On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 02:54:15PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
The script does not just remove man pages. Are the rest of the files
ok to stay there? The reason it is scripted is so that I don'thave to
spend ages manually commenting PLIST lines.
You don't have to spend ages manually
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 05:07:47PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
Am I going to assume that the size of the package is acceptable and
continue with a texlive_texmf-full package, which will be an all the
rest kind of affair?
I'm fine with the size. 316 MB compared to the teTeX thing (217 MB)
isn't
Hey Matthias,
On 03/06/07, Matthias Kilian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 05:07:47PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
Am I going to assume that the size of the package is acceptable and
continue with a texlive_texmf-full package, which will be an all the
rest kind of affair?
I'm
On 03/06/07, Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Matthias,
- Moving the manpages during do-install and then removing them using a
script is silly. Just omit this and @comment the bogus manpages in the
PLIST. That means, go with the above mentioned command line for
do-install, then
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 02:54:15PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
- Moving the manpages during do-install and then removing them using a
script is silly. Just omit this and @comment the bogus manpages in the
PLIST.[...]
[...]
Ok, I am unaware of any files missing. I will re-generate a new
Hi ports@,
I have just uploaded a new revision of this port (see my web-page),
which fixes a updmap-sys bug.
I have not have much feedback on this port since I made the minimal
version. I am assuming this is because most developers are all hacked
out from the hackathon?
Am I going to assume
Hi Emilio,
On 29/05/07, Emilio Perea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 09:41:02PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
I have now prototyped a more minimal subset of the TeXLive
distribution following concerns that the 500+MB texmf tree was too
large (which it is).
It builds and seems
Hello again,
I have now prototyped a more minimal subset of the TeXLive
distribution following concerns that the 500+MB texmf tree was too
large (which it is).
After much trial and error, blood and sweat, I have decided to use
TeXLives official scheme-tetex subset. Which is according TeXLive:
