RE: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-10-28 Thread Arpadffy Zoltan
: Richard Levitte [mailto:rich...@levitte.org] Sent: den 25 augusti 2009 10:09 To: openssl-dev@openssl.org; Arpadffy Zoltan Subject: Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS In message 839c820b5c926b4b89713b3a6ed68d2aae4...@sgstmail.scigames.at on Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:36:08 +0200, Arpadffy

Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-08-25 Thread Richard Levitte
In message 839c820b5c926b4b89713b3a6ed68d2aae4...@sgstmail.scigames.at on Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:36:08 +0200, Arpadffy Zoltan zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se said: Zoltan.Arpadffy Zoltan.Arpadffy Zoltan.Arpadffy Hello Richard, Zoltan.Arpadffy Zoltan.Arpadffy If those who do commit to the

RE: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-08-21 Thread Arpadffy Zoltan
Hello Richard, If those who do commit to the repository, I believe I'm the only one dealing with the VMS parts of the kit... I tested OPENSSL-VMS_64BIT-SNAP-20090821 as I was expecting that my changes would be there. I was wrong :( I wonder, where do you apply the patches and patch

Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-08-18 Thread Richard Levitte
(resend) In message 09081709341183_20200...@antinode.info on Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:34:11 -0500 (CDT), s...@antinode.info (Steven M. Schweda) said: sms From: Arpadffy Zoltan zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se sms sms As VMS does not have a make clean function yet, [...] sms smsWhen _all_

RE: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-08-18 Thread Arpadffy Zoltan
Hello, I haven't had a VAX account for a long time... someone give me one and I'll play... You can create your own account at http://www.polarhome.com/service/shell/ ... and just drop me a mail informing me what is you username. Regards, Z

Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-08-18 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: Richard Levitte rich...@levitte.org smsWhen _all_ the product files get put into architecture-specific sms directories, then cleaning gets easy. Agreed, but except for cleaning purposes, is there a reason to put architecture-independent files in architecture-specific directories?

RE: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-08-17 Thread Arpadffy Zoltan
Message- From: Steven M. Schweda [mailto:s...@antinode.info] Sent: den 15 augusti 2009 18:39 To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS From: Arpadffy Zoltan zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se This patch corrects build on OpenVMS systems. I

RE: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-08-17 Thread Arpadffy Zoltan
1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS In message 839c820b5c926b4b89713b3a6ed68d2aae4...@sgstmail.scigames.at on Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:15:12 +0200, Arpadffy Zoltan zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se said: Zoltan.Arpadffy OPTIONAL TODO Zoltan.Arpadffy - in order to make life more compatible we could use the same

RE: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-08-17 Thread Arpadffy Zoltan
/timeb.h + #endif Should not be there - please ignore it. Regards, Z -Original Message- From: Richard Levitte [mailto:rich...@levitte.org] Sent: den 17 augusti 2009 11:10 To: openssl-dev@openssl.org; Arpadffy Zoltan Subject: Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS In message

Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-08-17 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: Arpadffy Zoltan zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se As VMS does not have a make clean function yet, [...] When _all_ the product files get put into architecture-specific directories, then cleaning gets easy. Copied files? What's copied? =20 In makevms.com ALL target will do a

Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-08-15 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: Arpadffy Zoltan zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se This patch corrects build on OpenVMS systems. I haven't looked at it yet, but ... As VMS does not have a make clean function yet, it was hard to separate the really modified files from the copied (poor symlink imitation on VMS)

RE: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-08-12 Thread Arpadffy Zoltan
in advance. Regards Zoltan Arpadffy -Original Message- From: Steven M. Schweda [mailto:s...@antinode.info] Sent: den 15 juli 2009 21:48 To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS From: Dr. Stephen Henson st...@openssl.org OpenSSL version 1.0.0 Beta 3

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-08-12 Thread Steven M. Schweda
From: Arpadffy Zoltan zoltan.arpad...@scientificgames.se As you probably know VMS has a different DIFF output than UNIX diff and is not able to produce patch output. Please advice, how can I share my changes. May I submit a standard VMS diff output here? You might try GNU diff for

[openssl.org #2005] Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release

2009-08-10 Thread Guenter via RT
Hi Steve, Dr. Stephen Henson schrieb: Does adding Netware to the OPENSSL_SYS_BEOS_BONE part which #undefs AF_INET6 in b_sock.c work or do you need additional cases? yes, this works at first glance (cant tell more since I have finally a linkage prob so cant test ATM); with below patch compilation

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release

2009-07-22 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009, Guenter wrote: Hi, in addition to the issue below I see another one when I try to build with ASM support: although the *.asm files get generated, the mk1mf.pl script seems no longer to put the asm objects nor the asm build rules into the generated makefile ... I've

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release

2009-07-22 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009, Guenter wrote: HI Steve, Dr. Stephen Henson schrieb: OpenSSL version 1.0.0 Beta 3 OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS http://www.openssl.org/ OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The second beta is

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release

2009-07-22 Thread Guenter
Hi Steve, Dr. Stephen Henson schrieb: Does adding Netware to the OPENSSL_SYS_BEOS_BONE part which #undefs AF_INET6 in b_sock.c work or do you need additional cases? yes, this works at first glance (cant tell more since I have finally a linkage prob so cant test ATM); with below patch compilation

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release

2009-07-22 Thread Guenter
Hi Steve, Guenter schrieb: yes, this works at first glance (cant tell more since I have finally a linkage prob so cant test ATM); with below patch compilation finishes: now to the linkage prob which seems the last one with the NetWare CLIB platform: we have no gettimeofday() there, so we need a

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release

2009-07-21 Thread Guenter
Hi, in addition to the issue below I see another one when I try to build with ASM support: although the *.asm files get generated, the mk1mf.pl script seems no longer to put the asm objects nor the asm build rules into the generated makefile ... I've looked though the mk1mf.pl, but lost track

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release

2009-07-19 Thread Guenter
HI Steve, Dr. Stephen Henson schrieb: OpenSSL version 1.0.0 Beta 3 OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS http://www.openssl.org/ OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The second beta is now released. The beta release is available for

RE: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS

2009-07-16 Thread Arpadffy Zoltan
-Original Message- From: Steven M. Schweda [mailto:s...@antinode.info] Sent: den 15 juli 2009 21:48 To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release v. VMS From: Dr. Stephen Henson st...@openssl.org OpenSSL version 1.0.0 Beta 3 The VMS build fails pretty quickly. The VMS

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release

2009-07-16 Thread Michael Tüxen
Shouldn't DSO_ext be 6 if OPENSSL_SYS_MACOSX is defined? Best regards Michael On Jul 16, 2009, at 7:42 AM, Sander Temme wrote: On Jul 15, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: Try the next snapshot or this patch: http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=18416 Thanks for the report,

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release

2009-07-16 Thread Sander Temme
On Jul 15, 2009, at 11:44 PM, Michael Tüxen wrote: Shouldn't DSO_ext be 6 if OPENSSL_SYS_MACOSX is defined? Totally. I spaced on that, but see in the commit messages that Dr. Henson caught it. S. Best regards Michael On Jul 16, 2009, at 7:42 AM, Sander Temme wrote: On Jul 15,

OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release

2009-07-15 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OpenSSL version 1.0.0 Beta 3 OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS http://www.openssl.org/ OpenSSL is currently in a release cycle. The second beta is now released. The beta release is available for

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release

2009-07-15 Thread Sander Temme
On Jul 15, 2009, at 4:57 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: Please download and test them as soon as possible. This new OpenSSL Mac OS X 10.5.7 on Intel. ./Configure --prefix=/UserData/asf/openssl-1.0.0b3 shared threads zlib- dynamic darwin64-x86_64-cc Builds fine, but tests fail on

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release

2009-07-15 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009, Sander Temme wrote: On Jul 15, 2009, at 4:57 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: Please download and test them as soon as possible. This new OpenSSL Mac OS X 10.5.7 on Intel. ./Configure --prefix=/UserData/asf/openssl-1.0.0b3 shared threads zlib-dynamic

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta3 release

2009-07-15 Thread Sander Temme
On Jul 15, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: Try the next snapshot or this patch: http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=18416 Thanks for the report, That does the trick with a little further massaging. Revised patch: [scte...@legadema] tmp $ diff -u