Not just "like" a revolution, it WAS a revolution; although I think you're
getting the cart before the horse. The revolution led to the breakup of AT
rather than vice versa.
Plus, there's a big difference in being a monopoly in an essential service and
having a monopoly on a luxury product.
Thats for sure. When AT was a monopoly, there was no innovation.
The princess phone was their "innovation" Once they got broken up, it
was like a revolution.
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:18 AM, William Robb
wrote:
> Their strategy appears to aim to be the last man
Their strategy appears to aim to be the last man standing. I'm not sure how
good it would be for the industry to only have one or two choices.
Monopolies or near monopolies are never a good thing.
bill
On Tue, May 22, 2018, 11:39 PM Gonz, wrote:
> That is A LOT of money.
That is A LOT of money. It can only be good for the industry, the
resulting tech war should bring some interesting new products.
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:28 PM, Bill wrote:
> On 5/22/2018 9:17 PM, Gonz wrote:
>>
>> Wow, this is crazy... Sounds more than just
On 5/22/2018 9:17 PM, Gonz wrote:
Wow, this is crazy... Sounds more than just throwing to see what
sticks... I guess time will tell.
https://petapixel.com/2018/05/22/sony-investing-9b-in-image-sensors-aims-to-be-top-camera-brand-by-2021/
They have a lot of money. It will be interesting to
Wow, this is crazy... Sounds more than just throwing to see what
sticks... I guess time will tell.
https://petapixel.com/2018/05/22/sony-investing-9b-in-image-sensors-aims-to-be-top-camera-brand-by-2021/
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Bill wrote:
> On 5/17/2018
On 18/5/18, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I'd love for them to take some of the Rokinon/Samyang primes, make them
>weather sealed, and autofocus, maybe even HD coatings. My Rokinon
>24/1.4 is a stellar lens for night photography. They've got a bunch of
>other nice looking lenses
On Fri, 18 May 2018 19:09:29 -0700
Larry Colen wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
> > Reworking old lens formulas might not work. The optimum image
> > circle isn’t the same. And there’s something about the older lenses
> > that causes fringing. Clean sheet new designs are probably
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Reworking old lens formulas might not work. The optimum image circle isn’t the
same. And there’s something about the older lenses that causes fringing. Clean
sheet new designs are probably a better direction. In my experience, the new
zooms are better than most of the
Reworking old lens formulas might not work. The optimum image circle isn’t the
same. And there’s something about the older lenses that causes fringing. Clean
sheet new designs are probably a better direction. In my experience, the new
zooms are better than most of the A and FA primes.
Paul
>
Gonz wrote:
I think where
Pentax is lacking is in a system. They last had a complete system
back in the LX days. Unless you plan on using only zooms, their prime
offerings are mostly still from the film era like the Limited series,
or the DA lenses that can sometimes be used in FF. But say I
Its true that my most used lenses are the 24-70 and the 70-200 modern
DFA versions. I haven't acquired the 150-450, but I wonder how it
would compare to modern versions of a 600. The old film era 600/4
seemed to have a little softness from reports I heard. I know that
Nikon's and Canon's
For me, the lack of primes isn’t an issue, although I would like to have some
and believe they are coming. For 25 years I shot only primes, but today’s
Pentax zooms are very good and are the equal of most primes. I’ll put the image
quality of my D FA 150-450 up against the FA 600/4 any day. And
True that. Pentax definitely is lower cost at or close to equal
quality or performance (except for AF, where it still is behind). And
that is the major reason I started with Pentax back in 1979, they were
clearly more affordable and had a great reputation. I think where
Pentax is lacking is in
On 5/17/2018 12:37 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I see some younger photographers who are making their initial purchase of
pro-level gear going to Pentax. While I agree that Pentax will likely focus on
pro and advanced amateur offerings, I think they can own the lower priced end
of that niche.
On 5/17/2018 12:26 PM, Gonz wrote:
I see your point Bill, and you arguments make a certain amount of
sense as far as Ricoh's direction. But where I diverge in my opinion
is the survival part. Granted there will always be that cadre of
Pentax die hards, but as you can see from the average age
I see some younger photographers who are making their initial purchase of
pro-level gear going to Pentax. While I agree that Pentax will likely focus on
pro and advanced amateur offerings, I think they can own the lower priced end
of that niche. Pentax is a bargain. The K-1 isn’t quite the
I see your point Bill, and you arguments make a certain amount of
sense as far as Ricoh's direction. But where I diverge in my opinion
is the survival part. Granted there will always be that cadre of
Pentax die hards, but as you can see from the average age of pdml
posters, its only going up,
On 5/17/2018 8:33 AM, Gonz wrote:
Hmmm, I've been lusting over Fuji's stuff for a while now, maybe this
is the push that I need. On the other hand, I read something like
this:
https://petapixel.com/2018/05/17/ricohs-new-camera-sdks-open-the-door-to-3rd-party-apps/
Which I've been advocating
"Gonzosaurus"... I like that, sometimes I come into the office with a
bit of T-Rex attitude after a bad nites sleep... everyone steers
clear..
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 14/5/18, Gonz, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Thanks for the
Hmmm, I've been lusting over Fuji's stuff for a while now, maybe this
is the push that I need. On the other hand, I read something like
this:
https://petapixel.com/2018/05/17/ricohs-new-camera-sdks-open-the-door-to-3rd-party-apps/
Which I've been advocating for years now. There are few things
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:57 PM Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 14/5/18, Gonz, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Thanks for the insightful commentary. Sounds bleak for the most part.
> >I've been slowly coming to the conclusion that the Pentax ship is
> >sinking and its time to
On 14/5/18, Gonz, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Thanks for the insightful commentary. Sounds bleak for the most part.
>I've been slowly coming to the conclusion that the Pentax ship is
>sinking and its time to board a new one. Don't know which one
>however, but it seems that mirrorless is taking
They need to review their MF lens line-up as people are leaving the
645 line for the new boys on the block. I've now sold the majority of
my K-mount kit, it's quite refreshing not to constrained however my
new kit is quite limited in scope and will remain so for the
foreseeable future, it's doing
On 5/14/2018 3:22 PM, Gonz wrote:
Thanks for the insightful commentary. Sounds bleak for the most part.
I've been slowly coming to the conclusion that the Pentax ship is
sinking and its time to board a new one.
That's not the message I got. The message I got is that Ricoh is in it
for the
Thanks for the insightful commentary. Sounds bleak for the most part.
I've been slowly coming to the conclusion that the Pentax ship is
sinking and its time to board a new one. Don't know which one
however, but it seems that mirrorless is taking over to some degree.
I would like to keep my best
On Fri, 11 May 2018 17:18:42 -0600 Bill wrote:
>
> We discussed the changes from the K1 to the K1II. For practical
> purposes there are three. The signal processor is all about cleaning up high
> ISO signals. It should have little to no effect at low
ISO, no matter what DPReview and
The local pusher has their trade show running today and tomorrow. Being
what as how there is some Pentax gear I am interested in at the moment,
and having a few spare hours today, I found myself at their shop this
afternoon.
Things I have learned:
I need to get out more. The last time I was
28 matches
Mail list logo