> On May 7, 2018, at 21:52, Karl Williamson wrote:
>
> And I'm running into something that I know I had not previously gotten as far
> as (which is encouraging), and I'm writing now for counsel.
>
> What to do about input files that are encoded in some alien
On 05/08/2018 07:05 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On May 8, 2018, at 18:48, John SJ Anderson wrote:
I suspect the plea for counsel was more intended for David, but I’ll pipe up
from the peanut gallery and say, “why not both?” It seems like the ideal thing
to put under a
On May 8, 2018, at 18:48, John SJ Anderson wrote:
> I suspect the plea for counsel was more intended for David, but I’ll pipe up
> from the peanut gallery and say, “why not both?” It seems like the ideal
> thing to put under a feature flag.
I’m sorry, I’ve lost all context
On 05/13/2016 12:24 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On May 13, 2016, at 11:03 AM, Karl Williamson wrote:
If we wanted to be cute, we could call it Pod::Simple::SimplyPod, with you
know, only one, natural, ingredient, and no harmful additives.
But is it organic? Or
On May 13, 2016, at 7:00 PM, Ron Savage wrote:
> So make it -J JustPod, or is that parameter list sacrosanct?
>
> Perhaps leave -M, and add -J, which defaults to a value of JustPod.
You pass the name of the formatting module to -M. I see no reason to change it.
D
Hi David
On 12/05/16 10:39, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On May 11, 2016, at 5:29 PM, Karl Williamson wrote:
Like John, I don’t much care. I agree that Pod::Simple::Pod lacks necessary
information. ExtractPod seems fine to me. Uh, though there is this:
perldoc
On May 13, 2016, at 11:03 AM, Karl Williamson wrote:
> If we wanted to be cute, we could call it Pod::Simple::SimplyPod, with you
> know, only one, natural, ingredient, and no harmful additives.
But is it organic? Or Biodynamic?
D
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
On 05/11/2016 07:38 PM, John SJ Anderson wrote:
On May 11, 2016, at 17:52, Ron Savage wrote:
On 12/05/16 10:39, David E. Wheeler wrote:
Which also seems a little weird. Maybe Pod::Simple::PodFormat?
Pod::Simple::ExtractPod is good, but possible is Pod::Simple::JustPod.
Hi
On 12/05/16 10:39, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On May 11, 2016, at 5:29 PM, Karl Williamson wrote:
Which also seems a little weird. Maybe Pod::Simple::PodFormat?
Pod::Simple::ExtractPod is good, but possible is Pod::Simple::JustPod.
--
Ron Savage - savage.net.au
On May 11, 2016, at 5:29 PM, Karl Williamson wrote:
>> My only comment on ‘ExtractPod’ as a name would be that all the other
>> modules in the Pod::Simple dist that do similar things are simply named
>> ‘Pod::Simple::$FORMAT’, (e.g., Pod::Simple::HTML,
10 matches
Mail list logo