Having taken a few suggestions I re-photographed my second PAW here it
is along with the URL
of the first for anyone who might be interested.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PAW_--_FisheyeWaterfall2.html
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PAW_--_FisheyeWaterfall.html
No it doesn't work with all M42 lenses some of the lenses have flanges
that are too narrow.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Don
Subject: Re: M42 lens on K mount
It's fine, mine is the same way.
I ended up permanently mounting the adaptor to the lens and
If someone is unwilling then they're hardly sitting for a portrait in my
opinion, but I could be wrong.
Simon King wrote:
Peter J. Alling asked;
Have you had un-willing adult sitters?
Haven't we all?
My wife and most of my family would rather never be in a photograph, and my
kids
Hello mapson,
Wednesday, March 10, 2004, 4:01:22 AM, you wrote:
m I just erased the HD drive which had photos. I made a copy of all of them,
m except for about 100 ;-(
m Would anyone know a good (preferably freeware or shareware - so I could get
m it without probs) program that enables to
That's a very strong composition. I like it.
Amita Guha wrote:
I'm taking a graphic design course, and last week's homework was to take
an object and portray it 50 different ways. Not necessarily a
photography assignment, but what else was I going to do? I borrowed
Nate's Canon 300d and shot at
Hello Boris,
BL Now you tell us grin... You make perfect sense to me then. I tried
BL similar things myself but eventually I grew dissatisfied with this
BL kind of shots. Naturally it is me speaking. Here is one example
BL http://boris.isra-shop.com/photos/35/against-the-rules.htm where I got
BL
Hi!
Well, my lines are between your lines that are between other's lines
grin...
It was taken intentionally on an overcast day. So it is not a
snapshot, neither was taken on a trip, it is right here in Oradea;) I
wanted to take it on an overcast day to eliminate some very
unpleasant shadows.
Sigma sell their lenses in all the main mounts, and generally at rather
lower prices than Pentax. They are therefore likely to sell far more, and
have far greater economies of scale.
I suspect that they sell anywhere from twenty to a hundred times as many
of any particular lens as the Pentax
Hi,
Clint wrote:
Shel the reason I might not continue to use XP-2 is the contrast does not
look right. I dont know if the kodak brand film would be better, alot of the
blame might be on me for not using filters. Just a thought the whole folder
is located here:
Who did your scans, Clint? At
Hi!
Attila, thanks for your word about my photo.
I recently bought an F 70-210/4-5.6 lens that also has rotating front
element. I do have 49 mm polarizer but this is my first such lens.
I've no idea how would I use polarizer on it. Perhaps pre-focusing,
switching to manual focus if necessary
I would agree that, in practice, the necessity to blow up a *ist D image
may not matter if you are using a lens with very high resolution.
However, not all lenses, especially zooms, exhibit superb resolution, and
in such cases I am sure that the difference will be observable.
The only way to
doesn't make the Sigma lens higher in quality than what Pentax sells at a
slightly higher price point. people who own other Sigma lenses can tell you,
the prices reflect pretty close to absolute quality differences even between
vendors.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: John Forbes
On 10 Mar 2004 at 10:37, John Forbes wrote:
I would agree that, in practice, the necessity to blow up a *ist D image
may not matter if you are using a lens with very high resolution.
However, not all lenses, especially zooms, exhibit superb resolution, and
in such cases I am sure that the
From: Don Herring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am planning to get a 1.4-S teleconvertor, mainly
to use with my A* 300/4.
Can this particular converter be used with a 500/4.5
screw mount (with the
screw mount adapter of course)?
Yes it can. Also the L-converters (2x-L, 1.4x-L) do
work with this
Hi,
I use this film regularly, most of my recent BW shots (think of 35mm
cameras; in MF I pefer more traditional ones like FP4, APX or
Fortepan) was XP2s.
I'd say that XP2 is a very special film. As others mentioned, it has
probably the widest exposure latitude of all films available today,
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Cassino
I usually do a 1 minute pre-soak before developing. With 120 film
the pre-soak water comes out dark indigo blue. I peel the film off
the paper and cut the end with the adhesive on it - at first I thought
I must of left some paper
That's a different point entirely.
How they choose to price their products is up to them; my point was that
if they make enough they can afford to produce high quality at low prices.
John
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 06:30:24 -0500, Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
doesn't make the Sigma lens
Oh yes, the technical issues are much more important that actually going out
and taking photos.
Bill
JC,
Thanks for backing up your assertions with
your modeling approach and assumptions. Now we
can debate the merits of technical issues rather
than point fingers and talk past each other.
On 10 Mar 2004 at 7:41, Bill Owens wrote:
Oh yes, the technical issues are much more important that actually going out and
taking photos.
If you sort out the technical issue before you go out taking photos you'll be
in for less of a surprise/disappointment when you come back :-)
Cheers,
Mark Cassino wrote:
I usually do a 1 minute pre-soak before developing. With 120 film the
pre-soak water comes out dark indigo blue. I peel the film off the paper
and cut the end with the adhesive on it - at first I thought I must of left
some paper in there, but it doesn't look like it
If you dont mind the technical stuff your just a point 'n shooter!
JCO
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
Hi Rob,
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:43:12 +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
Has anyone here proven that DA lenses are designed to be sharper than their FF
35mm equivalents? My take on the DA lens revolution was that they are designed
to only cover an APS sensor (and secondarily designed to extract more
Using a polarizer on a rotating front element (like the 70-210mm F):
It's not rocket science here -
# 1 - compose/focus
# 2 - adjust polarizer for effect
# 3 - set exposure
# 4 - readjust polarizer, if necessary
# 5 - check exposure
# 6 - take the photo
Somewhat awkward but doable.
Ken
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman
Subject: Re: Polarizer and rotating front element (was: Re[2]: PAW:
City Hall Tower)
Hi!
Attila, thanks for your word about my photo.
I recently bought an F 70-210/4-5.6 lens that also has rotating
front
element. I do have 49 mm polarizer
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: 120 film darkroom q
I usually rinse a couple of times to get rid of most of the blue
dye,
but it's more superstition than anything else ;) I've never noticed
any
problems when I've forgotten to do it.
Pre rinsing is a good
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: *ist D sensor and 35mm lens resolution
If you dont mind the technical stuff your just a point 'n
shooter!
Wrongo me boy.
It's not so simple as that.
There is not giving a rats fart about technical stuff at all (The
point and
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling
Subject: Re: M42 lens on K mount
No it doesn't work with all M42 lenses some of the lenses have
flanges
that are too narrow.
I don't have a lot of M42 lenses, the 17mm Tak is the only one I have
with a wide enough flange to allow this, were
Exactly. When I first commented on the photo I wanted to see more detail in
the highlights. I haven't totally changed my mind, but I do see how the
highlights give it a somewhat haunting image, which works in this photo.
David Madsen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.davidmadsen.com
Alle 08:45, mercoledì 10 marzo 2004, Peter J. Alling ha scritto:
Having taken a few suggestions I re-photographed my second PAW here it
is along with the URL
of the first for anyone who might be interested.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PAW_--_FisheyeWaterfall2.html
I like the clarification. As long as the claim is made withing 30 days of the
purhase. I thought that they didn't want to hear about the problem before 30
days because the item may still show up. So their policy is that they will do
nothing before 30 days is up, and they will do nothing after
It is not that the polarizer doesn't work, it is just that you have to adjust it
everytime you change focus.
I use polarizers to control reflections, not to make the sky look like a crayon
drawing. I sometimes think that if some aliens landed and looked through a
couple of books of photographs
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Andre Langevin wrote:
Assuming that we are talking budget lenses here, Pentax M80-200/4.5 or
F70-210/4-5.6, is the general wisdom. The A70-210/4 is more expensive,
though it's supposed to be a lot better than the other two.
Kostas
A lot better? I remember having seen
Oh yes, the technical issues are much more important
that actually going out and taking photos.
Bill
Well, the is the Pentax-Discuss Mail List as opposed to the
Photography-Discuss Mail List :-)
Seriously, your point is well taken. Besides, many of us lens-heads enjoy
discussing the
Does anyone have any experience with this lens? Is it any good?
Steven Desjardins
A bit off-topic but Tokina makes a dedicated low-power achromatic
close-up lens, the CUP 840, which is also a cheaper alternative to
the Pentax T-226 ($60. instead of $110.) Both have about 0,5 diopter
power.
...also the A200/2.8 and 200/2.5 with a 77-72 step-down ring.
Andre
The German Word for it is: Bankeinzug or Lastschrifteinzugsverfahren
which is a veeery long word g.
The idea behind it is to avoid the costs that credit card companies charge.
If I give somebody my account data and give him or her the written
permission to charge my account, this person has only
I too would opt for the F, but I have even heard people (outside the
list) say the F is not a patch on the A.
Outside the list... hmm... does it count?
Perhaps they are wrong, or they have different criteria to me.
Kostas
I heard such praise for the F (the Pentax, not the Takumar) that I
bought
From: D. Glenn Arthur Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Amita Guha posted:
http://www.beyondthepath.com/photos/paw/2004-03-07.html
That looks familiar, so it's probably a brand I know. It's
not Yamaha (at least it doesn't match mine). Who made it?
Oh yeah, I like the photo BTW.
Thanks!
Definitely. It certainly makes me want to go spank the plank.
Spank the plank...hehe...gotta remember that one.
I'm glad you guys all liked the shot. Thanks for the comments! :)
Amita
My comment was meant to say that there are some people here who are more
concerned with technical issues than they are with taking pictures.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 8:42 AM
Subject: RE: *ist
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
could be because they are stuck with the 45.5mm flange
registration and they are designing even shorter focal length
zoom lenses, the retrofocus factor is kicking their ass.
The only way they will ever get maximum performance from
a APS sensor system
Hi!
It is an old Jewish holiday known as Purim where among other things
parents dress their kids in carnival clothes and then kids celebrate.
I wonder whether any of these two work. I wonder which is better. I
wonder what you might want to say...
Technically it is Agfa 200, FA 50/1.7 somewhere
Oops, it should have been read as:
I had the A 70-210 for a while many years ago...
Somebody was wondering why the DA-type lenses seem to be so big when the
whole idea was supposedly to make them small. Nikon guys have the same
question about DX lenses.
I think the answer is that the DA lenses are smaller than they would be if
they were not DA. Does anybody make a 16-45 that
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
could be because they are stuck with the 45.5mm flange
registration and they are designing even shorter focal length
zoom lenses, the retrofocus factor is kicking their ass.
The only way they will ever
Hi!
I must say this is among the most original shots I've seen. The
geometry is well thought through. Though usually this is called
composition, but to my sense of beautiful it appeals more like a
geometrical drawing.
Everything is flawless about this picture. It deserves to be enlarged
and used
Hi,
thanks - 'Lastschrift' was the word I was struggling for and couldn't
remember. At eToys we were going to put Lastschrift onto the site, so
people could just type in their account details, and we would charge
the account. Very open to abuse.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Wednesday, March 10, 2004,
Hi!
Thanks!
Boris
Bob W wrote:
thanks - 'Lastschrift' was the word I was struggling for and couldn't
remember. At eToys we were going to put Lastschrift onto the site, so
people could just type in their account details, and we would charge
the account. Very open to abuse.
... sounds like folks might
Hi!
Scoff and Quaff... Well, straight to my favorites it goes...
Wonder how many little linguistic jokes are there in Harry Potter
books...
Quidditch?! (Ditch a quid?!)
Never mind.
Boris
Amita Guha answered:
From: D. Glenn Arthur Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That looks familiar, so it's probably a brand I know. It's
not Yamaha (at least it doesn't match mine). Who made it?
Thanks! It is actually a Yamaha F335. Big fat dreadnought. I've had it
for a year and I still
Hi!
Frank's analysis is extensive and exhaustive... grin
There is one thing that I particularly would think needs fixing. You
see, without the title or the story it is not that easy to see that
the left-most boy actually shoots with bow and arrow. Which I humbly
think wasn't your original
Hi!
TMP The tree to the left looks a bit strange due to it actually being taller
TMP than the skyscrapers, for me, it puts the perspective out a little. Maybe
TMP (I'm not sure where you were standing), you could have moved a little more
TMP to the right to not include the tree in the frame?
Hi!
You donate but then you do
not expect anything in return...
Rac Tsadaka...
If I am not mistaken there Judaic law has very specific rules about
that. For instance, one has to give to charity at least a very certain
part of their income...
Boris
P.S. Tsadaka in Hebrew means Charity which
Hi!
g Yes, I know many people who have a giving mentality. Quite a few of those are
g jews. And yes there are those with a give-me mentality, even to the point they
g are taking from the needy. Unfortunately, I know some of those also. The best
g kind of people, to my mind, are the ones who give
--
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 20:54:22 +0200
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
It is an old Jewish holiday known as Purim where among other things
parents dress their kids in carnival clothes and then kids celebrate.
I wonder whether any of these two work. I
Hi!
It seems I neglected to mention that the makeup is being applied by my
wife to our daughter g...
Hope no-one was overly confused here...
Boris
Nice family shot, Boris. Color works much better for this.
Good exposure, nice use of Depth of Field. Do you have more
shots of the situation. Just wondering of there's one
without your wife's hand covering your child's face.
shel
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
It is an old Jewish holiday
My old printer is on its last legs. It's an Epson 1200 and it has
produced more than 1000 12 x 18s. It's not printing very well with OS X
10.3 and Photoshop CS. I think the drivers haven't been uptdated beyond
system 10.1, which is quite diffferent. Since it's a clunker anyway, I'm
thinking of
Hi!
SB Nice family shot, Boris. Color works much better for this.
SB Good exposure, nice use of Depth of Field. Do you have more
SB shots of the situation. Just wondering of there's one
SB without your wife's hand covering your child's face.
Shel, I have few more but it takes at least 30-40
From: D. Glenn Arthur Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Out of curiosity, how
old is your FG335? (I'm pretty sure I've played one and
liked it ... which would explain the striping looking
familiar. And yeah, I could tell it was a dreadnaught from
the shape of the waist. ;-) )
I got
It's quite hard to go out and take photos on a mailing list. Personally
I'd choose to take photos in the real world and discuss technical issues
online. :-)
S
Bill Owens wrote:
Oh yes, the technical issues are much more important that actually going out
and taking photos.
You can see skies that look very much like those obtained with a
polarizer if you go to a high enough altitude. See
http://www.tagne.com/photoinfo.php?id=t01 for example.
S
graywolf wrote:
It is not that the polarizer doesn't work, it is just that you have to
adjust it everytime you change
Looks just like Western Canada,except for the hilss.LOL
Nice shot Ken.I like the effects the rolling hills give it.The lone elevator looks very
errie.
Pleasing colours too.
Dave
Please check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Snow is definitely cool so a warm filter is appropriate
along WITH exposure compensation. I do 2 stops for bright
snow. Doing 1.5 with an 80A should be suitable.
Along this vein, I've used the 80A with weddings to keep the
blues out of gowns. Some labs print too straight for me
and I've
Great! I'd love to see more ... ;-)) Your daughter looks
like quite a charmer.
Boris Liberman wrote:
Shel, I have few more but it takes at least 30-40 minutes to scan and
edit so that on one evening I can do at most 3 or so scans...
I will be posting more...
Can anyone recommend a reputable place for Pentax repair that could take a
look at my 35mm lens. There is some oil on the blades and the aperture
just does not seem as snappy as it should be. I live in the Twin Cities,
but am assuming I'll have to mail it somewhere for repair.
This is a pretty
On 10 Mar 2004 at 8:58, Gonz wrote:
Not proven, but there is some empirical evidence. Some of those PS
digitals have very tiny sensors, but lenses to match the proper image
circle. If you calculate the resolution of those lenses, then they come
out quite high.
Getting back to DA lenses
Hi Boris,
Nice shot, but the hand on the back of the childs neck gives me the
impression that she is being forced to wear the makeup.
I cant pick between the b/w or colour, they both seem to work well.
Regards,
Paul
Hi!
SB Nice family shot, Boris. Color works much better for this.
SB Good
FF 35mm is more than 50% wider angle of coverage compared
to *istD sensor, that is HUGE for a given focal length but
not anywhere near the difference a tiny PS sensor would be.
that would be mega-HUGE.
JCO
J.C.
Yamaha Guiars have almost nothing to do with Pentax.
All of you hell-bent on describing soundhole rosettes
please use the new subject.
\
Out of curiosity, how
old is your FG335? (I'm pretty sure I've played one and
liked it ... which would explain the striping looking
familiar. And yeah, I
And that is perfectly all right. There are some that are more interested in
having one of everything Pentax ever made, that is all right too. If I had the
money I would probably own hundreds of cameras, but I would not take a lot more
photos than I would now if I had the money. And again that
I should photograph the back of the caustic guitar at my house (left here by
a friend) that has a rather big 'dent' in the back from being used to hit
it's owner's brother in the head. Definite imperfections.
David Madsen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.davidmadsen.com
-Original
Spell check failed me. It should be an acoustic guitar, not a caustic
guitar. Or maybe it should.
David Madsen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.davidmadsen.com
-Original Message-
From: David Madsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 3:40 PM
To: [EMAIL
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:49:31 -0500
From: Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CLA for 35mm/f2 SMC-M (also, opinions between 35mm f2 and
35mm f2.8?)
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii ; format=flowed
Can anyone
Do NOT knock the KX until you've tried. it. KX can be had
with a range-finder split image screen, but the small microprism
is very useful. Pulling out the wind lever to meter is a GOOD
thing. Smack it back, push that cute little shutter button almost
all the way down, and wait for the moment
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Lon Williamson wrote:
These lenses all have failings. Too big, or One Touch, or too
expensive to serve as standbys. Who makes an acceptable, reasonably
flare resistant, small, manual focus, 70/80-200/210 for not much money?
I thought that historically One Touch and MF
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Andre Langevin wrote:
I too would opt for the F, but I have even heard people (outside the
list) say the F is not a patch on the A.
Outside the list... hmm... does it count?
Dunno. If they (re)join, will the F get a constant aperture or a metal
barrel? :-)))
Kostas
And she takes good shots without knowing what she wants to know.
I think we probably agree more than not, Rob.
Rob Studdert wrote:
Strangely Tan seems quite interested in the technicalities, at least that's the
impression I got during our conversations, am I right Tan?
Holy crap Tan! I was expecting blurry subject movement and lots of odd
angles. I should know better than to not expect the best from your shots!
Your favorites are good, but this on is amazing too!
http://www.tanyamayer.com/shannonnoll/pages/ShannonNoll15.html
Christian
- Original Message
Hi,
Wednesday, March 10, 2004, 11:21:27 PM, Rob wrote:
If I shipped a used camera from Australia that was purchased new (with tax
paid) from a vendor inside the EU to an EU member country would it attract a
second round of tax?
it's not clear to me what the order of events has been. Here
I thought maybe it plays sharp all the time.
David Madsen wrote:
Spell check failed me. It should be an acoustic guitar, not a caustic
guitar. Or maybe it should.
David Madsen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.davidmadsen.com
-Original Message-
From: David Madsen
As David said,
Holy crap are those good!
I took concert piccies a couple of weeks ago, and got back the contacts and
they blow, compared to those. For some reason the singer really liked them
(can't figure out why), and 4x6 proofs will be back on Friday (she wanted me
to order them - go
From: Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The full frame question boils down to economics. Of course, this
question has been argued to death in this and other forums. A FF Pentax
would probably cost much more than most people here could afford, this
just to be able to break even. Even then, I don't
Shel's list is on my site. When I entered Pentax repair in google it was the 5th
item that came up.
http://graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pentax_repair_shops.html
--
Andre Langevin wrote:
Can anyone recommend a reputable place for Pentax repair that could
take a
look at my 35mm lens. There is some
Boris,
Despite my extensive and exhaustive analysis, I think that the proper
cropping did wonders.
Did you see Lasse's re-work of the image on those WOW threads? Along with
cleaning things up, he cropped out the right hand boy, and enlarged the
image. It really worked well! I've long since
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The K2 is clearly the more evolved camera, with a number of relocated
controls and a different shutter-speed-dial design.
It does sort of point out how the K series are essentially evolved
spotmatics (along the lines of the Metallica prototypes and such) and the
real
...and in the process, Shel learned I'm still right, and frank's dead
wrong!
LOL!
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
...of course, I'd ~never~ say that I like blown out highlights in someone
else's photo, just because I've taken so many photos with the highlights
inadvertantly blown out by overexposure, after which I've pawned off the
print as artsty.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2069022
Uh,
Whats wrong with a PC as long as you don't run Windows on it?
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 00:31, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 10 Mar 2004 at 17:36, Lon Williamson wrote:
It amazes me that Pentax shooters can be Techno folks.
LOL, next you'll say you're surprised we don't all use Mac's joke
Cheers,
Jens,
Interesting result. As you mentioned in your text, your scanner may be the
limiting factor for your MZ-S = Fuji Superia = Epson 3200 flow. The
imaging system in the scanner probably isn't sharp enough to capture all of
the detail in the film. I have an Epson 2450 (the older version
Attila,
I didn't mean to discourage you - quite the contrary; I hope you go out and
take many more photos of buildings or whatever you want to take photos of.
They should turn out the way you want them to, not the way I want them to.
If you're satisfied with them, that's all that really
Paul,
I don't have one, and I don't use a Mac. I hope this is
helpful ;-))
But a good friend does use a Mac with the newer OS, and he
also uses the Epson 2200. He's happy, and believe me, were
he not, I'd know about it. We did some printing at his
place not too long ago, and the results
Hi Lon ...
I don't understand your comment about smackin' me with a
backhoe. Is that anything like gittin' whupped upside the
haid with a 2x4 that's been soakin' in creosote for dang
near a month? If so, thet sukka's sure gonna hurt some
LOL
Anyway, I'm glad you like the PAW and the WOW (which
On 10 Mar 2004 at 18:09, frank theriault wrote:
...of course, I'd ~never~ say that I like blown out highlights in someone
else's photo, just because I've taken so many photos with the highlights
inadvertantly blown out by overexposure, after which I've pawned off the
print as artsty.
Tan -
Two and fifteen - both have the makings of album covers.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 4:16 PM
Subject: Fairygirl's first attempt at concert pix...
So I went to
On 10 Mar 2004 at 17:36, Lon Williamson wrote:
It amazes me that Pentax shooters can be Techno folks.
LOL, next you'll say you're surprised we don't all use Mac's joke
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
Whats wrong with a PC as long as you don't run Windows on it?
Frits Wüthrich
LOL.
not only that, but use the best film and digital settings,
i.e. ISO 50 not ISO200.
jco
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
I had the A35/2.8 few years ago. It was good lens optically, although not
razer sharp. There are some mechanical optical differences between the M
A so their parts aren't that interchangable. Make sure the aperture spring
of the M is in good condition.
Regards,
Alan Chan
Rob,
That is so freaking wild!
I like that a lot.
thanks,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I saw a documentary on a young Sydney photographer Trent Parke a week
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
