Re: [Ql-Users] Stella

2017-03-23 Thread Arnould
Nothing is happening with Stella. First this document was not intended
for publication. Thierry Godefroy insisted to do it.

Then in fact Stella is a concept for a range of operating systems.
Tony kept telling me that it would be more efficient to develop
hardware first and then dedicated OSes rather than try to port monster
OSes to different devices. 

Let us find a billionaire who would like a real "smart" phone and who
could pay for 10 good programmers during a year, and then Stella could
become something.

I have also come to the conclusion that not only money but also 
language is a major brake to evolution. Google "Performance Impact of
Lock-Free Algorithms on Multicore
Communication APIs" and try to read it. This paper more or less comes
to the same conclusions as Tony and a few others. And then the authors
conclude that existing systems should be patched... But where are the
"managers" who can understand this jargon?  I think that they do not
exist.

Arnould




On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:13:42 -0500, Dave Park wrote
> Tony
> 
> So, what *IS* happening with Stella?
> 
> With quiet deference, not personally knowing your policy on 
> sacrifices,
> 
> Dave
> 
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Urs Koenig (QL) 
> <q...@bluewin.ch> wrote:
> 
> > Tony Tebby wrote:
> > > 5) The only real barrier is ignorance. The story of Android is
> > illustrative. If, in
> > > 2005, Google had known that they could have developed an
entirely new
> > > operating system and had it up and running sooner than trying to
kludge
> > > something out of Linux, would they have bought Android Inc. for
$50M? Of
> > > course not, but they did not know.
> > First, glad to read from you again!
> >
> > Having to deal with all kind of Windows and Linux systems in my
> > professional
> > life, I must say that the pain is not big enough for most people
and the
> > industry to rethink and restart. That's how human function, look
at cars or
> > electricity for example. Even with global warming and GAU's like
Chernobyl
> > and Fukushima rethinking and revolution are slow and with hurdles.
> >
> > Anyhow, I still spend approx. an hour a day to keep your legacy
alive. The
> > QL/E distribution - made with my limited skills and capabilities -
is an
> > offspring which is a handy thing to run, experience and show
> > what-could-have-been. At least those 500+ completed downloads
since April
> > 2015 prove some interest is still there.
> >
> > http://sinclairql.net/repository.html#QLE
> >
> > Urs
> >
> > ___
> > QL-Users Mailing List
> >
> 
> -- 
> Dave Park
> Sandy Labs
> d...@sinclairql.com
> ___
> QL-Users Mailing List

___
QL-Users Mailing List


[Ql-Users] QL

2012-08-03 Thread Arnould
http://www.smbc-comics.com/comics/20120601.gif

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Interesting uses for QL parts

2012-01-09 Thread Arnould
 I have said this before but Laurence Reeves was a master of 
 this sort of programming.  His QL Forth  was under 4k of 
 machine code I think.
 
 Tony
 

Why was?

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Digital Precision Super Forth (+ Reversi)

2011-06-13 Thread Arnould
If this can help, here is the command for ghostscript to merge pdf
files (I use Ubuntu Linux, but I believe it also works in windows)

gs -dBATCH -dNOPAUSE -q -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sPAPERSIZE=a4
-sOutputFile=finished.pdf file1.pdf file2.pdf file3,pdf

Even when I do not merge files, I always use it to reduce the size of
the scanned files by a factor of about 4.

Arnould


On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:47:13 +0100, Neil Riley wrote
 Rich
 
 It would appear that the photocopier in work does rather 
 more than just photocopy! it has the option to email as 
 .pdf's also!!
 
 Four .pdf's should be sitting in your email inbox, did a 
 quick trial run to my work email and that seemed to work.
 
 Fingers crossed.
 
 Neil
 

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Announcement about the future of Ser-USB

2011-04-13 Thread Arnould
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:18:53 +0100, Adrian Ives wrote
 Urs,
 
 File transfers to and from FAT format devices will still be 
 possible using the File Manager, but a native QDOS driver 
 will not now be supported.
 
 There is one massive limitation with the standard QL 
 hardware that cannot be overcome anyway, and that's the fact 
 that it can only support 4800 baud with one stop bit.  This 
 means that even when the driver is working it is so slow 
 that transferring anything larger than a few small text 
 files is a painful experience.
 

Hans Peter Recktenwald was not happy with the QL's serial driver. He
developped SIMSER and his code can be freely reused.

Can be found on this site:

http://morloch.hd.free.fr/smsq/

and a short description in english here (more detailed in german though):

http://globalfilesearch.net/download.aspx?path=romeo-klive.nvg.ntnu.no/pub/sinclair/ql/utils/simser.zip

Maybe it could be worth to test this with your Ser-USB driver?

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Announcement about the future of Ser-USB

2011-04-13 Thread Arnould
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:11:27 +0100, Adrian Ives wrote
 Arnould,
 
 Thank you for this.  The last time I looked at simser I 
 couldn't find an English translation, and had other things 
 to deal with, so I set it aside; but this helps a lot. I 
 will take a look and see if it can be applied to this problem.
 
 Adrian
 

And I just found that the zip file on Dilwyn's site also contains
english information but in a doc file

http://www.dilwyn.me.uk/utils/index.html

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Qemulator

2010-03-14 Thread Arnould
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:23:47 +, Tony Firshman wrote
 copying exercise for Winchester Research Unit
 Another great QDOS feature I discovered which saved loads of 
 time.  I used:
 
 5 CLS
 10 FORMAT ram1_mdv1_
 15 WSTAT ram1_
 30 WCOPY ram1_ to flp2_f05_2_
 35 STAT flp2_
 40 ed 30
 
 I did the ED 30 so I could edit for the next mdv.
 Now what I didn't expect was that after down arrow to save 
 the line, when I pressed ESC there was another implicit RUN!
 
 OK 'RUNenter' isn't a load of typing by itself, but when 
 one has maybe 350 microdrives it IS, especially as sometimes 
 one has to run dozens of times to eventually read some files.
 

Excellent! It really works. But is it by design or by chance?

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[Ql-Users] Back on topic (was Re: Today Apple ...)

2010-01-31 Thread Arnould
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:46:48 +0100, Anton Preinsack wrote
 Sad, but true. Another reason why the Q60 deserves a 
 relaunch...;-)
 
 Anton
 
 Am 30.01.2010 um 22:26 schrieb de...@q40.de:
 
  The iSlate and Z88 do not run QL programs. So not relevant. Derek

It is only yesterday with all this buzz on the ipad that I realized
that Steve did it again! The iphone and now the ipad are not
multitasking, here an extract from the SDK instructions:

“Only one iPhone application can run at a time, and third-party
applications never run in the background. This means that when users
switch to another application, answer the phone, or check their email,
the application they were using quits.”

If interested also look at this link, where you will be informed that
76 MB of memory is a little bit low for multitasking:

http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2008/03/13/iphone-20-sdk-the-no-multitasking-myth/

Why did I write Steve did it again? Because he already did it in
1984. They had the Lisa, there was Unix, but the systems that worked
and sold en masse were not multitasking: they were the first MacOS and
MS-DOS.

However I am amazed that he did it again, and that he was right again.
Again it is this non-multitasking system that works and sells better
than Symbian (message passing multitasking) or Win-CE (posix like
multiprocessing) systems.

Why did I write Back on topic? Because I understood about 10 years
ago that the multitasking QDOS/SMSQ-E is in fact a multitasking system
(time sharing as TT would say) that, from the point of view of the
user jobs and thus the point of view of the applications programmers,
behaves more like a monotasking system than a multitasking system. And
yet, as we all know, it multitasks very well.

QDOS/SMS-E is now more than 25 years old, but is it still 25 years
ahead of today's time? I think yes and I believe that this is why it
never had and will not have a stable commercial niche in the
foreseeable future. In fact it is clear that systems developers love
the complexity of posix-like multiprocessing/multithreading
environments: it is because it secures their workplace and their
wages. And BTW I did not dream this, one of them, system programmer at
ABB robotics, wrote exactly this to me.

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] ql-mac Lucerne show - the youth hostel

2009-09-07 Thread Arnould
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 15:38:50 +0100, Dilwyn Jones wrote
 Alternatively, try www.villamaria.ch (German only...Google 
 translate has mixed results shall we say)
 
 If you try www.luzern.com that site will let you book online 
 and list hotels by price etc, even giving you maps of Lucerne.
 
 Dilwyn

In Switzerland hotels are terribly expensive. So are youth hostels,
but then the prices are those of youth hostels, and they provide
excellent quality. 

Moreover I have the experience of the youth hostel in Lucerne, I was
there for 2 nights in the summer 2005 with my motorbike when there
were catastrophic rains all over Switzerland, and it is not so bad a
remembering as it could be.

Google Jugendherberge Luzern or go to http://www.youthhostel.ch/ and
everything is also explained in english.

If I can come I think that I will stay there.

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Copying files from QL to PC

2009-06-04 Thread Arnould
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:52:47 +0200, Marcel Kilgus wrote
 aup...@dsl.pipex.com wrote:
  I think what's going on is that there's a combination of characters
  within the file body that is being interpreted as an EOF (ctrl-z).
 
 Yes, you can't transfer binary files this way as there is no 
 way of knowing when the file ends. You'd have to abort the 
 COPY command manually, but IIRC copy then discards the 
 things it has written.
 
copy mdv1_filename to ser1h
 
 on the QL side and
 
type com1  filename
 
 on the PC side plus manually aborting using CTRL+C when the 
 file is completely send might do the trick, I'm not sure.
 
 Alternatively if text transfer works reliably one could 
 encode the binary files in base64, send it over the link and 
 decode it on the other side. I've written some SBasic 
 procedures to do this but there'd still be some more work 
 needed for this.
 
 Marcel

I did something like this in 1986/87 but only for pure ASCII text
files. After the file was copied over, the PC still needed an end of
file control code to understand what happened, CTRL+Z I think, wich
had to be sent manually with something like:

OPEN#3,SER1...
PRINT#3,CODE(you will find the code of CTRL+Z)
CLOSE#3

or with more modern systems you can use BPUT for example.

Arnould

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Copying files from QL to PC

2009-06-04 Thread Arnould
On Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:07:08 +0200, Marcel Kilgus wrote
 Arnould wrote:
  I did something like this in 1986/87 but only for pure ASCII text
  files. After the file was copied over, the PC still needed an end of
  file control code to understand what happened, CTRL+Z I think, wich
  had to be sent manually with something like:
 
 That's what the z in ser1hz is for, no need to do it manually.
 
 Marcel
 

Ah OK, mystery solved 20 years later... Thanks :)

Arnould

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] hypertext query

2008-08-27 Thread Arnould
I remember very well that there was an article somewhere in the QL
literature (QL World? Quanta? Quasar?) about someone developing such a
software eventually for sale later. It was well before internet
hypertext and I was fascinated by the principle. But I think that this
software never became commercial. 
I don't remember anything else though, like software title or author's
name..  

Arnould


On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:14:19 +0100, Dilwyn Jones wrote
  Dilwyn,
  a poke in a different direction , then: In the late eighties/early 
  nineties, when C68 entered stage,  there were attempts to port the 
  TeX/LaTex typesetting system from Minix to QDOS. The term
hypertext would 
  certainly apply to this (but in a different sense), and it has
references 
  to a compiler as well. Whether the attempts ended up with working
code, 
  however, I do not recall.
  Regards
  Tobias
 Ah, thank you Tobias, this ties in with something else the 
 correspondent mentioned. I'll pass on this message to Terry -
  I hope he finds this useful.
 
 I now remember correponding briefly with Ralf Rekoendt about 
 the TeX system back then.
 
 Dilwyn Jones
 =
 Original message follows:
 
 Hi Dilwyn,
 Many thanks for the information from Timothy.
 The software I was talking about was in use about 10 years 
 before the web appeared. The idea of Hypertext was in 
 discussion from around 1965, long before the Mac's 
 Hypercard. Many of us were using software that had 
 'Hypertext' in its name in the early 80s. I can date it 
 because I was one of the earliest QL users and I was 
 programming in it before the IBM PC came of the market. This 
 software enable one to write books or documents (only for 
 use on one computer) that had a clickthrough feature so that 
 you could click through to learn more about something (like 
 a wiki) or even make a jump to a different document. I 
 remember it was written in C and I remember early discussion 
 about the idea of object orientation at that time (a friend 
 at Lancaster Uni had just written one of the early PhDs on 
 object orientation based on ADA I think the only softwares 
 to use OO at the time). The QL software I remember was very 
 similar to the hypetext software called GUIDE (written at a 
 uni in the south of England) and I'm waiting for my brain to 
 come up with the author! Many thanks again from here in 
 Australia, Best regards, Terry
 
 ___
 QL-Users Mailing List
 http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Hi Resolution Colour Graphics on a Standard QL?

2008-06-21 Thread Arnould



On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:13:51 +0100, Rich Mellor wrote
 It is good to see that progress has continued and the 
 sources now released for QL - Dithvide, which allows the 
 standard QL to display high resolution colours - see 
 http://omega.webnode.com/products/sinclair-ql-dithvide-2/
 
 This should be supported - wonder if anyone would be 
 interested in writing a game using these techniques?

The sample pictures are good! I did not know that my old QL was able
to display such screens!

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Cobra5329

2008-02-27 Thread Arnould
 But first, you'd 
 have to have a full 68k emulation on the coldfire going -
 which is not an easy task in itsself.
 
 Regards
 Tobias

I know. 
Here is what Marcel wrote into this list on 3. Dec. 2004 about
converting the source code of SMSQ/E to Coldfire which has an
instruction set that is a subset of the 68k instruction set as well as
developing a 68K emulator for Coldfire. This came after a (very) long
presentation by Nasta:

Hm, it IS worse than I imagined.

Marcel 

At this occasion we also had the very last comment by Tony Tebby into
the list.

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Cobra5329

2008-02-27 Thread Arnould
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:58:21 +0100, pgraf wrote
 Hi Derek,
 
 Just to save you time and money: All ideas to just buy an 
 existing Coldfire board and get QL software run natively are 
 bound to fail.
 
 All the best
 Peter

Another path would be to try to adapt just SMSQ/E + SBasic + some
other tools like C68 and Turbo and forget about QL compatibility, at
least in the beginning of such a project. I wonder how many thousands
of hours of work this would mean.

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Cobra5329

2008-02-27 Thread Arnould
Yes Malcolm,

We already know this, it was the subject of the (long) email of Nasta
at beginning of Dec. 2004. The only difference: 3 years later there is
a board with everything built in to tinker. It only lacks V4 core of
the Coldfire. But this seems to be very annoying to say the least, as
Nasta already had pointed out and Peter now confirms.

Arnould


On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:14:28 +, Malcolm Lear wrote
 Hi Arnould
 
 This link is quite interesting.
 http://www.microapl.co.uk/Porting/ColdFire/
 
 Malcolm

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Cobra5329

2008-02-26 Thread Arnould
No answer to this message neither to a couple of older ones. Did
anybody receive one of them?

Arnould



On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:18:59 +0100, Arnould wrote
 I know that a little more than 3 years ago Nasta came to the
 conclusion to use V4 Coldfire to possibly port SMSQ/E. But 
 then there is this interesting platform named Cobra5329 
 which could be bought today to tinker:
 
http://www.sentec-elektronik.de/532099982512f6403/53209998251462643/53209998cd0e8c016/index.html
 and
http://elmicro.com/de/cobra5329.html
 
 If first URL too long, then search for cobra5329.
 
 What to think about this?
 
 Arnould
 ___
 QL-Users Mailing List
 http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Cobra5329

2008-02-26 Thread Arnould
In fact I find it interesting because this future proof processor has
everything to possibly develop a less than $50 SMSQ/E based machine.
This target being production cost (not selling price) for a few
hundred or more machines equiped with case and LCD display. With this
idea, that Cobra5329 could be considered a sort of existing prototype.

And of course SMSQ/E (+ Superbasic + C68 + an assembler + EasyPtr +
QDT + ???) for this board may be sold for a few hundred $ or Euros per
licence.

OK, only dreaming...

Arnould



On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:35:38 +, Derek Stewart wrote
 I got this as well, the specification look good.
 
 The main problem is who will write the software to drive the 
 board.
 
 Derek
 
 Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
  On 26 Feb 2008 at 12:43, Arnould wrote:
 

  No answer to this message neither to a couple of older ones. Did
  anybody receive one of them?
 
  
  Yes, I got it, I just don't know what to say about it...
 
  Wolfgang

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[Ql-Users] Cobra5329

2008-02-24 Thread Arnould
I know that a little more than 3 years ago Nasta came to the
conclusion to use V4 Coldfire to possibly port SMSQ/E. But then there
is this interesting platform named Cobra5329 which could be bought
today to tinker:

http://www.sentec-elektronik.de/532099982512f6403/53209998251462643/53209998cd0e8c016/index.html
and
http://elmicro.com/de/cobra5329.html

If first URL too long, then search for cobra5329.

What to think about this?

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[Ql-Users] Working sotware (was Re: fast find)

2008-01-08 Thread Arnould
After long technical studies of what was done in the past (ie before
1983) Tony Tebby did software that worked (and still works). 
That Marcel managed to make QPC work on top of Windows is a kind of
miracle.

Arnould



On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 00:33:34 +, Roy wood wrote
 There are two parallel threads here. On the one hand people 
 complaining about Windows and on the other  people 
 struggling with Linux, which, to the uninitiated, it a maze 
 of undocumented and unhelpful commands.
 
 Does this not posit a hypothesis :
 
 i.e. no one writes software/OS that works - except perhaps Marcel.
 

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Tops-10, SMP, NT and QDOS (was 2.5 inch HD)

2008-01-03 Thread Arnould
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 20:51:35 +, Norman Dunbar wrote
 Hi Dave,
 
 Dave Walker wrote:
 
  Modern machines have hyperthreaded CPU cores, so you are more
  likely
  to load multiple applications and still get decent performance if
   you have lots of memory available.
 
 A good theory, in practice it is let down by either the 
 design of the Core Duo chip or the OS not utilising things 
 properly - I'm not sure which.
 
 In a Core Duo, all accesses to the Input Output sub-systems 
 *must* be done by the first core and only by the first core. 
 I read this about a month ago in one of the mainstream 
 computer comics - can't remember which one now that I need to.
 
 Apparently, core 1 says to core 0, stop that and service 
 this I/O request for me, so core 0 has to comply, so 
 anything running on the first core is interrupted while it 
 passes on I/O requests for the second core, and the second 
 core is delayed in processing I/O while it hangs around 
 waiting for the first core to pay attention!
 
 An interesting design I thought when I read it.
 
 Cheers,
 Norman.
 ___
 QL-Users Mailing List
 http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Hello,

It is interesting to see that this was all done already in the past, see:

http://www.inwap.com/pdp10/paper-smp.txt

Also see this interwiew of Bill Gates and notice how he says that the
PDP10 was a fantastic machine:

http://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/comphist/gates.htm#tc4

That was when he was allowed to use a PDP-10 at nights,
thus when he was about 12. Further research show that this early
TOPS-10 timesharing single processor OS did work internally like
the QL's QDOS. However UNIX was free within universities, hence was
successfull, and Digital Equipment favored its VAX line of OSes, based
on similar algorithms than UNIX. That lead them to the end within
about 20 years. In the meantime Microsoft had grown enough with a ugly
but _working_ monotasking system (MS-DOS it was named) and could hire
a technical leader at DEC. Bill hired the chief designer of the VAX
products which lead to NT, 2000, XP, Vista etc.. instead of those
great developers of that fantastic Tops-10. The right technology was
killed a second time. Sinclair Research and Tony Tebby came about 15
years after DEC and did reinvent the wheel but was not successfull
either. As I am optimistic I think that the better technology wins in
the end, but it must come at the right time (the story of gas vs
electric engines in cars). So it must be reinvented many times. IMHO
it is definitely not Linux...

Happy new year 
Arnould

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] Tops-10, SMP, NT and QDOS (was 2.5 inch HD)

2008-01-03 Thread Arnould
... and for those interested another link that I just found on the
same subject, by a woman and another Tony 

http://www.inwap.com/pdp10/usenet/smp

Notice how the spin lock was invented!


 
 Hello,
 
 It is interesting to see that this was all done already in 
 the past, see:
 
 http://www.inwap.com/pdp10/paper-smp.txt
 
 Also see this interwiew of Bill Gates and notice how he says 
 that the PDP10 was a fantastic machine:
 
 http://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/comphist/gates.htm#tc4
 
 That was when he was allowed to use a PDP-10 at nights,
 thus when he was about 12. Further research show that this early
 TOPS-10 timesharing single processor OS did work 
 internally like the QL's QDOS. However UNIX was free within 
 universities, hence was successfull, and Digital Equipment 
 favored its VAX line of OSes, based on similar algorithms 
 than UNIX. That lead them to the end within about 20 years. 
 In the meantime Microsoft had grown enough with a ugly but 
 _working_ monotasking system (MS-DOS it was named) and could 
 hire a technical leader at DEC. Bill hired the chief 
 designer of the VAX products which lead to NT, 2000, XP, 
 Vista etc.. instead of those great developers of that 
 fantastic Tops-10. The right technology was killed a second 
 time. Sinclair Research and Tony Tebby came about 15 years 
 after DEC and did reinvent the wheel but was not successfull 
 either. As I am optimistic I think that the better 
 technology wins in the end, but it must come at the right 
 time (the story of gas vs electric engines in cars). So it 
 must be reinvented many times. IMHO it is definitely not Linux...
 
 Happy new year 
 Arnould


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] QDT: how many jobs

2007-06-14 Thread Arnould
Hello,

For those who use QDT: how many jobs run during a typical working 
session? 

Arnould


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] Eindhoven June 16

2007-05-30 Thread Arnould
Hello,

Who foresees to go to Eindhoven on June 16? 

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QXL... and WMOV

2007-03-14 Thread Arnould
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:46:34 +, P Witte wrote
 silvercreekvalley writes:
 
  As I'm fairly new to the QL scene, 

I am amazed by the number of new QL users these days... And how did 
you, new QL users, this quite hidden mailing list?

 To move the program's windows interactively,
 enter the command WMOV and move the pointer to some 
 location and press enter. To quit the second instance of 
 Sbasic enter QUIT.

Is this new? It doesn't work in my QPC 3.21 (OK my QPC is maybe 
outdated, but it works well for my current needs)

Arnould, Paris, France
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] XChange bug

2006-12-07 Thread Arnould
About the backscroll bug in Quill

 Ive never had the problem with Abacus, only Quill (which I 
 forgot to mention).
 

I could have thrown the QL out of the window because of this bug. 
This was 20 years during my studies. My workaround was to edit my 
texts in an editor and use Quill only for formatting and printing. 

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Is Goldfire vapourware? I don't fhink so

2006-04-10 Thread Arnould
... but it seems to be a very long term project.

In a few words: 

I was there, in Croatia, in May 2004 and Summer 2005. I intend to go 
again this summer. My project is: I want Nasta to make a very low 
cost QL. At this moment I am not really interested to see a QL 
based on the very latest fastest possible Coldfire, but this would be 
a beginning. And I am ready to invest more than 1000 Euro. And I 
believe other people would also invest some money in a well prepared 
project.

The fact is that Nasta is certainly our man to do the hardware, but 
right now he must live and he has already too much to do for his 
employer. Because he currently develops electronics not based on his 
knowledge of the QL and he regrets it. However his employer is also 
quite interested in a low cost QL for his own use, this is sure.

The second problem that he explained to me is not design of a board  
but industrialisation. As a matter of fact there is a mechanical 
problem: modern surface mounted chips require toolings and machines 
that is readily available in the far east, but there they are not 
interested by low production batches. So he wants to find a supplier 
interested and able to manufacture small batches in Europe. And even 
possibly in Croatia. Last summer this seemed to be his major problem 
even if he had an idea...

In the meantime Nasta had told me that we could try to find some sort 
of development board, pay it and lend it to Marcel to try to adapt 
SMSQ/E to the Coldfire (Coldfire emulator of the 68k). But IRC he did 
not go very far into this direction as a board made by Freescale (I 
believe) would be usable from a software point of view, if only the 
connectors were bigger to be able to adapt monitor, keyboard, serial 
connection etc.. Mechanical problem again. 

AND anyway I do not know if Marcel could be interested. Marcel?

So you see, there is some hope. However I must also say that, after 2 
years, if nothing comes out of this, I will try to find a better paid 
job in my world company, and if this happens I would not be very 
available for this project any more (In France my employer is forced 
to take me back at the same wages as long as 2 years later if 
creation of a company fails, the sort of advantage our youth is 
fighting for in the streets).

Arnould, Paris, France


On Sat, 08 Apr 2006 16:32:40 +0100, Tarquin Mills wrote
 The lack of any sounds on this list suggest that Goldfire, 
 even in planning form, is not ready and never will be, 
 probably thanks to being based on the Coldfire CPU. While I 
 look forward to being corrected, my hopes have faded :-(.
 
Tarquin Mills (Chairman)

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Today 20 years ago...

2006-01-25 Thread Arnould
My QL was 20 in November 84. I don't remember the exact date, but I 
still have the invoice somewhere in the handbook. It was version JM 
imported to France by a non official reseller. It still works well. 
Including the microdrives.

Arnould


On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:37:17 + (GMT), Stephen Usher wrote
 Well, actually, it was 20 years ago tomorrow, but why wait..
 
 I also got my QL then.

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] Wikipedia and QL nostalgy

2006-01-13 Thread Arnould
There is a whole lot of information about the QL etc in the english  
version of Wikipedia, for example:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair_QL

and a link to this text that I did not know:
 http://www.nvg.ntnu.no/sinclair/computers/ql/ql_sst.htm

and also this one:
 http://www.jan-jones.co.uk/index.html

Who did all this work? Different people?

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] Win apps from QPC

2005-12-20 Thread Arnould
IIRC it is possible to start windoze applications from QPC. Can 
somebody remind me how?

Is it possible to feed the win keyboard buffer from QPC in order to 
type in passwords?

Can QPC start a number of applications in turn?

Reason: I am fed up to spoil 3 minutes every morning to start my 
working environment. 220 days/year x 3 min/day x 25 years / 60 
min/hour = 275 hours when I get chance to stop it. And this is 
without time to start the PC (it is already switched on, I only need 
to log in).

And please, I do not want to study autoexec.bat or equivalent windoze 
stuff...

Thank you in advance
Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] Next Eindhoven show

2005-09-21 Thread Arnould
IIRC the next Eindhoven local show is on Saturday 15. October. Am I 
right?

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] A4 or A5

2005-08-05 Thread Arnould
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 18:55:43 +0100, gwicks wrote
 
 Just a pity there was scarcely any reactions from members 
 about the preference for A4 or A5,
 
 Best Wishes, Geoff

I prefer A5 for historic reasons. But I stack them open, ie in A4 
format, so it is not so important anyway.

Arnould

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QL Eindhoven

2005-06-18 Thread Arnould
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 09:51:46 +0100, Tony Firshman wrote
 Hallo from the internet connection at the Eindhoven meeting 
 (courtesy of Sjef vdm)
 
 Tony

Hello,
I am not there because of a tight budget and nothing to see from
Nasta: I am still extremely interested by a low cost hardware QL
successor even if it does not get the maximum possible speed
However in exchange I will send an order for at least QDT and maybe
Qword which I wanted to buy today.
Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] QL Eindhoven

2005-06-18 Thread Arnould
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 14:03:45 +0100, Tony Firshman wrote
 Here are photos from the show, uploaded via the internet connection:
 
 http://firshman.co.uk/photos.htm

Jean-Louis: je t'ai vu sur les photos. T'aurais pu penser  me
tlphoner avant d'y aller comme un voleur. J'aurais pu le faire aussi
tu me dira..

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


RE: RE: [ql-users] Just an idea for a new Product.....

2005-04-20 Thread Arnould
About USB keys with emulators:
 
 Well, the Spectrum one we are doing has taken Dixons by 
 storm, they are very excited about it. I know the Emulator 
 DVDs and CDs are popular too in mainstream stops.
 

So let you do a QL one with the Spectrum emulator..

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Just an idea for a new Product.....

2005-04-19 Thread Arnould

 Getting back on topic...
  I would be interested in the DVD, but, as I am limited to 
 plain vanilla QDOS emulation (uQLx, QLAY), because, I can't 
 justify the outlay for QPC2. (I'm not saying that it's 
 over-priced, but in a limited and shrinking market, no 
 selling price can be a commercial proposition, so better 
 surely to drop the price and get some new sales than leaving 
 it at a price where it costs a comparable price to complete 
 linux distro, complete with professional manuals, and 6 cds 
 or so of applications, or an oem version of Windows)..so,
  I assume that much of the DVD would be of little interest 
 to me. So, the questions are: how much would you want to 
 sell it for, and would you structure it in such a way that 
 it would be obvious to me which progs would not work under QDOS?
 
 Jeremy

Should be sold with QPC at a good price, shoudn't it?

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited

2005-02-23 Thread Arnould

That explains why I thought that it was part of SMSQE

Arnould

 Yes, I know, but as a free Sernet comes with SMSQE
  
  ??
  I didn't even know that!
  Wolfgang

  
  
 :-) then look at your qpc2 - program disk  :-))
 
 wolfgang



WebMail / Magic OnLine
http://www.magic.fr

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Visit to Switzerland

2005-02-08 Thread Arnould
Hello,

Any time for me. As shops close on 4 O'clock, it could even be 5 or 6 
O'clock for me.

Arnould

On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:27:44 +0100, Dent wrote
 Hi
 
 Elisabeth and I could come to Sursee on Saturday.
 What time do you suggest?
 
 Jon.
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Koenig Urs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2005 4:26 PM
 Subject: AW: [ql-users] Visit to Switzerland
 
 Hi
 
 I would be around on Saturday or Sunday for a chat as well.
 I could offer our company offices in Sursee as host.
 
 Would really be nice to see you, Jon and hopefully others!
 
 Urs



WebMail / Magic OnLine
http://www.magic.fr

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: AW: [ql-users] Visit to Switzerland

2005-02-08 Thread Arnould
For me it is perfect. I will be there. 3 hours is a lot of time as my 
main interest is to speak with Jonathan. 
But if you bring a SMSQ/E system then I would be happy if it could 
send me a Hello email.

Arnould

On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:42:08 +0100, Koenig Urs wrote
 Hi all
 
 I suggest this coming Saturday Feb 12th at 2 O'clock, so we 
 will have about 3 hours for our meeting.
 
 Location:
 http://www.bisonsystems.ch/de/public/unternehmen/filialen/sursee.htm
 
 OK?
 
 Urs
 



WebMail / Magic OnLine
http://www.magic.fr

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Toolkit II

2004-07-25 Thread Arnould Nazarian

TK2 copyright will not expire until at least 2010 (I believe that it 
was  made available in 1985) however IIRC TK2 has been released to the 
public  by TT... Of course I may be wrong on the latter. (TT?)

IIRC the TK2 version that is on Dylwin's emulators CDROM is OK to use 
with emulators. I had asked this TT and Jochen, but Dylwin should know 
better.

Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm


Re: [ql-users] Question on SBASIC job trees in SMSQ/E

2004-05-14 Thread Arnould Nazarian

You can always alter the owner once you have started a job.

Yes, but in Sbasic, how?
Arnould
___
QL-Users Mailing List


Re: [ql-users] Question on SBASIC job trees in SMSQ/E

2004-05-13 Thread Arnould Nazarian
It is the first time I use such features, and after 20 years of readings
about QDOS, I had the impression that both 'test' jobs would have 
belonged to 'launcher'.


I don't think most people would want it this way. This would mean that
you couldn't write startup scripts that EX other jobs as the job would
be killed at the end of the script.
Marcel
I understand. Of course in that case it would be easy to never kill the 
startup script.
And what about a version of EX that would allow to launch jobs working 
in parallel to the others (ie not blocked as with EW until end of 
processig), but daughters of the launching one?
Would it be complicated?

Arnould

___
QL-Users Mailing List


Re: [ql-users] Question on SBASIC job trees in SMSQ/E

2004-05-13 Thread Arnould Nazarian

What you want is that the EX'd prog be owned by the launcher job, which uis what I 
definitely wouldn't want.
The only solution I can see would be a new keyword. How about EX_M (EXec with 
Me as owner)?

This could be a trivial change that I could build into the next version of SMSQ/E.

Would that solve your problem?

Exactly !!! I had just sent my last message when yours arrived !

Wolfgang
Arnould

___
QL-Users Mailing List


Re: [ql-users] Operating Systems

2004-04-12 Thread Arnould Nazarian

SMSQ/E is mostly so easy to use because it has never even heard of the
words security concept (does the mail count as OnTopic now? ;-) )
And if I understood well my discussions with TT, this was exactly his 
target in 1983: no security stuff for a very small personal computer 
because it is not needed, not wished and it would complicate things for 
the user as well as for the programmer.
Arnould

___
QL-Users Mailing List


[ql-users] Philips USB chip

2004-04-12 Thread Arnould Nazarian
I lost the URL for the Philips USB chip. I don't know how. Can you 
resend it?
Arnould

___
QL-Users Mailing List


Re: [ql-users] Nasta

2004-04-11 Thread Arnould Nazarian
ZN a écrit:
Now I get to be the subject on an email list ;-) - well, there is always
that first time, i suppose ;-)
[snip]
Regards,

Nasta
Hello,
I know how painful it is to receive all this spam. Fortunately I receive 
only ~50/day and 80% are send to other [EMAIL PROTECTED] users. So this flood 
is relatively easy to filter (I asked them 3 times if they were hacked 
or if they sold the adresses: no answer..).
Do you have another email that is easier to use?
Arnould

___
QL-Users Mailing List


Re: [ql-users] Nasta

2004-04-11 Thread Arnould Nazarian

A possible project being investigated is a board that would in essence be a
QL replacement, that could fit into the old case (or a much cmaller one),
would include extra frills and in essence be a all-in-one machine, is a
board based on the aforementioned 68VZ328 Dragonball. There was talk of
this on the list before, but at that time there was no source for the CPUs.
Note that this board would be far less powerfull than a GoldFire (or Q60) -
think of it as a 66MHz GoldCard with loads more RAM and Aurora+ style
graphics, but would be a simple and quite cheap solution for a replacement
QL for non-power users ;-) especially if I can find a market for it
elsewhere and sell it under the guise of something else (which I think I
may be able to do).
And now questions about this 68328. You talk about the VZ version. But 
according the motorola web site there is the 68SZ328:

The MC68SZ328 (DragonBall Super VZ) microprocessor, the fourth 
generation of the 68K-based DragonBall family of products, is designed 
to save system designers time, power, and cost. Requiring less board 
space, it allows for reduced pin count and fewer programming steps when 
designing products. The major differences between previous versions of 
DragonBall processors and the new Super VZ are an improvement in system 
speed, TFT color LCD support, an A/D converter (with touch panel 
control), an MMC/SD host controller, a DMA controller, embedded SRAM, a 
USB device controller, and an I2C interface.

It has a lot of things on board, even 100 kb of memory not mentioned in 
the extract above. And it is reasonably fast: 10 MIPS against about 7 
MIPS in the 24 MHz 60020 based Super Gold Card (if I understand how to 
do the calculation :)

But do you know more about the USB interface? I do not know the exact 
terminology, but IIRC what you already wrote here, it is not the same in 
the PC and in accessories. Is it a real USB port like in PCs? (I know 
the sotware problem of drivers, it is not the question).

And: is it available in reasonnable quantities, ie about 50 units?

Arnould

___
QL-Users Mailing List


Re: [ql-users] One last try...

2004-04-11 Thread Arnould Nazarian

OK, I'll go on record to subsidise this at the tume of 100 .
Anybody else?
Wolfgang


You can count on me. However apparently the money would be welcome, but 
he has no plans to relocate (see Nasta discussion).
Arnould



___
QL-Users Mailing List


Re: [ql-users] Nasta

2004-04-11 Thread Arnould Nazarian

The USB interface is not a USB 'HOST' but rather a USB endpoint. I.e, a
SZ328 system with propper software support becomes a USB device, rather
than a host (or, to use simpler terms, a controller). As such, this port
will not be able to accept other USB devices directly, although there
appears to be a way to do this using some sort of a USB bridge device,
something which is commonly used in USB to USB networking cables, for
instance. Specs on this are very difficult to find. I have only seen it
referred to in a completely unrelated document (for a Cirrus - Crystal MP3
player chip), where this approach is used to connect USB mass memory
devices.
Exactly, that was underlying idea: use of the USB port provided with of 
that chip for mass storage, and more specifically, use the USB flash 
memory keys around that are cheaper and cheaper. But it is not possible. 
Here the best sum up of a few hours of comments reading and browsing 
through the USB 1.1 specifications ( www.usb.org ):

USB is a very asymmetrical protocol; the roles of the host and the 
targets are very different. (Some specific examples: *all* data 
transfers are initiated by the host; the host sends a SOF token once per 
millisecond; the host is in charge of enumerating the device tree, 
reading each device's descriptor, and polling any devices whose 
descriptors request it. The target simply listens, and responds to 
requests, except for a very few situations such as wakeup-from-sleep.)

So the conclusion: I still hope that it may be feasible to interface 
flash ram or rom cartridges to the 68SZ328, but it will not be through 
the USB *device* port that they provided. Or maybe yes, but outside of 
any industry standard by using very special tinkering. Let it be.

___
QL-Users Mailing List


Re: [ql-users] One last try...

2004-04-01 Thread Arnould Nazarian
Dave P a écrit:
Hi all...

Timing is a bit off, but this isn't an April Fool joke... :)

I have been working on a business venture in embedded computing. It
involves computing for environmental controls. For this I have specified a
hardware reference platform with minimal requirements that are quite high.
I am now sitting on standard ARM 7500 complete system boards with the
following spec:
64MHz EP7500FE ARM system on chip (200/400 MHz options)
2x 72 pin SIMM for FPM or EDO memory, up to 256MB.
Three ROM sockets, 2MB flash, supports 6MB max.
Parallel port, serial ports, floppy
Dual channel IDE ATA/33
Integrated video:
  800 x  600 @16.7M
 1024 x  768 @32K
 1600 x 1200 @256
Any user-customizable resolution/frame rate selectable.
Integrated 10BaseT Ethernet
Integrated ESS audio.
16 bit ISA slot
Real time clock
I2C bus
I am now at the point of needing to obtain or create a basic OS and
filesystem for my product. I have no real need to create anything, as
Linux or BSD are available... but...
[snip]
Is there any demand/need for this? Pretty much you have to speak up now
either way, or the project won't start...


I discussed many years about this with Tony Tebby. And think I know his 
answer: what money do you have to pay him for that job?

I tend to believe that this is the right reaction. So after you did the 
hardware (I think that needed some money to do), do you have the budget 
to start/finish the sotware? Then you could count on Tony and something 
much better than QDOS/SMSQ/E (possibly with a SMSQ/E emulator as a bonus).

Arnould



___
QL-Users Mailing List


Re: [ql-users] Eindhoven, QL Today Renewal and NEWS

2004-03-23 Thread Arnould Nazarian

Nope, sorry. Any Paris show anytime ?


We thought of one last year.
However I recall two years ago you were one of the few visitors.
I brought Bruno Coativy  some imperial sized dies (thread cutters) to
make 1/4 tripod bolt.  That was the sum total of the 'QL' trading there.
We did not see any of the French user group leaders
I was there, but you had already left

How many people on this list would come to a Paris show at the end of
October?
I know Bruno would come - he is not on the web, but uses my BBS
regularly.
I would attend, earlier than last time

Arnould



___
QL-Users Mailing List


Re: [ql-users] The QL in 3D (first real thread on new list)

2004-03-22 Thread Arnould Nazarian
Dilwyn Jones a écrit:
Sorry, I did not make it clear enough, I mean true 3D (funny
coloured

glasses, panoramic displays etc) not 3D Graphics.

Please sign my petition and get the QL back in the high street (see
sig).

--
  Tarquin Mills
Ah, I see, those red and blue specs you get with some films.



And of course you know that early game, Wanderer, for the QL, which did 
something like this. I even have it here somewhere whith the plastic 
glasses. But I never was excellent as seeing 3D that way. And I find 
games boring, so I still own it, tried it once about 18 years ago and 
never looked at it again...

Arnould

___
QL-Users Mailing List