Re: [ql-users] Bug in SMSQ 312 maybe - or am I barking ?

2006-09-24 Thread George Gwilt
On 22 Sep 2006, at 08:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, A6,A1 was a typo, I meant A4 - apologies. On the other hand, my QDOS Companion (Pennell) has the load/save parameters as $32 to $ff and not $ff31 to $ as you state. I went on a doc hunt last night and Dickens has the negatives

Re: [ql-users] Bug in SMSQ 312 maybe - or am I barking ?

2006-09-24 Thread Marcel Kilgus
George Gwilt wrote: Dickens says that codes $31 to $FF are extended to a negative word $FF31 to $ when used to determine the storage address. Apart from the fact that $31 does not seem to be allowed, Pennel and Dickens are saying the same thing in different ways, Pennel is in fact correct.

Re: [ql-users] Bug in SMSQ 312 maybe - or am I barking ? (OT ramblings about left and right)

2006-09-23 Thread Jeremy Taffel
According to Wikipedia, the story about Napoleon is legend with no basis in fact. However, what is interesting is that road traffic statistics seem to suggest that driving on the left is safer. The theory is that the preponderance of right eye dominance results in statistically faster

Re: [ql-users] Bug in SMSQ 312 maybe - or am I barking ? (OT ramblings about left and right)

2006-09-23 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeremy Taffel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Jeremy (still lurking, rarely QLing these days) What, not even QL emulating ... :-) -- Malcolm Cadman ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [ql-users] Bug in SMSQ 312 maybe - or am I barking ?

2006-09-22 Thread Norman
Morning Marcel, Wolfgang, Thanks for your replies. Nope, that's where you differ with the documentation. First, the variable area is (A6,A4), typo I guess, and second, the opcodes $FF31 to $ are for load/save, not $32 to $FF. Yes, the latter DO work, but it seems that's more an

Re: [ql-users] Bug in SMSQ 312 maybe - or am I barking ?

2006-09-22 Thread Norman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not only that, but codes from -5 through to -1 will overwrite data at the top of your A4 stack. Ignore that. I'm a pillock. I've got my mental stack upside down again :o( Cheers, Norman. ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [ql-users] Bug in SMSQ 312 maybe - or am I barking ?

2006-09-22 Thread Norman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Morning Derek, Many years ago I wrote many Hyperbolic function based on The Advanced QL User Guide, by Dickens. All seemed to work fine. Funny that. I was just wondering if anyone had ever done that sort of thing when I was looking at Dickens last night. Spooky :o)

Re: [ql-users] Bug in SMSQ 312 maybe - or am I barking ?

2006-09-22 Thread Norman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not only that, but codes from -5 through to -1 will overwrite data at the top of your A4 stack. Ignore that. I'm a pillock. I've got my mental stack upside down again :o( Actually, I may not be a pillok after all ! Correct me if I'm

Re: [ql-users] Bug in SMSQ 312 maybe - or am I barking ?

2006-09-22 Thread Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm looking forward to hearing back from you all :o) PS. I'm off to France next week, so any replies after today will be delayed in being read. I've got to drive on the wrong side of the road for a week - that should be fun. If you are anywhere around Marseilles,

Re: [ql-users] Bug in SMSQ 312 maybe - or am I barking ?

2006-09-22 Thread Norman
Thanks. (I think !!!) Cheers, norman. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 10:41 22/09/2006 +0100, you wrote: Probably, I can see no connection ! -- ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [ql-users] Bug in SMSQ 312 maybe - or am I barking ?

2006-09-22 Thread Norman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You must visit Minerve. We probably will - I'll be driving and MrsD will be navigating in her usual manner - you should have turned left back there ! (Only kidding) SNIP and wine around there is pronounced Ving with a hard end G - important to know (8-)#

Re: [ql-users] Bug in SMSQ 312 maybe - or am I barking ?

2006-09-22 Thread Marcel Kilgus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not with the LOAD/SAVE op code as far as I can see, they always take 6 bytes from the A1 stack and load back 6 bytes. There is no way that I can see (using the maths package) to load and save a word for example. Yes, but nobody tells you that the data area is just for

Re: [ql-users] Bug in SMSQ 312 maybe - or am I barking ?

2006-09-22 Thread Norman
Hi Marcel, Yes, but nobody tells you that the data area is just for FP data. True, but if I was setting up an area of storage I'd be sure (myself) to keep my FP stuff well away from my other stuff purely because it's possible for the FP stuff to wander all over my other stuiff if I get the

Re: [ql-users] Bug in SMSQ 312 maybe - or am I barking ?

2006-09-22 Thread Norman
Marcel, Well, I myself have never used this and only read up on it after your questions... Much obliged - thanks ! The idea of my own column commenting on all the things I read that are wrong or at least not-quite-right has already crossed my mind, but then I'm lazy and currently don't

Re: [ql-users] Bug in SMSQ 312 maybe - or am I barking ?

2006-09-21 Thread Marcel Kilgus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was explaining the SAVE and LOAD op codes for RI_EXEC and RI_EXECB where the top of stack floating point value is saved to a variables area at (A6,A1.L) or a new TOS is created by loading back from said area. The op codes for save are even in the range $32 to $FF and