Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-12 Thread Wolfgang Uhlig

Hi, everybody,

I was a little bit startled by the reaction of Nasta, who wants to sell his QXL for 
$100,-!
Sorry for being so generous ;-) , but the three QXLs I offer have been working for 
about 3-
4 years in a bicycle shop here in Holland which I had written an administration 
program 
for.
They (the shop owners) sold their shop recently and the new owners of course)have a 
PC-network. But they were at least so friendly as to ask me, whether I wanted to have 
the QXLs. I could not resist :-)
So, there are 5 people who like to have one. My preference is for Dave Dexter, Dokos 
Phoebus and Al Feng, don't ask me why. 
But
You will have to pay the costs for sending it to you. I don't know yet how much it 
will be, 
so be patient for one more day. Tomorrow I'll go to the post office with a well packed 
QXL 
and ask how much it will cost to England or USA.
As soon as I know, I will post an e-mail to the QLusers group and tell you. If you 
still want 
it, we will have to find out, how to manage the money-stuff.

Until then,

Wolfgang 
 





Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-12 Thread Richard Zidlicky

On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 06:15:39PM +0200, Wolfgang Uhlig wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I am moderately optimistic about GTK, next version of it is rumored
 to be able to run on simple framebuffer devices and that would be very
 simple to do in QDOS.
 Richard
 I'm new in the users-group, Richard (or who else), what is GTK?

graphical/widget/windowing toolkit, formerly gimp-toolkit. There
should be www.gtk.org.. if not find a link from gnome.org.

 Und Richard, warum kommst du nie mehr nach Eindhoven?

I was skiing in France at that time.. it was the only 3 weeks 
they had good snow this year so nothing that could be done.

Richard



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-11 Thread Tony Firshman

On  Wed, 10 Apr 2002 at 23:18:50, Dexter wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])


 Oh, for heaven's sake, why would you need a custom transformer?

My dear Nasta, have you become so disillusioned that you don't see the
*fun* in winding yer own transformer? ;P

It's a great way to pass an evening :o)
... much like tapestry or knitting (8-)#


  QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:252/67) +44(0)1442-828255
   tony@surname,demon.co.uk  http://www.firshman.demon.co.uk
Voice: +44(0)1442-828254   Fax: +44(0)1442-828255
 TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-11 Thread Phoebus Dokos

At 12:15 ìì 8/4/2002, you wrote:

Hi,

 I am moderately optimistic about GTK, next version of it is rumored
 to be able to run on simple framebuffer devices and that would be very
 simple to do in QDOS.
 Richard
I'm new in the users-group, Richard (or who else), what is GTK?

GTK means GiMP ToolKit IIRC... (From the Gnu Image Manipulation Program...: 
GiMP)

Phoebus



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-11 Thread Tony Firshman

On  Thu, 11 Apr 2002 at 14:17:54, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])

At 12:15 ìì 8/4/2002, you wrote:
Who?^
This is something I got pulled up (rightly) on quite a while back.
This attribute is fine for personal email, but is not good in a public
area.  I bet it is configurable - my mailer allows %c character
substitutions to construct any weird and wonderful attribute you want.
Mine is very boring but has your name, Phoebus (8-)#

-- 
 QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:252/67) +44(0)1442-828255
  tony@surname,demon.co.uk  http://www.firshman.demon.co.uk
   Voice: +44(0)1442-828254   Fax: +44(0)1442-828255
TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-11 Thread Phoebus Dokos

At 05:45 ìì 11/4/2002, Tony Firshman, hardware guru extraordinaire, wrote:

 ^   /
How about this---|   better? {:-D
  \


On  Thu, 11 Apr 2002 at 14:17:54, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])

 At 12:15 ìì 8/4/2002, you wrote:
Who?^
This is something I got pulled up (rightly) on quite a while back.
This attribute is fine for personal email, but is not good in a public
area.  I bet it is configurable - my mailer allows %c character
substitutions to construct any weird and wonderful attribute you want.
Mine is very boring but has your name, Phoebus (8-)#

Aside the jokes, I know, but due to a restructuring of my Opera files (due 
to the continuous development of the Greek version), I have reverted to 
using Eudora for the moment (where you have to manually edit the response 
string... or at least I don't know where the heck it can be found)... Will 
you forgive me for just a little longer - I do try to edit them but being 
Greek (and therefore very hasty I forget) ?? (Please please please???:-)


Phoebus



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-10 Thread ZN

On 08/04/02 at 21:26 Dexter wrote:

 However a European PSU will work with a US QL if you use a step up 
 transformer...

I've seen transformer winding kits up to the job for $20 in a local parts 
outlet. Could be fun - been ages since I last wound a custom transformer 
:o)

Oh, for heaven's sake, why would you need a custom transformer? Step-up's
are available in every shape and size from many places. Also, with dozens
and dozens of 'old stuff' distributors in the US I'm sure you can find any
type of transformer you care to immagine (www.alltronics.com, www.meci.com,
www.jameco.com, etc, ect)

 P.S. Damn that 6 Gb drive takes forever to format with QubIDE ;-)

How long would the 80 gigger I just bought take then? Hopefully, it'll be 
quicker on the SuperIDE :o)

Fraid not, at least not for a while. Nothing to do with xxxIDE, but with
the speed of the QL's 8-bit bus. The peak bandwidth is only 1.8MB/sec and
even a bit less with GC/SGC. All of this really to cater for the 8301 video
ULA. Even with Aurora, which is capable of about 5.5MB/s things get stuck
at 1.8 because the GC/SGC deliberately slow down when communicating through
the QL bus, just in case there is a 8301 somewhere - even if it's in the
spare parts bin :-)
GF's IO protocol is software-customizeable, and can push the 8-bit bus very
far (probably too far) - in theory, up to 12MB/sec but that's still only
ATAPI PIO3 or so, IF signal integrity on the bus remains sufficient.

Nasta




Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-10 Thread Dexter

On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, ZN wrote:

 On 08/04/02 at 21:26 Dexter wrote:
 
  However a European PSU will work with a US QL if you use a step up 
  transformer...
 
 I've seen transformer winding kits up to the job for $20 in a local parts 
 outlet. Could be fun - been ages since I last wound a custom transformer 
 :o)
 
 Oh, for heaven's sake, why would you need a custom transformer?

My dear Nasta, have you become so disillusioned that you don't see the 
*fun* in winding yer own transformer? ;P

It's a great way to pass an evening :o)

SNIP too much info about GF

It's nice that's you've made progress to the point of having hard figures 
and specific details. It's reassuring. :o)

If there's anything we can do to help, let us know.

Dave
(busily working away)





Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-08 Thread Richard Zidlicky

On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 03:21:05PM -0500, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
 ??? 6/4/2002 3:10:11 ìì, ?/? Bill Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:
 Qpaintshop Pro
 
 Now why would you want a PaintShop Pro clone on the QL...? Paintshop is one of the 
worse graphics programs I've ever used (and 
 trust me I know my way around gfx ;-) Now if you told me Photoshop or Fractal Design 
Painter yeah! I am with you! Heck the GiMP 
 is great as well (No GTK in sight though Unless Thierry is constructively 
spending his time in the sea ;-)))

I am moderately optimistic about GTK, next version of it is rumored
to be able to run on simple framebuffer devices and that would be very
simple to do in QDOS.
GIMP itself may need a little more than this - for example virtual
memory to be useful.

Richard




Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-08 Thread Malcolm Cadman

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dexter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Malcolm Cadman wrote:

 Probably best to have a look, then.  Although I am a great believer in
 alternatives ... it makes for more challenges.

Well here's the plan:

The program has a config file with sensible defaults. The first time it's 
run it asks for your name, email address, POP3 and SMTP servers. It asks 
if you want to set up a .sig file.

After that, and immediately for all subsequent executions, it goes to the 
folder display. This gives you access to your inbox, outbox, and archived 
mail in month-by-month folders. Archived mail is compressed.

It will as far as possible use pine keypresses to do thing, providing a 
useful subset of functionality. It will do everything plain text. If it 
receives email in HTML format, it will strip out or obey the tags the best 
it can. If there's a MIME or UUE attachment it will understand it, and you 
can save that attachment as a file. I'm looking at ways to reliably 
transfer header info.

Very interesting outline ... you have been planning :-)

What are you going to code it in ... C ?

 ... and I guess its an American power supply that you need ?

Yes. I will be doing an ATX - QL adaptor at some point, but it's a case 
opening job, so many won't like it. However, ATM I have a QL I can't use, 
though I understand a PSU is available for me - I just have to contact 
someone and arrange it.

Well, if you ever visit England I've got lots of them ... that have been
donated to the London Quanta Group.  They are too heavy to economically
post.

-- 
Malcolm Cadman



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-08 Thread Dexter

On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Malcolm Cadman wrote:

 Very interesting outline ... you have been planning :-)

Yes. It's hard to do anything more than planning without ethernet and a 
TCP/IP stack ;)

 What are you going to code it in ... C ?

Initially, SBASIC, and then in C once I'm happy with how it works. I'm 
happier with C but have never done any on the QL, whereas SBASIC is a 
quicker throw-it-together-and-test-it language :o) It's not like email 
clients have to be fast, anyway.

 Well, if you ever visit England I've got lots of them ... that have been
 donated to the London Quanta Group.  They are too heavy to economically
 post.

I wonder. Do the transformers in QL PSUs have 120 and 240v windings, or 
did they use a different transformer for each region?

Dave
ql.spodmail.com
(New posts by Nasta in the forum, with latest news on the Goldfire, 
Aurora 2 and SuperIDE/EtherIDE - check it out!)






Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-08 Thread Phoebus Dokos

At 04:08 ìì 8/4/2002, the Daveman wrote:

Initially, SBASIC, and then in C once I'm happy with how it works. I'm
happier with C but have never done any on the QL, whereas SBASIC is a
quicker throw-it-together-and-test-it language :o) It's not like email
clients have to be fast, anyway.

I am not sure if Jon's QLTCP has an SBasic I/F ... maybe you will have to 
resort to access it using the tried and true Peek/Poke S*Basic interface ;-)

  Well, if you ever visit England I've got lots of them ... that have been
  donated to the London Quanta Group.  They are too heavy to economically
  post.

I wonder. Do the transformers in QL PSUs have 120 and 240v windings, or
did they use a different transformer for each region?

Different from what I recall
However a European PSU will work with a US QL if you use a step up 
transformer...

Phoebus


P.S. Damn that 6 Gb drive takes forever to format with QubIDE ;-)



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-08 Thread Dexter

On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:

 I am not sure if Jon's QLTCP has an SBasic I/F ... maybe you will have to 
 resort to access it using the tried and true Peek/Poke S*Basic interface ;-)

If the worst comes to the worst, I would write some kind of front end for 
it, but that's distraction from my core business - getting new things out 
there :o)

 However a European PSU will work with a US QL if you use a step up 
 transformer...

I've seen transformer winding kits up to the job for $20 in a local parts 
outlet. Could be fun - been ages since I last wound a custom transformer 
:o)

 P.S. Damn that 6 Gb drive takes forever to format with QubIDE ;-)

How long would the 80 gigger I just bought take then? Hopefully, it'll be 
quicker on the SuperIDE :o)

Dave
ql.spodmail.com





Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-08 Thread Tony Firshman

On  Mon, 8 Apr 2002 at 19:31:27, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: GawSgHA$[EMAIL PROTECTED])


Well, if you ever visit England I've got lots of them ... that have been
donated to the London Quanta Group.  They are too heavy to economically
post.
Who donated you lots of 110 ac power supplies with US plugs, or are you
forgetting that he lives in the USA (8-)#

-- 
 QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:252/67) +44(0)1442-828255
  tony@surname,demon.co.uk  http://www.firshman.demon.co.uk
   Voice: +44(0)1442-828254   Fax: +44(0)1442-828255
TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-08 Thread Tony Firshman

On  Mon, 8 Apr 2002 at 21:08:25, Dexter wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])


 Well, if you ever visit England I've got lots of them ... that have been
 donated to the London Quanta Group.  They are too heavy to economically
 post.

I wonder. Do the transformers in QL PSUs have 120 and 240v windings, or
did they use a different transformer for each region?
They don't - I think Malcolm was confused.

-- 
 QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:252/67) +44(0)1442-828255
  tony@surname,demon.co.uk  http://www.firshman.demon.co.uk
   Voice: +44(0)1442-828254   Fax: +44(0)1442-828255
TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-08 Thread Dexter

On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Malcolm Cadman wrote:

 In addition you should find C68 on the QL easy to adapt to.

If using it is anything like using GCC, I'll be fine...

 ql.spodmail.com
 (New posts by Nasta in the forum, with latest news on the Goldfire, 
 Aurora 2 and SuperIDE/EtherIDE - check it out!)
 
 The site was down when I looked last night.

Did you type www. in front of it? It was definitely up last night. I was 
sat there nursing it through a storm - we had 15 inches of rain last 
night, and some hail too. Texas is grand when it comes to extreme weather. 
Luckily, the power was only out for about 20 minutes, and the UPSes can 
hold out for about 35 minutes.

It was a very pretty storm though :o)

Dave
ql.spodmail.com





Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-08 Thread Malcolm Cadman

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On  Mon, 8 Apr 2002 at 19:31:27, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: GawSgHA$[EMAIL PROTECTED])


Well, if you ever visit England I've got lots of them ... that have been
donated to the London Quanta Group.  They are too heavy to economically
post.
Who donated you lots of 110 ac power supplies with US plugs, or are you
forgetting that he lives in the USA (8-)#

He .. he .. I meant UK ones :-)

-- 
Malcolm Cadman



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-08 Thread Malcolm Cadman

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dexter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Malcolm Cadman wrote:

 In addition you should find C68 on the QL easy to adapt to.

If using it is anything like using GCC, I'll be fine...

You will ...

 ql.spodmail.com
 (New posts by Nasta in the forum, with latest news on the Goldfire, 
 Aurora 2 and SuperIDE/EtherIDE - check it out!)
 
 The site was down when I looked last night.

Did you type www. in front of it? It was definitely up last night. I was 
sat there nursing it through a storm - we had 15 inches of rain last 
night, and some hail too. Texas is grand when it comes to extreme weather. 
Luckily, the power was only out for about 20 minutes, and the UPSes can 
hold out for about 35 minutes.

It was a very pretty storm though :o)

Wow ! ... I guess everything in Texas is big then :-)

Also given the time difference, my 'last night' was probably your
morning.

-- 
Malcolm Cadman



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-08 Thread Tony Firshman

On  Mon, 8 Apr 2002 at 22:10:09, Dexter wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])

On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Malcolm Cadman wrote:

 In addition you should find C68 on the QL easy to adapt to.

If using it is anything like using GCC, I'll be fine...

 ql.spodmail.com
 (New posts by Nasta in the forum, with latest news on the Goldfire,
 Aurora 2 and SuperIDE/EtherIDE - check it out!)

 The site was down when I looked last night.

Did you type www. in front of it? It was definitely up last night. I was
sat there nursing it through a storm - we had 15 inches of rain last
night, and some hail too. Texas is grand when it comes to extreme weather.
Luckily, the power was only out for about 20 minutes, and the UPSes can
hold out for about 35 minutes.

It was a very pretty storm though :o)

I won't forget the flight across the USA a few years back between the
East and West coast QL shows.  We had the most amazing aerial view of
storms below us.  That was the time when a plane was hit and crashed
somewhere in the Rockies, I think.
The US certainly does have grand storms, but it is a big place (8-)#
-- 
 QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:252/67) +44(0)1442-828255
  tony@surname,demon.co.uk  http://www.firshman.demon.co.uk
   Voice: +44(0)1442-828254   Fax: +44(0)1442-828255
TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-08 Thread Wolfgang Uhlig

Hi,

I am moderately optimistic about GTK, next version of it is rumored
to be able to run on simple framebuffer devices and that would be very
simple to do in QDOS.
Richard
I'm new in the users-group, Richard (or who else), what is GTK?
Und Richard, warum kommst du nie mehr nach Eindhoven?

Wolfgang Uhlig






Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-08 Thread Malcolm Cadman

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dexter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Malcolm Cadman wrote:

 Wow ! ... I guess everything in Texas is big then :-)

Well, TX weather is a case of extremes. There's warm and humid air 
circulating up from the gulf of Mexico, and cold, dry air coming down from 
alaska/canada... They meet in a spectacular line that spawns terrific 
storms, tornados, hail that has been known to put bullet holes in the tops 
of peoples' heads, and often 12 inches of rain in one hour, causing flash 
floods that are more than rising water, and literally like the rumble in 
the distance that appears as a wave six foot high.

I live on high ground. :o)

A wise man, then :-)

 Also given the time difference, my 'last night' was probably your
 morning.

I can see a couple of people tried to access www.ql.spodmail.com and one 
person (I won't name you, but I know who you are!) tried to access 
ql.spodmail.com/qeyboard and ql.spodmail.com/goldfire *tsk tsk*

It's http://ql.spodmail.com/

Yes, just logged on OK this evening ... and registered.

A very neatly done Forum that you have created.

-- 
Malcolm Cadman



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-08 Thread Dexter

On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Malcolm Cadman wrote:

 A very neatly done Forum that you have created.

Thank you - but I didn't create it - I just installed, configured and 
expanded it a little. :o)

If anyone has any ideas for forums they'd like to see there, and 
especially if they'd like to moderate their own forums, please let me 
know.

Dave
http://ql.spodmail.com/





Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-07 Thread Malcolm Cadman

In article 3X6Z6PNNJ6ZMJPL07DCWVMURIF1XB8.3cae130a@quantum-central,
Phoebus Dokos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
 5/4/2002 4:05:54 ??, / Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED] :

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dexter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:

 Well i am not using the forum because last I checked the site was down :-)

You mean the day the CSU/DSU blew up, poof, and I had to go out and spend 
boucoup bucks on a new one? :o(

Everything's fine now :o)

What is the address again ?

-- 
Malcolm Cadman


http://ql.spodmail.com

OK ... it will now go in the favourites :-)

-- 
Malcolm Cadman



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-07 Thread Malcolm Cadman

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dexter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:

 Qmail
 
 Exists... Ask J. Dent for more :-)

Well, mine'll probably be called Qemail (pronounced keymail) to match the 
Qeyboard (pronounced, well, you know ;)

Nice idea of 'namimg' :-) ... Jon's work needs a good interface attached
to it to become a 'useable by all' emailer.

Assuming that you will be basing it on Jon's TCP/IP code ... if you
really are planning something :-)

-- 
Malcolm Cadman



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-07 Thread Malcolm Cadman

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dexter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

 Qmail

Hmmm, I do have to do something there. I've written an email client 
before. If I do something, it will end up looking like pine.

 Qbrowser

Even the most basic browser is a huge undertaking. This would have to be a 
group effort.

 Well you did ask

That'll teach me :o)

Tarquin has already started to write a browser in beta form for the QL -
he is also a RISC OS user - I have forgotten what he calls it.

I have a copy, yet it doesn't work for me :-(
... anyone got it working ?

It is only text at present.

-- 
Malcolm Cadman



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-07 Thread Dilwyn Jones

Tarquin has already started to write a browser in beta form for the
QL -
he is also a RISC OS user - I have forgotten what he calls it.

Hyperbrowser

I have a copy, yet it doesn't work for me :-(
... anyone got it working ?

Yes, all but one version I could only get to work with text. He has
(or was plannign to?) use Photon to display JPEGs but I don't think I
got hold of this version. I seem to remember it relied on a version of
Photon which was able to have filenames for display passed as a
parameter and I'm not sure that existed then (i.e. did Tarquin get it
working or was it just a feature he'd put in ready for when Dave
Westbury got that to work in Photon).

It is only text at present.

That's a start at least. Text browsers are a bit useless in the modern
graphics-driven internet but at least Lynx and HyperBrowser form
something from which to start from once soql becomes reality (if ever
Jon Dent sorts his Linux systems out - I think he was having problems
with a Linux system he was setting up to test and debug soql). There
was another QL text-only browser called QMosaic too. If you could find
a version which worked on your system, it worked rather well as a
text-only browser. Trouble was, of all the versions I came across (and
I have 2 or 3) they were a bit fussy as to which QL system they'd run
on.

Any graphical QL browser would need to be able to handle much of what
the internet currently thrusts upon us - reasonably fast display of
various graphics format like PNG, JPEG, and GIF. Or at the very least
be sufficiently capable of putting a square in the display where the
graphic is to go and a 'Click On This To View This Graphic' as the
next step up from text browsers. One way would be for this 'Click To
View' thingy to call up a graphics viewer like PhotoQL or Photon via
FileInfo 2 and over time a library of file viewers would be available,
so that even if browser development stopped external viewers etc
(plug-ins???) allowed some advancement.

We also need a first GD2 graphics program. No need to be PaintSlap Pro
or whatever, just a little something along the lines of earlier QL
graphics programs which allow you to draw some simple graphics.

It does go to show that although up until now we have had adequate
software development tools to produce reasonable software, GD2 has not
had the support tools necessary to plough ahead with good software.
Yes, the Q40 has brought some good programs, but to some extent they
are specific to Q40, or are only at their best on a Q40/Q60. How I
look forward to QPTR and EasyPtr being GD2-aware for example.

Wolfgang Uhlig recently sent me a cute little GD2 program called
QcoLour which helps with the development of hues and shades on high
colour systems, and I think is the first or one of the first QL
program to use 'skins' or user definable backgrounds (nice colour
ripples and textures). A neat little splash of colour.

Simon Goodwin, for example,  has been doing some good work with his
Digicam software, so people with some Kodak cameras can download and
handle camera graphics on a QDOS system.

The capability is there, but we have to remember it's talented
individuals working in their spare time and mostly for free.

--
Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.soft.net.uk/dj/index.html




Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-07 Thread Dexter

On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Malcolm Cadman wrote:

 Nice idea of 'namimg' :-) ... Jon's work needs a good interface attached
 to it to become a 'useable by all' emailer.

I haven't seen his work. However, the mail client I plan to do will be 
functional, text-based, and probably fully open source.

 Assuming that you will be basing it on Jon's TCP/IP code ... if you
 really are planning something :-)

I'm really planning to do it. Not having a power supply for my QL is the 
biggest challenge to doing anything! ;)

Dave
ql.spodmail.com





Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-07 Thread Phoebus Dokos




I'm really planning to do it. Not having a power supply for my QL is the
biggest challenge to doing anything! ;)

Dave
ql.spodmail.com

Dave did you contact François Lanciault yet for the PSU?


Phoebus



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-07 Thread Dexter

On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:

 Dave did you contact François Lanciault yet for the PSU?

No. I don't know who that is :o)

Sounds like I missed something when I should have been paying attention.

Could you email their contact details privately? :*)

Dave
ql.spodmail.com





Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-07 Thread Phoebus Dokos

At 02:33 ìì 7/4/2002, you wrote:

On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:

  Dave did you contact François Lanciault yet for the PSU?

No. I don't know who that is :o)

Sounds like I missed something when I should have been paying attention.

Could you email their contact details privately? :*)

Dave
ql.spodmail.com



Hold on... coming via separate email RIGHT UP :-)

Phoebus



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-07 Thread Malcolm Cadman

In message 009f01c1de51$006f5ca0$20065cc3@default, Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Tarquin has already started to write a browser in beta form for the
QL -
he is also a RISC OS user - I have forgotten what he calls it.

Hyperbrowser

Ah ... yes, that's the one :-)

I have a copy, yet it doesn't work for me :-(
... anyone got it working ?

Yes, all but one version I could only get to work with text. He has
(or was plannign to?) use Photon to display JPEGs but I don't think I
got hold of this version. I seem to remember it relied on a version of
Photon which was able to have filenames for display passed as a
parameter and I'm not sure that existed then (i.e. did Tarquin get it
working or was it just a feature he'd put in ready for when Dave
Westbury got that to work in Photon).

It is only text at present.

That's a start at least. Text browsers are a bit useless in the modern
graphics-driven internet but at least Lynx and HyperBrowser form
something from which to start from once soql becomes reality (if ever
Jon Dent sorts his Linux systems out - I think he was having problems
with a Linux system he was setting up to test and debug soql). There
was another QL text-only browser called QMosaic too. If you could find
a version which worked on your system, it worked rather well as a
text-only browser. Trouble was, of all the versions I came across (and
I have 2 or 3) they were a bit fussy as to which QL system they'd run
on.

Yes, that seems to be the core of it, at present ... exactly which
system it will run on.

However, it is still early days ...

Any graphical QL browser would need to be able to handle much of what
the internet currently thrusts upon us - reasonably fast display of
various graphics format like PNG, JPEG, and GIF. Or at the very least
be sufficiently capable of putting a square in the display where the
graphic is to go and a 'Click On This To View This Graphic' as the
next step up from text browsers. One way would be for this 'Click To
View' thingy to call up a graphics viewer like PhotoQL or Photon via
FileInfo 2 and over time a library of file viewers would be available,
so that even if browser development stopped external viewers etc
(plug-ins???) allowed some advancement.

Download speed needs to be good, for graphics.  Although many are not a
problem to display if the site authors have taken the trouble to
correspond the file size to the graphic display size.  Unfortuneatley
many sites have graphics that have been 'slung up'.

We also need a first GD2 graphics program. No need to be PaintSlap Pro
or whatever, just a little something along the lines of earlier QL
graphics programs which allow you to draw some simple graphics.

The parts for this seem to be coming together now that graphics can be
done well on a QDOS / SMSQ base.

I know that Chris Cave is working on an excellent technical drawing
program - called 'Drawing', as I am working on writing the manual for it
:-)

So, the QL can do graphics, and and it very well !

It does go to show that although up until now we have had adequate
software development tools to produce reasonable software, GD2 has not
had the support tools necessary to plough ahead with good software.
Yes, the Q40 has brought some good programs, but to some extent they
are specific to Q40, or are only at their best on a Q40/Q60. How I
look forward to QPTR and EasyPtr being GD2-aware for example.

I have not seen what has been done for the Q40/Q60.

Wolfgang Uhlig recently sent me a cute little GD2 program called
QcoLour which helps with the development of hues and shades on high
colour systems, and I think is the first or one of the first QL
program to use 'skins' or user definable backgrounds (nice colour
ripples and textures). A neat little splash of colour.

Yes, I have downloaded that ... the examples are impressive.  Although
it does now show up the poor quality of the fonts.

Simon Goodwin, for example,  has been doing some good work with his
Digicam software, so people with some Kodak cameras can download and
handle camera graphics on a QDOS system.

The capability is there, but we have to remember it's talented
individuals working in their spare time and mostly for free.

That is it ... yet it is fun :-)

-- 
Malcolm Cadman



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-07 Thread Malcolm Cadman

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dexter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Malcolm Cadman wrote:

 Nice idea of 'namimg' :-) ... Jon's work needs a good interface attached
 to it to become a 'useable by all' emailer.

I haven't seen his work. However, the mail client I plan to do will be 
functional, text-based, and probably fully open source.

Probably best to have a look, then.  Although I am a great believer in
alternatives ... it makes for more challenges.

 Assuming that you will be basing it on Jon's TCP/IP code ... if you
 really are planning something :-)

I'm really planning to do it. Not having a power supply for my QL is the 
biggest challenge to doing anything! ;)

Good !

... and I guess its an American power supply that you need ?


-- 
Malcolm Cadman



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-07 Thread Roy Wood

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dexter 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Tony Firshman wrote:

 Well I tried that.  I registered, and it then invited me to login using
 user name and password.  Considering I had never registered a password,
 that was difficult (8-)#

It emails the password to you, and you can change it later.

Anyway, it's already a failed idea, so I'll work on something else. Like,
maybe, some advertising material for the Qeyboard :o)
Actually I realise that The forum bit is different. I was referring to 
ql-chat which I tried to log onto and have yet to receive a message on.
-- 
Roy Wood
Q Branch, 20 Locks Hill Portslade. Sussex. BN41 2LB. UK
Tel : +44 (0)1273 386030 Fax : +44 (0)1273 430501 (New number!)
Mobile +44(0)7836 745501
Web : www.qbranch.demon.co.uk





Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-07 Thread Dexter

On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Malcolm Cadman wrote:

 Probably best to have a look, then.  Although I am a great believer in
 alternatives ... it makes for more challenges.

Well here's the plan:

The program has a config file with sensible defaults. The first time it's 
run it asks for your name, email address, POP3 and SMTP servers. It asks 
if you want to set up a .sig file.

After that, and immediately for all subsequent executions, it goes to the 
folder display. This gives you access to your inbox, outbox, and archived 
mail in month-by-month folders. Archived mail is compressed.

It will as far as possible use pine keypresses to do thing, providing a 
useful subset of functionality. It will do everything plain text. If it 
receives email in HTML format, it will strip out or obey the tags the best 
it can. If there's a MIME or UUE attachment it will understand it, and you 
can save that attachment as a file. I'm looking at ways to reliably 
transfer header info.

 ... and I guess its an American power supply that you need ?

Yes. I will be doing an ATX - QL adaptor at some point, but it's a case 
opening job, so many won't like it. However, ATM I have a QL I can't use, 
though I understand a PSU is available for me - I just have to contact 
someone and arrange it.

Dave
ql.spodmail.com




Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-07 Thread Dexter

On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Roy Wood wrote:

 Actually I realise that The forum bit is different. I was referring to 
 ql-chat which I tried to log onto and have yet to receive a message on.

qlchat is on sabbatical. :o)

I'm reorganizing everything on the servers here. I now have a separate 
mail server, and am reconfiguring dozens of apps to work with the new MTA 
(Exim). Unfortunately, the lists are a medium priority so they won't be 
back until probably the middle of the week.

The main server, 'box', is having a major upgrade and refit next week too. 
After that, I will have a secure and stable environment that I can grow 
with...

It's only taking so long because of my insistence on using Linux instead 
of anything Microsoft - it's quite a learning curve.

Dave
ql.spodmail.com





Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-06 Thread Bill Waugh


- Original Message -
From: Dexter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: QL Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 2:47 AM
Subject: [ql-users] QL Forum



 Hi all,

 Well, I'm scratching my head...

 I really want to do something constructive for the QL community. I'm
 working on the soon-to-be-released Qeyboard. I've done some work on a QL
 ethernet interface, which is now incorporated into Qubide 2 as etheride...

 And I set up a forum that nobody uses... :o)

 I have a web server sat here 99.9% idle, and it's up for whatever people
 have actual use for. It looks like the QL forum is not a hit. So, what is
 needed? Tell me, and I'll do my best. :o)

Qpaintshop Pro
Qmail
Qbrowser

Well you did ask

All the best - Bill






Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-06 Thread Dexter

On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:

 Qmail
 
 Exists... Ask J. Dent for more :-)

Well, mine'll probably be called Qemail (pronounced keymail) to match the 
Qeyboard (pronounced, well, you know ;)

 Qbrowser
 
 Exists... See QL - Lynx (If you really want to use it though you gotta have a TCP 
enabled QL (currently only uQLx does that...)...

It's a bit of a stretch thinking of lynx as a web browser in the full 
sense of the word these days. I am hoping we may be able to produce 
something that can present graphics, tables, and hopefully handle sound 
too :o)

Dave
ql.spodmail.com





Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-05 Thread Malcolm Cadman

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dexter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:

 Well i am not using the forum because last I checked the site was down :-)

You mean the day the CSU/DSU blew up, poof, and I had to go out and spend 
boucoup bucks on a new one? :o(

Everything's fine now :o)

What is the address again ?

-- 
Malcolm Cadman



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-05 Thread Phoebus Dokos

Ôçí 5/4/2002 4:05:54 ??, ï/ç Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ýãñáøå:

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dexter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:

 Well i am not using the forum because last I checked the site was down :-)

You mean the day the CSU/DSU blew up, poof, and I had to go out and spend 
boucoup bucks on a new one? :o(

Everything's fine now :o)

What is the address again ?

-- 
Malcolm Cadman


http://ql.spodmail.com



--
Phoebus R. Dokos - Quantum Leap Software
Web and Graphic Design - Custom Program Solutions
Tech Support - Software Localization
Web: http://www.dokos-gr.net
ICQ#:34196116 / SMS:+30973267887
SMS:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-05 Thread Tony Firshman

On  Fri, 5 Apr 2002 at 16:11:38, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
(ref: 3X6Z6PNNJ6ZMJPL07DCWVMURIF1XB8.3cae130a@quantum-central)

 5/4/2002 4:05:54 ??, / Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED] :

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dexter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:

 Well i am not using the forum because last I checked the site was down :-)

You mean the day the CSU/DSU blew up, poof, and I had to go out and spend
boucoup bucks on a new one? :o(

Everything's fine now :o)

What is the address again ?

--
Malcolm Cadman


http://ql.spodmail.com
Well I tried that.  I registered, and it then invited me to login using
user name and password.  Considering I had never registered a password,
that was difficult (8-)#

Ah well - no problem.  I will get all info by email so that will do me
for now.  I would not log in to the forum much anyway - I much prefer
the mailing list/usenet method.  It is much easier all in one place.

-- 
 QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:252/67) +44(0)1442-828255
  tony@surname,demon.co.uk  http://www.firshman.demon.co.uk
   Voice: +44(0)1442-828254   Fax: +44(0)1442-828255
TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG



Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-05 Thread Roy Wood

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dexter 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

Hi all,

Well, I'm scratching my head...

I really want to do something constructive for the QL community. I'm
working on the soon-to-be-released Qeyboard. I've done some work on a QL
ethernet interface, which is now incorporated into Qubide 2 as etheride...

And I set up a forum that nobody uses... :o)

I have a web server sat here 99.9% idle, and it's up for whatever people
have actual use for. It looks like the QL forum is not a hit. So, what is
needed? Tell me, and I'll do my best. :o)
I have tried to log onto the forum and I get no response. Have you a 
list of those registered ?
-- 
Roy Wood
Q Branch, 20 Locks Hill Portslade. Sussex. BN41 2LB. UK
Tel : +44 (0)1273 386030 Fax : +44 (0)1273 430501 (New number!)
Mobile +44(0)7836 745501
Web : www.qbranch.demon.co.uk





Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-05 Thread Dexter

On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Tony Firshman wrote:

 Well I tried that.  I registered, and it then invited me to login using
 user name and password.  Considering I had never registered a password,
 that was difficult (8-)#

It emails the password to you, and you can change it later.

Anyway, it's already a failed idea, so I'll work on something else. Like, 
maybe, some advertising material for the Qeyboard :o)

Dave
ql.spodmail.com





Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-05 Thread ZN

*** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***

On 06/04/02 at 02:50 Dexter wrote:

[Developer forum]

 Anyway, it's already a failed idea, so I'll work on something else.

Don't pronounce it dead yet... there are a couple of new topics.

 some advertising material for the Qeyboard :o)

By all means. You've been very quiet lately (I know, pot, kettle, black,
etc...)

Nasta





[ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-04 Thread Dexter


Hi all,

Well, I'm scratching my head...

I really want to do something constructive for the QL community. I'm 
working on the soon-to-be-released Qeyboard. I've done some work on a QL 
ethernet interface, which is now incorporated into Qubide 2 as etheride...

And I set up a forum that nobody uses... :o)

I have a web server sat here 99.9% idle, and it's up for whatever people 
have actual use for. It looks like the QL forum is not a hit. So, what is 
needed? Tell me, and I'll do my best. :o)

Dave
ql.spodmail.com





Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-04 Thread Phoebus Dokos

??? 4/4/2002 8:47:47 ìì, ?/? Dexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:


I have a web server sat here 99.9% idle, and it's up for whatever people 
have actual use for. It looks like the QL forum is not a hit. So, what is 
needed? Tell me, and I'll do my best. :o)

Well i am not using the forum because last I checked the site was down :-)

--
Phoebus R. Dokos - Quantum Leap Software
Web and Graphic Design - Custom Program Solutions
Tech Support - Software Localization
Web: http://www.dokos-gr.net
ICQ#:34196116 / SMS:+30973267887
SMS:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: [ql-users] QL Forum

2002-04-04 Thread Dexter

On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:

 Well i am not using the forum because last I checked the site was down :-)

You mean the day the CSU/DSU blew up, poof, and I had to go out and spend 
boucoup bucks on a new one? :o(

Everything's fine now :o)

Dave
ql.spodmail.com