Re: PadLock engine SHA1 support

2005-10-31 Thread Michal Ludvig
Andy, Ping :-) Did you have time to look at this patch? Should I add/fix something? Thanks! Michal Ludvig -- * Personal homepage: http://www.logix.cz/michal __ OpenSSL Project

Re: [openssl.org #1230] static(no-shared) build for VC-32 have wrong codegeneration option

2005-10-31 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
Once again I want to remind openssl-dev subscribers that if you want to make sure that originator of RT tickets, such as this one, receives your comment, reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not openssl-dev. Trouble is that RT ticket originator isn't necessarily subscribed to openssl-dev, rather

CRYPTO_thread_setup CRYPTO_thread_cleanup

2005-10-31 Thread Marios Karagiannopoulos
Hello guys, I have a problem in implementation of CRYPTO_thread_setup() and cleanup functions. I've already implemented an application which consists of 4 thread. Each thread of those 4 spawns 100 other threads with different gsoap clients. The problem is that I can't separate some Openssl calls

Re: [openssl.org #1230] static(no-shared) build for VC-32 have wrong codegeneration option

2005-10-31 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
but nt.mak contins line CFLAG= /MD /Ox /O2 /Ob2 /W3 /WX /Gs0 /GF /Gy /nologo -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_WIN32 -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN -DL_ENDIAN -DDSO_WIN32 -D_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE -DBN_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DSHA1_ASM -DRMD160_ASM /Fdout32 -DOPENSSL_NO_RC5 -DOPENSSL_NO_MDC2 -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 The

Re: Shared library version numbers [Was: LSB inclusion of OpenSSL]

2005-10-31 Thread Andy Polyakov
But I'll take up the cue and see what we can do that works everywhere. Then it would have to be the least common denominator: 97, 98, 100 or independent numbers such as 1, 2, 3. The above was referring to file suffixes. It should be noted that there're platforms, which has no notion of

Re: PadLock engine SHA1 support

2005-10-31 Thread Andy Polyakov
Ping :-) (-: Pong Did you have time to look at this patch? No, unfortunately. Are you in hurry? If yes, what's the hurry? Should I add/fix something? Windows support:-) SHA-224 [which differs from SHA-256 only by initial constants and truncated output]. Test programs [extra -e argument

Re: [openssl.org #1218] Status

2005-10-31 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
(2) after install, note: for v0.9.8a: otool -L libssl.dylib: libssl.0.9.8.dylib (compatibility version 0.9.8, current version 0.9.8) libcrypto.0.9.8.dylib (compatibility version 0.9.8, current version 0.9.8) /usr/local/lib/libgmp.3.dylib (compatibility version 7.0.0, current

Re: [openssl.org #1218] Status

2005-10-31 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
the problem is that applications i'm attempting to link to openssl 0.9.8 -- without these install_name prefixes -- either (a) do not 'find' the lib, despite an LDFLAGS/CPPFLAGS specification, or (b) incorrectly select the Apple-bundled libs on /usr. Can you elaborate on (b)? Can you

Re: Shared library version numbers [Was: LSB inclusion of OpenSSL]

2005-10-31 Thread Andy Polyakov
... in PAM case I can imagine problem with GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE being cross-polluted by 0.9.7 and 0.9.8 being *both* mapped into same application. Is it the case? Can you elaborate on which symbols were overloaded? You can figure this out by examining dynamic name tables *in pam modules* with

move to SVN?

2005-10-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At work I use SVN. It's much better then CVS (IMHO). When will OPENSSL move to SVN? __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org

Re: PadLock engine SHA1 support

2005-10-31 Thread Michal Ludvig
Andy Polyakov wrote: Did you have time to look at this patch? No, unfortunately. Are you in hurry? If yes, what's the hurry? No I'm not. I just wanted to move forward... Should I add/fix something? Windows support:-) Uh, eh, ... afterall I don't have a machine to test it on. SHA-224

Re: PadLock engine SHA1 support

2005-10-31 Thread Andy Polyakov
Test programs [extra -e argument perhaps]. ... to enable engines? Yes. On the other hand I suppose one can write a script, which would simply call 'openssl dgst -sha[1|256] -engine padlock' with a set of known input vectors... Could be. But should it be run automatically during make? I

Re: move to SVN?

2005-10-31 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:27:30 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: kent At work I use SVN. kent It's much better then CVS (IMHO). kent kent When will OPENSSL move to SVN? Personally, I'd rather it moved to monotone (http://www.venge.net/monotone/). SVN