I only looked at six pics, and to my eye, the quality is terrible,
especially for 4x5 negatives. Sorry, not at all impressed.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Vic MacBournie
Here is an interesting way to use your digital camera. I inherited a
pile of 4X5 negatives from my father who used
Neat stuff! They look very good.
This is basically how I've been working with some Minox 8x11mm
negatives. I use the DS, a 2x teleconverter, an extension tube set,
and an A50/2.8 Macro lens to net 2x magnification. With the Minox,
captures like this represent getting about a 5Mpixel image
Come on, Shel, be nice.
They need rendering work, for sure, but as fairly raw scans they are
good data.
Godfrey
On Mar 16, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I only looked at six pics, and to my eye, the quality is terrible,
especially for 4x5 negatives. Sorry, not at all impressed.
I can't say I'm amazed at the quality, but I think you have managed to record
the look of what were rather ordinary snapshots. Scanning, even on a flatbed
with photo attachement like the Epson 3200, would be a better solution and
would probably take only a bit longer. I did enjoy the pics. Old
Yes very charming!
Tom C.
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: PDML pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Halifax project
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:04:55 -0800
Neat stuff! They look very good.
This is basically how I've been working with some
At my wife's practice they've gone to a paperless office, which made
filing x-rays a pain in the butt. So now they slap 'em on a light
table and shoot 'em with a digital camera that's had exposure and focus
locked in. Much faster and easier (and less expensive) than trying to
scan a great
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 March 2006 22:03
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Halifax project
At my wife's practice they've gone to a paperless office,
which made filing x-rays a pain in the butt.
Over here the medical
On Mar 16, 2006, at 5:26 PM, Bob W wrote:
Over here the medical profession advises strongly against filing them
there.
We have rounded edges on our x-rays up here, so it's not so bad.
All I can think of now is the guy I went to school with who used to
lick his fingers after peeling apart
using
a non conventional capture device for this purpose, the quality is pretty
damn good.
vic
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Halifax project Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:56:32 -0800
I only looked at six pics
OK ... ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Vic Macbournie
Shel : When I said I was amazed at the quality, what I meant was I am
amazed
at the quality considering I am just shooting the negs with a digital
camera
and inverting them in PS. I recognize that using a scanner would be a
Thhey are very nuce, Vic.
There are som burbned out highlught - I wonder of your or you father caused
this?
(Looks like tje digital did this to me)
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Vic MacBournie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 16. marts 2006
11 matches
Mail list logo
