Hi there,
Anyone on BT connections, particularly BT Yahoo broadband, should check it's
spam filter. I just did and found 14 QL list messages. The other week when
there was Reverse engineering in the subject, I found 25 messges blocked!!
Cheers
Colin
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
...
There is an
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
...
There is an issue in particular with NTL which is causing havoc.
The root cause is spam, and many ISPs inept efforts at pre-filtering.
I remember chaos at Demon a few years ago, when someone decided to put
them on a blacklist because one of their customers had an
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 at 14:41:06, Robert Newson wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
One of my contacts using freeserve,co,uk is having terrible trouble.
Approximately 50% of her emails get filtered out somewhere in transit.
That is curious. My old email address[1] was with
Hi Malcolm,
I also find it better to get *every* email. Better as get it rejected from
the ISP.
Cheers...Ralf R.
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Cadman
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Dodgy Email
A good way of getting rid of spam if you
A good way of getting rid of spam if you are getting a lot of it,
although after the event, is to use a webmail service to look at
what
your ISP has waiting for you on their email server.
You can then delete it there, before you download.
I have found that to be effective. Although it
I shall watch the show calendar with renewed interest Geoff. I wonder if
Quanta will pay committee expenses if one decides to attend?
John Gilpin.
- Original Message -
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users
Dilwyn Jones writes:
You could always download the headers of all messages without
downloading
the bodies. (The pop3 TOP command sends the message header along
with the
first n (specified) lines of the message - if specified as 0, only
the
header is sent.)
This is actually not too
One is inclined in general to that if one gets no reply to an email
that
the party concerned did not have the decency to decline interest, as
I did
some time ago about a Dilwyn/Tesco. It would seem intrusive to
resend.
Email seems to work so well for the greater part one hesitates to
blame
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 at 10:30:35, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
How do these ISP spam filterings work?
Do they pattern match emails (i.e. look at it, that's spam, add it to
the list and stop every copy of that email) or simply decide that a
particular isp seems to carry a lot of
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 at 01:18:38, David Tubbs wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
At 08:41 17/01/2006 +, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably because their pint = 16FlOz to match 1lb = 16Oz, whereas the
imperial pint = 20flOz.
Cheers,
Norman.replied to a mail that never reached me
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 at 09:52:03, Tony Firshman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
My ISP does absolutely nothing other than spend £100,00 plus
whoops - £100,000
to cope
with the spam traffic. That is fine by me - I would rather be in
control of my own filters.
Tony
--
QBBS (QL fido
David Tubbs wrote:
One of my contacts using freeserve,co,uk is having terrible trouble.
Approximately 50% of her emails get filtered out somewhere in transit.
As you see, I use same, and Wanadoo ISP, they don't remove spam, just mark
it. Very little gets under and a tiny number of false
12 matches
Mail list logo
