Hi guys
as part of a controlled experience I'm going over all the changes in MC done in
squeak since pharo creation and
I saw that Squeak has
MCSnapshotBrowseraboutToStyle: aStyler
| classDefinition shouldStyle |
classSelection ifNil: [ ^false ].
self
levente did the following in squeak
- replaced MCMethodDefinition's Definitions class variable with a class
instance variable. The cached definitions are no longer registered for
finalization.
- a bit of cleanup around MCDefinition's Instances class variable
And I like the idea that we do
Interesting posting. But i don't think, that this is the right model for
refactoring, where a lot of 'depreciated classes' (reason: copyright,
restructuring, replacement, creating 'orthogonality', whatever) cause much
collateral damages in hundreds of packages, like it is in pharo at the
moment.
Well it's a somewhat longer story. I have some code to interface via the
serial lines. And I want to do that on Windows and Linux. So far so
good. Now my code for interfacing to the serial lines works fine on
Windows. But it fails on Linux here's the debug.log from Pharo:
THERE_BE_DRAGONS_HERE
I don't understand. Fuel holding multiple streams ? why? for what?
e.g. for source code. Imagine storing Monticello packages in Fuel so that
the source code is stored in the Fuel file and doesn't have to be written
to the changes file. Instead, a more powerful SourceFilesArray (actually a
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Yanni Chiu ya...@rogers.com wrote:
On 10/02/12 3:45 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
this is a good idea.
Hmmm. I think the .zip file approach is the correct/better approach to
take to my metadata problem.
This discussion did turn up a feature of Fuel that was
Hi guys,
Again one interesting topic for this weekend to discuss. David Nolen, a
Lisp and JavaScript guy posted in his blog an article titled Illiterate
Programming [1] where he said:
...Yet I think Smalltalk still fundamentally failed (remember this is a
programming language originally designed
Well... functional programming is hard and not everybody really understands
it... structured programming is hard and not everybody really understood
it... hmm at the end, programming is hard :-)
He gives no reason about his stament nor demonstration of it neither...
so he has a feeling, me too
That's if the debugger still works =:0 Good idea though.
From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
[pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Ben Coman
[b...@openinworld.com]
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 8:17 PM
To:
Yes, programming is hard. It's even harder if one is poorly educated and not
well read. I don't expect that everyone will have Smalltalk experience, but I
would expect someone nearing completion of a PhD in computer science to have at
least _heard_ of Smalltalk and Alan Kay. I recently met a
14328
-
Issue 5277: undeclared in FileList: volList
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5277
StartupPreferences shouldnt lauch script when you save
http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5275
--
Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
Let we remember that Smalltalk was designed for a kids, so programming
is hard anyway is in my opinion just too simplified answer.
While teaching new Smalltalkers I noticed that those without any
programming experience got it faster, specially comparing to those with
a relational DB experience.
I think it's worse than that. You are correct that relational storage has
become a religion. Most deny the flaws and can't even conceive of an
alternative, let alone whether an alternative might be better for a given
project. But again, this comes down to education, broadening of the mind,
I could not agree more... most programmers don't know what a is closure
(for example), have no idea of who is Alan Kay (or worse, Alonso Curch)
and they only care about how to use Spring's dependency injection without
understanding the real design flaw, or the new Hibernate annotations that
will
Camillo Bruni wrote:
On 2012-02-10, at 20:06, Ben Coman wrote:
I just realized that clearing up those two ShouldBeImplementeds from
DosFileDirectory did not really prove that startup preferences worked on MS
Windows.
So I found the StartupLoader classexample method
and did get... 'I
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply, and thanks everyone for the suggestions.
I did not provide much details because I am new to this domain and I wanted to
see from the reactions if maybe I am not missing some relevant direction.
We are trying to measure how an Oracle database can cope with an
Janko
Frankly I do not care about what other people are thinking.
OOP is a success look at Java, C#.
Now let us keep our energy to build better Smalltalks.
Stef
On Feb 11, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Hernan Wilkinson wrote:
I could not agree more... most programmers don't know what a is closure (for
Lead by example. +1.
From: pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr
[pharo-project-boun...@lists.gforge.inria.fr] on behalf of Stéphane Ducasse
[stephane.duca...@inria.fr]
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 1:34 PM
To:
Someone else, who I would bet money the average mainstream programmer would not
know, Kent Beck, wrote a fairly nice book. The Gang of Four, and Alpert, Brown
and Woolf's Smalltalk Companion book are valuable reading. Simon Lewis' Art
and Science of Smalltalk is excellent.
The point is that
On 11.02.2012 19:30, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply, and thanks everyone for the suggestions.
I did not provide much details because I am new to this domain and I wanted to
see from the reactions if maybe I am not missing some relevant direction.
We are trying to measure how
Hi,
On 11 Feb 2012, at 21:13, Philippe Marschall wrote:
On 11.02.2012 19:30, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply, and thanks everyone for the suggestions.
I did not provide much details because I am new to this domain and I wanted
to see from the reactions if maybe I am not
Hi
I had this crazy idea, what instead of buffering at the application
level I use the native buffer of the socket? I would be doing more or
less this:
set TCP_CORK to 1
set TCP_NODELAY to 0
do individual writes
set TCP_CORK to 0
set TCP_NODELAY to 1
do last write
goto 1
(use TCP_NOWAIT
Hi,
Is it possible to use the VB-Regexp package to construct a single regular
expression that ensures a string is alphanumeric and contains both at least
one number and alphabetic character.
Looking at the regexp package and documentation it doesn't appear so. In
javascript or perl you use
I've used the package to good effect, but you are beyond me - hopefully someone
else can offer some real help. You might something in the Reg ex chapter on
http://pharobyexample.org/
Look under Pharo by Example 2 on the right side of the page.
HTH (some).
Bill
Just thinking laterally (since I don't have the experience to apply to
the analysis), a practical business solution is to throw hardware at
the problem - particularly for a legacy application on old hardware.
One site I worked at was having issues with the overnight posting of the
days
ok, so
If no conforming visual exists, NULL is returned.
It is hard to imagine, that these attributes not supported
{GLX_RGBA. GLX_DEPTH_SIZE.
24.
GLX_DOUBLEBUFFER. 0}
the code seems to be fine.
This is what i found:
---
26 matches
Mail list logo
