not looking for meaningless effects like walking ants (from MS Word)
to be provided by TeX macro packages, faux smallcaps (and oblique and
bold) is not an unreasonable thing to
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 25-7-2012 04:33, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Basically I'm trying to move away from wordprocessors, and while I'm
not looking for meaningless effects like walking ants (from MS Word)
to be provided by TeX macro packages, faux smallcaps (and
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Marco wrote:
On 2012-07-25 Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Hi Shriramana,
Hi thanks for your help. Sorry to keep returning with errors (but as I
said I'm a noob):
loading : ConTeXt User Module / Simplefonts
! Undefined control sequence.
l.144
On 25-7-2012 09:41, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 25-7-2012 04:33, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Basically I'm trying to move away from wordprocessors, and while I'm
not looking for meaningless effects like walking ants (from MS Word)
to be provided by
Hi thanks everyone for their responses.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
But it lacks Indic scripts, so it's not an option for him, at least not
yet.
Indic scripts will be supported in mkiv some day soon (at the ntg meeting
there has been a presentation about
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Shriramana Sharma samj...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi thanks everyone for their responses.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
But it lacks Indic scripts, so it's not an option for him, at least not
yet.
Indic scripts will be
On 25-7-2012 10:16, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Hi thanks everyone for their responses.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
But it lacks Indic scripts, so it's not an option for him, at least not
yet.
Indic scripts will be supported in mkiv some day soon (at the ntg
On Jul 25, 2012, at 1:06 AM, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Rogers, Michael K mrog...@emory.edu wrote:
Here's a hack, which sort of works, definitely doesn't handle return --
there must be a better way. I hope you don't mind my using your text as
text. :-)
Am 25.07.2012 um 09:43 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Marco wrote:
On 2012-07-25 Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Hi Shriramana,
Hi thanks for your help. Sorry to keep returning with errors (but as I
said I'm a noob):
loading : ConTeXt User Module /
Am 24.07.2012 um 21:11 schrieb Shriramana Sharma:
Hello. I'm a veritable noob to both TeX and ConTeXT, so please bear
with my ignorance. I request your kind guidance. (BTW as I use Indic
scripts a lot, my typesetting engine is XeTeX.)
I want to produce small caps like those I can get in
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
\definehighlight[smallcaps][style=\setff{smallcaps}]
Hello and thanks for your help but even if I copy-paste your example
into TeXWorks and typeset it (remember, I'm using ConTeXT with XeTeX)
I get the error:
On 2012-07-25 Shriramana Sharma samj...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone please advise me what to do to get small caps in my current
font like in LibO and other popular GUI word-processing systems?
My guess is that DejaVu Sans Condensed has no small caps. That's why
you get the unexpected result.
On 24-7-2012 21:29, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
\definehighlight[smallcaps][style=\setff{smallcaps}]
Hello and thanks for your help but even if I copy-paste your example
into TeXWorks and typeset it (remember,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:21:22PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 24-7-2012 21:29, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
\definehighlight[smallcaps][style=\setff{smallcaps}]
Hello and thanks for your help but even if I
Thanks to all who replied.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Marco net...@lavabit.com wrote:
My guess is that DejaVu Sans Condensed has no small caps. That's why
you get the unexpected result. LibO might fake the small caps, which
should usually be avoided, since it often leads to
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Marco net...@lavabit.com wrote:
My guess is that DejaVu Sans Condensed has no small caps. That's why
you get the unexpected result. LibO might fake the small caps, which
should usually be avoided, since it often
Hello Aditya and thanks for your help. However, the following file
still does not my particular selected font to be shown in faux small
caps:
\def\fakesmallcaps{\let\processword\dofakesmallcapped\processwords}
\def\dofakesmallcapped#1{\dostartfakesmallcapped#1\dostopfakesmallcapped}
On Jul 24, 2012, at 10:33 PM, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
Hi -- is there absolutely no way for obtaining these fake small caps
in ConTeXT?
Here's a hack, which sort of works, definitely doesn't handle return -- there
must be a better way. I hope you don't mind my using your text as text. :-)
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Rogers, Michael K mrog...@emory.edu wrote:
Here's a hack, which sort of works, definitely doesn't handle return --
there must be a better way. I hope you don't mind my using your text as
text. :-)
Hi thanks for your help. Sorry to keep returning with
Barry Schwartz wrote:
Are there fonts that have a or b in the numr and dnom features but
where they do not work in frac?
that is unrelated, the replacement rules refer to glyphs an doften they
stick to digits so you get a/b with a large a and b and the fractional
slash which then gives an
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl skribis:
so, its not that frac itself is the problem dealing with in the engine,
because if so, many features would be a problem, it's just that font
makers stick to a couple of simple rules like:
(1) replace all
digits slash digits
by
sup
Barry Schwartz wrote:
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl skribis:
Barry Schwartz wrote:
If base mode uses the traditional TeX mechanism for ligatures, I don't
see any way the font can be blamed.
Ant does the same thing, I believe, using the OT tables and heuristics
to run the TeX processor. That's
Barry Schwartz wrote:
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl skribis:
but even then, if a font is not clear about issues, then one can get
unwanted side effects (the frac feature for instance is often quite
bugged and can only be applied selectively)
Yeah, I think trying to be fancy with contextual
Derek CORDEIRO wrote:
\usemodule[simplefonts]
Question for wolfgang ... do you enable node mode?
in basemode, it might be that ligatures are loaded after smallcaps (and
base mode is static) and then it's the order of features in the font
that determines what happens,
if so, then maybe we
Derek CORDEIRO wrote:
That does not work for me at all. The following does work with generating
the same ThOMAS
another test:
\definefontfeature[default] [default] [mode=node]
\definefontfeature[smallcaps][smallcaps][mode=node]
\definefontfeature[oldstyle] [oldstyke] [mode=node]
Hans
Barry Schwartz wrote:
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl skribis:
could it be a bug in the font? i.e. a Th ligature showing up in
smallcaps? if so, then simplefonts should disable ligatures in smallcaps
I'm looking at AGaramondPro-Regular in fontforge and it has the lookup
for small caps well above the
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:31 PM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
Derek CORDEIRO wrote:
That does not work for me at all. The following does work with generating
the same ThOMAS
another test:
\definefontfeature[default] [default] [mode=node]
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl skribis:
Barry Schwartz wrote:
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl skribis:
could it be a bug in the font? i.e. a Th ligature showing up in
smallcaps? if so, then simplefonts should disable ligatures in smallcaps
I'm looking at AGaramondPro-Regular in fontforge and it
Am 18.09.2009 um 19:57 schrieb Hans Hagen:
Question for wolfgang ... do you enable node mode?
No.
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist :
Barry Schwartz wrote:
If base mode uses the traditional TeX mechanism for ligatures, I don't
see any way the font can be blamed.
sure
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl skribis:
Barry Schwartz wrote:
If base mode uses the traditional TeX mechanism for ligatures, I don't
see any way the font can be blamed.
Ant does the same thing, I believe, using the OT tables and heuristics
to run the TeX processor. That's okay, as long as the
Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl skribis:
but even then, if a font is not clear about issues, then one can get
unwanted side effects (the frac feature for instance is often quite
bugged and can only be applied selectively)
Yeah, I think trying to be fancy with contextual substitutions is a
bit like
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Antoine Junod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Wolfgang!
Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Antoine Junod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
I actually use my font as simple as possible with a
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your reply :)
Henning Hraban Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am 2008-04-13 um 20:39 schrieb Antoine Junod:
I actually use my font as simple as possible with a
\definefont[boum][MyFont at 12pt]. Is it the problem?
Yes. You should set up your fonts with a typescript and
Hi Wolfgang!
Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Antoine Junod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
I actually use my font as simple as possible with a
\definefont[boum][MyFont at 12pt]. Is it the problem?
It the same with the \sc command.
Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Antoine Junod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Wolfgang!
Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Antoine Junod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
I actually use my font as
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Antoine Junod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Antoine Junod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Wolfgang!
Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:39 PM,
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Antoine Junod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
I'm still playing with a few otf fonts and enjoying the way ConTeXt
works :)
I'm now playing with a beautiful Garamond. I try to typeset a few
things with old-style numbers and, well, the output contains
Am 2008-04-13 um 20:39 schrieb Antoine Junod:
I actually use my font as simple as possible with a
\definefont[boum][MyFont at 12pt]. Is it the problem?
Yes. You should set up your fonts with a typescript and access small
caps / oldstyle as features.
Sorry, can't help you further at the
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On 7/1/06, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On 6/29/06, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
{\bf A test \variant[Caps] in small caps}
Does this work on your computer? (I don't get any caps here.)
No it doesn't, it was a leftover from a failed experiment
I did not follow
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
It works perfect except in a single case: \title{\molecule{SF_6}}
I had seen that, but not yet bothered to fix it. Still, it is
fairly easy to change the macro, try the version below.
Sorry, I thought you were talking about the spacing between F and 6.
Didn't work in
On 7/2/06, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
It works perfect except in a single case: \title{\molecule{SF_6}}
I had seen that, but not yet bothered to fix it. Still, it is
fairly easy to change the macro, try the version below.
Sorry, I thought you were talking about the
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Seems like understanding \expandafter would solve 90% of my problems.
I tried to understand that part in TeX book, but it's so cryptic (too
short) ... I understand the concept, but I'm not able to write the
code for it yet :(
The trick to \expandafter is that you
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On 6/29/06, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
{\bf A test \variant[Caps] in small caps}
Does this work on your computer? (I don't get any caps here.)
No it doesn't, it was a leftover from a failed experiment
Thanks for the magnificent macro! I replaced minus by $-$ and I had
On 7/1/06, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On 6/29/06, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
{\bf A test \variant[Caps] in small caps}
Does this work on your computer? (I don't get any caps here.)
No it doesn't, it was a leftover from a failed experiment
OK. I thought so :(
Thanks
On 6/29/06, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
{\bf A test \variant[Caps] in small caps}
Does this work on your computer? (I don't get any caps here.)
\newbox\chemlowbox
\def\chemlow#1%
{\setbox\chemlowbox\hbox{{\switchtobodyfont[small]#1}}}
\def\chemhigh#1%
{\ifvoid\chemlowbox
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Maybe what is needed is a \beforemathswitch token set. Then one could
do
\appendtoks \boldmath to \beforemathswitch
Already present: \everymathematics
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
It only gets the size right, not the boldnes. But it can be argued
that that is the correct behaviour anyways.
Not so long ago you argued that \alpha-sheet, \beta-helix,
\gamma-rays, ... should be part of text flow (a reason why the el
companion encoding should have
Sorry, messed up something. New version followws:
\newbox\chemlowbox
\def\chemlow#1%
{\setbox\chemlowbox\hbox{{\switchtobodyfont[small]#1}}}
\def\chemhigh#1%
{\ifvoid\chemlowbox \high{{\switchtobodyfont[small]#1}}%
\else \lohi[left]{\box\chemlowbox}{{\switchtobodyfont[small]#1}}\fi }
Hans Hagen wrote:
i didt follow this thread, so i may be wrong, but doesn't the ppchtex
(see manuals) module does that kind of stuff?
It doesn't retain font styles (at least, I could not make it do that)
Taco
___
ntg-context mailing list
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Sorry, messed up something. New version followws:
\newbox\chemlowbox
\def\chemlow#1%
{\setbox\chemlowbox\hbox{{\switchtobodyfont[small]#1}}}
\def\chemhigh#1%
{\ifvoid\chemlowbox \high{{\switchtobodyfont[small]#1}}%
\else
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I have to tiny questions:
1. How do I get small caps [bold] italic (except with the
\definedfont[ec-lmxxx])?
No idea.
2. I defined \molecule to be
\def\molecule#1{$\rm#1$},
better use {\mathematics{\rm #1}} so that you can also write
On Jun 28, 2006, at 7:44 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I have to tiny questions:
1. How do I get small caps [bold] italic (except with the
\definedfont[ec-lmxxx])?
Mojca,
this is a bit more complicated than it sounds. Have a look at Adam's
MyWay, section 4 explains how to do it.
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hello,
I have to tiny questions:
1. How do I get small caps [bold] italic (except with the
\definedfont[ec-lmxxx])?
No idea.
Same for me. I know that theoreticallu something would be possible
using \Var and special
On 6/28/06, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Some catcode trickery might work. This is all I could manage.
This does not work well, because
HSO\low{4}\high{-}
is not correct.
True, but if I'm aware of it, I can use \lohi{4}{$-$} if needed, which
works even better in
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On 6/28/06, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Some catcode trickery might work. This is all I could manage.
This does not work well, because
HSO\low{4}\high{-}
is not correct.
True, but if I'm aware of it, I can use
On Mar 2, 2005, at 10:59 AM, Adam Lindsay wrote:
Hold on one minute... we're talking about encodings for alternate
glyphs,
right? That's orthogonal to what Unicode is about. 'a' and 'Asmall'
pretty much take up the same unicode slot. Only 'a' appears in the
.cmap.xml file.
No, of course you're
Hans Hagen said this at Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:54:35 +0100:
about code ... wybo dekker has cleaned up the texfont code, so that will
be the
starting point for extensions
Wow. Thanks, Wybo!
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL
Thomas A.Schmitz wrote:
For the time being, I'm thinking of a very simple list that could just
serve as a pattern for arranging the lines I get from processing the
cmap.xml. I'm just thinking, not writing code yet...
about code ... wybo dekker has cleaned up the texfont code, so that will be the
Adam, I feel like a complete idiot now. I had been so proud about this
idea, but after re-reading you MyWay about OpenType, I see that I had
been reinventing the wheel: this is exactly the solution you had been
suggesting almost two years ago. Thanks for being generous about
this...
However,
Adam Lindsay wrote:
This is good stuff. I've tried to advocate a naming convention that would
be appropriate to this. I would suggest calling this texnansi-osfsc.enc,
as baseencoding-variant.enc. This is so a modified encoding can
masquerade as the base encoding within ConTeXt.
i'll add the
Thomas A.Schmitz said this at Sat, 26 Feb 2005 10:13:00 +0100:
In the last days, I played around with some truetype fonts, preparing
them for use with ConTeXt by creating tfms via the texnansi encoding.
Hello (again) Thomas,
This is good stuff. I've tried to advocate a naming convention that
This is good stuff. I've tried to advocate a naming convention that
would
be appropriate to this. I would suggest calling this
texnansi-osfsc.enc,
as baseencoding-variant.enc. This is so a modified encoding can
masquerade as the base encoding within ConTeXt.
Given this encoding with my
69 matches
Mail list logo