There is nothing...
...and i repeat Nothing...
humorous about lutefisk.
Jostein
On 9/6/06, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Found buried in a discussion on Slashdot (http://slashdot.org)
Hrmm... a larg enough block of Na [sodium] tossed into a lake would
essentially make a large pool
Jack,
Your link got the question mark in the wrong spot. This one works:
http://www.photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=182
That feline sure looks bugged too...:-)
Thanks for sharing
Jostein
On 9/5/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was bugging Miss Kitty with an A100 f/2.8 macro
On 9/5/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's an unsubstantiated rumor. It means little at this point.
Shel
Quite persistent, though. Might be worth heeding to.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 9/5/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what I call a lunch hour.
The sort I wish our middle management would take.
I thought they were permanently out for lunch? :-)
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 9/5/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heeding a rumor makes no sense. Why stock up on peripheral gear based on a
rumor ... you might end up with some useless peripherals. I'll just wait
until the camera is announced and in the stores.
No, I think you should buy an AA charger now.
I made this one of the 645D for my work desktop when the official
images were released at the time of PMA. Unfortunately I don't have
the link to the originals anymore. File size is 430 KB.
http://www.oksne.net/temp/645Dscreen.jpg
For the record, my contribution is only to combine a front and a
Christian wrote:
I'm just imaging the 645D with 600mm F5.6 lens and 1.4x TC... It would
be a killer shore bird rig. The 20D with 300/4 would be my flight lens
where handling and frame rate are needed... the possibilities are
intriguing. :-)
mmm
Would kill my back first,
Thanks for the comment, Marnie!
Yeah, I should have got the whole antennae, but it was too big for me. :-)
Enjoy your trip!
Jostein
On 9/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/29/2006 12:28:08 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
LOL...
Green Gadget of the Year
Cool, though.
Jostein
On 9/4/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.voltaicsystems.com/
--
Regards,
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
be slightly longer in most cases (to
cover the difference in Register).
-Adam
Jostein Øksne wrote:
Point about front element taken, but the front element is not THE
single factor in deciding the weight of a lens.
I have five lenses for the 645 system, and all of them are heavier
] wrote:
Huh???
There are three of them scheduled for release early next year.
Pål
- Original Message -
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: SMC Pentax D FA* 400/4 ED IF USM (WAS: Re
Hi Mark,
Tried to respond off-list, but your mail server rejects. It also
rejects the address I used to contact you through. What should I do?
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 9/2/06, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really hope for a 400/4. It is about the longest and fastest lens that can
be hand-held. With the 1,5X multiplication with the DSLR bodies, and perhaps
an AF 1,4X converter, it would be a killer outfit!
400/4 with SSM would be neat. Can't see
Out of 13 lenses projected until 2006, 11 are DA lenses, even the
upcoming f/2.8 zooms. Right now I find it hard to believe we will see
any more DFA lenses at all.
Jostein
On 9/2/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My fervent hope is that the FA lenses that have been discontinued in
the
Then tell me, guys,
Why are the medium format optics so much larger for corresponding
focal lengths and max apertures?
Jostein
On 9/2/06, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Maas mykroft at mykroft.com Sat Sep 2 08:49:28 EST 2006
400/4 with SSM would be neat. Can't see any good reason
/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then tell me, guys,
Why are the medium format optics so much larger for corresponding
focal lengths and max apertures?
The long lenses aren't, I had a 400/4 for my 67, it didn't taper much
as the back end used the external bayonet but the front
Hi Bill!
Great to have you back!
Jostein
On 9/2/06, Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guess I'm the oddball here. I'm perfectly happy with my *istD and have no
plans to replace it.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ryan
On 9/1/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My comment was not meant to be taken seriously! In fact, I suspect that
LF will be the last bastion of film, simply because it will be
prohibitively expensive to produce large sensors for a small user base.
Let's hope that producing film for the
On 9/1/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tongue in cheek?
Totally InComprehensible?
Jostein
:-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 9/1/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31.08.2006, at 23:20 , Peter Fairweather wrote:
Given that the new K10D is rumoured to make the 67II obsolete, surely
Pentax will just drop the 645D??!!
I don't know :-) But it would be interesting to see what is (2x
bigger than
On 9/1/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, but then again we have not speculated on whether your favourite
top-model will hand-deliver the camera to you.
Now that would be something. :-)
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On DPReview there is a gentleman who claims that his
local camera store in Portland, Maine showed him an
advertising flyer for the K10D with the following
specs:
- 10 Megapixels
That's hardly news...:-)
- ISO 100 to 3200
ISO 100? That's news.
- Shake Reduction
Given the K100D, that's
Thanks, Shel.
You have made your point.
Would you like some coffee?
Jostein
On 8/31/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yawn
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Douglas Newman
On DPReview there is a gentleman who claims that his
local camera store in Portland, Maine
On the subject of the K10D, there's so many eddies in the the internet
flow that creating a summary of common knowledge could be fun.
AFAIK, a list of reasonably well established facts include:
10 Mpx
Anti-shake
Evolved K-mount
SD memory cards, with support for 2 GB cards.
Rumors, here and
.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
lol
You must have got the coffee, then. Posting at half past one in the morning...
Cheers,
Jostein
On 8/31/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes ... but I can't talk about it.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jostein Øksne
On the subject of the K10D, there's so many eddies
I had the repairman at Pentax Norway to look at the images. According
to him, the damage is within a modular group of elements that should
be changed as a whole.
He explisitly told me he would not be able to just open it and clean
it, so I believe it is not an easy fix.
Jostein
On 8/31/06,
On 8/31/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob, who admits to having seen a press release, confirmed that it has a
battery grip.
When I searched the web for rumors, I found continued reference to
extended dynamic range and advanced noise reduction. Both of these are
apparently
Hey dude,
D'you fink your'e the only one?
Jostein :-(
On 8/31/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But I haven't read all the threads thoroughly over the last weeks (I
have had very prominent guests in my house, and they have of course
had
On 8/31/06, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe the contacts pop out the moment you mount an USM lens?
Hm.
I think that would mean that all the old powerzoom lenses would be
unusable on the K10D. That seems unlikely, imo.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 8/31/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two wheels. Like the D.
Fact or speculation?
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 8/31/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone care to make an educated guess to RAW speed buffer given that
JPEG is 3 fps 'streaming'?
So... 3fps is a fact?
Streaming JPEGs meaning no buffer congestion for JPEG? Fact or rumor?
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Based on the floaters from the previous thread, here's an update.
The wish from John Forbes for a two-wheel interface aka *istD and
(P)Z-1p seems so likely I threw it into facts at face value. Rob's
battery grip goes in there as well, along with the claim of 3fps,
which also seems very likely,
the 3fps
will go back in the rumor pool at the next update.
Jostein
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Based on the floaters from the previous thread, here's an update.
The wish from John Forbes for a two-wheel interface aka *istD
On 8/31/06, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was the subject on the power zoom feature?
I thought people were talking about using these contacts for USM drive.
I thought PZ itself is a dead issue (can see no reason to resurrect it,
particularly if Pentax are planning to equip lenses with
More proof of HyP.
But there's new acronym on that dial too; Sv.
Jostein
On 8/31/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/09/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/31/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very good synopsis. You are well organized, aren't
BTW The whole list is just an assemblages of the rumors floating around
That's given. Look at the name of the thread.
Some rumors seem more substantiated than others, though.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Jostein, you are one of the ones who knows!
Mph hmph phmm mh hmm.
Sorry. Can't break the spell. :-(
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Cotty, suitably discombobulated, burst out:
So let me get this right. If USM or it's Pentax-monikered equivalent is
introduced, anyone that wants to take advantage of it is going to have
to buy new lens(es) ?
LOL. That'll be hard to face for some, eh?
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 8/31/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm more of a sardonic chap. wg
wry grin ?
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 8/31/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Including body-driven AF lenses? I mean, will a K10D have an AF motor
inside the body as well?
If it hasn't, then ALL Pentax lenses on the market today will suddenly
become manual focus with a brand, spanking new camera. How would that
be for
Here's the second update.
There's an incredible lot of posts, so it's hard to keep up here. I'm
trying to consider info that seems to emerge from more than one
unrelated source. The more sources the better, I guess. Remember
also that this is not meant to be the ultimate truth about the K10D.
I'd
The current Pentax AF lenses come in at least three flavours. In its
simplest form, the camera needs to be switched to manual focus, and
then tweak.
With FA* lenses, all you have to do is pull the focus ring towards the
camera house. A small, audible click, and you have manual focus. Move
it
On 8/31/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have got the numbers wrong. The answer to everything is 42 ;-)
Nope. That's a common misconception. The real answer is:
Faster horses, younger women, older whiskey, and more money.
And less hair.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Press release date is around the 15. September.
And no, I'm not in the know of anything on this one. :-(
Jostein
On 8/31/06, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
???
Any news, Rumors???
Pål
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 8/31/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So as soon as you touch the focus ring, the AF disengages? How does it
re-engage? Surely you must stop AF for any meaningful manual focus to
take place?
AF must be set to single. Mine is most of the time anyway...:-) When
the camera settles on a
On 8/31/06, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seriously people, calm down for a moment and think about how much energy
you're wasting over this.
This is positive energy, John.
The Pentaxian equivalent of a group of chimps grooming eachother for fleas.
Jostein
vbg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
That's what I have been lead to believe, yes.
Jostein
On 8/31/06, Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it does mean that there are news about it in the press release?
- Original Message -
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent
It was good to see you again, Libermans. :-)
Looking forward to your GESO.
Jostein
On 8/30/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey!
After wonderful vacation (a picture from which I posted to the oncoming
PUG) I have returned home. In my opinion it was my best vacation ever. I
shall
On 8/29/06, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.oksne.net/paw/calanoid.html
Mush nicer thaqn the first one.
Good work
Thanks Dave.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 8/29/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exquisite !
The orientation is a plus.
Lighting looks pretty good to me.
Thanks, Ken!
Some very minor nits...
Hard to tell but it looks to me it could use a touch more DOF along the main
body.
Agreed. I may eventually have to employ
pics that are
more than mere documentation.
Jostein
On 8/29/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The technical quality is definitely improved over the first, but I
preferred the colors and feeling in the first one you showed.
Godfrey
On Aug 29, 2006, at 12:22 PM, Jostein Øksne
Thanks Joe. :-)
On 8/29/06, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.oksne.net/paw/calanoid.html
Thanks for looking.
Jostein
-
Cool.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 8/29/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.oksne.net/paw/calanoid.html
Wow! He looks small, what sort of length is he ? Lovely shot mate.
Thanks Cotty,
I guess it was about 3 mm head to tail.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 8/30/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now you're getting somewhere Jostein, a lot better. I think we can take more
of this. Now it's interesting from photographic point of view ;-)
I don't find the light bad (as you suggests in your online comment).
I understand you need all the
AFAIK, many of the MedF digitals achieve larger sensors by combining
more than one CCD. When doubling the area of a sensor means a tenfold
increase in cost it makes me wonder what kind of potential there may
be for cost reduction in the surrounding circuitry.
Aligning two CCDs comes with it's own
On 8/29/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The most interesting part in description is Aperture or exposure
control is not necessary ;-)
Not sure if the f/64-group would have cringed or applauded...:-)
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 8/29/06, D Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug, your getting like me, you spelt Canon wrong.
vbg
Have you tried eating bread with more grains. sheepish grin
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Ken,
This is the first time I say this about anyone in the P.J. Alling way:
I hate you. :-)
Very powerful image. Thanks for sharing.
Jostein
On 8/29/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Comments appreciated.
http://www.oksne.net/paw/calanoid.html
Thanks for looking.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 8/26/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He is embargoed if he was given information on condition that he keep
quiet about it.
Exactly.
:-)
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 8/23/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was there to :-) and I've got to admit I had much greater time watching
Jostein play, than I had with the product.
It is something with technical stuff like this, turns men into kids ;-)
HAR!
Jostein the adolescent
--
PDML
Thanks Ann,
Too much fun? Well... You know... um...
oh, well... Vacation is soon over anyway. :-)
Jostein
On 8/23/06, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jostein - you are having far too much fun --
that is fascinating - who cares if it's grainy?
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Actually, I still haven't located that missing reversal ring...:-(
Got plenty of epoxy and Cokin rings, though... :-)
Jostein
On 8/21/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Coming soon; pictures of in-field apparatus construction. 8-
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 8/21/06, Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
www.looksmall.com
Checked it out.
The images looks pretty nice for a toy. I mean, that's what it looks like...
I'd still like to experiment a little more with my Pentax lenses, though.
Link is bookmarked.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 8/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.oksne.net/paw/sidacrystallina.html
===
Impressive, Jostein, even with graininess.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
Thanks Marnie!
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 8/21/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very cool indeed. Your proofs are quite good. I'm anxious to see
more of this stuff from you.
Hope I will have time to produce some more before the season ends.
Thanks for the encouragement, Bruce. :-)
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
That's very kind, Godfrey. :-)
On 8/20/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 20, 2006, at 4:56 AM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
Okay, I'll be the first to admit that this is probably the worst pic
I've posted for a PESO so far.
...
http://www.oksne.net/paw/sidacrystallina.html
Okay, I'll be the first to admit that this is probably the worst pic
I've posted for a PESO so far.
Still, I'm happy with it because it is a first proof of concept for a
range of macro subjects I have not dared to explore until now, after
my success with the snow crystals last winter.
Plankton
On 8/18/06, Douglas Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
As you might have guessed from the subject line (!), I
am a new member. I recently found this esteemed list
from a reference on DPReview.
WeLcOmE aBoArD. :-)
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 8/18/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not just me beating up Pentax (good grief).
I second the parenthesis.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hi Tom,
You are free to pick from your archive, of course.
Jostein
On 8/19/06, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the consensus of opinion for the PUG? I have a shot that I took for
the abandoned theme but I have something a hell of a lot better in my archive.
Do you put shots in
On 8/16/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm fairly sure we've seen the same news. It's the big part of the
news, right?
Pentax Norway showed me a slide presentation which had CONFIDENTIAL
spelled out in red letters on all the pages, so my lips are Sealed.
Not entirely sure what
hmmm...
This guessing game is more about which features Aaron treasure most in
his 67, than it is about new features in the K10D.
My interpretation of the patent link Dag posted is that it looks like
a way to reek out noise produced by the sensor, in such a way that it
could be implemented at
All taken with FA*400/5.6 and 2X-L teleconverter, handheld.
The first one at 1/90s, the rest at 1/125s.
One of the chimney pics is done with AS, one without.
http://www.oksne.net/temp/imgp0809.jpg
http://www.oksne.net/temp/imgp0810.jpg
http://www.oksne.net/temp/imgp0813.jpg
these images.
Jostein
On 8/16/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All taken with FA*400/5.6 and 2X-L teleconverter, handheld.
The first one at 1/90s, the rest at 1/125s.
One of the chimney pics is done with AS, one without.
http://www.oksne.net/temp/imgp0809.jpg
http://www.oksne.net
Um...
What was the question again?
Jostein
On 8/16/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
22
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body
Date: Wed Aug 16, 2006 1:04 pm
Size: 708 bytes
To: Pentax-Discuss
I'll raise you by 3.14
Jostein
On 8/16/06, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
100
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body
Yup.
In nice, sinusoid patterns, of course.
Jostein
On 8/16/06, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to add some noise, eh?
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 7:24 PM
nononono
All that Was of CouRse entirely UNintentIOnal...
JostEin
On 8/16/06, jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gang, a fellow in Beijing, posting over at dpreview, decoded Jostein's
message. Jostein gave us some answers, but I (for one) was too slow to pick
them up. Pete Fang at
You have a nurse too?
:-)
Jostein
On 8/16/06, Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sadly, this is as close or even closer than most guesses.
And no, that's not a hint.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Peter Fairweather [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP
Hey Mike,
Great to see you back online. :-)
Of course we were pleased to see you, but you already knew that.
Jostein
On 8/16/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that an ace up your sleeve, or are you just pleased to see us?
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/16
Hello everyone,
Just browsing the archives today, I see there's been a couple of
reports on the K100D already, so there's little new I can add. I'd
like to add my voice to the choir praising the anti-shake, though.
For the last week, I've had a pre-production K100D on loan from Pentax
Norway,
Fotosight.ru refuse to show me the second image, but I really liked
the first one. The sign makes it. Makes me wonder what kind of quality
substance the once was, running to the pipeline.
May not mean much to people who can't read French, though...:-)
Jostein
On 7/18/06, Ralf R. Radermacher
Ken Waller wrote:
I would expect we'd be advised by that Moslem pdml'er as to local customs if
it affected him/her.
This is really no different than respecting the wishes of a friend when you
visit them. ie if you smoke he didn't like smoking in his house, you would
refrain from smoking
Shel wrote:
Well, Frank, apparently, according to some people, if the intent or meaning
isn't spelled out for them, it is a bad thing.
If I was to answer this your way, Shel, I would also begin with Well,
Frank, But I have no shame of discussing photography with people
I do not agree with,
Hi Shel,
You wrote:
What do you see? How does the photo effect you? Does it make you feel
anything or want to know more?
What I see does not engage me.
Maybe it would be more interesting if it had a context.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Define context in this case.
Lol... Why?
Jostein
[Original Message]
From: Jostein Øksne
You wrote:
What do you see? How does the photo effect you?
Does it make you feel anything or want to know more?
What I see does not engage me.
Maybe it would be more interesting
Ahh
Had a go at the same species in Assateague Nat'l park in 2004. Makes
me appreciate your shot all the more.
Great portrait.
I suppose some would find the background distracting, but I think it's
ok. Makes it more real life to me.
Jostein
On 7/17/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At
Gave me a good chuckle, Bruce.
Thanks for sharing.
Jostein
On 7/15/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a bit lighthearted - didn't see the resemblance until viewing
on a bigger screen.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/1000 sec @ f/6.7
William Robb wrote:
I tend to eschew the whole street photography thing in the same way I eschew
jazz music.
I don't get it, and I don't really feel the need to, either.
Mark!!!
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Shel,
My impression is that it doesn't get more difficult with larger
images, and not more tedious either. After all it's just a matter of
brush size. What always happens to me, though, is that with larger
images i start paying more attention to minute detail, and that's when
the workload builds
Hi guys and gals,
4 days to go to the next deadline.
Submission form is up and running again. Still at
http://www.oksne.net/autopug/pugform.asp
Cheers,
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hi guys and gals,
The next PUG deadline approacheth. Time to get the submissions ready, folks.
The apology is for not having the submission form currently up and
running. The ISP has been notified, and I await response. News of the
condition will be coming.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Hi Skye,
You have to check out the local copyright laws where you live to be
sure, but I would say that owner X is not allowed to make further
copies unless that is specifically agreed upon. That's basically what
copyright is all about. The buyer only buys the right to own the item,
not to make
Hi Dag,
That's pretty arrogant behaviour from the painter. Hope you get the
painting destroyed. Make sure that he agrees also to destroy any
sketches he made prior to the final painting, and to confirm his
action in writing.
Jostein
On 7/13/06, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to keep your
There's not much about Norm that could be described as normal.
You mean, in the same way that there's not much about Jack that could
be described as jackal?
Jostein-al
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
When reading this thread I was sure you would chime in with my little
mess-up with certain biting insects...:-)
Jostein
scratching his leg
On 7/14/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I once transposed the Polish words for Italian and hairy. Which explained
the confused look on my
hm let's see, to mount m42 (50 year old) lenses on a Pentax DSLR
you need an adapter To mount Canon FD lenses on a Canon DSLR you
need an adapter Same kind of computability I'd say.
Except that the newest FD lenses are not 50 years old. :-)
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
The course consisted of one exercise which involved a radial motion
using the forearm, raising a pint pot from bar to lips, and back. Repeat.
My tutor gave me 100%.
Har. Everyone knows you can't get more than 96%.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
901 - 1000 of 1081 matches
Mail list logo
