Aw! And, for a moment, I thought we just might have a little offsett to the
search for truth about the nuances of the third world.
Otis Wright
Dan Scott wrote:
Please keep us updated with any important security info. Thanks.
mkr
Please don't. Computer security is
Hi Frank,
Thanks for taking time to comment on my photo.
This was one of my first photos with the FA*200/2.8, i quite like this
lense. I got a few others that had a weird bokeh, but i quite liked the
bokeh in this one.
Thanks,
Paul Jones
- Original Message -
From: Frank Theriault
:)
- Original Message -
From: Otis Wright, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 2:55 AM
Subject: Re: Computer Security
Aw! And, for a moment, I thought we just might have a little offsett to
the
search for truth about the nuances of the third
On Mon, 02 Jul 2001 12:54:16 -0700, Cameron R. Hood wrote:
I had one of them for about a week, and the strap buckle (made of
plastic) let go one time when I was picking it up at an angle. All of my
photo gear went smashing to the ground. And no, it was not overloaded.
Repeated angry calls,
Bill D. Casselberry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Blakely wrote:
First World also first world
n.
During the Cold War, the industrialized capitalist nations of the world.
;^) Meet me in the next world, and don't be late!
J
Looks like pentax US has shipped the new Optio in the us.
check it out here.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0107/01070202pentaxoptio330.asp
3.3 MP and very small
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
Not to worry. It was just a one-time pointer to some useful
information since it appears that we all seem to be computer
users as well as camera users. I promise to keep my future
posts on topic, if everyone else does too, but I reserve the
right to respond to posts made by others, as did you.
Yes please comment on Sparkys day at the farm
Dave
Pentax User
Stouffville Ont Canada
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget
It seems sometimes I'm unsubscribed by force
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Interesting article about Kodak and their new President and what she's
trying to do with t
company:
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/is/20010702/bs/can_kodak_find_its_focus__1.
html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
There was also a pretty good article about Kodak and their relationship with
Microsoft in yesterday's Wall Street Journal. It seems that one of the
initial builds of Windows XP made it nearly impossible to use Kodak's
software. It also had some fairly accurate barbs about the skill and effort
Hi, gang.
sometime ago we talked about Sugimoto pictures and time exposures. Somebody
told he has the book of Sugimoto Time exposed. I need a scan of the
infamous cinema screen shot. It's for an university work (I study graphic
design). It will not be published anywhere, so it's not a terrible
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 2:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: test
It seems sometimes I'm unsubscribed by force
Happenned to me, too. I didn't received any mail fo couple
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001 at 11:40:49 -0700 (PDT), Juan J. Buhler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fwiw, I always welcome comments on my pictures. Especially negative
ones, as those are the ones that teach me things.
Precisely my sentiments. Fire away, anyone so inclined.
--
Rodger Whitlock
Victoria,
Len Paris wrote:
Not to worry. It was just a one-time pointer to some useful
information since it appears that we all seem to be computer
users as well as camera users.
Len, not to worry. We were both responding to the request to keep us
updated with important security info. I have
Thanks Bill Peifer and John Cohen for your comments on
Sparkys day at the Farm.You are right,it happened very fast
but i thought something might happen as i say,he has no big
animal expereince and just wanted to play.
This was scanned at a local Rapid Photo from a 5x7 and all we did
was rotate
I recently purchased a nifty Jupiter 9 85/2 in M42 screwmount. It came with a decent
looking adapter K.
(The whole thing was cheaper than two cases of Heineken. Yes I realize this lens is
probably NOT to be mentioned in the same breath with a real Pentax 85/2 but hey for
$50 and besides
List wisdom needed:
Over the week-end, at an outdoor concert, I mistakenly shot two rolls at ISO/ASA 100.
One was a Kodak TMY 400 (bw), the other was a Konica Centuria 800 (C-41 process).
Since I am sending this to a pro-lab, can I expect to get back something usable?
Any suggestions as to
I would like to connect an AF220T off-camera. What would I need? Is it
possible to use cords by manufacturers other than Pentax? (I read somewhere
that the Canon Cord 2 may be used. What about the Nikon SC-17? I saw a
picture on eBay and seems to be physically compatible.) My apologies for
asking
Michel Adam wrote:
Over the week-end, at an outdoor concert, I mistakenly shot two
rolls at ISO/ASA 100. One was a Kodak TMY 400 (bw), the other
was a Konica Centuria 800 (C-41 process).
Since I am sending this to a pro-lab, can I expect to get back
something usable?
Any
As far as I know, the MZ-S I looked at was for sale. Also, the
viewfinder was completely visible while wearing glasses, and the viewfinder
display seemed nice and bright. I didn't buy it, though. I'm still
waiting for word on the silver body.
Pat White
- Original Message -
From: Michel Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss@Pdml. Net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 3, 2001 9:57 AM
Subject: Salvaging unprocessed overexposed negs ?
List wisdom needed:
Over the week-end, at an outdoor concert, I mistakenly shot
two rolls at ISO/ASA
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Christopher Lillja wrote:
Is there a trick to fitting this? The adapter doesn't want to mount up
to any of my bodies. If I fit the adapter to the lens, still no go. I
sure as heck ain't gonna force it!
No trick. Just line it up properly and it should fit in easily.
just tell them that you shot both at 100.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I needed to resubscribe about three times in the latest pair of weeks...
Albano
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Michel Adam wrote:
Over the week-end, at an outdoor concert, I mistakenly shot two
rolls at ISO/ASA 100.
One was a Kodak TMY 400 (bw), the other was a Konica Centuria 800
(C-41 process).
Since I am sending this to a pro-lab, can I expect to get back
something
Just avoid third-party adapters. Pentax originals are smooth as silk and
you can use them with your fingernails. No personal good experiences with
third parties.
My two cents
Albano
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
I personally would like to see as many different
Pentax lenses as possible; I just won't hold my breath for a 17-35/2.8 though.
Firstly they need to upgrade the FA* 28-70/2.8 and the FA* 80-200/2.8 with
models without power-zoom. A better idea in my opinion is to make an 24-70/2.8
to
Hi folks,
It's been a while since my last post of shameless self promotion.
I have updated my site, with a couple of new galleries with pictures
from Italy and Paris (I edited out the bad stuff, or so I think), and
even a What's New section.
If you care to tell me what you think, insults and
Thanks Bill.
Pine Nuts, by Thomas Cakalic
Nice shot, Tom. This caught my eye immediately, because it's very similar
(in subject matter) to some macro shots I took a couple weeks ago during a
very light rain. I still have a couple more shots on the roll, so I'll
have
to wait to see if
Subject: Re: Salvaging unprocessed overexposed negs ?
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Michel Adam wrote:
Over the week-end, at an outdoor concert, I mistakenly shot
two
rolls at ISO/ASA 100.
One was a Kodak TMY 400 (bw), the other was a Konica
Centuria 800
(C-41 process).
Since I am
Group,
I'm floating my new website for your review.
I welcome your candid impression of the look of the
site, but primarily, the work itself.
I value your collective opinions.
www.photolightimages.com
Jack
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized
Hi all
I managed to catch up with my 84 year old aunt today, or is it yesterday
already? Whatever. :-) I haven't seen her for almost 5 years and haven't
visited her for the best part of twenty five years. My mother had told me
last week that she (my aunt) wanted to have a look at some of my
Metro, Paris, 2001, by Juan Buhler
I think there is a powerful message here, but the shot would benefit from
some commentary by the photographer. The static pose of the man in the
foreground contrasts well with the movement of the train. For me, this
conveys a sense of utter despair and
Hi everyone,
I have to make some black and white enlargements from color negs. What is
the name of the process that I would tell a custom lab that I want?
Thanks,
Jim A.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
First-time poster... go easy on me :)
I've been using my ZX-M for about six months. On a recent vacation I took
some photos in extreme, almost overhead, sunlight. I did what I could when
composing to try and get the sun behind me, but... let's just say the photos
are less than what I'd hoped
Note: forwarded message attached.
Posters,
This forward will, hopefully, provide a more
expeditious URL for your convenience in accessing my
site:
http:www.photolightimages.com
As must be obvious, I encourage your comments.
Thanks,
Jack
__
well, i did it. plunked down good old american coin (actually it was a us
postal money order) and bought my 1st lens, a zoom no less, the KA
35-105mm/f3.5 w/ macro. sounds nice doesn't it?
bought it for a fair price though i thought i could have gotten it for
$20-$25 less but sometimes u
ARe you sure that it's a pentax adapter? It might be a screw - minolta or
other adapter . . .
Illinois Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just avoid third-party adapters. Pentax originals are smooth as silk and
you can use them with your fingernails. No personal good experiences with
third
-Original Message-
From: Jack Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 12:44 PM
To: pentax-discuss
Subject: Fwd: Comments welcomed-follow up
Note: forwarded message attached.
Posters,
This forward will, hopefully, provide a more
expeditious URL for
Jon Hope wrote:
Hi all
I managed to catch up with my 84 year old aunt today, or is it yesterday
already? Whatever. :-) I haven't seen her for almost 5 years and haven't
visited her for the best part of twenty five years.
(inspiring story snipped)
Thanks Jon, for sharing.
Here's to hoping
Well Radio-cameras didn't move too well. Anyone taking bets on
cable/switch/telephone-cameras?
Otis Wright
Doug Franklin wrote:
Interesting article about Kodak and their new President and what she's
trying to do with t
company:
Jim Apilado wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have to make some black and white enlargements from color negs. What is
the name of the process that I would tell a custom lab that I want?
It's not really a separate process...you're probably thinking of
Panalure paper, which used to be the only paper you
Paul Warren wrote:
I'd now like to learn some more about fill-flash. I understand the basic
concept, but I'm confused about equipment. My ZX-M came with the
AF201SA flash, but my understanding is that it's not very appropriate
for fill flash. If I'm wrong, let me know! Anyway, I'm mostly
Here's what the rumors have been, in the order I have seen them on
rec.photo.film+labs:
1. An ISO 100 replacement exists for Ultra 50.
2. No U.S. dealers ordered it, so it will not be sold here.
3. Agfa has restructured, stopped trying to sell its film division, has
a new commitment to film,
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Here's what the rumors have been, in the order I have seen them on
rec.photo.film+labs:
1. An ISO 100 replacement exists for Ultra 50.
2. No U.S. dealers ordered it, so it will not be sold here.
3. Agfa has restructured, stopped trying to sell its film
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree, Lasse. I think there has been a comments freeze of late,
snip
Seems to me that any image posted on any given month should be open to
comment/criticism. If one is thin skinned, one may wish to say comments not
welcome, or some such thing.
But I agree
Jim Apilado wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have to make some black and white enlargements from color negs. What is
the name of the process that I would tell a custom lab that I want?
I've produced some fairly good BW prints from color negs on Kodak
Panalure paper. It's a bit tricky to work
On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Lasse Karlsson wrote:
I think that this is silly, that we individually should have to post
messages to the list (or at submission - I had totally forgotten about
it) saying that we want comments on our PUG submissions.
Well, we're talking about two different things. You
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Frank Theriault wrote:
Seems to me that any image posted on any given month should be open to
comment/criticism.
It *is* open to comments/criticism. The organized comments are meant to
*add onto* this, not replace it.
The semi-formalized critiques organized by Chris
I think right now the lack of comments may be that it's summer in the
northern hemisphere. In my case it's because I'm swamped at work.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: Lasse Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 5:05 PM
Subject: Suggestion to
Thanks for the help, guys. I'm pretty sure it's supposed to be an M42 to K adapter.
Several M42 lenses thread into it effortlessly, it just doesn't mate up to a k mount
body. It looks perfect but it's probably just junk.
Anyway, I found K adapters on BH, but none of them seem to be genuine
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Christopher Lillja wrote:
Anyway, I found K adapters on BH, but none of them seem to be
genuine Pentax. Any idea where I could find the real thing? Does
Pentax make them anymore?
Or should I just buy an old Spotmatic? :)
Of course! (To all of your questions) :)
The
The chorus,
It doesn't seem that complicated to me. That reads as
a condescending pompous statement from one who assumes
special insights. Maybe I'm too uncomplicated.
When anyone reads a critique of his/her work, each
word sears the sole. Glowing adjectives intoxicate
with delight and
really felt nice to read about your nice day.
i was thrilled too. actually, it reminds me - long back not only during my
school even during college days too i used to paint - and those concepts of
composition still stand valid in photography. in fact, i kind of moved to
photography on
wonderful !
i must say, you have a kind of style of your own. the light - rather the
way you catch the light and composition - i somehow find unique.
shall go over in details again and again. really inspiring.
anand
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Jack Davis wrote:
The chorus,
It doesn't seem that complicated to me. That reads as
a condescending pompous statement from one who assumes
special insights. Maybe I'm too uncomplicated.
What is this in response to?
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
Shadows at Play by Ollen Mullis.
Outstanding image. Congratulations!
Best,
Chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
being somewhat new to all of this i maybe asking the obvious question and for
that i apologize if i bore some of the more senior pug-sters but i'd like to
learn from their obvious experience.
what filter(s) do u love, can't live w/o, would never ever not have with u
when u grab a loaded
Hi,
The filters i use the most are UVs just to protect the lense, 81B to warm
things up a bit, polarizer and a colour correction filter for use under
tungsten light (think its an 80B).
If i had to take any one filter with me, it would be the polarizer or the
81B.
Cya
- Original Message
Hello
I am also looking for selling Pentax stuff:
Z-1 Special edition and 28-70mm f/:2..8 FA for about 720$
500FTZ about 120$
Someone interested ?
See you
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Gary L. Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Users Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi Chris!
I think the GN gives a clue to the distance for correct exposure.
With grey cards and stuff.
But I must admit your example makes me wonder...
Jostein
-Original Message-
From: Chris Brogden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ok, stupid question time. Does using the guide number
62 matches
Mail list logo
