2010/8/7 Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com:
I'll extend your compliment to the PowerPC emulation engineers at
Apple. The three leads on that part of the system are buddies of mine
since 1991. :-)
Mine, too, I still love my old 9600 even though I fire it up very
rarely and just for old
Cotty, are you still running Apple-PowerPC systems or are you on
Apple-Intel systems now? If you're on Apple-Intel systems, you really
want to move to Photohop CS3 at least for performance reasons. CS/CS2
are PowerPC executables, running in emulation on the current
generation of Apple hardware.
On 2010-08-07 13:26 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
If you're on Apple-Intel systems, you really
want to move to Photohop CS3 at least for performance reasons. CS/CS2
are PowerPC executables, running in emulation on the current
generation of Apple hardware. CS3 is the first native-code version of
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 1:29 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
while it's not as fast, CS2 runs without problem on Intel Macs (my
experience is up through Mac OS X 10.5); the Intel-native version is quicker
and has new features, and is an obvious choice for commercial production
use,
On 2010-08-07 15:36 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I didn't say CS2 had problems running on the Apple-Intel box; I said
performance was *significantly* improved.
indeed it is improved; i simply wanted to reassure Cotty that the
performance for many purposes is good enough and that CS2 is otherwise
On 7/8/10, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, are you still running Apple-PowerPC systems or are you on
Apple-Intel systems now? If you're on Apple-Intel systems, you really
want to move to Photohop CS3 at least for performance reasons. CS/CS2
are PowerPC executables, running in
On 7/8/10, steve harley, discombobulated, unleashed:
indeed it is improved; i simply wanted to reassure Cotty that the
performance for many purposes is good enough and that CS2 is otherwise
quite workable
Hey, you wanna try rendering some complicated stuff in Final Cut on a
2.4 15 MBP - compared
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 3:37 PM, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
To me, performance improvements like that make the CS2 to CS4 upgrade
fee trivial when I consider how much time it will save. It also means
editing becomes FAR more responsive and fun. :-)
it's a significant but not
8 matches
Mail list logo
