Hello, all.
A program, before it can run at it's runtime address, it has to configure the
memory, copy itself to the memory,
or enable the MMU; after these, it can run at it's runtime address.
My question is, how can I debug it with OpenOCD and gdb, when it does not
run at it's runtime
Give hardware breakpoints a go.
(gdb) hbreak *0x2314
--
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
___
Openocd-development
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:49 AM, David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net wrote:
Much to my surprise, I observed a flash erase_address ...
command erasing data which I didn't say should be erased.
The issue turns out to be generic NOR flash code which was
silently, and rather dangerously, morphing
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Yegor Yefremov
yegorsli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:49 AM, David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net wrote:
Much to my surprise, I observed a flash erase_address ...
command erasing data which I didn't say should be erased.
The issue turns out
An alternative would be to add an option that is disabled by
default that will check that the address range matches sector
boundaries. This is incompatible, but perhaps a better way to
go?
This would be along the lines of the options we have for flash
write_image.
flash erase_address force
Ouch.
This is a bit worse than I thought.
This breaks flash write_image as well.
Flash write_image will first erase all sectors in address ranges of
all segments to be written, then it will write all segments.
--
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
When building standard configuration on Windows (MSYS + MinGW):
libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src
-I../../src -g -O2 -D__USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wformat-security -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wbad-function-cast
-Wcast-align
When building standard configuration on Windows (MSYS + MinGW):
libtool: compile: gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src
-I../../src -g -O2 -D__USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wformat-security -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wbad-function-cast
-Wcast-align
When trying to flash STM32:
flash write_image erase c:\\a.hex
auto erase enabled
address range 0x0800 .. 0x0800681b is not sector-aligned
Command handler execution failed
in procedure 'flash' called at file command.c, line 637
called at file command.c, line 352
Don't know what should I
This is a known problem.
revert nor/flash/core.c to 5fdee60fd4d38e59c7b5f7aca5ad50b90e7d61ee
and see if it doesn't fix it.
--
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash
Ignore this for now. It runs fine with -O0, segfaults with -O2. Now to figure
out why.
-Original Message-
From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:openocd-
development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Austin, Alex
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 4:45 PM
To:
On Tuesday 22 December 2009, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
After applying the latest patches 0.4-rc1 I encountered the following error:
halt
flash write_image erase image.bin 0x1000 bin
auto erase enabled
address range 0x1000 .. 0x000135d3 is not sector-aligned
Command handler execution failed
On Tuesday 22 December 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
This is a bit worse than I thought.
This breaks flash write_image as well.
That was *this* problem report, in fact...
Flash write_image will first erase all sectors in address ranges of
all segments to be written, then it will write all
On Tuesday 22 December 2009, Freddie Chopin wrote:
flash write_image erase c:\\a.hex
auto erase enabled
address range 0x0800 .. 0x0800681b is not sector-aligned
Command handler execution failed
in procedure 'flash' called at file command.c, line 637
called at file command.c, line
Read-modify-erase-write on per-sector basis?
-Original Message-
From: openocd-development-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:openocd-
development-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of David Brownell
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 8:23 PM
To: Øyvind Harboe
Cc:
On 17.12.2009 19:39, David Brownell wrote:
On Thursday 17 December 2009, Dirk Behme wrote:
Ok, after board reset I get
-- cut --
scan_chain
TapName Enabled IdCode Expected IrLen IrCap IrMask
-- --- -- -- - -
16 matches
Mail list logo
