Hello,
Wednesday, June 8, 2005, 12:13:09 AM, you wrote:
PJA They're both well thought of the M is much smaller has a built in lens
PJA hood so it's a bit more convenient. The K is bigger and heavier, is a
PJA simpler optical formula and has a reputation for having the edge in
PJA sharpness and
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Wednesday, June 8, 2005, 12:13:09 AM, you wrote:
PJA They're both well thought of the M is much smaller has a built in lens
PJA hood so it's a bit more convenient. The K is bigger and heavier, is a
PJA simpler optical formula and has a
Hello Kostas,
KK No, to have the edge means to be better, though not by much.
Thanks for explanation! I was little a bit confused with the edge
as in the dictionary I can find two completely different meaning of
this word :) (I'm from Ukraine so English is not my native language).
I'm little
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/06/08 Wed AM 09:51:57 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re[3]: SMC Pentax M135/3.5 vs SMC Pentac K135/3.5
Hello Kostas,
KK No, to have the edge means to be better, though not by much.
Thanks for explanation! I was little a bit confused
Hello Mike,
Wednesday, June 8, 2005, 1:48:50 PM, you wrote:
mw Which part of Ukraine? I'm working with an organisation from
mw Kremenchug but have not yet had the opportunity to visit.
I live in the west of Ukraine - in Ternopil. Kremenchug is in the
center of Ukraine - Poltava region. You
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/06/08 Wed AM 11:01:34 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re[5]: SMC Pentax M135/3.5 vs SMC Pentac K135/3.5
Hello Mike,
Wednesday, June 8, 2005, 1:48:50 PM, you wrote:
mw Which part of Ukraine? I'm working with an organisation from
mw
Sorry, I though I was clear, the Both are good, the K is better. If
they were the same price and I could have only one I'd get the K version
if I wanted superior imaging the M if I needed something compact. I
selected superior imaging.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Wednesday, June 8,
Hello,
Can somebody tell the difference between those two lenses? I'm
interesting in quality of the pictures from them.
As I can see from Bojidar's site K version is little a bit heavier
and longer then M version.
I'm interesting in the picture difference of those lenses.
Thanks,
Jurij
They're both well thought of the M is much smaller has a built in lens
hood so it's a bit more convenient. The K is bigger and heavier, is a
simpler optical formula and has a reputation for having the edge in
sharpness and contrast. It's also a bit more difficult to find but few
know just
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, P. J. Alling wrote:
introduced, so you might pick one up inexpensively. I have a copy of
the K version that I almost never use since I picked up the K 135 f2.5.
Same here. Unless prices have risen, you can pick them up when they
occur on ebay for 30-40 GB.
Which is why I
Can somebody tell the difference between those two lenses? I'm
interesting in quality of the pictures from them.
As I can see from Bojidar's site K version is little a bit heavier
and longer then M version.
I'm interesting in the picture difference of those lenses.
I don't know about the K,
11 matches
Mail list logo
