Well thats a loaded question to which I'd say objection your honour
leading the witness and goes to state of mind ..
Today if i were to reboot the web I'd be ok with a XML flavour like similar
to HTML5/MXML (and in parts XAML). I'd also double down on ECMA4 or above
(either one) and i'd ignore
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:38 PM, David Connors da...@connors.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Scott Barnes scott.bar...@gmail.comwrote:
David: I think the words your seeking are JavaScript Stockholm Syndrome
.. I object strongly to a language who's surrounded by frameworks that
*Stares at XAML runtime*... *stares at WPF*... *stares at .NET Developers*
...i figure if all you really did was change the namespaces out and strip
away the Windows 8 Start menu shit, you're back to Win7 and WPF crap would
work..only devs would be clueless that the rendering pipeline was changed.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Scott Barnes scott.bar...@gmail.comwrote:
*Stares at XAML runtime*... *stares at WPF*... *stares at .NET Developers*
...i figure if all you really did was change the namespaces out and strip
away the Windows 8 Start menu shit, you're back to Win7 and WPF crap
better, faster? O.o... did you just say JavaScript is better than WPF?
.
---
Regards,
Scott Barnes
http://www.riagenic.com
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:02 AM, David Connors da...@connors.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Scott Barnes scott.bar...@gmail.comwrote:
*Stares at
Does it even matter when for browser apps one of them is DOA?
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Scott Barnes scott.bar...@gmail.comwrote:
better, faster? O.o... did you just say JavaScript is better than
WPF? .
---
Regards,
Scott Barnes
http://www.riagenic.com
On Fri, Feb 14,
either all - does it matter either way?
In closing - JavaScript is the digital age’s version of herpes, every time
you think its gone a new outbreak occurs – DHTML, AJAX, “HTML5″
---
Regards,
Scott Barnes
http://www.riagenic.com
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Craig van Nieuwkerk
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Scott Barnes scott.bar...@gmail.comwrote:
better, faster? O.o... did you just say JavaScript is better than
WPF? .
I said 'someone's 10kb of JS is better.
JavaScript is just Internet assembly language. It's the frameworks that
matter.
I used to hate
JavaScript is just Internet assembly language. It's the frameworks that
matter.
I used to hate JS with a passion, but the momentum around it is undeniable
and the things people accomplish with frameworks on top of it are
staggering.
So it was you who poetically said last year JavaScript is
David: I think the words your seeking are JavaScript Stockholm Syndrome
.. I object strongly to a language who's surrounded by frameworks that are
hell bent on abstracting developers from the said language as much as
possible because the said language is so far behind the evolution curve.
Had JS
Hey Scott - I have to admit I'm not particularly imaginative - if you were
building the internet from scratch, what do you think would be better than
JavaScript?
Does this product exist?
Thomas
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Scott
Isn't it all just perspective ?
All other languages are just wrappers around machine code anyway. :)
Resistance is futile
Any problem in computing can be solved by another layer of abstraction. And
any performance problem in computing can be solved by removing one layer of
Great point Greg.
There was a time where I didn't feel like a real programmer because I
wasn't writing my code in C++ and then one day I realised that the C++
programmers were not real programmers because they were not writing their
code in Assembly Language... and the Assembly Language
http://xkcd.com/378/
Sent from my flux capacitor. Please excuse brevity and any odd autocorrect
errors.
On 14/02/2014 12:28 PM, Stephen Price step...@perthprojects.com wrote:
Great point Greg.
There was a time where I didn't feel like a real programmer because I
wasn't writing my code in C++
Greg.
All machine languages are just wrappers for microcode [?]
Preet
On 14 February 2014 14:00, GregAtGregLowDotCom g...@greglow.com wrote:
Isn’t it all just perspective ?
All other languages are just wrappers around machine code anyway. J
“Resistance is futile”
“Any problem in
Where's my soldering iron...
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Preet Sangha preetsan...@gmail.com wrote:
Greg.
All machine languages are just wrappers for microcode [?]
Preet
On 14 February 2014 14:00, GregAtGregLowDotCom g...@greglow.com wrote:
Isn’t it all just perspective ?
All
Yeah, I was limiting it to the level of the microprocessor. No interest in
actually building or coding inside there nowadays.
Regards,
Greg
Dr Greg Low
1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913 fax
SQL Down Under | Web:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Scott Barnes scott.bar...@gmail.comwrote:
David: I think the words your seeking are JavaScript Stockholm Syndrome
.. I object strongly to a language who's surrounded by frameworks that are
hell bent on abstracting developers from the said language as much as
Yeah you need to move on from Silverlight that ship sailed in 2009 and even
if they wanted to put that broken toy back together again, it would be
likely back under the hood of WPF (which is apparently today what they
did by putting the WPF band back together - how or what that looks like
is
Silverlight/Jupiter (Windows XAML) started under ScottGu.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Scott Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 2:00 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Advice to Microsoft (not mine - the IT press and developer
inline (but not const)
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:19 PM, ILT (O) il.tho...@outlook.com wrote:
Silverlight “end-of-life” is a widely-felt gripe with developers, from my
reading (eg, just today – Visual Studio Magazine – “*Satya Nadella's
To-Do List*”
I wasn’t aware that Scott Guthrie had responsibility for Silverlight and XAML
initially.
_
Ian Thomas
Victoria Park, Western Australia
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of mike smith
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 12:28 PM
To:
Xaml from the early days of WPF is circa 2002 or earlier. I think the GU
was still hacking out ASP.NET on planes as a PM at that time.
On Feb 13, 2014 2:43 PM, ILT (O) il.tho...@outlook.com wrote:
I wasn't aware that Scott Guthrie had responsibility for Silverlight and
XAML initially.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Scott Barnes scott.bar...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm hoping he's behind the WPF reboot rumours i'm hearing more and more
of.
WPF Reboot?
I for one can't wait for 2 gigabyte of RAM footprint calculator
applications and my GPU shitting itself trying to draw a green
24 matches
Mail list logo
