Mark Roberts wrote:
Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the text on that site is irreadable (like that newly coined
word?) by my Netscape Communicator browser and 17 monitor, and Mac OS 9.2.1.
I just checked it in MSIE and Mozilla (on Windows, admittedly) and it
seems fine.
Cotty wrote:
HAR! My own post:
Go for it Ann. Consider that by 'published' they meant in print. Feign
ignorance if questioned.
bows
No applause please. Just throw money. Bills only, the coins hurt ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
Bills hurt too - besides Owens is too heavy to throw :)
on 19.11.03 18:13, Paul Eriksson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry but I can't agree with that a good quality record player in a good
stereo system a cd can't touch a LP much less a high quality pressed LP.
It's all relative. There are some audio qualities on LPs played on thousends
$
Hi Bernd,
on 19 Nov 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
And, Heiko, do you like it?
Yes, I do. But I have to admit, that I don't like it as enthusiastically
on the *istD as I did when I used it on my MZ-5n. Why? I prefer 35mm
instead of 53mm ;-) Overall the FA35/2 seems to be a very good performer
on 20.11.03 1:13, J. C. O'Connell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a friend who has about a $100k audio system
($29K loudspeakers) and he has invested heavily in
both analog and CD. On his system, the best LPs
crush CDs, it isnt even close and his digital stuff
cost about 20K including
on 20.11.03 9:01, Heiko Hamann at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I do. But I have to admit, that I don't like it as enthusiastically
on the *istD as I did when I used it on my MZ-5n. Why? I prefer 35mm
instead of 53mm ;-) Overall the FA35/2 seems to be a very good performer
on the *istD but
jmb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
I've found a buyer for my mint condition K2 and 50mm f/1.4 (sob!)
Hope it found a good home!
Next on the block to finance my transition from analog to digital will
be, appropriately enough, a vinyl record album: I have one of Mobile
Fidelity's
David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
I've found a buyer for my mint condition K2 and 50mm f/1.4 (sob!)
Really hate to see them go but I need to put money aside for an *ist-D and
a friend of mine would like to buy the camera (so at least I know it's
going to a good home).
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the text on that site is irreadable (like that newly coined
word?) by my Netscape Communicator browser and 17 monitor, and
Mac OS 9.2.1.
I just checked it in MSIE and Mozilla (on Windows,
A mantra well-known to my ears -- well-used to hearing my own words come
back to me. . .
Sad but true.
keith whaley
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
So ... BFD. When it gets to the point that discriminating people can't even
buy good equipment because the companies are busy dumbing down to most
Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark, it may be the colors that are the problem, not the font size
In Netscape there is a lot of royal blue on black - looks pretty but hard to
read.
Which version of Netscape? I just tried viewing it even with style
sheets turned off and don't get
Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the text on that site is irreadable (like that newly coined
word?) by my Netscape Communicator browser and 17 monitor, and
Mac OS 9.2.1.
I just
Got the 24 f/2 and BP FG20 yesterday. I must admit that *ist is no
longer small with the BP., but I will be able to use AAs instead of CR2.
One thing that I must say is that the FG-20 is not as good as MZ3's BP.
The new BP has so-so build quality and the worst battery compartment
I've ever seen.
hydofluoric acid
Oops. Make that hydrofluoric.
Fred, K1FW
Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://oem-box.biz/?id=seashoreat=bequeathhref=thump
Adobe Photoshop 7 for $59.95?
This web site is hosted on a home computer on a North Carolina
Roadrunner cable connection, which is in violation of Roadrunner's
service agreement, I believe. But I
are the Pentax 100mm dental macros more rare/collectible than the
ordinary 100mm f:4 macros?
Yes, in the sense that there aren't as many of 'em out there.
However, I've never really heard of a whole lot of excitement over
collecting them...
What is a good price to pay for one? I could get one
on 11/21/03 3:36 AM, Kevin Waterson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Dario Bonazza 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A software for camera remote control and direct storage on hard disk (via
USB) is announced, but not already available.
Ok, can the files be removed from
And, truly folks, don't use HF. It's very hard to handle and it's
physiological effects are severe. NaOH will just burn you . . .
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gee, Mark, you're selling an LP to finance a DSLR? Doesn't that make
you the root of all evil, or something of that ilk? ;-p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/19/03 07:34PM
Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Next on the block to finance my transition from analog to
NaOH definately etches glass, especially if you heat it
Hmmm... I didn't think of heating it. I do know that some pretty
concentrated NaOH can be kept in glass containers (but, that's at
room temperatures, I guess).
And, truly folks, don't use HF. It's very hard to handle and it's
Hi Bruce,
on 20 Nov 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
This certainly becomes one of the problems with a DSLR.
...
I remember a friend of mine
ended up selling most of his lenses (Nikon guy) after going digital
because the 1.5 magnification factor made his old lenses the wrong
lengths for his
Hi,
I got a used Tamron 90/2.5 (49mm thread) but it has the wrong Adaptall
mount. I don't know much about these mounts, any references? What I am
looking for is info on whether Adaptall and Adaptall 2 adaptors are
usable with this or only one type. Is it still the consensus that KA
Adaptalls are
I have no opinion WRT the quality of CDs versus LPs, but I thought the
following link from the UK Sunday Times 'Style' magazine might be timely?
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2104-882918,00.html
There is a large picture to accompany the words in the actual paper
magazine. Perhaps
In high school, we used dilute HF to etch glass. Use diamond to score it if
you need fine lines. There is glass etching cream available at craft stores.
Regards,
Bob...
Do not suppose that abuses are eliminated by destroying
the object which is abused.
Hi All,
Anyone have one of these, and how do you like it?
I`m going to get my daughter a little compact PS for Christmas.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gee, Mark, you're selling an LP to finance a DSLR? Doesn't that make
you the root of all evil, or something of that ilk? ;-p
The irony is not lost on me ;)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
I got a used Tamron 90/2.5 (49mm thread) but it has the wrong Adaptall
mount. I don't know much about these mounts, any references? What I am
looking for is info on whether Adaptall and Adaptall 2 adaptors are
usable with this or only one type.
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: Tamron Adaptall Mounts
Hi,
I got a used Tamron 90/2.5 (49mm thread) but it has the wrong Adaptall
mount. I don't know much about these mounts, any references? What I am
looking for is info on whether Adaptall and Adaptall 2
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://oem-box.biz/?id=seashoreat=bequeathhref=thump
Adobe Photoshop 7 for $59.95?
This web site is hosted on a home computer on a North Carolina
Roadrunner cable connection, which is in violation of Roadrunner's
Rob Brigham wrote:
A friend and camera shop owner in Canada said he was speaking to the
Pentax sales rep and he was saying that the RAW software is being worked
upon.
Good news if true!
Great!
P.S. Can I say I've said several times that I thought they would? Hehehehehe.
Really, I thought they
Hi,
Fred wrote:
If you have a piece of glass of the right shape and thickness, it
would be easy to matte one side with a solution of sodium
hydroxide. Some experimentation would be needed to get
concentration and times.
Gee, I don't think that NaOH will do anything to glass. I think
Herb Chong a écrit:
no remote control as you describe. also, at USB 1.1 speeds, the only
supported speed, you wouldn't want to. Pentax clearly saved money there and
intends you to remove the card and put it in a reader as your main transfer
mechanism.
As *ist D Usb is Usb-1.1, only card reader
Matti Etelapera a crit:
Hi,
are the Pentax 100mm dental macros more rare/collectible than the ordinary
100mm f:4 macros? What is a good price to pay for one?
I could get one for 95 euros (M-version), although I want to check it out
for possible lens separation first.
In France current price
På 19. nov. 2003 kl. 23.27 skrev mike wilson:
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
I am hoping to use it with the Tamron 90/2.5 (49mm) and adaptall; I
guess I need the dedicated converter to go 1:1 with this.
It's just an extension tube. You could use any tube of about 30mm.
Maybe a bit more - I don't
Something like laserdisc?
/Paul
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Question about slide-show or screen saver software
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 07:32:50 -0500
Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark, it may be the colors that
Using a solution of NaOH will not result in an evenly etched surface unless
the glass is constantly agitated. It will be difficult to control the amount
of etching and it will take a long time. Also NaOH results in a 'milky'
frosting -- the original idea was to have a 'clear' screen for
One of the members of our church asked for a copy of this. The first sale
of one of my images. Little Brown Church in the Vale:
http://groups.msn.com/BillOwensPhotos/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPhotoPhotoID=47
Bill
Congrats Bill! Nice pic. It is always a very nice feeling when
someone appreciates your work.
Bruce
Thursday, November 20, 2003, 8:46:16 AM, you wrote:
BO One of the members of our church asked for a copy of this. The first sale
BO of one of my images. Little Brown Church in the Vale:
BO
Congratulations Bill!
It does make you feel good when people ask (and is willing to pay :) ) for you
pictures, doesn't it.
Lasse
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 6:46 PM
Subject: My first sale!
One
Congrat's Bill. Very nice photo.Looks like the 925 will get a work out now,eh.
Dave
BTW.The TOpdml lads were very impressed by the Optio S picture of the ballon.
One of the members of our church asked for a
copy of this. The first sale
of one of my images.
At 11:46 AM 11/20/03, throwing caution to the wind, Bill Owens wrote:
One of the members of our church asked for a copy of this. The first sale
of one of my images. Little Brown Church in the Vale:
http://groups.msn.com/BillOwensPhotos/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPhotoPhotoID=47
Bill
woohoo. Now
Hi Chris,
Going to the site you posted, I got this:
The area you wish to access is behind registration.
If you are an existing user of Times Online please enter you Username
and Password on the spaces provided below on the right.
If you are new to Times
C o n g r a t u l a t i o n s
Boris
===8==Original message text===
BO One of the members of our church asked for a copy of this. The first sale
BO of one of my images. Little Brown Church in the Vale:
BO
Don't sell the lenses. They work on the ist-D.
I sold all my film bodies (including my beloved LX and MX) to fund the D. I
knew I would never shoot a roll of film once I went digital so it was a
no-brainer. For me.
Christian
- Original Message -
From: David Madsen [EMAIL
I sold my 645 and P30t to finance my *ist D, and will soon sell my Phillips
enlarger and Jobo processor to finish covering the cost. Any takers?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: David Madsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003
I just read somewhere that Sony ( or maybe it
was minolta?) has a new digicam ( not slr)
with 8Mpixel sensor!
Looks like 6Mpixel is not the leveling off
point in consumer models after all
J.C. O'Connell
One of the members of our church asked for a copy of this. The first sale
of one of my images. Little Brown Church in the Vale:
http://groups.msn.com/BillOwensPhotos/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPhoto;
PhotoID=47
Bill
Cool. Way to go!
Marnie aka Doe
The true alternative to plastic screens certainly is 'grind-your own', the
way Rollei did it back in the fifties:
www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-kellersv2/grind.jpg
The LP of focusing screens...
Sven
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: Bob Blakely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag,
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I just read somewhere that Sony ( or maybe it
was minolta?) has a new digicam ( not slr)
with 8Mpixel sensor!
They do. All of the sample photographs released so far have been
pretty terrible though. They are producing an 8mp sensor that is the
same
David,
In spite of my strong belief that in general digital is going to surpass
film quality, and, most of all, adding so many new advantages that film will
decline very quickly, in this specific case my advice is not to switch from
MZ-S to *ist D.
The *ist D won't give you the same quality you
Gee, that's right. A pro needs at least the FA* 80-200mm f/2.8 ED IF
Autofocus Lens, which will be an amazing 120-300 equivlaent on the *ist
D.
Nice picture, BTW. It's very sharp. What was the lens?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/20/03 12:41PM
At 11:46 AM 11/20/03, throwing caution to the wind, Bill
The big mistake some makers are doing now (especially Fujifilm and Sony) is
increasing pixel count (even more than truly neded) without increasing
sensor size accordingly. More pixel in the same size mean worse S/N
(signal/noise) ratio, hence grainy images. In other words, they're getting
rid of
Yep ... the F828 ... should be v-e-r-r-r-y interesting to see how well it
works. Its predecessors, the F717, was very highly regarded.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I just read somewhere that Sony ( or maybe it
was minolta?) has a new digicam ( not slr)
with 8Mpixel sensor!
Looks like 6Mpixel is
I wouldn't.
David Madsen wrote:
I am feeling a bit week, but not quite broken. I am in lust with the *istD,
but do not have enough money. My question for the owners of this fine
camera is, should I sell my film equipment to purchase the D? I have an
MZ-S, FA 100mm f2.8 macro, FA* 85mm f1.4,
Noisier I would assume. If they are going to increase
the number of pixels, they should increase the sensor
size along with it. Thats one of the reasons I lust
after a 10Mpixel full frame sensor but the cost is
out of reach by far at this point
Sorry, I wish I could give you a different advice and I'm sure many
folks won't agree with me, but I'm not going to switching from MZ-S to *ist
D for that same reason.
Also, my answer could be different when considering different makes.
Dario Bonazza
I agree, for the same reason, the
Where have you seen sample pics? Can you provide a URL? The dpreview
preview had no photos ... oops, images.
They do. All of the sample photographs released so far have been
pretty terrible though. They are producing an 8mp sensor that is the
same size as the old 5mp sensor and it shows
The F717 doesn't impress me so much. Images are sharp (sharper than those
taken by the *ist D, which is not so difficult), but noisy (=grainy) also at
100 ISO and too flat. Color balance is good, but the *ist D is better on
this respect. I didn't buy the F717 and I won't buy the F828.
Dario (very
I don't know who is buying Nikon D1h's? The brand new just released D2h is only
4mp. The D1X is 5.3mp. And no one would consider a Canon D1 at 4mp...
Mp's are not the only thing to look at, nor even the most important thing.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the Canon D30 is going to close
Would you believe.Sigma 24-50/4.0-5.6 on the *ist D.
Sharpened in Photoshop with nik sharpener pro.
Bill
Nice picture, BTW. It's very sharp. What was the lens?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/20/03 12:41PM
At 11:46 AM 11/20/03, throwing caution to the wind, Bill Owens wrote:
One of the
JCO, so do you see we can agree?
I'm fully with you on this topic.
Dario (yawn) Bonazza
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:05 PM
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
Noisier I
Graywolf wrote:
Mp's are not the only thing to look at, nor even the most important thing.
Maybe, but when doing blow ups it becomes important.
Marnie aka Doe
Tough. The MZ-S is a brilliant camera but chances are, you will almost stop
using it once you have the *ist D (unless you also do slides and slide
shows). I have a set of 12x18'' *ist D / FA 24-90 prints in front of me and
the subjective quality exceeds my expectations.
The prints look 'digital'
I was like you, until I found out my classic k and m lenses were not
completely compatible with the *istD. Also, the *ist D price is starting
to come down a little so eventually you will have enough to buy one.
Jim A.
From: David Madsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Yes and no. If you have a very good picture like those allowed by the best
digicams around (let's say 4 MP average), you can then easy
interpolate it up to 8-10 MP and still get a nice pixel-free blow up. That's
not theory, I saw many excellent examples of that.
If you have a so-so 6 MP picture,
I believe that below 3 MP, pixel count was the single most important factor
when thinking of good blow ups. Today, when serious compact digicams are in
the 4 MP area or more, pixel count is no longer the main factor to look at.
A good 4MP is better than an average 5-6 MP, also when dealing with
On 20/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
One of the members of our church asked for a copy of this. The first sale
of one of my images. Little Brown Church in the Vale:
http://groups.msn.com/BillOwensPhotos/
shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPhotoPhotoID=47
Congratulations Bill, well done.
More beef
I guess I will need to go with the flash cards. Very inefficient for my purpose.
I would like to able to take a photo and have it sent directly from the camera
to the PC for editting and printing.
I suspect you'd need a flash card in the camera, even if it was hooked up via
the USB cable,
Nikon D2H supposedly is wi-fi.
Bill
Somebody else on the list included a really good idea in his wishlist;
a camera with a built-in wireless or bluetooth connection. I'd expect
that to start showing up in the mid-term, perhaps one or two years from
now, just to compete with the ease-of-use
on 11/20/03 10:15 PM, Shel Belinkoff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where have you seen sample pics? Can you provide a URL? The dpreview
preview had no photos ... oops, images.
Someone posted first sample from his just-bought F828.
http://www.pbase.com/image/23462004exif=Y
Much better, than
I am feeling a bit week, but not quite broken. I am in lust with the *istD,
but do not have enough money. My question for the owners of this fine
camera is, should I sell my film equipment to purchase the D? I have an
MZ-S, FA 100mm f2.8 macro, FA* 85mm f1.4, and an FA 50mm f1.4. I also
On 20/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I don't know who is buying Nikon D1h's? The brand new just released D2h
is only
4mp. The D1X is 5.3mp. And no one would consider a Canon D1 at 4mp...
Sports photographers for newspaper and magazines. 4MP is plenty for a
half page - or even full page -
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 20/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I don't know who is buying Nikon D1h's? The brand new just
released D2h
is only
4mp. The D1X is 5.3mp. And no one would consider a Canon
D1 at 4mp...
Sports photographers for
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Cotty wrote:
Odd, I have CD-Rs that were burned nearly 6 years ago and are still
readable by my computers. Surely shome mishtake?
Me too. I have some CD-Rs with my company's archives that are older than
even 7 years. One
Yep, Lexar and others make USB2 6-in-1's. Firewire is also available
now.
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: *ist-D image transfer speeds
Speaking of the old cylinders, I've got a hilarious blooper clip from
Tech TV/Call for Help about one of those. It's a pretty big file but
I'd be willing to send it to you or any other list member.
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
They do. All of the sample photographs released so far have been
pretty terrible though. They are producing an 8mp sensor that is the
same size as the old 5mp sensor and it shows in the quality of the
photographs.
http://www.dpreview.com has
Erin is doing ok. She has been shooting a little Optio 230 more
lately. I'll see if I can get her to submit to next month's open
gallery. Thanks for asking.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, November 20, 2003, 10:27:41 AM, you wrote:
BO Thanks, Bruce, and yes it does.
BO BTW, is Erin
The Sony F828 is not on store shelves yet. It's not a DSLR but it will
probably be a great camera for the price. 8MP, a CZ T* zoom lens, and
the same night photo capabilities of the F717, plus the ability to use
CF cards and microdrives as well as Sony's proprietary memory stick. It
could well
John,
Sony has announced a follow on to the 717 (?) camera.
WWW.Dpreview.com has a review.
Mike Johnson is singing its praises on Photo.Net
Something to the effect that it's his only camera...
Regards, Bob S.
In a message dated 11/20/2003 3:36:27 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yep, Lexar and others make USB2 6-in-1's.
Right. I was merely pointing out that it's still pretty
common to find slow USB versions, even in systems where
you might expect something better (like my 3-month-old HP,
which has built-in firewire, USB2.0, an 800Mhz frontside
bus, support for the
I have had a couple of unreadable CD-Rs, but these have
almost always been bargain-brand no-name blanks.
So far (touch wood) I've had no problem with the Memorex
8x or 10x I use. They might cost a couple of cents more
per gigabyte, but they're still dirt cheap - I remember
when CD-R media cost
I wouldn't either, Tom,
I just bought a lovely LX at a very nice price.
Despite all the doom and gloom stories about film, I think it will be
available for some time. Mind you, my needs are simple. As long as Kodak
keeps making Tri-X and Ilford keeps making HP5+, I'm a happy boy.
Here's my
Watch it, Bill. It's intoxicating and addictive!!
Ain't it a grand feeling, though?
Beautiful shot. Congratulations!!
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello everyone,
I found this tidbit on http://www.ams-pentax.com/main/corporate.asp
1972
Company stock listed on the Amsterdam Stock Exchange's CDR market
PENTAX Carl Zeiss established in Tokyo
Introduction of SMC PENTAX eyeglasses
John
Congrats Bill! Sure feels good doesn't it.
Nice image by the way.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 11:46 AM
Subject: My first sale!
One of the members of our church asked for a copy of
I've got Photo CD's over 6 years old that have received heavy usage with no
ill effects.
I've read somewhere that it is best to store photo images on Gold CDs.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003
- Original Message -
From: David Madsen
Subject: Enablement needed
I am feeling a bit week, but not quite broken. I am in lust with the
*istD,
but do not have enough money. My question for the owners of this fine
camera is, should I sell my film equipment to purchase the D? I
Stan, I have the mount for this lens that you referred to. It was also
bought from a list member. I haven't used it much, but I can see it needs
modification. A two piece ring spacer is positioned around the lens body and
this spacer then fits into a ring receptacle and is retained by tightening
Dario Bonazza 2 wrote:
Yes, in 1975 the 6x7 already on the market for years, since it was
introduced in 1968 and put on sale in 1969.
Hmmm... are you thinking of K meaning Kleinbildformat, the German word for
35mm format? That's very interesting to me, since those were the years when
Asahi was
Hi David.
The lenses you have would work with *istD, therefore, the lenses
should stay. I think that quality of your MF camera would not be
surpassed by *istD, so perhaps this should stay either. Then of course
you could sell MZ-S and add funds for *istD and then optionally, if
you feel more than
Great work on the *istD. I also have the epson 925. Had a little
trouble with it producing streaks. I think it gets clogged easily. I
like your review of the 3200 scanner. I'm looking for a scanner right
now to scan alot of Kodachrome slides, which seem to be really difficult
according to
Absolutely. Please send all of the items below to me, and I'll send you a
*istD in return. :)
chris
===8==Original message text===
DM I am feeling a bit week, but not quite broken. I am in lust with the *istD,
DM but do not have enough money. My question for the
on 11/20/03 2:28 PM, David Madsen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am feeling a bit week, but not quite broken. I am in lust with the *istD,
but do not have enough money. My question for the owners of this fine
camera is, should I sell my film equipment to purchase the D? I have an
MZ-S, FA
Not that I'm too bothered if the transfer takes half an hour. The only
time I'm likely to care about speed is if I'm out in the field, when I
will probably be loading onto my laptop using a PCMCIA adapter, which
should be able to transfer a little faster.
Actually if you want really good
John Francis a écrit:
You can use the camera to send the files to your computer with the supplied
USB cord. I found it easier to buy a ~$20 card reader that plugs right into
the fromt-mounted USB connection on my CPU.
That's probably going to be the fastest transfer method, as long as you
get a
Wow! I have received several wonderful responses to my inquiry and I have a
lot to think about. FWIW, I have decided not to sell my film equipment at
this time. I believe that there is a *istD in my future, but not at the
expense of the equipment I have worked very hard to get. Thank you, all
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:28:43 -0700, David Madsen wrote:
I am feeling a bit week, but not quite broken. I am in lust with the *istD,
but do not have enough money. My question for the owners of this fine
camera is, should I sell my film equipment to purchase the D? I have an
MZ-S, FA 100mm f2.8
98 matches
Mail list logo
