Hi Hans,
Thanks for the new feature for row backgrounds, which I tested: it works
(though see below) and it is another great feature!
I wanted to add the information on the wiki, but thought it would be better to
explain the meanings of \ND and \NL: is the following correct:
\NC = New Column
On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Hans Hagen wrote:
\setupformulas[split=yes,align=flushleft] % already there
While you are tweaking formulas, would it make sense to add a key-value
interface for \startformula, so that the following also works:
\startformula[split=yes, align=flushleft]
...
On 6/19/2017 12:56 AM, Henri Menke wrote:
Let me quote the TeXbook (page 195):
»Although formulas within a paragraph always break after binary operations and
relations, displayed
formulas always break before binary operations and relations.«
given that one uses alignments
On the other
On Sun, 2017-06-18 at 13:00 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/17/2017 3:48 PM, Jeong Dal wrote:
> >
> > Dear Hans,
> >
> > I updated ConTeXt beta today and run your sample for long formula.
> > It works nice and it is the feature what many math people want I think.
> > Thank you for your concern.
Dear Hans,
> 2017. 6. 18. 오후 8:00, Hans Hagen 작성:
>
> this is how tex works: just look at inline math
>
Yes, you are right.
To start a new line with a sign may be a preference of me and some others.
I found a document which illustrates the different displays of a long
On 6/17/2017 3:48 PM, Jeong Dal wrote:
Dear Hans,
I updated ConTeXt beta today and run your sample for long formula.
It works nice and it is the feature what many math people want I think.
Thank you for your concern.
One thing that I’d like say is that a new line in the splitted long formula
Dear Hans,
I updated ConTeXt beta today and run your sample for long formula.
It works nice and it is the feature what many math people want I think.
Thank you for your concern.
One thing that I’d like say is that a new line in the splitted long formula
usually starts with operations in many
On 6/14/2017 11:33 AM, Mathias Schickel wrote:
Am 13.06.2017 um 16:46 schrieb Hans Hagen >:
On 6/13/2017 1:18 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote:
Am 12.06.2017 um 18:17 schrieb Hans Hagen >:
On 6/12/2017 5:56 PM, Mathias
> Am 13.06.2017 um 16:46 schrieb Hans Hagen :
>
> On 6/13/2017 1:18 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote:
>>> Am 12.06.2017 um 18:17 schrieb Hans Hagen :
>>>
>>> On 6/12/2017 5:56 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote:
Hi Hans,
if I get it right this means that you provide a
On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, Hans Hagen wrote:
attached what will be provided ... experimental for a while (not in the mood
now for harder stuff)
Thanks. I'll play around with it.
Aditya
___
If your question is of
this looks really cool and useful! thanks a lot, Hans!
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:46 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 6/13/2017 1:18 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 12.06.2017 um 18:17 schrieb Hans Hagen :
>>>
>>> On 6/12/2017 5:56 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote:
>>>
On 6/13/2017 1:18 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote:
Am 12.06.2017 um 18:17 schrieb Hans Hagen :
On 6/12/2017 5:56 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote:
Hi Hans,
if I get it right this means that you provide a mechanism that brakes formulas
automatically across several lines? I appreciate
> On 12 Jun 2017, at 17:25, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> experimental in next beta:
There is a TeX Live updating utility, at least on the MacOS distribution, that
allows for server synchronizations between the yearly updates. Is ConTeXt
updated there?
> Am 12.06.2017 um 18:17 schrieb Hans Hagen :
>
> On 6/12/2017 5:56 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>> if I get it right this means that you provide a mechanism that brakes
>> formulas automatically across several lines? I appreciate this very much!
>> Thank you for
On 6/13/2017 8:06 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Hans Hagen wrote:
i.e. (poor mans) multiline display math
Interesting. An important reference for automatic breaking of multiline
display are the notes of Michael J Downes included in the documentation
of breqn: see section
On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Hans Hagen wrote:
i.e. (poor mans) multiline display math
Interesting. An important reference for automatic breaking of multiline
display are the notes of Michael J Downes included in the documentation of
breqn: see section 14 (page 16) of
On 6/12/2017 5:56 PM, Mathias Schickel wrote:
Hi Hans,
if I get it right this means that you provide a mechanism that brakes formulas
automatically across several lines? I appreciate this very much! Thank you for
including this into the next beta!
Would it be possible to do something like
Hi Hans,
if I get it right this means that you provide a mechanism that brakes formulas
automatically across several lines? I appreciate this very much! Thank you for
including this into the next beta!
Would it be possible to do something like that for breaking long formulas
across pages (or
On 1/17/2017 8:27 PM, Henri Menke wrote:
On 01/17/2017 08:23 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/17/2017 8:13 PM, Henri Menke wrote:
On 01/15/2017 05:19 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Hi,
the next beta has additional keywords for texdefinitions:
\starttext
% [spaces|nospaces] [global] [unexpanded]
On 01/17/2017 08:23 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 1/17/2017 8:13 PM, Henri Menke wrote:
>> On 01/15/2017 05:19 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the next beta has additional keywords for texdefinitions:
>>>
>>> \starttext
>>>
>>> % [spaces|nospaces] [global] [unexpanded] [expanded] [..argument]
On 1/17/2017 8:13 PM, Henri Menke wrote:
On 01/15/2017 05:19 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Hi,
the next beta has additional keywords for texdefinitions:
\starttext
% [spaces|nospaces] [global] [unexpanded] [expanded] [..argument] csname
\starttexdefinition unexpanded doubleempty whatever [#1][#2]#3
On 01/15/2017 05:19 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the next beta has additional keywords for texdefinitions:
>
> \starttext
>
> % [spaces|nospaces] [global] [unexpanded] [expanded] [..argument] csname
>
> \starttexdefinition unexpanded doubleempty whatever [#1][#2]#3
Is only the outer level
> On 27 Jun 2016, at 10:38, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> The next beta will support this (for mp lovers)
>
> \definecolor[maincolor] [r=.5]
> \startMPpage
>fill fullcircle scaled 10cm withcolor "maincolor" ;
>...
> \stopMPpage
>
> So, in many cases you can use strings
On 4/15/2015 7:08 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Hans Hagen wrote:
\starttext
\starttabulate[||CL{darkred}|CM{darkgreen}CT{white}|CR{darkblue}||]
\NC first \NC left \NC middle \NC right \NC
last \NC \NR
\NC first \NC \color[white]{left} \NC
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Hans Hagen wrote:
\starttext
\starttabulate[||CL{darkred}|CM{darkgreen}CT{white}|CR{darkblue}||]
\NC first \NC left \NC middle \NC right \NC last \NC
\NR
\NC first \NC \color[white]{left} \NC middle \NC \color[white]{right}
\NC last \NC
Hi Hans, All,
I find this nomenclature confusing and a little confusing from a design
standpoint!
1) Color of the text background should be separate from the rest
of the cell background
2) the names should reflect to what they apply
That said we should have:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 23:46:35 +0100
Sietse Brouwer sbbrou...@gmail.com wrote:
[1] http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Tabulate
There is \starttabulate and \starttable.
I understand that they use different mechanisms, even though their
syntax are parallel. The wiki page [1] warns against the use of
On 3/20/2013 8:14 AM, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
Hi Hans, All,
I find this nomenclature confusing and a little confusing from a design
standpoint!
1) Color of the text background should be separate from the rest
of the cell background
2) the names should reflect
On 3/20/2013 8:24 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 23:46:35 +0100
Sietse Brouwer sbbrou...@gmail.com wrote:
[1] http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Tabulate
There is \starttabulate and \starttable.
I understand that they use different mechanisms, even though their
syntax are parallel.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 3/20/2013 8:14 AM, Keith J. Schultz wrote:
Hi Hans, All,
I find this nomenclature confusing and a little confusing from a design
standpoint!
1) Color of the text background should be separate from the rest
On 3/20/2013 5:36 PM, Jonathan Barchi wrote:
Just to be clear: CT provides an alternate method to colorize the
text, instead of
using the standard \color[foo]{bar} - right? There is already a
section on using
the \color command to colorize the text, so I want to make sure I'm adding this
i.e. we already had CL CM and CR, so CT is new .. should be wikified.
The wiki [1] describes these \C* commands:
\CR color is applied to the background of the text and the remaining
space on the right;
\CC color is applied to the background of the text only;
\CM color is applied
On 3/19/2013 11:46 PM, Sietse Brouwer wrote:
i.e. we already had CL CM and CR, so CT is new .. should be wikified.
The wiki [1] describes these \C* commands:
\CR color is applied to the background of the text and the remaining
space on the right;
\CC color is applied to the
33 matches
Mail list logo