using lenses from Pentax.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Don Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 10. marts 2006 08:41
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Photomicrographs
Hi all,
Someone on the list approved of my posting links to microscope
On Mar 13, 2006, at 11:27, Jens Bladt wrote:
Don, in your language - as well as mine - the word objektive means
lens. In
Danish a lens (linse) is just one (1) lens element. Objective as
opposed
to Ocular.
In English, however, I belive objective means something like Goal.
It also can be
On Mar 13, 2006, at 11:05 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
The word objective is very rarely used for a photographic lens
these days,
isn't it?
Objective in English was never used to refer to a photographic lens
per se. You hear it mostly in conjunction with telescopes and
microscopes, where it
-
Fra: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 13. marts 2006 19:28
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Photomicrographs
objective
adjective
---
1 (of a person or their judgment) not influenced by
personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing
facts : historians try
. marts 2006 08:41
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Photomicrographs
Hi all,
Someone on the list approved of my posting links to microscope pictures.
Recently I've been subverting my instrument in the direction of 'arty'
stuff. I've posted a large gallery of new crystal pictures to my
website
objective
adjective
---
1 (of a person or their judgment) not influenced by
personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing
facts : historians try to be objective and impartial. Contrasted
with subjective . • not dependent on the mind for existence;
actual : a matter of
On Mar 10, 2006, at 8:40 PM, Don Williams wrote:
Recently I've been subverting my instrument in the direction of
'arty' stuff.
I really like those photos. A few that really caught my eye:
http://www.kolumbus.fi/mimosa/hold/XTAL02/slides/J060.htm
on two ISP servers in Helsinki and one in Oklahoma.
I've changed that and they are on three ISP's server's in Helsinki and
the Oklahoma one holds videos and biological photomicrographs only. I'll
add navigation when I've sorted out what files are where between MTV3,
Kolumbus (Elisa
while back they were on two ISP servers in Helsinki
and one in Oklahoma. I've changed that and they are on three ISP's
server's in Helsinki and the Oklahoma one holds videos and biological
photomicrographs only. I'll add navigation when I've sorted out what
files are where between MTV3, Kolumbus
Hello Don,
I like you micrographs a lot.
My best microscope has semi plan objectives and I see I do need plan
objectives. I would like to know which chemicals I see. I used to do
this in the past and made some polarizing micrographs in black and
white.
Toine
Don Williams wrote:
Hi all,
Someone on the list approved of my posting links to microscope pictures.
That would have been me, probably
I think we discussed the aesthetics of bi-refringence under
crossed Nichols :)
I'm enjoying these Don, but wish they were titled with the
substance you
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Don Williams wrote:
Hi all,
Someone on the list approved of my posting links to microscope pictures.
That would have been me, probably
I think we discussed the aesthetics of bi-refringence under
crossed Nichols :)
I'm enjoying these Don, but wish they were
Don - thanks for the lowdown -- makes me want to play - but
I don't have access to
the hardware necessary...
I was curious about the subject matter as I used to describe
the rock sections
in class by what they looked like to me in the art world...
I think I liked your very
first image (strong
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Don - thanks for the lowdown -- makes me want to play - but
I don't have access to
the hardware necessary...
I was curious about the subject matter as I used to describe
the rock sections
in class by what they looked like to me in the art world...
I think I liked your
Very nice work, Don.
Fascinating structures on the micro stage!
Godfrey
On Mar 9, 2006, at 11:40 PM, Don Williams wrote:
www.kolumbus.fi/mimosa/
Very impressive stuff Don, I like watching the invisible ;-)
greetings
Markus
Recently I've been subverting my instrument in the direction of
'arty' stuff.
I really like those photos. A few that really caught my eye:
http://www.kolumbus.fi/mimosa/hold/XTAL02/slides/J060.htm
On Mar 11, 2006, at 1:38 AM, Don Williams wrote:
Okay Dave -- I've fixed the indices they're a lot better. But what
about the colour?
The dark background didn't bother me, neither does the white one :)
Thanks for splitting up the index.
- Dave
Hi all,
Someone on the list approved of my posting links to microscope pictures.
Recently I've been subverting my instrument in the direction of 'arty'
stuff. I've posted a large gallery of new crystal pictures to my
website. There are no 'Back' or 'Home' buttons. To get back one needs to
Hi all,
I'm still off the list, but there are some pictures posted at:
http://kotisivu.mtv3.fi/edfw/test2/index.htm
that might be interesting to some members. Some of the crystal pictures were
taken with an ME Super, but the high resolution images of diatoms are
non-Pentax. However they are
For those who might be interested I have posted a batch of pictures at:
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams/hold/micro
The subjects are bacteria and the scales from the wings of a very small
moth. The wing scales show detail down to the limit of resolution of the
light microscope at high
Hate to say this but your page is unreadable using Netscape Communicator 4.8
At 04:36 PM 6/9/03 +0300, you wrote:
For those who might be interested I have posted a batch of pictures at:
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams/hold/micro
The subjects are bacteria and the scales from the wings
___
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
Updated: March 30, 2002
- Original Message -
From: Peter Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: First photomicrographs with ME
Well, shucks, Peter, I have NetCOMM 4.79, and read it just fine!
keith whaley
Peter Alling wrote:
Hate to say this but your page is unreadable using Netscape Communicator 4.8
At 04:36 PM 6/9/03 +0300, you wrote:
For those who might be interested I have posted a batch of pictures at:
23 matches
Mail list logo
