RE: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review

2003-08-19 Thread Jason Carreira
-Original Message- From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I thought the writing was pretty good. I on the other hand question the need for boasting about a beta. It'd be weird to do a press release now, and then a similar one in a week or two when the final release

Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review

2003-08-19 Thread Anthony Eden
I am not replacing the command framework in JPublish with XWork. I was considering it at one point but have decided not to make that change. Sincerely, Anthony Eden Jason Carreira wrote: I've written up a short press release to go as an announcement to TSS and JavaLobby and on the OpenSymphony

RE: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review

2003-08-19 Thread Cameron Braid
Since you want us to know this, can you please indicate why you have made this decision ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Eden Sent: Wednesday, 20 August 2003 1:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press

Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review

2003-08-19 Thread Pat Lightbody
I thought the writing was pretty good. I on the other hand question the need for boasting about a beta. It'd be weird to do a press release now, and then a similar one in a week or two when the final release is out. +1 on that :) --- This

RE: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review

2003-08-19 Thread Jason Carreira
Ok, ok... We'll save it for the final release. -Original Message- From: Pat Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 10:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review I thought the writing was pretty good

RE: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review

2003-08-19 Thread roughley
Having just started working with WW2/XW, and liking it very much, an associate and I were thinking of putting together something also. Perhaps rather than a pure web-based tutorial (like Tracy is doing), we can present it in the form of an article / series of articles in order to reach an

Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review

2003-08-19 Thread Anthony Eden
this, can you please indicate why you have made this decision ? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Eden Sent: Wednesday, 20 August 2003 1:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review I am

RE: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review

2003-08-19 Thread Jason Carreira
I've updated the text to reflect that you are just adding support for Xwork actions to Jpublish. -Original Message- From: Anthony Eden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 11:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text

RE: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review

2003-08-19 Thread Jason Carreira
/WW2 press release text for review Having just started working with WW2/XW, and liking it very much, an associate and I were thinking of putting together something also. Perhaps rather than a pure web-based tutorial (like Tracy is doing), we can present it in the form of an article

[OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review

2003-08-18 Thread Jason Carreira
I've written up a short press release to go as an announcement to TSS and JavaLobby and on the OpenSymphony site. Take a look at let me know what you think: The OpenSymphony team is proud to announce the first beta releases of XWork 1.0 and WebWork 2.0. This is the first release of a complete

Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review

2003-08-18 Thread Hani Suleiman
1) I don't see the need to cuss webwork1. 2) The portlet sentence seems rather bizarre to me, a portal dispatcher? JSR-168 says very little about portals, so a portal dispatcher is certainly not self-explanatory, to me at any rate. 3) 'Two strategies for handling form submission' seems another

Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review

2003-08-18 Thread Mike Cannon-Brookes
I agree with Hani's points - but must add that on the whole this is awesome! Very solid, lots of text, good points made throughout. I know Hani meant to commend you on the overall quality, but forgot (or he hadn't taken his bile hat off ;)). M On 19/8/03 11:29 AM, Hani Suleiman ([EMAIL

RE: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review

2003-08-18 Thread Jason Carreira
-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review I agree with Hani's points - but must add that on the whole this is awesome! Very solid, lots of text, good points made throughout. I know Hani meant to commend you on the overall quality, but forgot (or he hadn't taken his bile hat off ;)). M

Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review

2003-08-18 Thread Hani Suleiman
On Monday, August 18, 2003, at 09:56 PM, Jason Carreira wrote: -Original Message- From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 9:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review 1) I don't see the need to cuss

RE: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review

2003-08-18 Thread Jason Carreira
: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 10:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review On Monday, August 18, 2003, at 09:56 PM, Jason Carreira wrote: -Original Message- From: Hani Suleiman

Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review

2003-08-18 Thread Joseph Ottinger
After it's done, I'll put it in JDJ :) On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote: I agree with Hani's points - but must add that on the whole this is awesome! Very solid, lots of text, good points made throughout. I know Hani meant to commend you on the overall quality, but forgot (or

Re: [OS-webwork] XW/WW2 press release text for review

2003-08-18 Thread Rickard Öberg
Hani Suleiman wrote: 1) I don't see the need to cuss webwork1. He's not cussing WebWork. He's explaining what is and why it is. 2) The portlet sentence seems rather bizarre to me, a portal dispatcher? JSR-168 says very little about portals, so a portal dispatcher is certainly not