Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-16 Thread Michael Olbrich
Hi, On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:02:14AM +, Alm, Michael wrote: > when was the -j option added to ptxdist? Which version? It was first introduced in ptxdist-2015.06.0 but, if I remember correctly there were still some parallel building issues to fix at the time. It works quite well for me

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-15 Thread Alm, Michael
Hi, when was the -j option added to ptxdist? Which version? Regards, Michael -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: ptxdist [mailto:ptxdist-boun...@pengutronix.de] Im Auftrag von Michael Olbrich Gesendet: Freitag, 15. September 2017 08:47 An: ptxdist@pengutronix.de Betreff: Re: [ptxdist

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-15 Thread Michael Olbrich
Hi, On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:44:13AM +0200, Tim Sander wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 13. September 2017, 17:38:24 CEST schrieb Michael Olbrich: > > Btw. don't use '-jeX -jiX' use '-j' instead. That uses a global jobserver > > shared by all packages. > Well i missed out this one. I know that this option

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-14 Thread Tim Sander
Hi Micheal Am Mittwoch, 13. September 2017, 17:38:24 CEST schrieb Michael Olbrich: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 08:42:26PM +0200, Tim Sander wrote: > > On Sonntag, 10. September 2017 21:16:52 CEST Robert Schwebel wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 08:36:13PM +0200, Tim Sander wrote: > > > > As for

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-13 Thread Michael Olbrich
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 08:42:26PM +0200, Tim Sander wrote: > On Sonntag, 10. September 2017 21:16:52 CEST Robert Schwebel wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 08:36:13PM +0200, Tim Sander wrote: > > > As for the speed i would say that one of my biggest gripes with ptxdist is > > > that -je16 -ji16

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-12 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:33:42PM +0200, Tim Sander wrote: > Am Dienstag, 12. September 2017, 22:12:15 CEST schrieb Robert Schwebel: > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 08:42:26PM +0200, Tim Sander wrote: > > > On Sonntag, 10. September 2017 21:16:52 CEST Robert Schwebel wrote: > > > > On Sat, Sep 09,

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-12 Thread Tim Sander
Am Dienstag, 12. September 2017, 22:12:15 CEST schrieb Robert Schwebel: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 08:42:26PM +0200, Tim Sander wrote: > > On Sonntag, 10. September 2017 21:16:52 CEST Robert Schwebel wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 08:36:13PM +0200, Tim Sander wrote: > > > > I really would

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-12 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 08:42:26PM +0200, Tim Sander wrote: > On Sonntag, 10. September 2017 21:16:52 CEST Robert Schwebel wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 08:36:13PM +0200, Tim Sander wrote: > > > I really would like to use ptxdist for my next private project where i > > > would like to try

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-12 Thread Tim Sander
On Sonntag, 10. September 2017 21:16:52 CEST Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 08:36:13PM +0200, Tim Sander wrote: > > I really would like to use ptxdist for my next private project where i > > would like to try ROS. > > ROS1 or ROS2? I would like to have something not to dated.

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-12 Thread Schenk, Gavin
Hi, > Am Montag, 11. September 2017, 07:14:00 schrieb Schenk, Gavin: > > * No Tab-completition as PTXDIST offers it. 5 Stages, ~130packages and > > 100.000 commands. I think a very usefull feature in PTXDIST! > > How does this work? I use zsh and have no tab completion for ptxdist, > but miss it

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-12 Thread Alexander Dahl
Hei hei, Am Montag, 11. September 2017, 11:25:53 schrieb Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia: > The main good thing about Yocto is that it is becoming hugely popular > and has a > very strong and active community. It would be great if the same would > happen with > ptxdist :-) FWIW: somewhere in between

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-12 Thread Alexander Dahl
Hei hei, Am Montag, 11. September 2017, 07:14:00 schrieb Schenk, Gavin: > * No Tab-completition as PTXDIST offers it. 5 > Stages, ~130packages and 100.000 commands. I think a very usefull > feature in PTXDIST! How does this work? I use zsh and have no tab completion for ptxdist, but miss it

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-11 Thread Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
Hello, My team is using ptxdist for several projects on several different boards and while there are of course things that can be improved, we are very happy with it. I have not used Yocto but have looked into it from time to time; my feeling is that it raises the level of abstraction too much

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-11 Thread Schenk, Gavin
Hi, > > yes I know the topic is blasphemy ;-) but I was wondering if there are > ppl that made usecase comparisons between ptxdist and Yocto? My personal > experience with small systems (no GUI/X/wayland) is that ptxdist is > really easy to get going. With large systems that need QT 5.9, >

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-10 Thread Erwin Rol
On Sun, 2017-09-10 at 21:24 +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > On 09.09.2017 18:33, Erwin Rol wrote: > > But when you want to do edit->compile->update iterations the "startup" > > time for bitbake seems to be a killer. With ptxdist I just call > > "./ptxdist compile bla" and I have

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-10 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
On 09.09.2017 18:33, Erwin Rol wrote: Exactly my problem, Yocto is becoming the Ubuntu of embedded Linux, and > like Ubuntu not everything is good about it. apropos Ubuntu: just had a ugly problem w/ my trusty notebook, which ate up my precious time: dbus didn't come up (just because a dumb

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-10 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 08:36:13PM +0200, Tim Sander wrote: > I really would like to use ptxdist for my next private project where i > would like to try ROS. ROS1 or ROS2? > As far as i see, its already packaged for OpenEmbedded or Angstrom. I only know of old ROS packages made by the BMW

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-10 Thread Robert Schwebel
Hi, On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 03:03:39PM +0200, Erwin Rol wrote: > yes I know the topic is blasphemy ;-) but I was wondering if there are > ppl that made usecase comparisons between ptxdist and Yocto? Well, it's not blasphemy at all. At Pengutronix, we are doing both, depending on the usecase and

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-09 Thread Tim Sander
Hi Erwin Am Samstag, 9. September 2017, 15:03:39 CEST schrieb Erwin Rol: > yes I know the topic is blasphemy ;-) but I was wondering if there are > ppl that made usecase comparisons between ptxdist and Yocto? My personal > experience with small systems (no GUI/X/wayland) is that ptxdist is >

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-09 Thread Erwin Rol
Hey all, On Sat, 2017-09-09 at 17:54 +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > On 09.09.2017 15:03, Erwin Rol wrote: > > but I was wondering if there are > ppl that made usecase comparisons > > between ptxdist and Yocto? My personal > > I'm currently in process of bringing up a board,

Re: [ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-09 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
On 09.09.2017 15:03, Erwin Rol wrote: Hi, yes I know the topic is blasphemy ;-) burn the witch ! ;-) but I was wondering if there are > ppl that made usecase comparisons between ptxdist and Yocto? My personal I'm currently in process of bringing up a board, where the vendor only

[ptxdist] Yocto

2017-09-09 Thread Erwin Rol
Hey all, yes I know the topic is blasphemy ;-) but I was wondering if there are ppl that made usecase comparisons between ptxdist and Yocto? My personal experience with small systems (no GUI/X/wayland) is that ptxdist is really easy to get going. With large systems that need QT 5.9,