In a message dated 4/25/2007 6:31:46 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marnie,
Try 2 is great.
Rick
=
Thanks.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
-
Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored.
Based on comments by the list, I thought I would try a few more things
and show you what I had to work with. The story I told is basically
how the shot came to be - whether you agree with my thought process or
not, that is why I took the shot. The issue I had was harsher
lighting than I wanted -
I like it as shot. I also like alternates two and three.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Based on comments by the list, I thought I would try a few more things
and show you what I had to work with. The story I told is basically
Bruce,
I think it's best in black and white - #3.
Regards, Bob S.
On 4/25/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on comments by the list, I thought I would try a few more things
and show you what I had to work with. The story I told is basically
how the shot came to be - whether you
#3, but with a grade higher contrast! If this were on film in BW, I would
have printed it on Agfa Brovira 6 :-)
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 4/25/07, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce,
I think it's best in black and white - #3.
Regards, Bob S.
I agree.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I second that.
I think #3 gets your idea cross better than the original image you
displayed.
Tom C.
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce,
I think it's best in black and white - #3.
Regards, Bob S.
On 4/25/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on comments by the list, I
Much prefer the original image, Bruce. It has a stirring airy sweep to
it that is quite nice.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on comments by the list, I thought I would try a few more
things
and show you what I had to work with. The story I told is basically
how the
I like alternative 3 best.
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on comments by the list, I thought I would try
a few more things
and show you what I had to work with. The story I
told is basically
how the shot came to be - whether you agree with my
thought process or
In a message dated 4/25/2007 2:02:16 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Based on comments by the list, I thought I would try a few more things
and show you what I had to work with. The story I told is basically
how the shot came to be - whether you agree with my thought
Bruce, I did these in about 10 minutes. I had 10 minutes to spare. :-)
I will take them down once I know you have seen them.
Some people are going to tell you to go with a straight BW conversion. But
in this case, I think you are right, it needs to be punched up.
Marnie,
Try 2 is great.
Rick
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce, I did these in about 10 minutes. I had 10
minutes to spare. :-)
I will take them down once I know you have seen
them.
Some people are going to tell you to go with a
straight BW conversion. But
in this case, I
The original, as shot gets my vote.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - End Part II
Based on comments by the list, I thought I would try a few more things
and show you what I had to work with. The story I told is basically
how
Bruce,
I also think the original image stands on its own the best for
conveying your original idea.
The BW works also, but it leaves me wanting to see more tonal range.
JayT
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Based on comments by the list, I thought I would try a few more things
and show you what I had
The original and Alternative #3 (bw) are the best. You see, Bruce, to
my eye what became of the ocean on the original image you presented did
not come across like water. I thought it was a bit more soil, just
without any vegetation on it.
Actually, I think that the original shot with just a
15 matches
Mail list logo
