Hi everyone,
Last week Boris asked me to see examples of some high ISO images with
and without being noise cleaned by NeatImage.
I've been busy, my apologies for the delay, but here they are:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sets/72057594113578363/
All of them where shot with an
I've posted this before, but here is a comparison between Neat Image,
Noise Ninja CS2's Reduce Noise filter on a ISO 3200 shot:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Noise%20Test/Misc_008.htm
Dave S.
On 4/22/06, Fernando Terrazzino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
Last week Boris asked
Hi!
Last week Boris asked me to see examples of some high ISO images with
and without being noise cleaned by NeatImage.
I've been busy, my apologies for the delay, but here they are:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/sets/72057594113578363/
Thanks Fernando.
I should (honestly
Dave, that's much better than mine...
On 4/22/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've posted this before, but here is a comparison between Neat Image,
Noise Ninja CS2's Reduce Noise filter on a ISO 3200 shot:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Noise%20Test/Misc_008.htm
Dave S.
Really? have you compare them at 100%? it's a matter of taste I guess...
On 4/22/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Last week Boris asked me to see examples of some high ISO images with
and without being noise cleaned by NeatImage.
I've been busy, my apologies for the delay,
so do I.
in fact, as i read rave reviews of noise ninja, i bought myself a license
last year, and after a few attempts to master it, came to conclusion that
with it, the hi-iso images too look better as they are, than processed.
i also find idt-dl noise at 1600 quite acceptable.
best,
mishka
On
Hi!
Fernando, you did really well... I have few points to make, so that you
might want to consider them for your next shoot.
1. I concur with what Godfrey said about potential to b/w rendering...
Also, if rendered b/w, the picture does not necessarily require to be
noise-reduced... You can
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Boris Liberman wrote:
c. Use 2 sec mirror pre-fire feature.
Handheld? Interesting; how does this work? Do people-subjects react to
the delay?
Kostas
Hi Boris,
I don't have the originals at work, I'll post a link to some
unpostprocessed images once I upload them at home.
Thanks for the ideas.
PS: MikeRobert and the others were ppl are posing, were taken with
the popup flash (with and awfull result as you can see... next time
I'll bring the
Hi!
c. Use 2 sec mirror pre-fire feature.
Handheld? Interesting; how does this work? Do people-subjects react to
the delay?
Kostas, if people are posing, they don't necessarily know when the shot
was actually taken. I doubt they will notice the 2 sec delay once you
pronounce that the
I'd say you did a rather good job on the technical side of things
considering the conditions. You might pull up the midrange brightness
on some of them. You can do that in PhotoShop curves with the rgb
curve. Just push the middle up. You might also improve some of them
slightly with an
I guess that's why most of the low light photography I see is shot
with BW (or BW in mind); makes sense, you can use blown highlights
and darks, and the grainiy look actually looks good in BW. I'll give
it try next time.
thnks
On 4/11/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not a
Paul, reading your post I realized that if I had composed that way (I
mean the right way) it would've been much better also for the
post-process, right? I mean that way I could've avoid some backlight
which was problematic to deal with during the shots and in the
postprocessing.
Didn't know about
Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Fernando Terrazzino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11. april 2006 07:01
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Question for the low light shooters
Last friday I had the chance to do my first indoor available light
. april 2006 07:01
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Question for the low light shooters
Last friday I had the chance to do my first indoor available light
shooting. The small event was not really a happy one, as this was a
farewell lunch for a couple of co-workers that joined the 500
Last friday I had the chance to do my first indoor available light
shooting. The small event was not really a happy one, as this was a
farewell lunch for a couple of co-workers that joined the 500
employees that were laid-off last week by the Co. I work for.
Anyway I tried to capture some shots as
Not a disparagement of your effort, Fernando, but I'm not a fan of
the Neat Image 'noise smoothed' look. It makes everything look
somewhat plasticky and artificial to me.
How to improve on the look ... well, I'm not sure. It depends upon
what you're after. I tend to work such low-light
17 matches
Mail list logo
