OpenPKG on Mac OS X 10.4

2007-05-28 Thread Anders F Björklund
Tried OpenPKG on Mac OS X and ran into some minor build issues with using static libraries on Darwin... 1) miniperl was using a dynamic libperl.dylib by default, and this didn't work when running from /tmp/openpkg 2) openssl does not work on darwin when using static libs, due to a hack

Re: OpenPKG on Mac OS X 10.4

2007-05-29 Thread Anders F Björklund
Bill Campbell wrote: Tried OpenPKG on Mac OS X and ran into some minor build issues with using static libraries on Darwin... I've got a fair number of packages running on PowerPC OS X. I saw that it was working for Mac OS X 10.3, so I thought I'd try it... I've found that most packages

Re: OpenPKG on Mac OS X 10.4

2007-06-02 Thread Anders F Björklund
With those two issues patched, it then bootstrapped just fine on Mac OS X 10.4.9 (tested on PowerPC and on Intel) [...] Now onwards to test some actual packages, but it looks good. Will let you know if I find anything else, or just ask... Tested building some packages now, and that's where

Darwin (Mac OS X) platform names

2007-06-02 Thread Anders F Björklund
What's the easiest way to customize the generated platform names that OpenPKG uses ? Currently it says e.g. i386-any-darwin8.9.1, while the Apple tools use i686-apple-darwin8 `uname -srp` says Darwin 8.9.1 i386 so it is technically right, but the kernel/Mac OS minor version probably shouldn't

Mac OS X: OpenSSL again

2007-06-03 Thread Anders F Björklund
First, a small addition to the openssl.patch for test: http://www.algonet.se/~afb/openpkg/openssl-addition.diff (originally did the same thing for apps for the bootstrap) However, the *reason* for the workaround is the fact that since OpenPKG does not provide a shared OpenSSL library, Darwin

Re: Darwin (Mac OS X) platform names

2007-06-03 Thread Anders F Björklund
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Currently it says e.g. i386-any-darwin8.9.1, while the Apple tools use i686-apple-darwin8 You talk about prefix/etc/openpkg/platform, I guess. This is a generated file just to make RPM happy. The any is inserted as OpenPKG itself doesn't use the

Re: Mac OS X: OpenSSL again

2007-06-03 Thread Anders F Björklund
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: However, the *reason* for the workaround is the fact that since OpenPKG does not provide a shared OpenSSL library, Darwin ld(1) will try to use the /usr/lib variant instead... So this will affect everything else using OpenSSL as well. The real solution would be

Re: Mac OS X: OpenSSL again

2007-06-03 Thread Anders F Björklund
I don't know of any linker option to have it look for static libs (other than explicitly listing them by name), but either a wrapper to the binary or even patching the source of the binary is doable. Reading through the source code I realize I didn't look *that* hard: -search_paths_first

Re: Mac OS X: OpenSSL again

2007-06-03 Thread Anders F Björklund
I did approach 1) for OpenSSL and approach 3) for Apache, and then the pitch succeeded* in running apache+lynx. :-) Hmm, almost forgot to mention that I did have to change the default apache configuration before it would start up: OpenPKG: start: apache:FAILED openpkg:rc:WARNING:

Re: Darwin (Mac OS X) platform names

2007-06-04 Thread Anders F Björklund
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Might a be a space or two too many for Mac OS X, but otherwise it is looking good I think ? (OpenDarwin is unfortunately dead) Ops, yes. Seems like we have to strip spaces somewhere. Can you quickly retry again with the version appended? There I tried to get rid

Re: Darwin (Mac OS X) platform names

2007-06-04 Thread Anders F Björklund
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: My bad, it was a tab character rather than spaces: Ah, a tab! This explains why even the old version failed. Ok, please once again and hopefully the last time I have to bother you with this nasty detection. Please retry with the appended version. Numbers works

Re: Darwin (Mac OS X) platform names

2007-06-04 Thread Anders F Björklund
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: It should be: concise system product: Mac OS X 10 regular system product: Mac OS X 10.3 verbose system product: Apple Mac OS X 10.3.9 And the technology should be: concise system technology: Darwin 7 regular system

Re: Mac OS X: OpenSSL again

2007-06-06 Thread Anders F Björklund
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: And need to provide fake binutils/gcc packages, with /usr symlinks. (so that dependencies and such work, otherwise it'll try to install) /openpkg/bin/cc - /usr/bin/cc /openpkg/bin/gcc - /usr/bin/gcc This can be provided by openpkg-import. Will do that, then:

Re: Mac OS X: OpenSSL again

2007-06-06 Thread Anders F Björklund
This can be provided by openpkg-import. Will do that, then: use openpkg-import to replace binutils and gcc. One little problem is that the binutils and cctools differ in content, so the following programs are missing: addr2line, objcopy, objdump, readelf I fixed the missing symlink target

Re: Mac OS X: OpenSSL again

2007-06-06 Thread Anders F Björklund
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: However, this still did not work because OpenPKG will fail to locate the real compiler e.g. i686-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.1 (from /usr/bin), but only find the gcc-4.0 driver front-end... (symlinked from cc) So either I need to bring some more symlinks in, or do it

Re: Mac OS X: OpenSSL again

2007-06-06 Thread Anders F Björklund
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Oh, I see. Ok, I've now improved the wrapper scripts. Please manually remove prefix/libexec/openpkg/override/{cc,gcc} and upgrade to the latest bootstrap version as of today. Then if -c or -E is present on the compiler command line the -Wl,-search_paths_first should

Darwin Issues affecting GCC's on OpenPKG

2007-06-08 Thread Anders F Björklund
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26510 compiling with static libs for darwin breaks during compile... http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19176 libgcc_s is required for correct running in terms of exceptions An interesting comment is: i686-darwin is not supported in any

Re: OpenPKG on Mac OS X 10.4

2007-06-09 Thread Anders F Björklund
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: I've now tried to build our gcc package (GCC 4.2.0). t starts just Ifine and compiles lots of things, but then it unfortunately fails [...] | strip -o libgcc_s.10.4.dylib_T${mlib} \ | -s

Re: OpenPKG on Mac OS X 10.4

2007-06-09 Thread Anders F Björklund
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: 2) by default it tries to use GNU/FSF gcc. This is not 100% binary compatible with Apple's gcc as far as I know and might lead to some subtle libgcc/libstdc++ problems later on ? So will switch, to gcc-5363. I've now tried to build our gcc package (GCC

Re: OpenPKG on Mac OS X 10.4

2007-06-09 Thread Anders F Björklund
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: Seems like lipo is some sort of a tool for the Universal Binaries stuff of Mac OS X Yup. The name made more sense when they were called fat binaries... http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ManPages/ man1/lipo.1.html It's part of cctools.

OpenPKG on Leopard (Mac OS X 10.5)

2007-11-05 Thread Anders F Björklund
Some software needed patching, in order to build: 1) extern inline is broken, with the Apple GCC this breaks most of GTK+, but also GNU tar... I hacked around the issue, just to make the bootstrap work OK: http://www.algonet.se/~afb/openpkg/tar-1.19-apple_nocode.patch 2) Bash doesn't work