Re: Pod::Simple output as POD

2018-05-11 Thread John SJ Anderson
> On May 7, 2018, at 21:52, Karl Williamson wrote: > > And I'm running into something that I know I had not previously gotten as far > as (which is encouraging), and I'm writing now for counsel. > > What to do about input files that are encoded in some alien

Re: Pod::Simple output as POD

2018-05-09 Thread Karl Williamson
On 05/08/2018 07:05 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: On May 8, 2018, at 18:48, John SJ Anderson wrote: I suspect the plea for counsel was more intended for David, but I’ll pipe up from the peanut gallery and say, “why not both?” It seems like the ideal thing to put under a

Re: Pod::Simple output as POD

2018-05-08 Thread David E. Wheeler
On May 8, 2018, at 18:48, John SJ Anderson wrote: > I suspect the plea for counsel was more intended for David, but I’ll pipe up > from the peanut gallery and say, “why not both?” It seems like the ideal > thing to put under a feature flag. I’m sorry, I’ve lost all context

Re: Pod::Simple output as POD

2018-05-07 Thread Karl Williamson
On 05/13/2016 12:24 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: On May 13, 2016, at 11:03 AM, Karl Williamson wrote: If we wanted to be cute, we could call it Pod::Simple::SimplyPod, with you know, only one, natural, ingredient, and no harmful additives. But is it organic? Or

Re: Pod::Simple output as POD

2016-05-14 Thread David E. Wheeler
On May 13, 2016, at 7:00 PM, Ron Savage wrote: > So make it -J JustPod, or is that parameter list sacrosanct? > > Perhaps leave -M, and add -J, which defaults to a value of JustPod. You pass the name of the formatting module to -M. I see no reason to change it. D

Re: Pod::Simple output as POD

2016-05-13 Thread Ron Savage
Hi David On 12/05/16 10:39, David E. Wheeler wrote: On May 11, 2016, at 5:29 PM, Karl Williamson wrote: Like John, I don’t much care. I agree that Pod::Simple::Pod lacks necessary information. ExtractPod seems fine to me. Uh, though there is this: perldoc

Re: Pod::Simple output as POD

2016-05-13 Thread David E. Wheeler
On May 13, 2016, at 11:03 AM, Karl Williamson wrote: > If we wanted to be cute, we could call it Pod::Simple::SimplyPod, with you > know, only one, natural, ingredient, and no harmful additives. But is it organic? Or Biodynamic? D smime.p7s Description: S/MIME

Re: Pod::Simple output as POD

2016-05-13 Thread Karl Williamson
On 05/11/2016 07:38 PM, John SJ Anderson wrote: On May 11, 2016, at 17:52, Ron Savage wrote: On 12/05/16 10:39, David E. Wheeler wrote: Which also seems a little weird. Maybe Pod::Simple::PodFormat? Pod::Simple::ExtractPod is good, but possible is Pod::Simple::JustPod.

Re: Pod::Simple output as POD

2016-05-11 Thread Ron Savage
Hi On 12/05/16 10:39, David E. Wheeler wrote: On May 11, 2016, at 5:29 PM, Karl Williamson wrote: Which also seems a little weird. Maybe Pod::Simple::PodFormat? Pod::Simple::ExtractPod is good, but possible is Pod::Simple::JustPod. -- Ron Savage - savage.net.au

Re: Pod::Simple output as POD

2016-05-11 Thread David E. Wheeler
On May 11, 2016, at 5:29 PM, Karl Williamson wrote: >> My only comment on ‘ExtractPod’ as a name would be that all the other >> modules in the Pod::Simple dist that do similar things are simply named >> ‘Pod::Simple::$FORMAT’, (e.g., Pod::Simple::HTML,