RE: Duplicate Posts (Still)

2002-03-20 Thread Bernard Dautrevaux
-Original Message- From: Paulo Matos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Duplicate Posts (Still) On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: rse Just to make sure we do not hit a bug in Postfix

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-20 Thread Mark H. Wood
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Andrew T. Finnell wrote: See that is quite strange. My assumption is I don't think it has to do with the Mailing list server itself but rather your Mail Client applications. Why not post the client's everyone is using that is receiving duplicate posts? If they are all

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Roger F. Borrello, Jr. wrote: Am I the only one getting 4 or 5 copies of posted messages? No, I have the same problem. Aarno __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Emanuel Dejanu
I have the same problem. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aarno Syvanen Sent: 18 martie 2002 10:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Duplicate Posts Roger F. Borrello, Jr. wrote: Am I the only one getting 4 or 5 copies of posted

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Andrew T. Finnell
: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Duplicate Posts I have the same problem. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aarno Syvanen Sent: 18 martie 2002 10:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Duplicate Posts

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread jirak
Lotus Notes 4.6.1 Andrew T. Finnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/18/2002 08:51:20 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Joel Jirak/Lex/Lexmark) Subject: RE: Duplicate Posts See that is quite strange. My assumption is I don't think it has to do

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Emanuel Dejanu
Microsoft Outlook 2000 / Windows 2000 Emanuel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrew T. Finnell Sent: 18 martie 2002 15:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Duplicate Posts See that is quite strange. My assumption is I don't think

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Ales Privetivy
Hello, looking thru mail envelopes it seems to me that host mmx.engelschall.com sends the same message more that one time. Ales Privetivy Two sample mail headers: -- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 18 15:02:28 2002

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Oscar Valenzuela
Lotus Notes Oscar Valenzuela Unix System Support 212 326-6465 Andrew T. Finnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/18/2002 08:51 AM Please respond to openssl-users To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: Duplicate Posts See that is quite strange

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Roger F. Borrello, Jr.
X-Mailer: PMMail 2.10.1999 for OS/2 Warp 4.05 - rb On Mon, 18 Mar 2002 16:10:35 +0200, Emanuel Dejanu wrote: |See that is quite strange. My assumption is I don't think it has to do |with the Mailing list server itself but rather your Mail Client |applications. Why not post the client's

RE: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Michael Wojcik
] Subject: RE: Duplicate Posts See that is quite strange. My assumption is I don't think it has to do with the Mailing list server itself but rather your Mail Client applications. Why not post the client's everyone is using that is receiving duplicate posts? If they are all the same

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002, Lance Nehring wrote: Yes, I see the same thing in my headers. I've also addressed this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to try to get their attention to investigate their email logs. A valid STMP host on the net should route the postmaster address to an admin. per RFC822.

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Lance Nehring
Yes, I see the same thing in my headers. I've also addressed this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to try to get their attention to investigate their email logs. A valid STMP host on the net should route the postmaster address to an admin. per RFC822. Sometimes mmx.engelschall.com shows up in the header as:

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Michael Sierchio
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: ... According to the Postfix logfile for this particular mail and the receiving MTA, it is the problem of the receiving MTA or the network connection to it: There you have it, Ralf -- the problem is with Postfix itself. Other mailing lists don't have this

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Michael Sierchio
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: As you can see, SMTPfeed (the LMTP service reported here by Postfix) on mmx.engelschall.com tried many times to deliver the message because the connection timed out in the middle of the SMTP conversation. And, yes, as the log also says, the result could be that the

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 06:08:49PM +0100, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: | Mar 18 10:27:36 info postfix/lmtp[83321]: 57F961950B: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], | relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1], delay=863, status=deferred (conversation with | 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] timed out while sending end of data -- message

Re: Duplicate Posts

2002-03-18 Thread Allan E Johannesen
Lutz.Jaenicke == Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lutz.Jaenicke I am not familiar with SMTPfeed, but I am quite familiar with Lutz.Jaenicke postfix :-) The message above means, that the mail body was sent Lutz.Jaenicke out successfully. According to RFC821, the body is finished