Hi,
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Ralf Gommers
As one lurker to another, thanks for calling it out.
Over-argumentative, and personality centric threads like these have
actually led me to distance myself from the numpy community. I do not know
how common it is now because I do not follow it closely anymore. It used to
be quite common at one
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:39 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not *any* cost, this goes deep and wide, it's one of the basic
concepts of numpy that you want to rename.
The proposal I last made was to
as a lurker, may I say that this discussion seems to have become
non-productive?
It seems all agree that docs needs improvement, perhaps a first step would
be to suggest doc improvements, and then the need for renaming may become
self-evident, or not.
aww darn, ruined my lurker status.
Matti
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:39 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not *any* cost, this goes deep and wide, it's one of the
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Gommers, on 2013-04-06 10:51, wrote:
P.P.S. expect an identical response from me to future proposals that
include backwards compatibility breaks of heavily used functions for
something that's not a functional enhancement or bug fix. Such proposals
are just not OK.
but it is a
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Paul Ivanov pivanov...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Gommers, on 2013-04-06 10:51, wrote:
P.P.S. expect an identical response from me to future proposals that
include backwards compatibility breaks of heavily used functions for
something that's not a
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:39 PM,
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Matthew
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
Hey
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 14:20 -0700, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
snip
Maybe we should go through and rename order to something more
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
Hey
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 14:20 -0700, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Nathaniel Smith
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
Hey
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 14:20 -0700,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:20 AM,
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Matthew
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Ralf
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:27 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:21 PM, Matthew Brett
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:27 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Ralf Gommers
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:39 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:27 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:39 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:27 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:31 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:39 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
We all agree that 'order' is used with two different and orthogonal
meanings in numpy.
well, not entirely orthogonal -- they are the some concept, used in
different contexts, so there is some benefit to their having
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
We all agree that 'order' is used
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:13 PM,
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:54 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:54 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Matthew Brett
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:33 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:54 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 12:40 -0700, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
snip
So - to restate in other words - this :
np.reshape(a, (3, 4), order='F')
could reasonably mean one of two orthogonal things
1) Retrieve data from the array using first-to-last indexing, return
any memory layout you
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 12:40 -0700, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
snip
So - to restate in other words - this :
np.reshape(a, (3, 4), order='F')
could reasonably mean one of two orthogonal things
1) Retrieve
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
snip
Maybe we should go through and rename order to something more descriptive
in each case, so we'd have
a.reshape(..., index_order=C)
a.copy(memory_order=F)
etc.?
I'd like to propose this instead:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:26 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Before you answer that -- does anyone see a use case for the 'A' and
'K' flags that can't be reasonably easily accomplished with .view() or
asarray() or ???
What order does a[a2] use to create the returned 1-D array?
...
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:26 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Before you answer that -- does anyone see a use case for the 'A' and
'K' flags that can't be reasonably easily accomplished with .view() or
Catching up with numpy 1.6
'No' means: I don't think it makes sense given the current behavior of numpy
with respect to functions that are designed to return views
(and copy memory only if there is no way to make a view)
One objective of functions that create views is *not* to change the
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 7:09 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
the context where it gets applied. So giving the same strategy two
different names is silly; if anything it's the contexts that should
have different names.
Yup, thats how I think about it too...
me too...
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:19 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 7:09 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2,
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
the context where it gets applied. So giving the same strategy two
different names is silly; if anything it's the
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
It was not enough for me or the three others who will publicly admit
to the shame of finding it confusing without further thought.
I would submit that some of the confusion came from the fact that with
ravel(), and
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
It was not enough for me or the three others who will publicly admit
to the shame of finding it confusing without further
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:24 AM,
Hi all,
Since we're mentionning obvious and non-obvious naming,
I think you agree that there is potential for confusion, and there
doesn't seem any reason to continue with that confusion if we can come
up with a clearer name.
So here is a compromise proposal.
How about:
*
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
We were teaching today, and found ourselves getting very confused
about ravel and shape in numpy.
Summary
--
There are two separate ideas needed to understand ordering in ravel and
reshape:
Proposal
-
* Deprecate the use of C and F meaning backwards and forwards
index ordering for ravel, reshape
* Prefer Z and N, being graphical representations of unraveling in
2 dimensions, axis1 first and axis0 first respectively (excellent
naming idea by Paul Ivanov)
What
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for the compliment, it's more enjoyable than other potential
explanations of my confusion (sigh).
But, I don't think that is the explanation.
well, the core explanation is these are difficult and
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
We were teaching today, and found ourselves getting very confused
about ravel and shape in numpy.
Summary
--
There are
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank you for the compliment, it's more enjoyable than other potential
explanations of my confusion (sigh).
But, I
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank you for the compliment, it's more
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
Maybe we should go through and rename order to something more descriptive
in each case, so we'd have
a.reshape(..., index_order=C)
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:37 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I still don't see why order is not a general concept, whether it
refers to memory or indexing/iterating.
I agree -- the ordering concept
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
This is like observing that if I say go North then it's ambiguous
about whether I want you to drive or walk, and concluding that we need
new words for the directions depending on what sort of vehicle you
use. So go
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is like observing that if I say go North then it's ambiguous
about whether I want you to drive or walk, and concluding that we need
new
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 7:09 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is like observing that if I say go North then it's ambiguous
about whether I
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is like observing that if I say go North then it's ambiguous
about whether I want you to drive or walk, and concluding that we need
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 7:09 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is like observing that if I say go North then it's ambiguous
about
On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 14:04 -0700, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 1:43 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:38 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 14:04 -0700, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 1:43 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 14:04 -0700, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 1:43 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
HI folks,
I've been teaching Python lately, have taught numpy a couple times
(formally), and am preparing a leacture about it over the next couple
weeks -- so I'm taking an interest here.
I've been
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:38 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 9:37 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:38 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 9:37 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:43 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:38 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Matthew Brett
matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 1:43 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:38 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We were teaching today, and found ourselves getting very confused
about ravel and shape in numpy.
Summary
--
There are two separate ideas needed to understand ordering in ravel and
reshape:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:14 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
We were teaching today, and found ourselves getting very confused
about ravel and shape in numpy.
Summary
--
There are two
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 19:08 -0700, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
We were teaching today, and found ourselves getting very confused
about ravel and shape in numpy.
Summary
--
There are two separate ideas needed to understand ordering in ravel and
reshape:
Idea 1): ravel /
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 19:08 -0700, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
We were teaching today, and found ourselves getting very confused
about ravel and shape in numpy.
Summary
--
There are two
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:14 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
We were teaching today, and found ourselves getting very confused
about ravel and shape in numpy.
Summary
--
There are two
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:14 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
We were teaching today, and found ourselves getting very
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:57 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:14 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 1:57 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:14 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:57 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:14 AM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29,
On Sat, 2013-03-30 at 12:45 -0700, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Sebastian Berg
sebast...@sipsolutions.net wrote:
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 19:08 -0700, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
We were teaching today, and found ourselves getting very confused
about ravel
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:57 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat,
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Bradley M. Froehle
brad.froe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:57 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Bradley M. Froehle
brad.froe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 4:57 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:50 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Bradley M. Froehle
brad.froe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:20 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:50 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Bradley M. Froehle
brad.froe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Matthew Brett
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:02 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:50 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Bradley M. Froehle
brad.froe...@gmail.com
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:02 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:50 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Bradley M. Froehle
brad.froe...@gmail.com
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:02 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:50 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:02 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:50 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We were teaching today, and found ourselves getting very confused
about ravel and shape in numpy.
Summary
--
There are two separate ideas needed to understand ordering in ravel and reshape:
Idea 1): ravel / reshape can proceed from the last axis to the first,
or the first to
81 matches
Mail list logo
