f Of Kurt Buff
> Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 9:49 PM
> To: ntsysadm
> Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server
> Core/NanoServer over Linux?
>
> Sorry - my bad. They are Privileged Access Workstations:
> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identit
> > Sent from Mail for Windows 10
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Michael B. Smith
> > Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2017 17:33
> > To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
> > Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server
> > Core/NanoServer over Linux?
&
orum.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
> > Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 1:03 PM
> > To: ntsysadm <ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com>
> > Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server
> Core/NanoServer over Linux?
> >
> > It's also a push to start implementing PAWs - Pro
ws 10
>
>
>
> From: Michael B. Smith
> Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2017 17:33
> To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
> Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server
> Core/NanoServer over Linux?
>
>
>
> Interesting read. Thanks.
>
> -Origina
From: Michael B. Smith<mailto:mich...@smithcons.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2017 17:33
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer
over Linux?
Interesting read. Thanks.
---
Interesting read. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Kurt Buff
Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 9:49 PM
To: ntsysadm
Subject: Re: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer
over Linux
RDP; trying to move away from that as much as
>> possible.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Matt Stork
>> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 11:38 AM
>> To: ntsysadm@lis
.myitforum.com
> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Matt Stork
> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 11:38 AM
> To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
> Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server
> Core/NanoServer over Linux?
>
> Running Core and Nano does not me
myitforum.com]
> On Behalf Of Matt Stork
> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 11:38 AM
> To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
> Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server
> Core/NanoServer over Linux?
>
> Running Core and Nano does not mean running without a
...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Matt Stork
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 11:38 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer
over Linux?
Running Core and Nano does not mean running without a GUI
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On
Behalf Of Katherine M. Moss
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 9:18 AM
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer
over Linux?
That’s the difficulty I’m having; currently, I’m the only one in my group who
To: ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com<mailto:ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com>
Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server Core/NanoServer
over Linux?
You can run linux without a gui.
Op 1 jun. 2017 11:54 p.m. schreef "Charles F Sullivan"
<charles.sulliva...@bc.edu<mailto:charles
appropriate. I think that’s the real answer.
*From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Rene de Haas
*Sent:* Thursday, June 1, 2017 6:49 PM
*To:* ntsysadm@lists.myitforum.com
*Subject:* RE: [NTSysADM] What is the argument for Windows Server
Core
You can run linux without a gui.
Op 1 jun. 2017 11:54 p.m. schreef "Charles F Sullivan" <
charles.sulliva...@bc.edu>:
> Or maybe you could say “Why use Linux when you can use Windows without the
> overhead and security vulnerabilities that go with a GUI?”
>
>
>
> *From:*
Or maybe you could say “Why use Linux when you can use Windows without the
overhead and security vulnerabilities that go with a GUI?”
*From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Katherine M. Moss
*Sent:* Thursday, June 1, 2017 4:34 PM
*To:*
15 matches
Mail list logo